Performance and Radioactivity Measurements of the PMTs for the LUX - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

performance and radioactivity measurements of the pmts
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Performance and Radioactivity Measurements of the PMTs for the LUX - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Performance and Radioactivity Measurements of the PMTs for the LUX and LZ Dark Matter Experiments Carlos Hernandez Faham Brown University Carlos Faham Brown University Particle Astrophysics Group TIPP 2011, June 11 The LUX Detector VIDEO


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Carlos Hernandez Faham

Brown University

TIPP 2011, June 11

Performance and Radioactivity Measurements

  • f the PMTs for the LUX and LZ Dark Matter Experiments

Carlos Faham

Brown University Particle Astrophysics Group

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The LUX Detector

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

The Large Underground Xenon Experiment

Video by Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Learner

VIDEO

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 Video by Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Learner

VIDEO

slide-5
SLIDE 5

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

5 11

e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e-e-

S1

slide-6
SLIDE 6

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

6 12

Δt

Δt

top hit pattern: x-y localization : z localization x

S2

e- e- e- e- e- e- e- e-e-

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Photo by C. Faham

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Dark Matter

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Dark Matter: Direct Detection

9

20 40 60 80 100 120 10

  • 10
  • 10
  • 10
  • m=100 GeV, =1.0107 cm2

Recoil Energy, Er [keVr] rr Xe A=131 Ge A= 73 Ar A= 40

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The LUX Hamamatsu R8778 PMTs

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Photo by C. Faham

Hamamatsu R8778

slide-12
SLIDE 12

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Hamamatsu R8778: High Expectations

12

Developed by Hamamatsu Photonics, in collaboration with XMASS, specifically for liquid xenon operation

Desired Characteristic Value Operational at LXe temperatures

  • 110 C min. temperature

High QE at 175 nm (UV) ~33% High CE 90% Single-photon sensitive, good single phe resolution ~35% sphe sigma/mu (ENF ~1.15) High peak anode current linearity 2% at 14 mA (~100 keVee S2) Low afterpulsing < 5% (charge) for new PMTs

slide-13
SLIDE 13

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Hamamatsu R8778 Single-phe (Sphe) Spectrum

13

10 20 30 40 50 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Sphe Area [mVns] Counts BA0339 Sphe Spectrum Gain = 3.9e+06 σ/µ = 0.384 ENF = 1.15

slide-14
SLIDE 14

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Hamamatsu R8778 QE in LUX

14

25 30 35 40 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Distribution of QE of 59 LUX R8778 PMTs QE at 175 nm [%] Counts Mean 33.3% STD = 2.3%

slide-15
SLIDE 15

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Healthy R8778 PMT Afterpulsing Spectrum

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

R8778 exposed to He, and having a small air leak

16

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 10

3

10

2

10

1

10

H+ He+ N+,O+ Main Pulse

t [µs] Normalized height Afterpulsing Spectrum for BA0214

slide-17
SLIDE 17

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Hamamatsu R8778 Output Linearity

18

5 10 15 20 40 30 20 10 10 20

2% Hamamatsu Spec

2% Linearity

Peak Anode Current (mA) % nonlinearity BA0404 Nonlinearity Plot

20100506 CHF

QUPID 2% nonlinearity ~1 mA

  • 100 C

2% nonlinearity at 14 mA

slide-19
SLIDE 19

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

LUX 20 PMT Commissioning

19

All 122 PMTs scheduled to be deployed in July, 2011 Partial PMT deployment due to pressure testing of vessel

Photo by C. Faham

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Radioactivity

slide-21
SLIDE 21

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Faking a WIMP

21

1) Electron Recoil Leakage 2) Single-scatter neutrons 3) Other non-gaussian rare events

slide-22
SLIDE 22

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Radioactivity Comparison

22

10 Bq

40K

10 kBq

40K, 14C

10 mBq

238U, 232Th, 40K, 60Co

slide-23
SLIDE 23

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

LUX’s R8778 Measured Radioactivity

23

102 103 10

  • 10
  • 10

10

1

Energy [keV] Counts / keV / kg / day

R8778 Background

SOLO counting facility

slide-24
SLIDE 24

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

LUX Component Radioactivity Comparison

24

  • D. Malling

These PMTs are not ultra-low background. Levels have improved much since then (see R11410 MOD radioactivity levels coming up...)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Implications for LUX

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The LZS and LZD Experiments

slide-27
SLIDE 27

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ)

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

28

LZD LUX

1000 3’’ PMTs

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The Hamamatsu R11410 MOD

An ultra-low background PMT

slide-30
SLIDE 30

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

R11410 MOD

30

T wice the photocathode area of the R8778 QE, gain, etc. equivalent to R8778 ~x2 better anode linearity See Yoshizawa’s presentation

slide-31
SLIDE 31

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Hamamatsu R11410 MOD

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Hamamatsu R11410 MOD Sphe Spectrum

32

50 100 150 200 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Sphe Area [mVns] Counts ZK4991 Sphe Spectrum Gain = 1.4e+07 σ/µ = 0.351 ENF = 1.12

slide-33
SLIDE 33

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Hamamatsu R11410 MOD Measured Radioactivity

33

102 103 10

  • 10
  • 10

10

1

Energy [keV] Counts / keV / kg / day

R8778 R11410 MOD Background

slide-34
SLIDE 34

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Hamamatsu R11410 MOD Radioactivity Results

34

  • 60Co will be further reduced in new Hamamatsu production units

by replacing Kovar metal enclosure

  • Further, 60Co always decays with correlated gammas, making the

single-scatter probability lower

  • 40K only has a 10% BR to EC + gamma decay mode

mBq/PMT Decay chain <0.4

238U

<0.3

232Th

<8.3

40K

2 ± 0.2

60Co

90% CL for upper limits, 1-sigma error bars

slide-35
SLIDE 35

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Conclusions

35

  • LUX employs 122 Hamamatsu R8778 for signal detection. These PMTs fulfill all

performance benchmarks for physics requirements.

  • They are the dominant source of radioactivity in LUX.
  • However, measured radioactivity levels yield <1 WIMP-like event in 300 days.
  • New ultra-low background Hamamatsu R11410 MOD PMTs have been measured to

have < 1 mBq/PMT combined U/Th.

  • Co remains at 2.0 ± 0.2 mBq, but will be removed by Hamamatsu in future

productions by changing Kovar enclosure

  • K, at 10% gamma decay BR, has negligible effects in backgrounds
  • Performance of R11410 MOD is identical to the thoroughly tested R8778 PMTs.

The LZS and LZD experiments will greatly benefit from using these PMTs.

  • This new technology is the best available in PMTs, and has equivalent radioactivity

levels to those of QUPIDs.

  • Background reduction in photodetectors beyond current limits will not result in

further gains for dark matter experiments, as coherent atmospheric neutrino scattering will remain the limiting background signal.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Thank you

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Extra Slides

slide-38
SLIDE 38

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

38

5 10 15 20 50 100 150

LUX 0.1 Event (Summed across all channels)

  • J. Chapman 01Oct2009

Brown Particle Astrophysics

µs phe/sample 0.5 0.5 5 10

S1

µs phe/sample 17 18 19 20 40 60

S2

µs

52.8 phe 4543 phe

S1 S2

slide-39
SLIDE 39

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

39

Photo by J. Chapman

slide-40
SLIDE 40

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

SOLO

40

  • 0.6 kg HPGe detector, 0.15 cm copper

shield

  • Located at the Soudan Underground

Laboratory (2000 mwe)

  • >30 cm lead shielding
  • The inner 5 cm lining of the chamber is

comprised of ancient lead, with 210Pb activity measured below 50 mBq/kg

  • A mylar shell and 2.5 slpm nitrogen gas

purge are used to eliminate gaseous radon from the chamber

Soudan Low-Background Counting Facility

slide-41
SLIDE 41

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Co-60 and K-40 Decay Chains

41

60 28Ni

0+ 1332.518 2+ 2158.64 2+ 2505.766 4+ 2 . 1

  • 6

2 5 5 9 9 . 9 7 3 6 1 1 7 3 . 2 3 7 E 2 ( + M 3 ) . 7 6 3 4 6 . 9 3 . 1 1 1 2 1 5 8 . 5 7 ( E 2 ) . 7 6 8 2 6 . 6 D + Q 9 9 . 9 8 5 6 1 3 3 2 . 5 1 ( E 2 )

stable

0.713 ps 0.59 ps 1.1 ps

60 27Co

0.057% 15.02 <0.022% >12.92 99.925% 7.5 5+

5.2714 y Q =2823.9

40 18Ar

0+ 1460.859 2+ 11 1460.830 E2

stable

1.12 ps

40 19K

0.048% 21.03 10.67% 11.61 4–

1.277 109 y

QEC=1504.9

10.72%

slide-42
SLIDE 42

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

LUX, LZS and LZD Sensitivities

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

Afterpulsing Delay - Ion Identification

43 0.025 0.026 0.027 0.028 0.029 0.03 0.031 0.032 0.5 1 1.5 Afterpulsing Delay vs. Bias Voltage, BA0217, Main Pulse ~100 pC (Anode) 1/

  • (bias) [V]

Afterpulsing Delay τ [µs]

Charge/Mass Ratio: AP1 = 1.1 ± 0.6 AP2 = 4.00 AP3 = 15.2 ± 0.1

AP1 AP2 AP3

AP1 AP2 AP3

He+ H+ N+, O+

Measured by He exposure

slide-44
SLIDE 44

TIPP 2011 Carlos Faham, Brown University

44