pediatric myocarditis
play

Pediatric Myocarditis Non-Invasive testing (and ?? Invasive) - PDF document

Goals: Discuss the spectrum of Myocarditis Etiology, pathophysiology and presentation Principles of initial Dx Pediatric Myocarditis Non-Invasive testing (and ?? Invasive) Diagnosis, Triage and Treatment How to best safely


  1. Goals:  Discuss the spectrum of Myocarditis • Etiology, pathophysiology and presentation  Principles of initial Dx Pediatric Myocarditis • Non-Invasive testing (and ?? Invasive) Diagnosis, Triage and Treatment  How to best safely triage at presentation • What’s the data? • Prediction modeling Jeffrey Gossett, M.D., F.A.A.P.  Principles of initial treatment Director Heart Failure, Heart Transplantation Benioff Children’s Hospitals • HF treatment • ”immuno-modulators”?? • Framework for escalation to MCS? Disclosure Goals:  Discuss the spectrum of Myocarditis  I have no relevant financial relationships with any companies related to the content of this course. • Etiology, pathophysiology and presentation  •  • •  • • • 1 9/4/2018

  2. Trichinella spiralis A Few Definitions from a Dumb Cath Jock  Yikes!!!!!  Myocarditis: • An injury of the myocardium (usually inflammatory) with cell damage and/or degeneration not caused by ischemia  Heart Failure: • The heart isn’t able to do it’s job well enough ‒ Heart failure= imbalance of perfusion/O2 delivery vs. needs  Inadequate C.O. to meet demands Pathogenesis Pathogenesis  Infections (most typical)  Toxin mediated • Drug induced– Anthracyclines other chemo (increasing list)/ radiation • Viral • Toxins (arsenic) ‒ Adenovirus, Enterovirus (Coxsackievirus B, echovirus,  Immune-mediated poliovirus), Parvovirus, HHV-6 • Hypersensitivity ‒ Others; influenza, CMV, HSV, EBV, HIV, RSV etc. • Autoimmune, or collagen–vascular diseases • Probably if we ECHOed everyone with flu all effected….. ‒ SLE, connective tissue disease, rheumatic fever, rheumatoid • Other infections arthritis, and scleroderma, Kawasaki disease, sarcoidosis ‒ Rickettsiae, bacteria, protozoa, parasites, fungi, and yeasts  Idiopathic • Most of the time exact etiology is never found 2 9/4/2018

  3. Pathophysiology Fulminant myocarditis  Viremia with direct viral effect on heart  Acute onset of shock • Virus infects cells, replicates and lyses • Malignant arrhythmias common  Auto-immune effects  Heart is usually SMALL on ECHO • Immune cell infiltration in response to virus/ viral persistence  Highest risk of needing MCS ‒ T-cells, Natural killer cells, Monocytes, Macrophages ‒ Initially beneficial, but can get out of control • BUT full recovery may be more likely • Cytokine release– TNFα, Interferon, interleukins ‒ Balance between beneficial and harmful effects ‒ May directly damage myocytes and depress inotropy  ?? Treatment potential ?? • Myocyte necrosis/fibrosis final pathway Presentation- Chronic, Sub-Acute and Acute Goals:  History– may be very subtle  • Often history of viral disease a few weeks prior (but who doesn’t) •  Symptoms- Very non-specific  Principles of initial Dx • Lethargy, low-grade fever, poor PO, rash, abdominal cx and malaise • Non-Invasive testing (and ?? Invasive) • CHF symptoms  ‒ Diaphoresis, palpitations, dyspnea, exercise intolerance, •  Arrhythmia • • May present with syncope or sudden death   Physical exam findings of congestive heart failure • • Hepatomegally, pallor, JVD, rales, unexplained tachycardia • ‒ May be sinus tachycardia or arrhythmia (SVT/VT) • 3 9/4/2018

  4. Diagnostics Biopsy  HISTORY , HISTORY , HISTORY  Controversial topic IN PEDIATRICS  CXR  Biopsy taken from RV side of ventricular septum • Cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion • Patchy inflammation with >50% false negatives  ECG– usually abnormal ‒ A mononuclear cell infiltrate is diagnostic of myocarditis • Sinus tachycardia, low voltage QRS, ST/T wave changes, arrhythmias • I DO NOT recommend biopsy routinely  ECHO ‒ Risk/benefit and management decisions does not justify • Poor cardiac function– does not prove etiology  164 pts across 7 centers only 45 (27%) had bx  Viral studies  In large PHIS DB study use fell from 25% in 2006 to 14% in 2011 • Can be difficult to get and interpret– but worth sending - Ghelani et al Demographics, trends, and outcomes in Pediatric Acute Myocarditis in the US 2006-2011 Circ Cardio Qual Outcome (5) 622-627 2012 - Butts et al. Characteristics of Clinically Diagnosed Myocarditis Ped Card (38) 1175-1182 (2017) Diagnostics Gross Pathology  Troponins:  Very patchy process on gross and • Typically abnormal (but how abnormal not useful) microscopic level ‒ VERY high in peri-myocarditis in teenagers • Compared troponin levels in myocarditis vs. dilated cardiomyopathy in pediatric patients ‒ Total of 43 patients– 24 w/ myocarditis  Median for myocarditis was 0.08 vs 0.01 for DCM  Cut off was 0.052 BUT Sensitivity 71%, Specificity 86% -Harris and Gossett Diagnosis and Diagnostic Modalities in Pediatric Patients with Elevate Troponin Ped Card (37) 1469-1474 (2016) -Soongswang et al Cardiac troponin its role in the diagnosis of clinically suspected myocarditis and chronic dilated CM in children Pediatr Cardio (23) 53, 2002 -Soongswang, J. et al. Cardiac Troponin T: A Marker in the Diagnosis of Acute Myocarditis in Children Pediatr Cardiol 26: 45-49, 2005 4 9/4/2018

  5. Biopsy in Myocarditis Goals:   Viral myocarditis •  •  How to best safely triage at presentation • What’s the data? • Prediction modeling   There are exceptions to my rules! • • Giant cell in sarcoidosis • • Auto-immune (lupus etc) • CMR in Myocarditis Presentation  Useful non-invasive assessment  7 large Pediatric Hospitals of myocardial edema  171 total patients • Excellent functional quantification • Bi-modal age distribution • Signs of edema (T2), early  GI symptoms and lower SF contrast enhancement (T1 gad) associated with and late GE death/transplant  50/164 patients (30%) in 7ctr  13% death/transplant study had MRI  PHIS DB study use rose from 5% in 2006 to 28% in 2011  BUT again may not impact rx Butts et al. Characteristics of Clinically Diagnosed Myocarditis Ped Card (38) 1175-1182 (2017) - Ghelani et al Demographics, trends, and outcomes in Pediatric Acute Myocarditis in the US 2006-2011 Circ Cardio Qual Outcome (5) 622-627 2012 - Butts et al. Characteristics of Clinically Diagnosed Myocarditis Ped Card (38) 1175-1182 (2017) 5 9/4/2018

  6. Presentation Presentation of myocarditis  Predictors of worse outcome:  76 patients • Younger patients • From 1/1/07-1/21/16 Patients with Acute Myocarditis • Female gender • 45% High Acuity 33 High-Acuity Cohort • Heart failure/ dec. perfusion • 55% Low Acuity 74 Records Obtained • Worse function 76 41 Low-Acuity Cohort  Worse function at admission predicted worse function at discharge 2 Records Missing • BUT– note the range!!! Pediatric Acute Myocarditis: Predicting Hemodynamic Compromise at Presentation to Healthcare Butts et al. Characteristics of Clinically Diagnosed Myocarditis Ped Card (38) 1175-1182 (2017) Wolf, Chaouki, Marino, Adin-Cristian and Gossett Presented at AHA 2016, paper in process So what to do at presentation?? Triaging myocarditis 21 Inotropic or Vasoactive 2 VAD to Transplant Medications only (1 Death post Transplant) (all received Inotropes/ vasoactive medications)  Retrospective review of patients with myocarditis 6 ECMO 1 Transplant from ECMO 33 High Acuity Cohort • Diagnosed by cardiologist (clinical diagnosis)  We defined 2 cohorts “high acuity” vs “low acuity” 1 VAD ‒ High acuity cohort: All patients who required inotropes, CPR, MCS 3 recovery of function (ECMO or VAD), progressed to transplant or died ‒ Low acuity cohort: Everyone else 4 Transplant • Reviewed signs and symptoms AT presentation ‒ ONLY data collected in first 24hours 1 Death (no VAD/ECMO) Pediatric Acute Myocarditis: Predicting Hemodynamic Compromise at Presentation to Healthcare Pediatric Acute Myocarditis: Predicting Hemodynamic Compromise at Presentation to Healthcare Wolf, Chaouki, Marino, Adin-Cristian and Gossett Presented at AHA 2016, paper in process Wolf, Chaouki, Marino, Adin-Cristian and Gossett Presented at AHA 2016, paper in process 6 9/4/2018

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend