Partnering to Success with Recycled Water Leveraging Opportunities - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

partnering to success with recycled water
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Partnering to Success with Recycled Water Leveraging Opportunities - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Partnering to Success with Recycled Water Leveraging Opportunities and Addressing Challenges Together February 21, 2014 Agenda Partnership & Collaboration Survey Summary of Results Importance Challenges &


slide-1
SLIDE 1

February 21, 2014

Leveraging Opportunities and Addressing Challenges Together

Partnering to Success with Recycled Water

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Partnership & Collaboration
  • Survey – Summary of Results
  • Importance
  • Challenges & Opportunities

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Delta Diablo – Lead of Western Recycled Water Coalition

  • 22 members, representing 3.8 million residents
  • Developing 26 projects
  • ~120,000 AFY
  • Pursue Federal Funding

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Western Recycled Water Coalition

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Partnership and Collaboration

  • Members of Congress want to help …but requests must be for

more than 1 project or 1 region or 1 state

  • Determine “real” recycled water projects that are in

development across the U.S.

  • Collaboration among five organizations for nationwide survey
  • Survey sent out October 2013; results tallied November

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Survey Summary Disclaimer – What it is and is not

  • It is a snapshot in time of results from responses

received from October 8 – November 4, 2013.

  • It is not the universe of recycled water projects in

development across CA or the United States.

  • It is not necessarily representative of projects, yield,
  • r cost of projects across the U.S.
  • It is responsive to the request to show where

agencies/organizations across the U.S. are currently investing $ in recycled water development.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

219 Survey Respondents Located in 33 States

Alaska Hawaii

October 2013 Nationwide Recycled Water Survey Results

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Survey Respondents in 14 States Reported Actively Developing Projects

Arizona California Colorado Florida Illinois Missouri Nevada New Mexico North Carolina Pennsylvania South Carolina Texas Virginia Washington Alaska Hawaii

October 2013 Nationwide Recycled Water Survey Results

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

92 Agencies with Recycled Water Projects

See CA Map (Next Slide)

Arizona California Colorado Florida Illinois Missouri Nevada New Mexico North Carolina Pennsylvania South Carolina Texas Virginia Washington Alaska Hawaii

October 2013 Nationwide Recycled Water Survey Results

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

65 Agencies with Projects in California

October 2013 Nationwide Recycled Water Survey Results

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

~900,000 AFY being Developed by Survey Respondents

(Qualifier: Some projects did not report AFY, some a range)

553,875 1,000 4,000 206,021 7,100 5,500

NR

8,900 5,696

NR

7,137 66,390 11,200 1,120

Arizona California Colorado Florida Illinois Missouri Nevada New Mexico North Carolina Pennsylvania South Carolina Texas Virginia Washington Alaska Hawaii

October 2013 Nationwide Recycled Water Survey Results

11

NR – not reported

slide-12
SLIDE 12

$6.4 Billion Total Project Costs for Survey Respondents

(Qualifier: Some projects reported a cost range) Note: do not divide $6.4b by 890K AFY

$ 5.7B

$2M $2M $173M

$30M

$700K $450K $40M $12M

$1M

$72.9M $240M

$12M

$12.8M

Arizona California Colorado Florida Illinois Missouri Nevada New Mexico North Carolina Pennsylvania South Carolina Texas Virginia Washington Alaska Hawaii

October 2013 Nationwide Recycled Water Survey Results

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 13 Advanced treatment facilities (UV/MF/RO); 9

tertiary treatment facilities; 5 scalping plants;

  • ~5 groundwater recharge and 4 indirect

potable reuse projects

  • Over 560 miles of pipeline, 36 storage facilities and

58 pump stations;

  • ~23 misc. projects to expand treatment,

distribution, or related facilities.

California Project Types

October 2013 Nationwide Recycled Water Survey Results

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Project Funding Sources

  • REAL PROJECTS: Over $630 million spent to date on

planned projects over the next 10 years

  • $450 million Federal & State funding secured to date
  • $380 M SRF Loans
  • $34 M Title XVI Grants
  • $4 M Other WaterSMART Grants
  • $3 M Other Federal Grants
  • $28 M Other State Grants

October 2013 Nationwide Recycled Water Survey Results

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Project Funding Needs

  • $2.8 Billion = Financial Support Needed
  • 34% are “unlikely” or “definitely not” going to move

forward without financial assistance

  • In California, 29 of 65 (45%) agencies are

“unlikely” or “definitely not” going to move forward without $ assistance

  • Represents over 225,000 AFY of

recycled water that may not be developed w/out $

October 2013 Nationwide Recycled Water Survey Results

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Potential for Water Reuse

Source: Wade Miller, WateReuse Association

  • About 7% of

municipal wastewater effluent in the U.S. is reclaimed and beneficially reused

  • Israel reuses more

than 70%

  • Singapore reuses

30%, up from 15% in recent years

  • Australia, now at 8%,

has a national goal of 30% by 2015 ~7.3% Reclaimed

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

How much is available in California?

  • 3.5 Million Acre feet of wastewater in California

are discharged to the ocean each year. “… represents the most immediately available and reliable source of new water in California.”

(source: WateReuse Association)

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Importance for California

We need water

December 2013 reservoir levels in Lake Oroville & Shasta Lake

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Challenge: Project Funding Needs

  • Agencies report needing ~50% State and/or Federal

partnership in order to build recycled water projects.

  • With no outside funding, new RW systems can take ~40

years to break-even

  • A 50% partnership may reduce break-even period to ~20

years

  • It’s very challenging for local governing bodies to invest in

infrastructure with break-even periods >20 years

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Why Does a 50% Cost Share Makes Sense?

Projects will provides local, state and federal benefits

  • Creating drought-tolerant supplies that can be relied

upon even with the predicted impacts of climate change;

  • Reducing dependence on imported water supplies;
  • Moving towards tertiary and advanced treatment of

wastewater;

  • Improving surface water quality and reusing precious

water supplies;

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Why Does a 50% Cost Share Makes Sense?

Projects will provides local, state and federal benefits

  • Moving California toward Statewide recycling

goals;

  • Supporting jobs and economic development;
  • Capitalizing on local agencies willingness to

invest local dollars on at least a 1:1 basis for an investment that has state and federal benefits well beyond 20 years.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Pursue New Federal Funding

  • Previous funding sources – not available
  • Title XVI – no new project authorizations and no earmarks
  • Monitor New Federal Legislation:
  • Water Infrastructure Financing Innovation Authority (WIFIA
  • proposed loan program)
  • “California Emergency Drought Relief Act of 2014”
  • Others? Modifications to existing acts

Challenges & Opportunities

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Pursue New State Funding

  • Previous: Propositions 13 and 50
  • Existing: Proposition 84 – Round 3 remains
  • New:
  • Drought legislation
  • Water Bond
  • Modify:
  • CWSRF Loans – 0% for

30 years

Challenges and Opportunities

slide-24
SLIDE 24

California Follow-up Survey (Feb. 2014)

  • 57 California Agencies Participated
  • 45 agencies with projects to construct in 1-3 years:
  • Finance $1.1 B
  • Produce/distribute 200 TAF
  • State Water Resources Control Board – Reviewing

Results

  • Considering potential to offer 0-?% interest loans for RW
  • Criteria? Timing? TBD
  • Requires Board approval

Opportunities

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Value of 0% financing Example: $10 Million Project

SRF Terms Annual Debt Service Present Worth of Debt Service* Savings v. $10 M project*

  • Equiv. Grant

Funding* 30-year, 2.1% $452,662 $7,373,361 $2,626,639 26% 30-year, 1% $387,481 $6,311,635 $3,688,365 37% 30-year, 0.5% $359,789 $5,860,563 $4,139,437 41% 30-year, 0% $333,333 $5,429,624 $4,570,376 46%

25

*Using a 4.5% Discount Rate representative of traditional tax-exempt bond financing rate

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Next Steps

  • Inform: 65 projects in CA developing over 550,000 AFY,

$2.8 funding needs

  • Being shared with elected officials, funding agencies
  • Solidify the “ask”: Agencies report needing ~50% State

and/or Federal partnership in order to build recycled water projects

  • Work with SWRCB: 0-1% 30-year loans for ready

recycled water projects – limited time opportunity

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Next Steps (cont.)

  • Secure new funds:
  • Identify state elected officials to support water bond

language or separate legislation to increase RW funding

  • Seek callout $ for RW
  • Monitor Federal legislative proposals
  • Seek additional funding for recycled water projects

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Collaboration & Partnership

  • Join together - Speak as one voice

Continue to work together and invite others to join (WateReuse, CASA, WRWC, ACWA) Thank you

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Contact

Jayne Strommer JayneS@ddsd.org (925) 756-1910 www.westernrwc.org