P ARTICIP ATION IN E XIS TING K EN -C AR YL R ANCH F ACILITIES , - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
p
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

P ARTICIP ATION IN E XIS TING K EN -C AR YL R ANCH F ACILITIES , - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nov 05, 2022 316 likes •814 views

K EN -C AR YL R ANCH 2017 C OMMUNITY S URVEY S VEY R ES ULTS AND K EY FINDINGS UR R ES E R ATES PONS 2,550 households mailed a postcard invitation to complete the survey online 1,850 households on the KCR email list emailed an

slide-1
SLIDE 1

KEN-CAR

YL RANCH

2017 COMMUNITY S

URVEY

S

UR VEY RES ULTS AND KEY FINDINGS

slide-2
SLIDE 2

RES

PONS E RATES

  • 2,550 households mailed a postcard invitation to

complete the survey online

  • 1,850 households on the KCR email list emailed an

invitation to complete the survey online

  • Of the combined 4,400 invitation sent, 1,814

respondents completed the survey (396 from the postcard invitation and 1,418 from the email invitation), for a response rate of 41 percent and a margin of error of approximately +/- 2.3 percentage points calculated for questions at 50 percent response

slide-3
SLIDE 3

POS

TCARD MAILING

slide-4
SLIDE 4

RES

PONDENT AND

HOUS

EHOLD

DEMOGRAPHICS

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RES

PONDENT CHARACTERIS TICS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

HOUS

EHOLD CHARACTERIS TICS

(1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied) (1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HOUS

EHOLD CHARACTERIS TICS

(1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied) (1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

TOP REAS

ONS FOR MOVING TO KCR

TOP MENTIONS

  • 1. (1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very

satisfied)

  • 1. Location
  • 2. Open space / trail system
  • 3. Community / neighborhood
  • 4. Schools
  • 5. Beauty
slide-9
SLIDE 9

P

ARTICIP ATION IN

EXIS

TING KEN-CAR YL RANCH

F

ACILITIES, AMENITIES, AND S ERVICES

slide-10
SLIDE 10

OVERALL P

ARTICIP ATION

slide-11
SLIDE 11

S

PECIFIC ACTIVITY P ARTICIP ATION (PT.1)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

S

PECIFIC ACTIVITY P ARTICIP ATION (PT.2)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

P

ARTICIP ATION BY LOCATION IN KCR

slide-14
SLIDE 14

P

ARTICIP ATION BY TENURE IN KCR

slide-15
SLIDE 15

P

ARTICIP ATION BY AGE

slide-16
SLIDE 16

P

ARTICIP ATION BY PRES ENCE OF KIDS

slide-17
SLIDE 17

MOS

T IMPORTANT ACTIVITIES

slide-18
SLIDE 18

MIS

S ING ACTIVITIES

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LEVEL OF S

ATIS F ACTION WITH

EXIS

TING KEN-CAR YL RANCH

F

ACILITIES, AMENITIES, AND S ERVICES

slide-20
SLIDE 20

S

ATIS F ACTION WITH F ACILITIES

slide-21
SLIDE 21

S

ATIS F ACTION WITH S PORTS FIELDS/ COURTS

slide-22
SLIDE 22

S

ATIS F ACTION WITH RECREATION

PROGRAMMING & COMMUNITY S

ERVICES

slide-23
SLIDE 23

S

ATIS F ACTION WITH COMMUNICATIONS

slide-24
SLIDE 24

S

ATISF ACTION WITH GREENBELTS,

LANDSCAPING, & P

ARKS

slide-25
SLIDE 25

SATISFACTION WITH OPEN SPACE

Dissatisfied respondents were asked a follow-up question to better understand why:

slide-26
SLIDE 26

IF DISSATISFIED WITH UNPAVED BACKCOUNTRY DIRT TRAILS QUANTITY (6% OF RESPONDENTS OVERALL)…

slide-27
SLIDE 27

IF DISSATISFIED WITH FREQUENCY OF OPEN SPACE PATROLS (12% OF RESPONDENTS OVERALL)…

slide-28
SLIDE 28

S

ATIS F ACTION OVER TIME (PT. 1)

Note: Answer option wording changed slightly between 2012 and 2017. In 2012, “no opinion/neutral” and “don’t use” were provided as response options. In 2017, “neutral” and “no opinion” were provided as separate response options, and respondents were also given a “don’t use” response option. Graph above only shows %4/5 and %1/2 for year-over-year comparability.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

S

ATIS F ACTION OVER TIME (PT. 2)

Note: Answer option wording changed slightly between 2012 and 2017. In 2012, “no opinion/neutral” and “don’t use” were provided as response options. In 2017, “neutral” and “no opinion” were provided as separate response options, and respondents were also given a “don’t use” response option. Graph above only shows %4/5 and %1/2 for year-over-year comparability.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

S

ATIS F ACTION BY LOCATION

slide-31
SLIDE 31

ITEMS TO BE PROVIDED MORE EFFECTIVEL

Y

VERBATIM EXAMPLE COMMENTS

(1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied) (1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied) I strongly support the continued construction of open space trails as defined in the Trails Master Plan. Dead trees need to be removed. We have an abundance of

  • pportunities here. I

cannot think of how to make it any better, except for the sidewalks and

  • vergrowth shrubbery

and trees. Cost of tennis programs need to be analyzed. Many empty court hours throughout the year. Why are there lighted courts when no one is playing? At pool, lap lane rules should be better enforced by lifeguards--

  • ften young kids play in the lanes

when I am swimming laps.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

ITEMS TO BE REDUCED/ DIS

CONTINUED

VERBATIM EXAMPLE COMMENTS

(1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied) (1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied) I would not like to see any

  • f the facilities,amenities
  • r services reduced or

discontinued - they are part of what makes KC Ranch a great place to live. I don't think that we need anymore back country trails. The number of people on the trails does not indicate a need to build more. If it not self sustaining, the Equestrian Center needs to be. My dues and taxes should not support it. This appeals to a very small percentage of our residents. Definitely NOT! I love everything provided here ESPECIALLY the maintained greenbelt on the Plains! If member usage can keep facilities, amenities and services

  • perating then

no, do not discontinue.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

FUTURE F

ACILITIES,

AMENITIES, AND S

ERVICE IDEAS

slide-34
SLIDE 34

INTERES

T IN FUTURE AMENITIES

slide-35
SLIDE 35

COMMENTS ON FUTURE INTERES

TS

VERBATIM EXAMPLE COMMENTS

(1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied) (1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied) Older members of our community would like to have restroom facilities more convenient to the activity venues. No partnerships with other entities that will give those entities access to KCR properties or facilities. If you can't afford them, then cut them. I feel like this neighborhood is divided between retirees and young families. As a newer resident, I'd like the

  • pportunity to raise my family

here the same way many of them already got to. Time to pass the tourch the instead of fighting change/updates. I would prefer that we limit any disturbance of the natural landscape and environment. I don't want Highlands Ranch in Ken Caryl Would love to see a bar/grill/coffee/ice cream place in the valley that is

  • pen all year!
slide-36
SLIDE 36

BIGGES

T THREATS TO QUALITY OF LIFE

VERBATIM EXAMPLE COMMENTS

(1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied) (1=Not at all satisfied, 3=Neutral, 5=Very satisfied) Crime - Police do not patrol nearly enough Increase in traffic on C- 470 Fire danger Poor or lack of lawn,tree and wall maintenance.

  • ver-development. we love living in

the peaceful community of the valley. finding the balance between open space and amenities is difficult The constant speeding through the neighborhoods Degradation of the amenities of the community via aging Too many unauthorized users of trail systems

slide-37
SLIDE 37

FUNDING IMPROVEMENTS

slide-38
SLIDE 38

TOLERANCE FOR INCREAS

E IN DUES

slide-39
SLIDE 39

TOLERANCE FOR INCREAS

E IN DUES BY LOCATION

slide-40
SLIDE 40

COVENANT CONTROL

slide-41
SLIDE 41

OPINION OF COVENANT ENFORCEMENT

slide-42
SLIDE 42

OPINION OF COVENANT ENFORCEMENT

slide-43
SLIDE 43

OPEN S

P ACE

slide-44
SLIDE 44

OPEN S

P ACE PREFERENCES

slide-45
SLIDE 45

OPEN S

P ACE PREFERENCES

slide-46
SLIDE 46

RES

IDENT-OWNED

PERIMETER FENCES

slide-47
SLIDE 47

PERIMETER FENCES PREFERENCES

slide-48
SLIDE 48

RES

IDENT DIRECTOR Y

slide-49
SLIDE 49

INTERES

T IN RES IDENT DIRECTOR Y