p aeruginosa aeruginosa p present therapeutic options in
play

P. aeruginosa aeruginosa : : P. Present therapeutic options in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

P. aeruginosa aeruginosa : : P. Present therapeutic options in Present therapeutic options in Intensive Care Intensive Care Y. Van Laethem Laethem Y. Van (CHU St- -Pierre & Universit Pierre & Universit libre de libre de


  1. P. aeruginosa aeruginosa : : P. Present therapeutic options in Present therapeutic options in Intensive Care Intensive Care Y. Van Laethem Laethem Y. Van (CHU St- -Pierre & Universit Pierre & Université é libre de libre de (CHU St Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium Belgium) ) Bruxelles, Brussels,

  2. Activity vs vs Pseudomonas Pseudomonas aeruginosa aeruginosa Activity Pseudomonas aeruginosa - MYSTIC Belgium - 1998/2005 100 90 80 % susceptible strains 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 MER IMI CAZ CPM PTZ CIP AMU 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 n=263 n=211 n=233 n=264 n=214 n=204 n=242 n=260

  3. Susceptibility Patterns for Pseudomonas Susceptibility Patterns for Pseudomonas aeruginosa : Total : Total vs vs non non- -CF strains CF strains aeruginosa 2002 2003 Total Non-CF Total Non-CF (n=175) (n=140) (n=237) P value (n=184) MEM 88.6 87.1 76.8 0.02 82.1 IPM 78.9 77.9 71.7 NS 77.2 CAZ 78.3 78.6 67.5 0.02 76.6 CPM 74.3 75.0 58.1 0.001 67.8 P+T 86.9 86.4 77.2 0.01 78.8 CIP 76.6 79.3 57.0 <0.001 68.5 AMK 80.0 87.9 68.2 0.01 76.0 ⇒ Increase in resistance: affected by CF isolates !

  4. Multi Drug Resistant Isolates of Multi Drug Resistant Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa aeruginosa 1997 1997 - - 2004 2004 Pseudomonas Country N° ° Centers Centers N° ° of isolates (%) of isolates (%) Country N N Ps.aeruginosa MDR Ps.aeruginosa MDR Belgium 8 1613 152 (9.4) Belgium 8 1613 152 (9.4) Czech Republic 1 164 39 (2.4) Czech Republic 1 164 39 (2.4) Germany 7 1799 172 (9.6) Germany 7 1799 172 (9.6) Italy 3 1111 252 (22.7) Italy 3 1111 252 (22.7) Poland Poland 1 1 178 178 3 (1.7) 3 (1.7) Russia 1 160 41 (25.6) Russia 1 160 41 (25.6) Sweden 4 267 5 (1.9) Sweden 4 267 5 (1.9) Turkey Turkey 9 9 1280 1280 383 (29.9) 383 (29.9) UK 5 1056 82 (7.8) UK 5 1056 82 (7.8)

  5. MONOTHERAPY COMBINATION THERAPY

  6. Sepsis (1) Sepsis (1) � Mica Paul et al BMJ 2004 Mica Paul et al BMJ 2004 � � Meta Meta- -analysis analysis of 64 of 64 randomized randomized trials trials � with 7586 non 7586 non neutropenic neutropenic patients patients with → betalactam → betalactam = = betalactam betalactam + aminoside + aminoside on the basis of all cause fatality fatality on the basis of all cause - No No advantage advantage among among patients patients with with - P. aeruginosa aeruginosa infection (426 patients) infection (426 patients) P.

  7. Sepsis (2) Sepsis (2) � Clinical Clinical failure failure more more common common with with � combination treatment treatment combination � No No difference difference in the rate of in the rate of development development � of resistance resistance of ⇒ lack ⇒ lack of of compelling compelling data to support data to support the initial use of combination combination the initial use of therapy… … therapy

  8. Combination versus versus monotherapy monotherapy Combination Bodey et al Bodey et al Arch Arch Int Med 1985 Int Med 1985 � Retrospective Retrospective study study in 410 cancer patients in 410 cancer patients � with P. P. aeruginosa aeruginosa septicemia septicemia with of MD Anderson Cancer Center of MD Anderson Cancer Center � 1/3 1/3 with with pneumonia pneumonia � → betalactam → betalactam monotherapy monotherapy = = combination combination ↔ 71% 72 ↔ 71% 72 � NB : NB : very very poor poor outcome outcome if if monotherapy monotherapy with with � an aminoglycoside aminoglycoside (29%) (29%) an

  9. Combination versus versus monotherapy monotherapy Combination Hilf,Yu et al Am J Med 1989 et al Am J Med 1989 Hilf,Yu � � 200 patients with with P. P. aeruginosa aeruginosa septicemia septicemia 200 patients � � Prospective study study Prospective ↔ 47% (mono) ) ↔ � Mortality Mortality : 27% ( : 27% (combination combination) 47% (mono) � � BUT : BUT : less less potent potent AB AB than than now now � < 10% < 10% had had received received pipera, pipera, cefta cefta or or � � imipenem imipenem � Alternative conclusion : Alternative conclusion : � combination therapy therapy is is superior superior to an to an amino amino alone alone! ! combination

  10. Combination versus versus monotherapy monotherapy Combination in P.aeruginosa P.aeruginosa septicemia septicemia in � Since Since 1989 : 1989 : several several studies studies : : � � same same outcome outcome � – Vidal Vidal Arch Arch Int Med 1996(189 pat) Int Med 1996(189 pat) – – Kuikka Kuikka Eur Eur J Clin J Clin Microb Microb Infect Dis 1998 Infect Dis 1998 – – Sigman Sigman Int J Int J Inf Inf Dis 1998 (123 pat) Dis 1998 (123 pat) – – Chatzinikolaou – Chatzinikolaou Arch Arch Int Med 2000(145 pat) Int Med 2000(145 pat) – Chamot Chamot AAC 2003 AAC 2003 – – BUT : BUT : majority majority of ID experts of ID experts still still favor favor use of a use of a – combination, , especially especially if S to the if S to the betalactam betalactam combination is ≤ ≤ 80% agent is 80% agent

  11. Endovascular infections infections Endovascular � Rare cases of Rare cases of endocarditis endocarditis ( (esp.drug esp.drug addicts addicts) ) � � Case reports of Case reports of failure failure with with several several � mono/combination combination therapy therapy mono/ � Meropenem Meropenem and and tobra tobra sucessfull sucessfull in one case in one case � � Association of Association of rifampin rifampin with with carbenicillin carbenicillin / / � amino effective in 2 cases effective in 2 cases clinically clinically R to the R to the amino combination .( combination .(Yu Yu AAC 1984) AAC 1984)

  12. Nosocomial pneumonia pneumonia (1) Nosocomial (1) � P. P. aeruginosa aeruginosa in the in the three three leading leading pathogens pathogens in in most most VAP VAP � studies studies - High High failure failure rate rate with with aminoglycosides aminoglycosides alone alone - (historic historic data) data) ( - No data for inclusion of No data for inclusion of amino amino for for fully fully S S - organisms(not (not optimally optimally active in the active in the lungs lungs at at organisms concentration obtained obtained with with IV administration) IV administration) concentration � No prospective No prospective study study of a of a betalactam betalactam with with � or without without a FQ a FQ or

  13. Nosocomial pneumonia pneumonia (2) Nosocomial (2) � No data for No data for aerosolized aerosolized administration in administration in � ACUTE P. aeruginosa aeruginosa pneumonia pneumonia : : ACUTE P. - Small DBR Small DBR study study in VAP due to in VAP due to various various - pathogens ( ( Brown AAC 1990 ) but potential potential pathogens Brown AAC 1990 ) but efficacy in MDR in MDR P.aeruginosa P.aeruginosa pneumonia pneumonia efficacy (case reports) (case reports) � No data No data showing showing prevention prevention of of development development of R of R � to imipenem imipenem by the addition of an by the addition of an aminoglycoside aminoglycoside to (Cometta ( Cometta AAC 1994) AAC 1994)

  14. Comparison of 8 versus 15 days of AB therapy for VAP in adults • Chastre et al , JAMA 2003 • Prospective, randomized, double-blind study (until day 8) • 51 ICU in France - From 6/99 to 6/02 • Either short course of AB : 8 days long (classic) course : 15 days with BAL at D1

  15. Study Design Study Design 769 ineligible 1171 patients assessed for eligibility 180 had early-onset VAP 79 had inappropriate initial treatment 79 had SAPS II >65 77 had severe immunosuppression 77 had been enrolled in other studies 75 had extrapulmonary infections 402 randomised 70 died before Day 3 31 were aged <18 yr 21 refused consent 19 had DNR orders 61 were excluded for other reasons 197 assigned to 205 assigned to 15-day regimen 8-day regimen 1 patient excluded from analysis (Consent withdrawal) 197 included in 204 included in analysis analysis Chastre, Wolff, Fagon, et al. JAMA 2003 , Wolff, Fagon, et al. JAMA 2003 Chastre

  16. Cumulative Survival Survival Estimates Estimates According According to to Cumulative Duration of of Antimicrobial Antimicrobial Treatment Treatment Duration 1.0 Probability of Survival 0.8 0.6 8-day 0.4 15-day 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Days after bronchoscopy Chastre, Wolff, Fagon, et al. JAMA 2003 , Wolff, Fagon, et al. JAMA 2003 Chastre

  17. Bacteriology Bacteriology % 8-day 100 15-day 80 p=0.613 p=0.973 p=0.913 60 43.2 40.2 40 32.9 30.9 20 11.2 11.3 0 Polymicrobial MRSA NF-GNB Chastre, Wolff, Fagon, et al. JAMA 2003 , Wolff, Fagon, et al. JAMA 2003 Chastre

  18. Cumulative Survival Survival Estimates Estimates According According to to Cumulative Duration of of Antimicrobial Antimicrobial Treatment Treatment Duration 1 NF-GNB ,8 ,6 ,4 8-day ,2 15-day p=0.39 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Days Chastre, Wolff, Fagon, et al. JAMA 2003 , Wolff, Fagon, et al. JAMA 2003 Chastre

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend