outline Dark Matter Search with Antimatter Current status and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

outline
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

outline Dark Matter Search with Antimatter Current status and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TA U P 2 0 1 9 S e p 1 0 t h 2 0 1 9 THE GRAMS PROJECT DUAL MEV GAMMA-RAY AND DARK MATTER OBSERVATORY T S U G U O A R A M A K I , S L AC outline Dark Matter Search with Antimatter Current status and recent results of indirect dark matter


slide-1
SLIDE 1

T S U G U O A R A M A K I , S L AC

TA U P 2 0 1 9 S e p 1 0 t h 2 0 1 9

THE GRAMS PROJECT

DUAL MEV GAMMA-RAY AND DARK MATTER OBSERVATORY

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • utline

Dark Matter Search with Antimatter

Current status and recent results of indirect dark matter search Why is antimatter survey important? Antimatter-based dark matter search with GRAMS

MeV Gamma-Ray Observations

Current status of MeV gamma-ray observations Why are MeV gamma-ray observations important? MeV gamma-ray observations with GRAMS

Summary

GRAMS First Paper accepted in Astroparticle Physics

Aramaki et al., 2019

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Dark Matter Search

slide-4
SLIDE 4

INDIRECT Dark Matter SEARCH

a

DM DM

q, h, W, e +, γ, ν, p, d, n…

_ _ _

POSITRON: AMS-02, PAMELA, DAMPE… GAMMA RAY: FERMI-LAT, VERITAS, CTA, GRAMS… NEUTRINO: ICECUBE, ANTARES… ANTIPROTON: AMS-02, PAMELA, BESS, GAPS, GRAMS ANTIDEUTERON: AMS-02, BESS, GAPS, GRAMS ANTIHELIUM: AMS-02, GAPS, GRAMS 4

MEASURE DM ANNIHILATION/DECAY PRODUCTS

COMPLEMENTARY SEARCHES WITH DIFFERENT DETECTION METHODS AND BACKGROUND MODELS ARE CRUCIAL TO VALIDATE DM SIGNATURES

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Recent Results from fermi-lat

Possible DM signatures from Galactic Center Region (GCE) Inconsistent with dwarf spheroidal galaxy (dSph) observations

(recent observations for new dSphs show some small excess)

FERMI GALACTIC CENTER EXCESS (GCE) ~50GeV DM or astrophysical objects?

Daylan et al., 2016 gamma-ray excess observed

5

Launched in June 2008, targeting 20MeV - 300GeV gamma-rays

— Fermi Dwarf Galaxy Observation (Ackermann et al., 2015)

10-25 10-27 10 100 1000 10-26

Thermal Relic Cross Section (Steigman et al., 2012)

mᵪ [GeV] <σv > [cm3/s]

Excluded

Fermi Galactic Center Excess — Calore et al., 2014 — Daylan et al., 2014 — Abazajian et al., 2015

10-24

¯ bb

<latexit sha1_base64="mn4t03Afz1AIdBXox69qkMUN1ZQ=">AB8XicbVDLSsNAFL3xWeur6tLNYCm4KokIdlw47KCfWAbymR60w6dTMLMRCihf+HGhSJu/Rt3/o2TNgtPTBwOGcu9wTJIJr47rfzsbm1vbObmvH9weHRcOTnt6DhVDNsFrHqBVSj4BLbhuBvUQhjQKB3WB6m/vdJ1Sax/LBzBL0IzqWPOSMGis9DgKqsmBOgvKwUnXr7gJknXgFqUKB1rDyNRjFLI1QGiao1n3PTYyfUWU4EzgvD1KNCWVTOsa+pZJGqP1skXhOalYZkTBW9klDFurviYxGWs8im6wWUTPRq14u/uf1UxM2/IzLJDUo2XJRmApiYpKfT0ZcITNiZglitushE2oszYkvISvNWT10nqu5Zfn9dbTaKOkpwDhdwCR7cQBPuoAVtYCDhGV7hzdHOi/PufCy/bjFzBn8gfP5A8wCkEs=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="mn4t03Afz1AIdBXox69qkMUN1ZQ=">AB8XicbVDLSsNAFL3xWeur6tLNYCm4KokIdlw47KCfWAbymR60w6dTMLMRCihf+HGhSJu/Rt3/o2TNgtPTBwOGcu9wTJIJr47rfzsbm1vbObmvH9weHRcOTnt6DhVDNsFrHqBVSj4BLbhuBvUQhjQKB3WB6m/vdJ1Sax/LBzBL0IzqWPOSMGis9DgKqsmBOgvKwUnXr7gJknXgFqUKB1rDyNRjFLI1QGiao1n3PTYyfUWU4EzgvD1KNCWVTOsa+pZJGqP1skXhOalYZkTBW9klDFurviYxGWs8im6wWUTPRq14u/uf1UxM2/IzLJDUo2XJRmApiYpKfT0ZcITNiZglitushE2oszYkvISvNWT10nqu5Zfn9dbTaKOkpwDhdwCR7cQBPuoAVtYCDhGV7hzdHOi/PufCy/bjFzBn8gfP5A8wCkEs=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="mn4t03Afz1AIdBXox69qkMUN1ZQ=">AB8XicbVDLSsNAFL3xWeur6tLNYCm4KokIdlw47KCfWAbymR60w6dTMLMRCihf+HGhSJu/Rt3/o2TNgtPTBwOGcu9wTJIJr47rfzsbm1vbObmvH9weHRcOTnt6DhVDNsFrHqBVSj4BLbhuBvUQhjQKB3WB6m/vdJ1Sax/LBzBL0IzqWPOSMGis9DgKqsmBOgvKwUnXr7gJknXgFqUKB1rDyNRjFLI1QGiao1n3PTYyfUWU4EzgvD1KNCWVTOsa+pZJGqP1skXhOalYZkTBW9klDFurviYxGWs8im6wWUTPRq14u/uf1UxM2/IzLJDUo2XJRmApiYpKfT0ZcITNiZglitushE2oszYkvISvNWT10nqu5Zfn9dbTaKOkpwDhdwCR7cQBPuoAVtYCDhGV7hzdHOi/PufCy/bjFzBn8gfP5A8wCkEs=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="mn4t03Afz1AIdBXox69qkMUN1ZQ=">AB8XicbVDLSsNAFL3xWeur6tLNYCm4KokIdlw47KCfWAbymR60w6dTMLMRCihf+HGhSJu/Rt3/o2TNgtPTBwOGcu9wTJIJr47rfzsbm1vbObmvH9weHRcOTnt6DhVDNsFrHqBVSj4BLbhuBvUQhjQKB3WB6m/vdJ1Sax/LBzBL0IzqWPOSMGis9DgKqsmBOgvKwUnXr7gJknXgFqUKB1rDyNRjFLI1QGiao1n3PTYyfUWU4EzgvD1KNCWVTOsa+pZJGqP1skXhOalYZkTBW9klDFurviYxGWs8im6wWUTPRq14u/uf1UxM2/IzLJDUo2XJRmApiYpKfT0ZcITNiZglitushE2oszYkvISvNWT10nqu5Zfn9dbTaKOkpwDhdwCR7cQBPuoAVtYCDhGV7hzdHOi/PufCy/bjFzBn8gfP5A8wCkEs=</latexit>

Propagation model: MED

DIFFICULT TO VERIFY DM SIGNATURES DUE TO MIMIC SIGNAL FROM BACKGROUND NEED A NEW APPROACH/EXPERIMENT TO VALIDATE THE RESULTS

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ek

2Flux (GeV m-2 s-1 sr-1)

Ek (GeV) bkg dm AMS-02 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 10-1 100 101 102 103

Recent Results from ams-02

PLANCK ~50GeV DM?

Cui et al. 2016)

NEED A NEW APPROACH, EXPERIMENT TO VALIDATE THE RESULTS

6

Launched in May 2011, targeting cosmic-rays including antiparticles Possible DM detection in antiproton measurements Possible detection of antiheliums and antideutrons

▶ Antiproton excess: ~50GeV DM (consistent with Fermi GCE) or cosmic-ray interaction? ▶ Antiheluim detection: ▶ If from DM, a large excess should be seen in the antiproton/antideuteron fluxes? ▶ antimatter clouds in our galaxy?

So far, 6 3He, 2 4He candidate events reported

_ _

slide-7
SLIDE 7

WHY ANTIDEUTERONS?

BACKGROUND-FREE DM SEARCH AT LOW-ENERGY ~ 400x

BKG: Ibarra et al., 2013

PRIMARY FLUX DM ANNIHILATION/DECAY

HADRONIZATION PROCESS _
 p _
 n DARK MATTER
 ANNIHILATION q,h,W… DM DM COALESCENCE
 PROCESS (PC) _
 d

SECONDARY FLUX COSMIC RAY INTERACTION

p (CR) +H (ISM)→ p + H + p + n + p + n

_ _

_
 d

7

AMS-02 AMS-02 BESS upper limit GAPS — DM, mᵪ = 30GeV

Kinetic Energy per Nucleon [GeV/n] 0.1 1 10 100 10-7 10-5 10-3 10-8 10-6 10-4 10-9 Antideuteron Flux [m-2 s-1 sr-1 (GeV/n)-1]

GRAMS — background

GAPS FIRST SCIENCE FLIGHT IS SCHEDULED FROM ANTARCTIC IN 2021 GRAMS: NEXT GENERATION EXPERIMENT

Aramaki et al., 2016

LSP: Donato et al., 2008

slide-8
SLIDE 8

p π+ π- π- π- π+

_ d

Refilling e-

X-RAY

X-RAY

X-RAY

Eγ = zZ

( )

2 M *

m

e * R H

1 nf

2 − 1

ni

2

⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ ⎟ π- NUCLEAR ANNIHILATION p π- π+

Auger e-

ATOMIC TRANSITIONS

n=nK~40 no,lo n=1 n=2

π0 π+

TOF Plastic Scintillator LAr TPC

Concept proven with accelerator beam test Cascade model developed for X-ray yields

EXOTIC ATOM Ar

_ d

Aramaki et al., 2013

X-ray X-ray X

  • r

a y

8

GRAMS Antimatter Detection Concept

The antiparticle slows down & stops, forming an excited exotic atom A time of flight (TOF) system tags 
 candidate events and records velocity De-excitation X-rays provide signature Annihilation products provide additional
 background suppression

MEASURE ATOMIC X-RAYS AND ANNIHILATION PRODUCTS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

GRAMS antideuteron identification technique

PLANCK

Atomic X-rays from exotic atom

▶ different energy: 58, 97 keV for antiproton, 74, 114 keV for antideuterons

Pion/proton multiplicity

▶ antideuterons produce more pions and protons

Stopping range (depth sensing)

▶ antideuterons with the same velocity go deeper before stopping

dE/dX energy deposit in LArTPC

▶ antideuterons with the same velocity deposit more energy

EXPECTED BACKGROUND/MIMIC EVENTS ~0.01

9 CR p, e± REJECTION: ANTIPROTON AND ANTIDEUTERON SELECTION Select slow particles with TOF Simultaneous detection of secondary/annihilation products (pions/protons) ▸ Slow CR p and e± may not be able to produce secondary particles ANTIDEUTERON IDENTIFICATION FROM ANTIPROTONS

slide-10
SLIDE 10

LArTPC SiPMs Anode wires/pads (X-Y plane) E-FIELD Segmentation

Plastic Scintillators: TOF - measure velocity and incoming angle LArTPC: Calorimeter and particle tracker

▶ Scintillation light at SiPMs to trigger events ▶ Wires/pads on anode plane (X, Y), drift time (Z) to provide a 3D image/track ▶ Well-studied, widely-used in large-scale DM/neutrino experiments

Scintillation light localized by segmentation to reduce coincident background

10

GRAMS Detector Design

LARTPC DETECTOR SURROUNDED BY PLASTIC SCINTILLATORS LARTPC MEASURES SCINTILLATION LIGHT AND IONIZATION ELECTRONS

p π+ π- π- π- π+

_ d Plastic Scintillator LAr TPC

X

  • r

a y X-ray X

  • r

a y

Scintillation Light Ionization Electrons 1.4m x 1.4m x 20cm

slide-11
SLIDE 11

<σv > [cm3/s] 10-25 10-27 10 100 1000 10-26

Thermal Relic Cross Section (Steigman et al., 2012)

mᵪ [GeV]

Excluded

10-24

¯ bb

<latexit sha1_base64="mn4t03Afz1AIdBXox69qkMUN1ZQ=">AB8XicbVDLSsNAFL3xWeur6tLNYCm4KokIdlw47KCfWAbymR60w6dTMLMRCihf+HGhSJu/Rt3/o2TNgtPTBwOGcu9wTJIJr47rfzsbm1vbObmvH9weHRcOTnt6DhVDNsFrHqBVSj4BLbhuBvUQhjQKB3WB6m/vdJ1Sax/LBzBL0IzqWPOSMGis9DgKqsmBOgvKwUnXr7gJknXgFqUKB1rDyNRjFLI1QGiao1n3PTYyfUWU4EzgvD1KNCWVTOsa+pZJGqP1skXhOalYZkTBW9klDFurviYxGWs8im6wWUTPRq14u/uf1UxM2/IzLJDUo2XJRmApiYpKfT0ZcITNiZglitushE2oszYkvISvNWT10nqu5Zfn9dbTaKOkpwDhdwCR7cQBPuoAVtYCDhGV7hzdHOi/PufCy/bjFzBn8gfP5A8wCkEs=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="mn4t03Afz1AIdBXox69qkMUN1ZQ=">AB8XicbVDLSsNAFL3xWeur6tLNYCm4KokIdlw47KCfWAbymR60w6dTMLMRCihf+HGhSJu/Rt3/o2TNgtPTBwOGcu9wTJIJr47rfzsbm1vbObmvH9weHRcOTnt6DhVDNsFrHqBVSj4BLbhuBvUQhjQKB3WB6m/vdJ1Sax/LBzBL0IzqWPOSMGis9DgKqsmBOgvKwUnXr7gJknXgFqUKB1rDyNRjFLI1QGiao1n3PTYyfUWU4EzgvD1KNCWVTOsa+pZJGqP1skXhOalYZkTBW9klDFurviYxGWs8im6wWUTPRq14u/uf1UxM2/IzLJDUo2XJRmApiYpKfT0ZcITNiZglitushE2oszYkvISvNWT10nqu5Zfn9dbTaKOkpwDhdwCR7cQBPuoAVtYCDhGV7hzdHOi/PufCy/bjFzBn8gfP5A8wCkEs=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="mn4t03Afz1AIdBXox69qkMUN1ZQ=">AB8XicbVDLSsNAFL3xWeur6tLNYCm4KokIdlw47KCfWAbymR60w6dTMLMRCihf+HGhSJu/Rt3/o2TNgtPTBwOGcu9wTJIJr47rfzsbm1vbObmvH9weHRcOTnt6DhVDNsFrHqBVSj4BLbhuBvUQhjQKB3WB6m/vdJ1Sax/LBzBL0IzqWPOSMGis9DgKqsmBOgvKwUnXr7gJknXgFqUKB1rDyNRjFLI1QGiao1n3PTYyfUWU4EzgvD1KNCWVTOsa+pZJGqP1skXhOalYZkTBW9klDFurviYxGWs8im6wWUTPRq14u/uf1UxM2/IzLJDUo2XJRmApiYpKfT0ZcITNiZglitushE2oszYkvISvNWT10nqu5Zfn9dbTaKOkpwDhdwCR7cQBPuoAVtYCDhGV7hzdHOi/PufCy/bjFzBn8gfP5A8wCkEs=</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="mn4t03Afz1AIdBXox69qkMUN1ZQ=">AB8XicbVDLSsNAFL3xWeur6tLNYCm4KokIdlw47KCfWAbymR60w6dTMLMRCihf+HGhSJu/Rt3/o2TNgtPTBwOGcu9wTJIJr47rfzsbm1vbObmvH9weHRcOTnt6DhVDNsFrHqBVSj4BLbhuBvUQhjQKB3WB6m/vdJ1Sax/LBzBL0IzqWPOSMGis9DgKqsmBOgvKwUnXr7gJknXgFqUKB1rDyNRjFLI1QGiao1n3PTYyfUWU4EzgvD1KNCWVTOsa+pZJGqP1skXhOalYZkTBW9klDFurviYxGWs8im6wWUTPRq14u/uf1UxM2/IzLJDUo2XJRmApiYpKfT0ZcITNiZglitushE2oszYkvISvNWT10nqu5Zfn9dbTaKOkpwDhdwCR7cQBPuoAVtYCDhGV7hzdHOi/PufCy/bjFzBn8gfP5A8wCkEs=</latexit>

GAPS GRAMS Fermi Galactic Center Exces Daylan et al., 2016 Abazajian et al., 2016 Calore et al., 2015 AMS-02 Antiproton Excess Cui et al., 2016 Fermi Dwarf Galaxy Observation Ackermann et al., 2015

100

GRAMS COULD DEEPLY INVESTIGATE FERMI GCE, AMS-02 ANTIPROTON EXCESS CURRENTLY EVALUATING ANTIHELIUM SENSITIVITY

11

GRAMS Sensitivity in DM Parameter Space

STRONG TENSIONS WITH FERMI GCE/DSPHS AND AMS-02

Aramaki et al., 2019

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MeV Gamma-Ray Observation

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Current Status of MeV Gamma-Ray Observations

13 MeV-gap

GAMMA-RAYS IN MEV REGION POORLY EXPLORED = “MEV GAP”

Takahashi et al., 2013 Compton scattering process dominates in MeV Good energy & spacial resolution required

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Previous experiments: COMPTEL and COSI

14

▶ 12 HPGe crystals (2x2x3), double-sided stripped ▶ energy range: 0.2 - 5 MeV ▶ spacial resolution: ~ 2mm3 ▶ 1st balloon flight from Antarctica in 2014 ▶ 2nd flight from New Zealand in 2016

NASA ~1.6m NaI Crystal Liquid Scintillator ~ 8cm

  • Z. Andreas

~ 8cm

▶ launched into space in 1991 ▶ installed on Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory ▶ energy range: 0.75 - 30 MeV ▶ spacial resolution: ~ 40cm3 ▶ Detected ~30 sources

COMPTEL (The Imaging Compton Telescope) COSI (The Compton Spectrometer and Imager)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

GAMMA-RAY SPECTRUM

▶ Extreme objects ▶ Neutron stars: high matter density ▶ Magnetars: strong magnetic field ▶ AGNs/Blazars: powerful jets ▶ Transition of physical processes ▶ Cosmic MeV gamma-ray background

GAMMA-RAY LINES

▶ Positron annihilation: 511 keV ▶ Nuclear lies are typically in ~MeV ▶ Radioactive isotopes provide physical condition during nucleosynthesis ▶ SNe: 26Al (1809keV), 60Fe (1173keV, 1333keV), 44Ti (1157keV), 56Co (847keV) ▶ Neutron capture: 2H (2223keV), Cosmic-ray interactions: 12C* (4438keV)

MULTI-MESSENGER ASTRONOMY

▶ EM counterparts of NS-NS mergers ▶ r-process in NS mergers/remnants

DARK MATTER SEARCH

▶ MeV gamma rays from DM annihilation

MeV Gamma-Ray Science

15

100 10 1 0.1 E [MeV]

Gamma-ray lines Transition of physical processes MeV-gap Inoue et al., 2019 Wu et al., 2019

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Plastic Scintillators: Veto incoming charged particles LArTPC: Compton camera and calorimeter (for pair-production)

▶ Scintillation light at SiPMs to trigger events

Signal localized by segmentation to reduce coincident background

▶ Wires/pads on anode plane (X, Y), drift time (Z) to provide a 3D image/track ▶ 3 or more Compton event circles to identify the direction of the source

16

GRAMS Detection Concept: MeV Gamma-rays

LArTPC TOF Plastic Scintillator SiPMs Anode wires/pads (X-Y plane)

E-FIELD

Segmentation e- e- e+ e-

Gamma-Ray Pair Production Event

e- e- θ

Gamma-Ray Compton Scattering Event Charged Particle

e-

LARTPC DETECTOR SURROUNDED BY PLASTIC SCINTILLATORS LARTPC MEASURES SCINTILLATION LIGHT AND IONIZATION ELECTRONS

Compton “Event Circles”

slide-17
SLIDE 17

LARTPC vs. semiconductor detector

17

LArTPC Semiconductor (Si/Ge) ρ (g/cm3) 1.4 2.3/5.3 Toperation ~80K ~240K/~80K Cost $ $$$ Signal scintillation light + Ionization electrons electrons, holes X, Y Positions wires on anode plane (X-Y) double-sided strips Z position from drift time from layer # # of Layers 1 layer multi-layers # of Electronics # ### Dead Volume almost no dead volume detector frame, preamps Neutron bkg Identified with pulse shape No rejection capability

LArTPC Semiconductor Detector (Si/Ge)

Anode wires/pads SiPMs LArTPC Si/Ge Preamp Frame

LARTPC IS COST-EFFECTIVE AND EASILY EXPANDABLE TO A LARGER-SCALE, MUCH LESS CHANNELS/ELECTRONICS REQUIRED, ALMOST NO DEAD VOLUME

x Y Z

slide-18
SLIDE 18

GRAMS MeV Gamma-ray Continuum sensitivity

18

SINGLE BALLOON FLIGHT: AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE IMPROVED SATELLITE MISSION: COMPARABLE (BETTER) TO FUTURE MISSIONS

Takahashi et al., 2013 Aramaki et al., 2019

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

“Event Circle” becomes “Event Arc”

R&D FOR PROOF OF CONCEPT – IN A FEW YEARS

▶ Validate detection concept with a small-scale prototype detector ▶ Develop event reconstruction technique

FIRST BALLOON FLIGHT - IN 5-10 YEARS

▶ MeV gamma-ray observations focusing on bright objects, nuclear lines ▶ Antimatter-based indirect DM search ▶ Possibly detect antideuterons from DM in the first flight ▶ Investigate Fermi/AMS-02 results

TPC DESIGN UPGRADE/DEVELOPMENT - IN 10 YEARS

▶ Improve energy/position resolutions, event reconstruction ▶ Finer pitch of anode wires/pads to track Compton scattered electrons ▶ Add calorimeters to improve the performance of Energy measurement

SATELLITE MISSION - IN > 10 YEARS

▶ All sky survey in the MeV energy domain ▶ MeV gamma-rays from NS-NS mergers ▶ Cosmic MeV gamma-ray background ▶ Antimatter-based (including antihelium) DM search

Future Prospects

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Summary

20

▶ GRAMS is the first experiment to target both gamma-ray observations in the poorly

explored MeV energy band and antimatter-based dark matter search.

▶ With a cost-effective, large-scale, LArTPC detector, the sensitivity to MeV gamma rays

can be more than an order of magnitude improved compared to previous experiments.

▶ GRAMS antineutron measurements can provide an essentially background-free dark

matter signature while deeply investigating and validating the possible dark matter detection indicated in Fermi GCE and AMS-02 antiproton measurements.

▶ The project is currently in the R&D phase and will demonstrate the detection concept

using a small-scale prototype detector.

▶ Project will then become a balloon-borne experiment, as a step forward to a satellite

mission with detector upgrades. Tsuguo Aramaki, SLAC GRAMS antimatter search Hirokazu Odaka, U of Tokyo GRAMS event reconstruction Georgia Karagiorgi, Columbia U GRAMS LArTPC design Yoshiyuki Inoue, RIKEN GRAMS MeV gamma-ray science GRAMS COLLABORATION

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Backup

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Angular Resolution and Effective Area

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Background and Detector Design

23

LArTPC (140cm x 140cm x 20cm)

1.5m 30cm 1.5m 3.5m 2m

Plastic Scintillators

≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈ ≈

y x z