ore g o n dre pro g ra m
play

Ore g o n DRE Pro g ra m Se rg e a nt E va n Se the r Ore g o n - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ore g o n DRE Pro g ra m Se rg e a nt E va n Se the r Ore g o n Sta te Po lic e T o pic s fo r Disc ussio n Ore g o n Drug Re c o g nitio n E xpe rt (DRE ) Pro g ra m Wha t a re we do ing a b o ut DUI I -Drug s? Q & A


  1. Ore g o n DRE Pro g ra m Se rg e a nt E va n Se the r Ore g o n Sta te Po lic e

  2. T o pic s fo r Disc ussio n  Ore g o n Drug Re c o g nitio n E xpe rt (DRE ) Pro g ra m  Wha t a re we do ing a b o ut DUI I -Drug s?  Q & A

  3. Ab o ut me  12 Ye a rs a s a po lic e o ffic e r  8 ye a rs a s a DRE  5 ye a rs a s a DRE I nstruc to r  3 ye a rs a s a n E MT

  4. Ore g o n DRE Pro g ra m Ove rvie w & Pro g ra m Sta ts

  5. Ore g o n DRE Pro g ra m  I nte rna tio na l pro g ra m initia te d in 1987, o ve rse e n b y NHT SA a nd I ACP.  Ore g o n’ s pro g ra m initia te d in 1995.  Curre ntly 220 DRE s in 74 diffe re nt a g e nc ie s a c ro ss the sta te , pre do mina ntly in Va lle y a nd Me tro a re a .  T his re pre se nts a ppro xima te ly 4% o f a ll la w e nfo rc e me nt o ffic e rs in the Sta te o f Ore g o n.

  6. Ore g o n DRE Pro g ra m  Pro g ra m ma na g e d b y the Ore g o n Sta te Po lic e – Pa tro l Se rvic e s Divisio n  F unde d b y ODOT g ra nts (no t inc luding sa la ry)  T ra ining : $230,000  Ove rtime : $125,000  Blo o d T e sting : $60,000

  7. Wha t is a Drug Re c o g nitio n E xpe rt?  Ce rtifie d la w e nfo rc e me nt o ffic e r.  E xpe rie nc e in DUI I / Drug e nfo rc e me nt a nd re c o mme nda tio ns fro m DRE s a nd pro se c uto rs.  72 ho urs o f c la ssro o m tra ining .  T a ug ht b y DRE I nstruc to rs, physic ia ns a nd E MT s.  40 ho urs o f fie ld c e rtific a tio n tra ining .  Supe rvise d e va lua tio ns a nd writte n re po rts.  Co mpre he nsive fina l kno wle dg e e xa mina tio n.  Co ntinuing e duc a tio n re q uire d.  Re -c e rtific a tio n pro c e ss e ve ry two ye a rs.

  8. Wha t is the DRE Pro to c o l?  12 Ste p Syste ma tic & Sta nda rdize d E va lua tio n  E va lua te s sub je c t’ s me dic a l, me nta l a nd physic a l c o nditio n.  Opinio n o f the E va lua to r (De c isio n Pro c e ss)  I s the sub je c t impa ire d?  I f so , is it a me dic a l impa irme nt o r drug impa irme nt?  I f a drug impa irme nt, wha t c a te g o ry/ c a te g o rie s o f drug s a re c a using the impa irme nt?

  9. T o o ls the DRE use s  BP Cuff  Ste tho sc o pe  Ora l the rmo me te r  Pupilo me te r  I nc a nde sc e nt Pe nlig ht  UV lig ht  Glo ve s

  10. De fining the te rm, “drug ”… Any substanc e that, whe n take n into the human body, c an impair the ability of the pe r son to ope r ate a ve hic le safe ly. Drug E va lua tio n & Cla ssific a tio n Pro g ra m

  11. De fining the te rm, “drug ”… Any substanc e that alte r s pe r c e ption or be havior , r e duc ing that individual’s ability to func tion in an ac ade mic e nvir onme nt. Drug I mpa irme nt T ra ining fo r E duc a tio na l Pro fe ssio na ls

  12. I ng e stio n / Ab so rptio n E xc re tio n Distrib utio n Me ta b o lism

  13. Why a re the re se ve n c a te g o rie s?  E a c h c a te g o ry c o nsists o f drug s tha t c a n impa ir a pe rso n’ s me nta l a nd physic a l a b ility.  T he c a te g o rie s diffe r in the wa y the drug s a ffe c t the b o dy.  T he c a te g o rie s diffe r in o b se rva b le sig ns a nd sympto ms o f impa irme nt.

  14. Dura tio n o f Drug E ffe c ts Dura tio n va rie s de pe nding o n:  Me tho d o f I ng e stio n  Do sa g e  Ag e  We ig ht  T o le ra nc e  I nte ra c tio ns with o the r drug s  Psyc ho a c tive me ta b o lite s vs. ina c tive me ta b o lite s

  15. Se ve n Drug Ca te g o rie s Ce ntra l Ne rvo us Syste m (CNS) De pre ssa nts Ce ntra l Ne rvo us Syste m (CNS) Stimula nts Ha lluc ino g e ns Dissoc iative Ane sthe tic s Na rc o tic Ana lg e sic s I nha la nts Ca nna b is

  16. Ore g o n DRE Pro g ra m Sta tistic s  1509 drug e va lua tio ns  813 (54%) we re in 2015 “po lydrug ”  760 – Ca nna b is  _ No t I mpa ire d  436 – CNS  _ Me dic a l De pre ssa nts  _ Alc o ho l o nly  476 – CNS Stimula nts  368 – Na rc o tic Ana lg e sic s  7 – Ha lluc ino g e ns  7 – Disso c ia te Ane sthe tic s  5 – I nha la nts

  17. Ho w ma ny Drug DUI I s a re the re in Ore g o n?  Are DRE e va lua tio ns a n a c c ura te me tric fo r sta te wide DUI I -Drug a rre sts?  2015: 3,510 sub je c ts b le w .00% - .07% o n a n I nto xilyze r 8000 b re a th te st instrume nt.  Ho w did we miss 57% o f the se po te ntia l c a ndida te s?

  18. Ho w did we miss 2001 pe o ple ? !  An unkno wn numb e r o f the se we re impa ire d b y o nly a lc o ho l a nd the inve stig a tio n sto ppe d the re .  So me sub je c ts re fuse d to pa rtic ipa te in a DRE e va lua tio n.  So me o ffic e rs did no t re c o g nize the sig ns o f drug impa irme nt.  No DRE s we re a va ila b le to pe rfo rm the e va lua tio n.

  19. Ho w ma ny Drug DUI I s a re the re in Ore g o n?  T he re is no wa y to a c c ura te ly tra c k drug DUI I s in Ore g o n.  Da ta : who c o lle c ts it, ho w is it c o de d, e tc .  I mplie d Co nse nt L a w do e s no t a ddre ss c o lle c tio n o f b lo o d/ urine if the sub je c t b lo ws o ve r .08%.  DUI I s a re g e ne ra lly no t tra c ke d b y sub sta nc e .

  20. Wha t do e s the DRE Pro g ra m do ?  T ra ining  DRE Sc ho o l  Adva nc e d Ro a dside I mpa ire d Driving E nfo rc e me nt (ARI DE )  Drug I mpa irme nt T ra ining fo r E duc a tio na l Pro fe ssio na ls (DI T E P)  Pre se nta tio ns to L e g isla ture , g o ve rnme nt g ro ups, pub lic g ro ups, stude nts, la w e nfo rc e me nt, pro se c uto rs, e tc .

  21. Wha t do e s the DRE Pro g ra m do ?  E nfo rc e me nt  DRE E va lua tio ns  DUI I e nfo rc e me nt  F uture : T ruc ke r Che c ks  F uture : Hig h Visib ility E nfo rc e me nt

  22. Wha t do e s the DRE Pro g ra m do ?  Da ta Co lle c tio n  DRE e va lua tio ns  Pre va le nc e o f drug c a te g o rie s  Re c re a tio na l vs OMMP c a nna b is use rs  Ca nna b is pro duc t type  Blo o d te sting fo r drug s

  23. DRE Blo o d T e sting Gra nt  Ne w for F F Y 2015- 2016 $60,000  169 b lo o d sa mple s te ste d fo r 141 inc ide nts.  T ra c king a va rie ty o f a spe c ts.  I nc ide nt type s  Drug pre va le nc e  T HC le ve ls  Blo o d sa mple c o lle c tio n de la ys  DRE e va lua tio ns a nd c o nfirma tio n %  Re ne we d for F F Y 2016- 2017 $120,000

  24. Q & A

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend