On the Homology of the Real Complement of the k -Parabolic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

on the homology of the real complement of the k parabolic
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

On the Homology of the Real Complement of the k -Parabolic - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On the Homology of the Real Complement of the k -Parabolic Arrangement Christopher Severs 1 Jacob A. White 2 1 Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Reykjavik University 2 Arizona State University Mathematical Sciences Research Institute


slide-1
SLIDE 1

On the Homology of the Real Complement of the k-Parabolic Arrangement

Christopher Severs1 Jacob A. White2

1Mathematical Sciences Research Institute → Reykjavik University 2Arizona State University → Mathematical Sciences Research Institute

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Outline

1

Background

2

The k-Parabolic Arrangement

3

Cellular Model

4

Discrete Morse Theory

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

2 / 32

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Subspace arrangements A - is a collection of linear subspaces (over Rn). Assume ∩X∈A X = 0. The complement M(A ) = Rn − ∪X∈A X. Primary interest: Study homology of M(A ). Note: homology groups ’measure’ i-dimensional holes in a space. Has surprising application in complexity theory (and linear decision trees) - Bj¨

  • rner, Lov`

asz, Yao

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

3 / 32

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

The k-equal arrangement Definition The k-equal arrangment, An−1,k consists of subspaces (of Rn): xi1 = xi2 = ... = xik, for all distinct indices 1 ≤ i1 < ... < ik ≤ n When k=2 we recover the Braid hyperplane arrangement.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

4 / 32

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

The k-equal arrangement Definition The k-equal arrangment, An−1,k consists of subspaces (of Rn): xi1 = xi2 = ... = xik, for all distinct indices 1 ≤ i1 < ... < ik ≤ n When k=2 we recover the Braid hyperplane arrangement. In 1995, Bj¨

  • rner and Welker computed the homology of M(An,k).

Homology groups are torsion free. Hi is trivial unless i = t(k − 2), some 0 ≤ t ≤ n

k .

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

4 / 32

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

A type B and D k-equal arrangement In 1996, Bj¨

  • rner and Sagan defined type B and D analogues.

Definition The Dn,k arrangement consists of subspaces (of Rn): ±xi1 = ±xi2 = ... = ±xik, 1 ≤ i1 < · · · < ik ≤ n The Bn,k,h arrangement consists of Dn,k plus subspaces: xi1 = . . . = xih = 0, 1 ≤ i1 < . . . < ih ≤ n They computed the homology of Bn,k,h. In 2000, Kozlov-Feichtner computed the homology of Dn,k, k > n

2.

Homology groups are torsion free

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

5 / 32

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

The usual approach Usual approach to finding homology of M(A ):

1

Apply Goresky MacPherson formula (to reduce problem to studying homology of ∆(L (A ))

2

Show that ∆(L (A )) is shellable.

3

Deduce that Hi(∆(L (A ))) is torsion-free, get Betti numbers.

4

Obtain results for M(A ).

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

6 / 32

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

The usual approach Usual approach to finding homology of M(A ):

1

Apply Goresky MacPherson formula (to reduce problem to studying homology of ∆(L (A ))

2

Show that ∆(L (A )) is shellable.

3

Deduce that Hi(∆(L (A ))) is torsion-free, get Betti numbers.

4

Obtain results for M(A ). NOTE THAT WE ARE NOT USING THIS APPROACH!

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

6 / 32

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Primary goals

1

Generalize k-equal arrangement to any finite reflection group W.

2

Construct a cellular model for the complement.

3

Apply discrete Morse theory to our cellular model.

4

Obtain results regarding homology and Betti numbers.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

7 / 32

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Outline

1

Background

2

The k-Parabolic Arrangement

3

Cellular Model

4

Discrete Morse Theory

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

8 / 32

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Reflection group Now we begin our generalization. W - an irreducible finite real reflection group acting on Rn. S = set of simple reflections associated to W. R = {wsw−1 : w ∈ W, s ∈ S} is the set of all reflections

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

9 / 32

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Coxeter Arrangement for W Definition The Coxeter arrangement is given by hyperplanes Hr = {x ∈ Rn : rx = x} for each r ∈ R.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

10 / 32

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Definitions for Galois correspondence Definition of k-parabolic arrangement involves parabolic subgroups. Definition G ⊆ W is parabolic if ∃I ⊆ S, w ∈ W such that G =< wIw−1 >. G is k-parabolic if G is irreducible and of rank k − 1.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

11 / 32

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Definitions for Galois correspondence Definition of k-parabolic arrangement involves parabolic subgroups. Definition G ⊆ W is parabolic if ∃I ⊆ S, w ∈ W such that G =< wIw−1 >. G is k-parabolic if G is irreducible and of rank k − 1. For G ⊂ W, let Fix(G) = {x ∈ Rn : wx = x, ∀w ∈ G} For subspace X ⊂ Rn, let Gal(X) = {w ∈ W : wx = x, ∀x ∈ X}

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

11 / 32

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Galois Correspondence P(W) - poset of all parabolic subgroups of W ordered by inclusion. L (W) - poset of all ∩s of hyperplanes of H (W), ordered by ⊇. Note: Posets are both lattices. Theorem (Barcelo and Ihrig, 1999) P(W) ∼ = L (W) via G → Fix(G) Gal(X) ← X We use this “Galois correspondence”. But first we give an example for A3 = S4.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

12 / 32

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Example of correspondence W = S4 L (S4) P(S4)

1234 1/2/3/4 e <12> <34> 23<12>23 34<23>34 24<12>24 <23> 12/34 134/2 123/4 13/24 124/3 1/234 14/23 1/23/4 14/2/3 1/24/3 13/2/4 12/3/4 1/2/34 13<12,34>13 <23,34> 34<12,23>34 23<12,34>23 <12,23> 12<23,34>12 <12,34> <12,23,34>

Example: 14/23 ↔< (1, 4), (2, 3) >= (1, 3) < (1, 2), (3, 4) > (1, 3) Example: 134/2 ↔< (1, 3), (3, 4) >= (1, 2) < (2, 3), (3, 4) > (1, 2)

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

13 / 32

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Definition of the k-parabolic arrangement Definition Pn,k(W) = the collection of all k-parabolic subgroups of W. The k-parabolic arrangement Wn,k is the collection of subspaces Fix(G), G ∈ Pn,k(W)

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

14 / 32

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Examples of the k-parabolic arrangement We recover some of the previous examples. W An Bn Dn(k = 3) Dn(k > 3) W(k = 2) Wn,k An,k Bn,k,k−1 Dn,3 Bn,k,k−1 H (W) ∴ The k-equal arrangement has been generalized.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

15 / 32

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Outline

1

Background

2

The k-Parabolic Arrangement

3

Cellular Model

4

Discrete Morse Theory

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

16 / 32

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

The Coxeter Complex and Permutahedron H (W) ∩ Sn−1 induces the Coxeter complex C (W). Perm(W), the type W Permutahedron, is a polytope with face poset dual of C (W). Faces of Perm(W) correspond to cosets uWI, ordered by inclusion. Note: WI =< I >, for I ⊂ S.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

17 / 32

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Picture Wn,k H (W) Ck(W) C (W) Permk(W) Perm(W)

k-parabolic subgroups → all parabolic subgroups (under ⊆) {wWI ⊇ k-parabolic cosets} → all standard parabolic cosets (under ⊇) {wWI ⊇ k-parabolic cosets} → all standard parabolic cosets (under ⊆)

∩Sn−1 dualize ∩Sn−1 dualize ∴ M(Wn,k) is equivalent to removing Permk(W) from Perm(W).

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

18 / 32

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

The subcomplex Permk(W) Permk(W) - subcomplex of W-Permutahedron, minimal nonfaces correspond to cosets wWI, such that WI is k-parabolic. Proposition M(Wn,k) is homotopy equivalent to Permk(W). Proposition uses techniques of Bj¨

  • rner and Ziegler.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

19 / 32

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Example with B3,3 H (B3) B3-Permutahedron B3,3

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

20 / 32

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Conclusion - Cellular Model ∴ We have constructed a cellular model for M(Wn,k). Homology of Permk(W) = Homology of M(Wn,k). Moreover, our uniform algebraic definition of Wn,k gives us a uniform algebraic description of Permk(W).

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

21 / 32

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Outline

1

Background

2

The k-Parabolic Arrangement

3

Cellular Model

4

Discrete Morse Theory

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

22 / 32

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Discrete Morse Theory Discrete Morse theory - combinatorial approach to replacing Permk(W) with a ’smaller’ complex PermM

k (W) ∼

= Permk(W). It was originally discovered by Robin Forman. One hopes that the homology of PermM

k (W) is easy to compute.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

23 / 32

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Acyclic Matchings

  • Gk(W)− the directed Hasse diagram for Permk(W), with edges u → x

if u covers x. Definition M - a matching of Gk(W). Reverse the edges of M to obtain GM

k (W).

M is an acyclic matching if GM

k (W) has no directed cycles.

Motivation - edges of M correspond to cellular collapses.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

24 / 32

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Main Theorem of Discrete Morse Theory Given Permk(W), M, let Ci = set of unmatched i-cells. Theorem (R. Forman, 1996) There exists a CW complex PermM

k (W), such that

Permk(W) ∼ = PermM

k (W).

Moreover, the i-cells of PermM

k (W) are in bijection with Ci.

Two applications of Discrete Morse Theory are found here @ FPSAC:

1

Eric Clark, Richard Ehrenborg - The Frobenius Complex

2

Bridget Eileen Tenner - Boolean Complexes and Boolean Numbers

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

25 / 32

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Main result Theorem (Severs, W, 2009) Let k ≥ 3.

1

∃ an acyclic matching M on Permk(W), given by an algorithm.

2

The number of unmatched i-cells, |Ci|, is 0 unless i = t(k − 2) for some integer 0 ≤ t ≤ n

k .

3

In PermM

k (W), ∂σ = 0 for all σ ∈ ∆c.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

26 / 32

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Main result We can now conclude results concerning the homology of M(Wn,k). Theorem (Severs, W, 2009)

1

Hi(M(Wn,k)) ∼ = Hi(PermM

k (W))

2

Homology groups of M(Wn,k) are torsion-free.

3

Hi = 0 unless i = t(k − 2) for some 0 ≤ t ≤ n

k .

4

dim Hi(M(Wn,k)) = |Ci|.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

26 / 32

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Setup for Algorithm Given coset wWI, first consider the Dynkin diagram. Consider s2s6W{s3,s7} in W = E7, k = 3.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

27 / 32

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Setup for Algorithm Example: s2s6W{s3,s7} in W = E7, k = 3. Place a linear order on reflections.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

27 / 32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Setup for Algorithm Example: s2s6W{s3,s7} in W = E7, k = 3. Circle vertices corresponding to s ∈ I.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

27 / 32

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Setup for Algorithm Example: s2s6W{s3,s7} in W = E7, k = 3. Write down minimal length element of wWI.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

s2s6

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

27 / 32

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Setup for Algorithm Example: s2s6W{s3,s7} in W = E7, k = 3. Color descents of minimal element red.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

s2s6

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

27 / 32

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Setup for Algorithm Example: s2s6W{s3,s7} in W = E7, k = 3. Goal: Attempt to circle/uncircle one black vertex.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

s2s6

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

27 / 32

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Setup for Algorithm Example: s2s6W{s3,s7} in W = E7, k = 3. Cannot circle first vertex - eliminate s1, s3.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

s2s6

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

27 / 32

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Setup for Algorithm Example: s2s6W{s3,s7} in W = E7, k = 3. We cannot circle s2, s4.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

s2s6

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

27 / 32

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Setup for Algorithm Example: s2s6W{s3,s7} in W = E7, k = 3. We can circle s5.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

s2s6

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

27 / 32

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Setup for Algorithm Example: s2s6W{s3,s7} in W = E7, k = 3. Match s2s6Ws3,s7 with s2s6Ws3,s5,s7.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

s2s6

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

27 / 32

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Unmatched Elements Unmatched elements wWI correspond to cosets like the following:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

s5

In this case, W = A8, k = 3, and the coset is s5Ws2,s3,s7,s8.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

28 / 32

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Unmatched Elements For wWI unmatched (w of minimal length), we have:

1

I consists of connected components of size k − 2.

2

each component has a black back neighbor.

3

vertices nonadjacent to any component must be red.

4

si is a descent of w ↔ si is red.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

28 / 32

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Example of B3,3 Algorithm can be used to find Betti numbers (W = B3, k = 3) Here we have the faces. dim # faces 48 1 72 2 12

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

29 / 32

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Example of B3,3 Algorithm can be used to find Betti numbers (W = B3, k = 3) For 0-faces, circle first black vertex. Thus, all but one of the 0-faces are matched. dim # faces 48 − 47 = 1 1 72 − 47 = 25 2 12

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

29 / 32

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Example of B3,3 Algorithm can be used to find Betti numbers (W = B3, k = 3) For 2-faces, uncircle first circled vertex in diagram. Thus, all 2-faces are matched. dim # faces 1 1 25 − 12 = 13 2 12 − 12 = 0

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

29 / 32

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Example of B3,3 Algorithm can be used to find Betti numbers (W = B3, k = 3) By our Theorem, we obtain the Betti numbers. i βi(M(B3,3)) 1 1 13 2

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

29 / 32

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Unmatched elements for B3

−1−2−3 123 −213 −2−13 −123 12−3 132 13−2 −3−12 −3−2−1 −3−12 −312 23−1 231

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

30 / 32

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Other Results One can compute the Betti numbers of exceptional types, and obtain (nasty) formulas for the infinite families. Approach of discrete Morse theory and cellular models work for other arrangements as well.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

31 / 32

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Future Work Can these unmatched elements Ci be used to understand the action of W on Hi(M(Wn,k))?

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

32 / 32

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Background The k-Parabolic Arrangement Cellular Model Discrete Morse Theory

Questions? Thank you.

k-Parabolic Arrangement

  • C. Severs, J. White

33 / 32