on the freeze operator in constraint ltl
play

On the freeze operator in constraint LTL Stphane Demri LSV, ENS de - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

On the freeze operator in constraint LTL Stphane Demri LSV, ENS de Cachan Joint work with Ranko Lazi c and David Nowak On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL p. 1 Constraint systems Constraint system: D = D, ( R ) I


  1. On the freeze operator in constraint LTL Stéphane Demri LSV, ENS de Cachan Joint work with Ranko Lazi´ c and David Nowak On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 1

  2. Constraint systems • Constraint system: D = � D, ( R α ) α ∈ I � . • Interpretation domains of program variables. • Atomic D constraint: R ( x 1 , . . . , x t ) , x i ∈ VarSet . • A D -valuation v : VarSet → D . • Examples: � N , = , < � , � N , = , succ � , � R , = , < � , � Z , = , < � , �{ 0 , 1 } ∗ , ⊂ , = � , � Z , ( R φ ( x 1 ,...,x n ) ) φ ( x 1 ,...,x n ) ∈ Presburger � . . . On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 2

  3. D -automata X x ≡ 2 32 x + 1 ∧ X x > x ∧ X y = y y ≤ x ∧ X y ≡ 2 32 y + 1 ∧ . . . X x ≡ 2 32 x + 1 ∧ X x > x ∧ X y = y x = 0 ∧ y = 0 x > 0 ∧ φ = φ = q 1 q 2 q 3 q 4 φ = y ≤ x ∧ φ = x = y ∧ X x = 0 ∧ X y = 0 q 6 q 5 φ = X y ≤ x, X y ≡ 2 32 y + 1 ∧ X y > y ∧ X x = x On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 3

  4. Logics over constraint systems • Design of temporal logics for model-checking D -automata. • Which properties of the constraint system lead to decidability? • Which ingredients of temporal logics lead to undecidability? • Which techniques of the temporal logic L can be used for L( D )? On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 4

  5. LTL over constraint systems • Atomic term constraint R ( X n 1 x 1 , . . . , X n t x t ) . • X i x interpreted as the value of x in the i th next state. • φ ::= R ( X n 1 x 1 , . . . , X n t x t ) | ¬ φ | . . . the rest as for LTL. • Models: σ : N → ( VarSet → D ) . = R ( X n 1 x 1 , . . . , X n t x t ) iff • σ, j | value of x 1 in the j + n 1 th state � �� � ( σ ( j + n 1 )( x 1 ) , . . . , σ ( j + n t )( x t )) ∈ R i.e. values at different states can be compared. On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 5

  6. LTL as a fragment of CLTL ( { 0 , 1 } , =) • { p 2 , p 3 } · { p 3 } · { p 1 , p 3 } . . . | = F ( p 1 ∧ p 3 ) � 0 0 x 1 1 . . . | = F ( x 1 = 1 ∧ x 3 = 1) 1 0 0 x 2 . . . 1 1 x 3 1 . . . p i ⇔ XX p j ≈ x i = X 2 x j . • p i ≈ ( x i = 1) On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 6

  7. CLTL ( D ) problems • Satisfiability problem for CLTL ( D ) : instance: a CLTL ( D ) formula φ , question: is there a model σ such that σ | = φ ? • Model-checking problem for CLTL ( D ) : instance: A D -automaton A and a CLTL ( D ) formula φ , question: are there a symbolic ω -word v = φ 0 , φ 1 , . . . accepted by A , a model σ (a realization of v ) such that σ | = φ and for every i ≥ 0 , σ, i | = φ i ? • Standard equivalence between these problems. On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 7

  8. Constraint versions of LTL • For every finite D , CLTL ( D ) is in PSPACE . • CLTL ( D, <, =) is PSPACE -complete for every D ∈ { R , Q , Z , N } . • LTL over integer periodicity constraints + constraints of the form x < y over Z is also PSPACE -complete. • CLTL ( N , = , +1) is undecidable but flat LTL over Presburger constraints is decidable [Comon&Cortier00]. Different from Presburger LTL from [Bouajjani et al.95]. • Open problem: decidability status of CLTL ( { 0 , 1 } ∗ , ⊆ ) with either the prefix or the subword relation. On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 8

  9. Extensions of the logical language • Past-time operators. Thanks to [Gastin&Kuske03] most PSPACE results can be extended by adding a finite number of MSO-definable operators. • Branching-time temporal logics. Model-checking for CTL extension of CLTL ( Z , <, =) + constants is already undecidable [Cerans94]. • First-order features. TPTL [Alur&Henzinger94] with freeze operator is decidable. On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 9

  10. Adding the freeze operator • VarSet = FleVarSet (flexible variables) ∪ RigVarSet (rigid variables). • Unary ↓ y = X j x with y ∈ RigVarSet , x ∈ FleVarSet . • Environment ρ : RigVarSet → D . • Models σ : N → ( FleVarSet → D ) . • σ | = ρ ↓ y = X n x φ iff σ | = ρ [ y �→ σ ( n )( x )] φ . • σ | = ρ R ( t 1 , . . . , t n ) iff ( � t 1 � σ,ρ , . . . , � t 2 � σ,ρ ) ∈ R with � X n x � σ,ρ = σ ( n )( x ) if x is in FleVarSet � y � σ,ρ = ρ ( y ) if y is in RigVarSet On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 10

  11. Examples • TPTL is exactly the fragment of the logic CLTL ↓ ( D ) where − D = N and the only flexible variable is t (time); − the predicates of D are the following: • ( x ≤ c ) c ∈ Z , ( x ≤ y + c ) c ∈ Z , • ( x ≡ d c ) c,d ∈ N , ( x ≡ d y + c ) c,d ∈ N , − the formulae are of the form G ( t ≤ X t ) ∧ GF ( t < X t ) ∧ φ with the freeze quantifier used with bindings of the form ↓ x = t . • CLTL ↓ (IPC + ) defined over the constraints π of the form x < d | x = d | x ≡ k y + c | ¬ π | π 1 ∧ π 2 | ∃ x π with variables interpreted in Z is EXPSPACE -complete [Demri04] (no equality “ x = y ”). On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 11

  12. Freezing the current value is enough • Proposition . For any formula φ of CLTL ↓ ( D ) , there exists an equivalent formula φ ′ such that: − any occurence of ↓ in φ ′ is of the form ↓ y = x , − FleVars ( φ ′ ) = FleVars ( φ ) and RigVars ( φ ′ ) = RigVars ( φ ) . • Reduction for formulae ↓ y = X n x ψ . • Proof by structural induction on �| ψ | , n � . • Until case: ↓ y = X n +1 x ψ 1 U ψ 2 ≡ ↓ y = X n +1 x ψ 2 ∨ ( ψ 1 ∧ X ψ 1 U ψ 2 ) ≡ ( ↓ y = X n +1 x ψ 2 ) ∨ (( ↓ y = X n +1 x ψ 1 ) ∧ X ↓ y = X n x ψ 1 U ψ 2 ) On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 12

  13. Atomic formulae with rigid variables For any formula φ of CLTL ↓ ( D ) , there exists an equivalent formula ψ such that: • atomic formulae in ψ contain only rigid variables, • if any occurence of ↓ in φ is of the form ↓ y = x , then the same is true of ψ , • FleVars ( ψ ) = FleVars ( φ ) , • if k is the maximum number, over all atomic formulae in φ , of distinct terms of the form X n x with x ∈ FleVarSet , then | RigVars ( ψ ) | ≤ | RigVars ( φ ) | + k . On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 13

  14. Undecidable variants • The following variants of TPTL are undecidable [Alur&Henzinger94] − without the monotonicity conditions on time sequences or, − with the addition of the multiplication by 2 or, − by replacing the time domain by Q . • CLTL ↓ ( N , <, =) with past-time operator F − 1 is undecidable. • CLTL ↓ ( N , =) restricted to 1 rigid variable, 4 flexible variables and the operators X , X − 1 , F , F − 1 is already undecidable, consequence of [David04]. On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 14

  15. Other logics with freeze (I) • ↓ x in hybrid logics [Blackburn&Seligman95, Goranko96]. − ↓ x φ : φ holds true in the variant model where x is true only at the current state. − Every reachable state can be visited inf. often: ∀ G ↓ x ∃ XF x . • LTL with past-time operators and Now [Laroussinie et al.02]. On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 15

  16. Other logics with freeze (II) • Repeated Hybrid Quantified LTL [French03]. − Model ( µ, σ ) with µ : N → S and σ : S → 2 AP . = φ where σ ′ is the p -variant of σ = ↓ p φ iff ( µ, σ ′ ) , i | − ( µ, σ ) , i | in which p belongs only to σ ′ ( µ ( i )) . − RHLTL with F , X , . . . equivalent to CLTL ↓ ( N , =) with F , X , . . . restricted to one flexible variable. − Corollary . CLTL ↓ ( N , =) restricted with 2 rigid variables and the temporal operators X , X − 1 , F , F − 1 is undecidable. On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 16

  17. First-order logics • First-order temporal logics [Gabbay et al.03]. − Flexible variable x � monadic P x interpreted by singleton. − T( x = x ′ ) = ∃ yP x ( y ) ∧ P x ′ ( y ) T( ↓ y = x φ ) = ∃ y P x ( y ) ∧ T( φ ) . − CLTL ↓ ( N , =) with one rigid variable can be encoded in monodic fragment with 2 individual variables, monadic predicate symbols, equality. • Logics on words with data [David04, Boja´ nczyk et al.05]. − Decidability of FO2 ( ∼ , <, +1) [Boja´ nczyk et al.05]. − CLTL ↓ ( N , =) can be easily encoded in FO ( ∼ , <, +1) . − See also register automata [Kaminski&Francez94] and data automata [Bouyer et al 03]. On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 17

  18. Finite domain D • Theorem . D constraint system with equality such that | D | ≥ 2 . Satisfiability for CLTL ↓ ( D ) is EXPSPACE -hard. • Reduction from the 2 n corridor tiling problem. Comparison of variables of temporal distance 2 n is possible. • Theorem . D finite constraint system. Satisfiability for CLTL ↓ ( D ) is in EXPSPACE . On the freeze operatorin constraint LTL – p. 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend