occurrences of exactly solvable pdes in combinatorial
play

Occurrences of exactly solvable PDEs in combinatorial problems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 15, 2024 •211 likes •1.28k views

PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Occurrences of exactly solvable PDEs in combinatorial problems Alois Panholzer Institut f ur Diskrete Mathematik und Geometrie TU Wien, Austria

  1. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Problems for random trees/mappings, where labels play essential rˆ ole 3 7 6 9 1 1 17 8 14 11 10 2 16 5 9 3 15 5 13 19 12 4 7 14 2 11 6 18 12 13 8 10 4 Occurrence and avoidance of label-patterns in trees/mappings: Runs Records Alternating mappings 6 / 25

  2. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings n -mappings: functions f from set [ n ] := { 1 , 2 , . . . , n } into itself: f : [ n ] → [ n ] Functional digraph G f of f : G f = ( V f , E f ), with V f = [ n ] and E f = { ( i , f ( i )) , i ∈ [ n ] } Simple structure: connected components of G f : cycles of trees 7 / 25

  3. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings n -mappings: functions f from set [ n ] := { 1 , 2 , . . . , n } into itself: f : [ n ] → [ n ] Functional digraph G f of f : G f = ( V f , E f ), with V f = [ n ] and E f = { ( i , f ( i )) , i ∈ [ n ] } 3 9 6 1 17 8 11 10 2 16 15 5 13 19 7 14 18 12 4 Simple structure: connected components of G f : cycles of trees 7 / 25

  4. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings n -mappings: functions f from set [ n ] := { 1 , 2 , . . . , n } into itself: f : [ n ] → [ n ] Functional digraph G f of f : G f = ( V f , E f ), with V f = [ n ] and E f = { ( i , f ( i )) , i ∈ [ n ] } 3 9 6 1 17 8 11 10 2 16 15 5 13 19 7 14 18 12 4 Simple structure: connected components of G f : cycles of trees 7 / 25

  5. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Interesting example for avoiding a label patterns”: Alternating mappings: labels on each iteration path are up-down alternating sequence: i = f 0 ( i ) < f 1 ( i ) > f 2 ( i ) < f 3 ( i ) > · · · or i = f 0 ( i ) > f 1 ( i ) < f 2 ( i ) > f 3 ( i ) < · · · f 2 ( i ) − f ( i ) � � Equivalently: · ( f ( i ) − i ) < 0 for all i Corresponding quantity for permutations (“labelled line”): alternating permutations enumerated by zig-zag numbers (tangent and secant numbers) 8 / 25

  6. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Interesting example for avoiding a label patterns”: Alternating mappings: labels on each iteration path are up-down alternating sequence: i = f 0 ( i ) < f 1 ( i ) > f 2 ( i ) < f 3 ( i ) > · · · or i = f 0 ( i ) > f 1 ( i ) < f 2 ( i ) > f 3 ( i ) < · · · f 2 ( i ) − f ( i ) � � Equivalently: · ( f ( i ) − i ) < 0 for all i Corresponding quantity for permutations (“labelled line”): alternating permutations enumerated by zig-zag numbers (tangent and secant numbers) 8 / 25

  7. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Interesting example for avoiding a label patterns”: Alternating mappings: labels on each iteration path are up-down alternating sequence: i = f 0 ( i ) < f 1 ( i ) > f 2 ( i ) < f 3 ( i ) > · · · or i = f 0 ( i ) > f 1 ( i ) < f 2 ( i ) > f 3 ( i ) < · · · f 2 ( i ) − f ( i ) � � Equivalently: · ( f ( i ) − i ) < 0 for all i Corresponding quantity for permutations (“labelled line”): alternating permutations enumerated by zig-zag numbers (tangent and secant numbers) 8 / 25

  8. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Interesting example for avoiding a label patterns”: Alternating mappings: labels on each iteration path are up-down alternating sequence: i = f 0 ( i ) < f 1 ( i ) > f 2 ( i ) < f 3 ( i ) > · · · or i = f 0 ( i ) > f 1 ( i ) < f 2 ( i ) > f 3 ( i ) < · · · f 2 ( i ) − f ( i ) � � Equivalently: · ( f ( i ) − i ) < 0 for all i Corresponding quantity for permutations (“labelled line”): alternating permutations enumerated by zig-zag numbers (tangent and secant numbers) 8 / 25

  9. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Structure: zig-zag property on each path in functional graph 3 18 11 2 12 8 7 15 1 13 9 17 10 6 5 4 16 19 14   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 f : ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓   5 17 2 5 4 4 17 15 17 19 15 10 4 19 10 17 10 1 16 local minima alternate with local maxima : avoiding { up-up, down-down } 9 / 25

  10. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Structure: zig-zag property on each path in functional graph 3 18 11 2 12 8 7 15 1 13 9 17 10 6 5 4 16 19 14   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 f : ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓   5 17 2 5 4 4 17 15 17 19 15 10 4 19 10 17 10 1 16 local minima alternate with local maxima : avoiding { up-up, down-down } 9 / 25

  11. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Structure: zig-zag property on each path in functional graph 3 18 11 2 12 8 7 15 1 13 9 17 10 6 5 4 16 19 14   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 f : ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓   5 17 2 5 4 4 17 15 17 19 15 10 4 19 10 17 10 1 16 local minima alternate with local maxima : avoiding { up-up, down-down } 9 / 25

  12. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Combinatorial decomposition: w.r.t. largest labelled node n T 1 T 2 T ′ T r T 1 n C : or T r C ′ n ⇒ treatment requires auxiliary parameter: number of local minima ⇒ require also treatment of quantity for rooted labelled trees (Cayley trees) 10 / 25

  13. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Combinatorial decomposition: w.r.t. largest labelled node n T 1 T 2 T ′ T r T 1 n C : or T r C ′ n ⇒ treatment requires auxiliary parameter: number of local minima ⇒ require also treatment of quantity for rooted labelled trees (Cayley trees) 10 / 25

  14. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Combinatorial decomposition: w.r.t. largest labelled node n T 1 T 2 T ′ T r T 1 n C : or T r C ′ n ⇒ treatment requires auxiliary parameter: number of local minima ⇒ require also treatment of quantity for rooted labelled trees (Cayley trees) 10 / 25

  15. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Corresponding problem for trees: Alternating trees (= intransitive trees): enumerative studies: Postnikov [1997] n T n = 1 � n � � k n − 1 number of rooted alternating trees: 2 n k k =0 occurs in combinatorial studies of hyperplane arrangements: Postnikov and Stanley [2000] Kuba and P. [2010]: studies of alternating tree families via combinatorial decomposition w.r.t. largest node using auxiliary parameter “number of local minima” 11 / 25

  16. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Corresponding problem for trees: Alternating trees (= intransitive trees): enumerative studies: Postnikov [1997] n T n = 1 � n � � k n − 1 number of rooted alternating trees: 2 n k k =0 occurs in combinatorial studies of hyperplane arrangements: Postnikov and Stanley [2000] Kuba and P. [2010]: studies of alternating tree families via combinatorial decomposition w.r.t. largest node using auxiliary parameter “number of local minima” 11 / 25

  17. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Generating functions treatment: trees: quasi-linear first order PDE F z ( z , u ) = uF u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) + u connected mappings: linear first order PDE C z ( z , u ) = uC u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) + uF u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) mappings: set of connected mappings M ( z , u ) = e C ( z , u ) 12 / 25

  18. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Generating functions treatment: trees: quasi-linear first order PDE F z ( z , u ) = uF u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) + u connected mappings: linear first order PDE C z ( z , u ) = uC u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) + uF u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) mappings: set of connected mappings M ( z , u ) = e C ( z , u ) 12 / 25

  19. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Generating functions treatment: trees: quasi-linear first order PDE F z ( z , u ) = uF u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) + u connected mappings: linear first order PDE C z ( z , u ) = uC u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) + uF u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) mappings: set of connected mappings M ( z , u ) = e C ( z , u ) 12 / 25

  20. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Generating functions treatment: trees: quasi-linear first order PDE F z ( z , u ) = uF u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) + u connected mappings: linear first order PDE C z ( z , u ) = uC u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) + uF u ( z , u ) e F ( z , u ) mappings: set of connected mappings M ( z , u ) = e C ( z , u ) 12 / 25

  21. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Theorem (P., 2012) Generating function solution: ( e F + 1) 2 F = z 1 + e F M ( z ) = 2 e F (1 + (1 − F ) e F ) , with 2 Enumeration formula: for M n number of alternating n-mappings n +1 1 � n + 1 � � ( k − 1) n M n = 2 n +1 k k =0 Asymptotics: √ 2 √ ρ + 2 � n � n ρ := 2 LambertW (1 M n ∼ · , e ) ≈ 0 . 556929 . . . 4 e ρ 13 / 25

  22. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Theorem (P., 2012) Generating function solution: ( e F + 1) 2 F = z 1 + e F M ( z ) = 2 e F (1 + (1 − F ) e F ) , with 2 Enumeration formula: for M n number of alternating n-mappings n +1 1 � n + 1 � � ( k − 1) n M n = 2 n +1 k k =0 Asymptotics: √ 2 √ ρ + 2 � n � n ρ := 2 LambertW (1 M n ∼ · , e ) ≈ 0 . 556929 . . . 4 e ρ 13 / 25

  23. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Label patterns in trees/mappings Theorem (P., 2012) Generating function solution: ( e F + 1) 2 F = z 1 + e F M ( z ) = 2 e F (1 + (1 − F ) e F ) , with 2 Enumeration formula: for M n number of alternating n-mappings n +1 1 � n + 1 � � ( k − 1) n M n = 2 n +1 k k =0 Asymptotics: √ 2 √ ρ + 2 � n � n ρ := 2 LambertW (1 M n ∼ · , e ) ≈ 0 . 556929 . . . 4 e ρ 13 / 25

  24. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Hiring problem: introduced by Broder et al [SODA, 2008]; independently by Krieger et al [Ann. Prob. 2007] (unknown number of) candidates arrive sequentially each candidate is interviewed and gets a score (absolute or relative) decision whether to hire current candidate or not must be made instantly, depending on scores of candidates seen so far Important class of selection strategies: Quality of recruited staff increases whenever candidate is hired 14 / 25

  25. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Hiring problem: introduced by Broder et al [SODA, 2008]; independently by Krieger et al [Ann. Prob. 2007] (unknown number of) candidates arrive sequentially each candidate is interviewed and gets a score (absolute or relative) decision whether to hire current candidate or not must be made instantly, depending on scores of candidates seen so far Important class of selection strategies: Quality of recruited staff increases whenever candidate is hired 14 / 25

  26. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Hiring problem: introduced by Broder et al [SODA, 2008]; independently by Krieger et al [Ann. Prob. 2007] (unknown number of) candidates arrive sequentially each candidate is interviewed and gets a score (absolute or relative) decision whether to hire current candidate or not must be made instantly, depending on scores of candidates seen so far Important class of selection strategies: Quality of recruited staff increases whenever candidate is hired 14 / 25

  27. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Hiring problem: introduced by Broder et al [SODA, 2008]; independently by Krieger et al [Ann. Prob. 2007] (unknown number of) candidates arrive sequentially each candidate is interviewed and gets a score (absolute or relative) decision whether to hire current candidate or not must be made instantly, depending on scores of candidates seen so far Important class of selection strategies: Quality of recruited staff increases whenever candidate is hired 14 / 25

  28. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Hiring problem: introduced by Broder et al [SODA, 2008]; independently by Krieger et al [Ann. Prob. 2007] (unknown number of) candidates arrive sequentially each candidate is interviewed and gets a score (absolute or relative) decision whether to hire current candidate or not must be made instantly, depending on scores of candidates seen so far Important class of selection strategies: Quality of recruited staff increases whenever candidate is hired 14 / 25

  29. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  30. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  31. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  32. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  33. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 2 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  34. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 2 5 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  35. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 2 5 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  36. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 2 5 4 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  37. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 2 5 4 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  38. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 2 5 4 1 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  39. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 2 5 4 1 7 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  40. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 2 5 4 1 7 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  41. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 2 5 4 1 7 6 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  42. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies “Hiring above the median”-strategy: candidate is recruited iff its score is better than median score of already hired staff Assume s 1 < s 2 < · · · < s k are scores of already hired candidates ⇒ new candidate is hired iff score is higher than s ⌊ k +1 2 ⌋ (lower median) 3 2 5 4 1 7 6 ⇒ 5 hired candidates 15 / 25

  43. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Basic question: consider random sequence of n candidates how many candidates h n will be hired? Krieger et al [2007]: Expectation: E ( h n ) √ n → c . It seems impossible to determine c analytically. Helmi and P. [2012]: analytic expression for c Gaither and Ward [2012]: analysis of more general strategies 16 / 25

  44. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Basic question: consider random sequence of n candidates how many candidates h n will be hired? Krieger et al [2007]: Expectation: E ( h n ) √ n → c . It seems impossible to determine c analytically. Helmi and P. [2012]: analytic expression for c Gaither and Ward [2012]: analysis of more general strategies 16 / 25

  45. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Basic question: consider random sequence of n candidates how many candidates h n will be hired? Krieger et al [2007]: Expectation: E ( h n ) √ n → c . It seems impossible to determine c analytically. Helmi and P. [2012]: analytic expression for c Gaither and Ward [2012]: analysis of more general strategies 16 / 25

  46. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Basic question: consider random sequence of n candidates how many candidates h n will be hired? Krieger et al [2007]: Expectation: E ( h n ) √ n → c . It seems impossible to determine c analytically. Helmi and P. [2012]: analytic expression for c Gaither and Ward [2012]: analysis of more general strategies 16 / 25

  47. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Evolution of median of hired staff during “hiring process”: n candidates interviewed; median of hired staff is ℓ -th largest ( n + 1)-th candidate with certain score arrives Markov chain with states ( n , ℓ ) odd and ( n , ℓ ) even : ℓ P = 1 − ℓ ℓ P = 1 − P = n +1 n +1 n +1 ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ ) ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ ) ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ ) 2 1 ℓ P = n +1 ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ + 1) Linear first order PDE for suitable g.f. of prob. P { h n = k } : zu − u − u 2 z 2 � � z (1 − z ) F z ( z , u ) + F u ( z , u ) − zF ( z , u ) = 0 1 − z 17 / 25

  48. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Evolution of median of hired staff during “hiring process”: n candidates interviewed; median of hired staff is ℓ -th largest ( n + 1)-th candidate with certain score arrives Markov chain with states ( n , ℓ ) odd and ( n , ℓ ) even : ℓ P = 1 − ℓ ℓ P = 1 − P = n +1 n +1 n +1 ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ ) ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ ) ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ ) 2 1 ℓ P = n +1 ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ + 1) Linear first order PDE for suitable g.f. of prob. P { h n = k } : zu − u − u 2 z 2 � � z (1 − z ) F z ( z , u ) + F u ( z , u ) − zF ( z , u ) = 0 1 − z 17 / 25

  49. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Evolution of median of hired staff during “hiring process”: n candidates interviewed; median of hired staff is ℓ -th largest ( n + 1)-th candidate with certain score arrives Markov chain with states ( n , ℓ ) odd and ( n , ℓ ) even : ℓ P = 1 − ℓ ℓ P = 1 − P = n +1 n +1 n +1 ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ ) ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ ) ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ ) 2 1 ℓ P = n +1 ( n , ℓ ) �→ ( n + 1 , ℓ + 1) Linear first order PDE for suitable g.f. of prob. P { h n = k } : zu − u − u 2 z 2 � � z (1 − z ) F z ( z , u ) + F u ( z , u ) − zF ( z , u ) = 0 1 − z 17 / 25

  50. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Theorem (Helmi and P., 2011) “Hiring above lower median”: Number h n of hired candidates is distributed as follows: � n − 1 −⌊ k ( n − ℓ ℓ − 1 ) 2 ⌋  � ℓ ) , for k = 2 ℓ − 1 odd ,  ⌈ k ( n 2 ⌉− 1  P { h n = k } = = � n ( n − ℓ ℓ − 2 ) � ⌈ k ℓ − 1 ) , for k = 2 ℓ − 2 even . 2 ⌉  ( n  Theorem Expectation of h n satisfies: E ( h n ) = √ π √ n + O (1) . √ h n asymptotically Rayleigh distributed with parameter σ = 2 , ( d ) → ˆ R, where ˆ h n i.e., √ n − − R has density function f ( x ) = x 2 e − x 2 ˆ 4 , for x > 0 . 18 / 25

  51. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models Analysis of on-line selection strategies Theorem (Helmi and P., 2011) “Hiring above lower median”: Number h n of hired candidates is distributed as follows: � n − 1 −⌊ k ( n − ℓ ℓ − 1 ) 2 ⌋  � ℓ ) , for k = 2 ℓ − 1 odd ,  ⌈ k ( n 2 ⌉− 1  P { h n = k } = = � n ( n − ℓ ℓ − 2 ) � ⌈ k ℓ − 1 ) , for k = 2 ℓ − 2 even . 2 ⌉  ( n  Theorem Expectation of h n satisfies: E ( h n ) = √ π √ n + O (1) . √ h n asymptotically Rayleigh distributed with parameter σ = 2 , ( d ) → ˆ R, where ˆ h n i.e., √ n − − R has density function f ( x ) = x 2 e − x 2 ˆ 4 , for x > 0 . 18 / 25

  52. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn model: Urn with 2 type of balls: n white balls, m black balls � a b � Transition matrix: M = c d Urn evolution process: choose ball at random examine color put ball back into urn insert balls according transition matrix: if white ball chosen: add a white and b black balls if black ball chosen: add c white and d black balls 19 / 25

  53. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn model: Urn with 2 type of balls: n white balls, m black balls � a b � Transition matrix: M = c d Urn evolution process: choose ball at random examine color put ball back into urn insert balls according transition matrix: if white ball chosen: add a white and b black balls if black ball chosen: add c white and d black balls 19 / 25

  54. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn model: Urn with 2 type of balls: n white balls, m black balls � a b � Transition matrix: M = c d Urn evolution process: choose ball at random examine color put ball back into urn insert balls according transition matrix: if white ball chosen: add a white and b black balls if black ball chosen: add c white and d black balls 19 / 25

  55. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Example: � 2 1 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 initial configuration: n = 7 yellow (white) balls and m = 6 black balls 20 / 25

  56. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Example: � 2 1 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 initial configuration: n = 7 yellow (white) balls and m = 6 black balls p yellow = 7/13 p black = 6/13 20 / 25

  57. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Example: � 2 1 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 initial configuration: n = 7 yellow (white) balls and m = 6 black balls Inspected color: yellow 20 / 25

  58. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Example: � 2 1 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 initial configuration: n = 7 yellow (white) balls and m = 6 black balls 2 x 1 x 20 / 25

  59. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Example: � 2 1 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 initial configuration: n = 7 yellow (white) balls and m = 6 black balls 20 / 25

  60. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Example: � 2 1 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 initial configuration: n = 7 yellow (white) balls and m = 6 black balls p yellow = 9/16 p black = 7/16 20 / 25

  61. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Example: � 2 1 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 initial configuration: n = 7 yellow (white) balls and m = 6 black balls Inspected color: black 20 / 25

  62. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Example: � 2 1 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 initial configuration: n = 7 yellow (white) balls and m = 6 black balls 1 x -1 x 20 / 25

  63. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Example: � 2 1 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 initial configuration: n = 7 yellow (white) balls and m = 6 black balls 20 / 25

  64. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Diminishing urn models: P´ olya-Eggenberger urn model with ball replacement matrix M in addition: set of absorbing states A ⊂ N 0 × N 0 . urn evolves according to matrix M until absorbing state ( i , j ) ∈ A is reached consider only well defined urns: urn always ends in absorbing state of A 21 / 25

  65. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Diminishing urn models: P´ olya-Eggenberger urn model with ball replacement matrix M in addition: set of absorbing states A ⊂ N 0 × N 0 . urn evolves according to matrix M until absorbing state ( i , j ) ∈ A is reached consider only well defined urns: urn always ends in absorbing state of A 21 / 25

  66. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Diminishing urn models: P´ olya-Eggenberger urn model with ball replacement matrix M in addition: set of absorbing states A ⊂ N 0 × N 0 . urn evolves according to matrix M until absorbing state ( i , j ) ∈ A is reached consider only well defined urns: urn always ends in absorbing state of A 21 / 25

  67. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models Diminishing urn models: P´ olya-Eggenberger urn model with ball replacement matrix M in addition: set of absorbing states A ⊂ N 0 × N 0 . urn evolves according to matrix M until absorbing state ( i , j ) ∈ A is reached consider only well defined urns: urn always ends in absorbing state of A 21 / 25

  68. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: proposed by Knuth and McCarthy [1991] in a bottle there are n small pills and m large pills a large pill is equivalent to two small pills every day a person chooses a pill at random if a small pill is chosen, it is eaten up if a large pill is chosen it is broken into two halves: one half is eaten and the other half, which is now considered to be a small pill, is returned to the bottle Main question: What is the number of small pills X m , n remaining when all large pills have been consumed? 22 / 25

  69. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: proposed by Knuth and McCarthy [1991] in a bottle there are n small pills and m large pills a large pill is equivalent to two small pills every day a person chooses a pill at random if a small pill is chosen, it is eaten up if a large pill is chosen it is broken into two halves: one half is eaten and the other half, which is now considered to be a small pill, is returned to the bottle Main question: What is the number of small pills X m , n remaining when all large pills have been consumed? 22 / 25

  70. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: proposed by Knuth and McCarthy [1991] in a bottle there are n small pills and m large pills a large pill is equivalent to two small pills every day a person chooses a pill at random if a small pill is chosen, it is eaten up if a large pill is chosen it is broken into two halves: one half is eaten and the other half, which is now considered to be a small pill, is returned to the bottle Main question: What is the number of small pills X m , n remaining when all large pills have been consumed? 22 / 25

  71. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (6,1) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

  72. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (5,2) 6/7 (6,1) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

  73. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (5,2) 6/7 2/7 (5,1) (6,1) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

  74. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (5,2) 6/7 2/7 (5,1) (6,1) 1/6 (5,0) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

  75. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (5,2) 6/7 2/7 (4,1) (5,1) (6,1) 1/6 5/5 (5,0) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

  76. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (5,2) 6/7 2/7 (4,1) (5,1) (6,1) 1/5 1/6 5/5 (4,0) (5,0) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

  77. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (5,2) 6/7 2/7 (4,1) (3,1) (5,1) (6,1) 1/5 1/6 4/4 5/5 (4,0) (5,0) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

  78. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (5,2) (2,2) 6/7 2/7 3/4 (4,1) (3,1) (5,1) (6,1) 1/5 1/6 4/4 5/5 (4,0) (5,0) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

  79. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (1,3) 2/3 (5,2) (2,2) 6/7 2/7 3/4 (4,1) (3,1) (5,1) (6,1) 1/5 1/6 4/4 5/5 (4,0) (5,0) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

  80. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (1,3) 2/3 3/4 (5,2) (2,2) (1,2) 6/7 2/7 3/4 (4,1) (3,1) (5,1) (6,1) 1/5 1/6 4/4 5/5 (4,0) (5,0) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

  81. PDEs and combinatorial problems Label patterns On-line selection Urn models P´ olya-Eggenberger urn models The pill’s problem: � − 1 0 � ball replacement matrix M = 1 − 1 absorbing states A = { (0 , n ) | n ∈ N 0 } start with 6 large pills and one small pill (1,3) 2/3 3/4 (5,2) (2,2) (1,2) 6/7 2/7 2/3 3/4 (4,1) (3,1) (5,1) (6,1) (1,1) 1/5 1/6 4/4 5/5 (4,0) (5,0) ⇒ The state (0 , 2) ∈ A is reached. 23 / 25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

An Exact Connection between two Solvable SDEs and a Non Linear Utility Stochastic PDEs Mohamed

An Exact Connection between two Solvable SDEs and a Non Linear Utility Stochastic PDEs Mohamed

An Exact Connection between two Solvable SDEs and a Non Linear Utility Stochastic PDEs Mohamed MRAD Joint work with Nicole El Karoui e Paris VI, Universit EcolePolytechnique, elkaroui@cmap.polytechnique.fr, mrad@cmap.polytechnique.fr

1.01k views • 21 slides
Turings Legacy Continues Solvable with Python Decidable Languages = Solvable with C = =

Turings Legacy Continues Solvable with Python Decidable Languages = Solvable with C = =

15-251: Great Theoretical Ideas in Computer Science Lecture 7 Turings Legacy Continues Solvable with Python Decidable Languages = Solvable with C = = Solvable with Java (decidable by Turing Machienes) = Solvable with SML P RIMALITY

688 views • 42 slides
Turings Legacy Continues Solvable with Python Decidable Languages = Solvable with C = =

Turings Legacy Continues Solvable with Python Decidable Languages = Solvable with C = =

15-251: Great Theoretical Ideas in Computer Science Lecture 6 Turings Legacy Continues Solvable with Python Decidable Languages = Solvable with C = = Solvable with Java (decidable by Turing Machienes) = Solvable with SML P RIMALITY

537 views • 49 slides
Parametric solvable polynomial rings and applications Heinz Kredel, University of Mannheim CASC

Parametric solvable polynomial rings and applications Heinz Kredel, University of Mannheim CASC

Parametric solvable polynomial rings and applications Heinz Kredel, University of Mannheim CASC 2015, Aachen Overview Introduction Solvable Polynomial Rings Parametric Solvable Polynomial Rings Solvable Quotient and Residue Class

1.55k views • 36 slides
AM 205: lecture 16 Last time: hyperbolic PDEs Today: parabolic and elliptic PDEs,

AM 205: lecture 16 Last time: hyperbolic PDEs Today: parabolic and elliptic PDEs,

AM 205: lecture 16 Last time: hyperbolic PDEs Today: parabolic and elliptic PDEs, introduction to optimization The -Method: Accuracy The truncation error analysis is fairly involved, hence we just give the result: u n +1 u n

657 views • 50 slides
Some useful tasks involving language Find all phone numbers in a text, e.g., occurrences such

Some useful tasks involving language Find all phone numbers in a text, e.g., occurrences such

Some useful tasks involving language Find all phone numbers in a text, e.g., occurrences such as Finite-State Machines and Regular Languages When you call (614) 292-8833, you reach the fax machine. Find multiple adjacent occurrences of the

83 views • 4 slides
Common Divisors of Solvable Polynomials in JAS Heinz Kredel, University of Mannheim ICMS 2016,

Common Divisors of Solvable Polynomials in JAS Heinz Kredel, University of Mannheim ICMS 2016,

Common Divisors of Solvable Polynomials in JAS Heinz Kredel, University of Mannheim ICMS 2016, Berlin Overview Introduction Example Solvable Polynomial Rings Parametric Solvable Polynomial Rings Generic Common Divisors

695 views • 25 slides
Occurrences and Researches of Harmful Algal Blooms in China in Recent Years LU Songhui Research

Occurrences and Researches of Harmful Algal Blooms in China in Recent Years LU Songhui Research

WESTPAC HAB Workshop 2016, Nha Trong Occurrences and Researches of Harmful Algal Blooms in China in Recent Years LU Songhui Research Center for Harmful Algae and Marine Biology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China Outline 1. Occurrences of

499 views • 34 slides
Introduction: Combinatorial Problems Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Enric Rodr

Introduction: Combinatorial Problems Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Enric Rodr

Introduction: Combinatorial Problems Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Enric Rodr guez-Carbonell February 11, 2020 Combinatorial Problems A combinatorial problem consists in finding, among a finite set of objects, one that

402 views • 18 slides
AM 205: lecture 16 Last time: hyperbolic PDEs Today: parabolic and elliptic PDEs,

AM 205: lecture 16 Last time: hyperbolic PDEs Today: parabolic and elliptic PDEs,

AM 205: lecture 16 Last time: hyperbolic PDEs Today: parabolic and elliptic PDEs, introduction to optimization The Wave Equation We now briefly return to the wave equation: u tt c 2 u xx = 0 In one spatial dimension, this models,

608 views • 60 slides
Math 283, Spring 2006, Prof. Tesler May 22, 2006 Markov chains and the number of occurrences

Math 283, Spring 2006, Prof. Tesler May 22, 2006 Markov chains and the number of occurrences

Math 283, Spring 2006, Prof. Tesler May 22, 2006 Markov chains and the number of occurrences of a word in a sequence (Chapter 4.54.9; 11.1,2,4,6) 1. Finite state machine for counting occurrences of a word or motif We revisit the problem of

480 views • 22 slides
UNSAFE PORTS: abnormal occurrences and the insurance solution. David Pitlarge Partner Marine,

UNSAFE PORTS: abnormal occurrences and the insurance solution. David Pitlarge Partner Marine,

UNSAFE PORTS: abnormal occurrences and the insurance solution. David Pitlarge Partner Marine, Trade &amp; Energy Hill Dickinson LLP Unsafe Ports: abnormal occurrences Basic warranty Practical terms types of dispute

466 views • 19 slides
TI : . Great Theorem ::: ' :::i::i:::::::i ( solvable group

TI : . Great Theorem ::: ' :::i::i:::::::i ( solvable group

Applications . of Galois Proof ' TI : . Great Theorem ::: ' :::i::i:::::::i ( solvable group ) Deth and Hit YA ; cyclic is His Hit , fer all . so that Osian RESULT ! BIG

594 views • 17 slides
On some applied problems using nonlinear elliptic PDEs C. Finlay Department of Mathematics and

On some applied problems using nonlinear elliptic PDEs C. Finlay Department of Mathematics and

On some applied problems using nonlinear elliptic PDEs C. Finlay Department of Mathematics and Statistics McGill University September 12, 2019 1. Background Where do nonlinear elliptic PDEs arise? Elliptic PDEs appear in many areas of

658 views • 22 slides
Special geometry Simon G. Chiossi Special geometry with solvable Lie groups Lie groups

Special geometry Simon G. Chiossi Special geometry with solvable Lie groups Lie groups

Special geometry with solvable Lie groups Special geometry Simon G. Chiossi Special geometry with solvable Lie groups Lie groups actions Six dimensions Seven dimensions Nilpotent/Solvable Lie groups Nilmanifolds Holonomy Groups and

582 views • 36 slides
20.1 Combinatorial Optimization next chapters: combinatorial optimization similar scenario,

20.1 Combinatorial Optimization next chapters: combinatorial optimization similar scenario,

Foundations of Artificial Intelligence April 1, 2019 20. Combinatorial Optimization: Introduction and Hill-Climbing Foundations of Artificial Intelligence 20.1 Combinatorial Optimization 20. Combinatorial Optimization: Introduction and

491 views • 7 slides
On a storage process for fluid networks with multiple L evy input Krzysztof D ebicki

On a storage process for fluid networks with multiple L evy input Krzysztof D ebicki

On a storage process for fluid networks with multiple L evy input Krzysztof D ebicki University of Wroc law, Poland Presentation at EVA 2005 Gothenburg, Sweden August, 2005 1 Outline of the talk Two-node tandem network

652 views • 14 slides
Grafting Coordinates for Teichm uller Space October 2006 David Dumas (ddumas@math.brown.edu)

Grafting Coordinates for Teichm uller Space October 2006 David Dumas (ddumas@math.brown.edu)

Grafting Coordinates for Teichm uller Space October 2006 David Dumas (ddumas@math.brown.edu) http://www.math.brown.edu/ddumas/ (Joint work with Mike Wolf) 2 Grafting Start with X , a closed hyperbolic surface, and , a simple

338 views • 13 slides
CS 170 Section 1 Divide-and-Conquer Owen Jow | owenjow@berkeley.edu Agenda Introduction

CS 170 Section 1 Divide-and-Conquer Owen Jow | owenjow@berkeley.edu Agenda Introduction

CS 170 Section 1 Divide-and-Conquer Owen Jow | owenjow@berkeley.edu Agenda Introduction Asymptotics review Divide-and-conquer Master theorem Complex numbers Introduction About Me Owen Jow

559 views • 25 slides
Distributed localization of networked cameras Stanislav Funiak Carlos Guestrin Mark Paskin

Distributed localization of networked cameras Stanislav Funiak Carlos Guestrin Mark Paskin

Distributed localization of networked cameras Stanislav Funiak Carlos Guestrin Mark Paskin Rahul Sukthankar Carnegie Mellon University Stanford University Intel Research IPSN 2006 presentation, April 19, 2006 1 Distributed Localization

429 views • 29 slides
The role of directories in Single Sign on Systems Victoriano Giralt Central Computing Facility

The role of directories in Single Sign on Systems Victoriano Giralt Central Computing Facility

The Dark Ages The Enlightenment The Industrial Revolution The XXI century Summary The role of directories in Single Sign on Systems Victoriano Giralt Central Computing Facility University of Malaga TERENA EuroCAMP Ljubljana April 3rd

1.39k views • 105 slides
Models of language Evolution Session 09: Evolution of Pragmatic Strategies Roland M uhlenbernd

Models of language Evolution Session 09: Evolution of Pragmatic Strategies Roland M uhlenbernd

S IGNALING G AME B EHAVIOURAL S TRATEGIES &amp; U PDATE D YNAMICS M ODELING PRAGMATIC PHENOMENA Models of language Evolution Session 09: Evolution of Pragmatic Strategies Roland M uhlenbernd University of T ubingen S IGNALING G AME B

361 views • 32 slides
A line-breaking construction of the stable trees Christina Goldschmidt (Oxford) Joint work with

A line-breaking construction of the stable trees Christina Goldschmidt (Oxford) Joint work with

AofA15, Strobl, Austria, 8-12 June 2015 A line-breaking construction of the stable trees Christina Goldschmidt (Oxford) Joint work with B en edicte Haas (Paris-Dauphine) Uniform random trees Let T n be the set of unordered trees on n

1.91k views • 156 slides
31. Generic Refactoring for Programming and Modeling Languages Jan Reimann, Mirko Seifert, Prof.

31. Generic Refactoring for Programming and Modeling Languages Jan Reimann, Mirko Seifert, Prof.

Technical University Dresden Department of Computer Science Chair for Software Technology 31. Generic Refactoring for Programming and Modeling Languages Jan Reimann, Mirko Seifert, Prof. Uwe Amann 1. 1. Fro rom C Code to to Mo Models ls

382 views • 14 slides

More recommend