Object vision (Chapter 4) Lecture 8 Jonathan Pillow Sensation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

object vision chapter 4
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Object vision (Chapter 4) Lecture 8 Jonathan Pillow Sensation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Object vision (Chapter 4) Lecture 8 Jonathan Pillow Sensation & Perception (PSY 345 / NEU 325) Princeton University, Spring 2015 1 Outline for today: adaptation Chap 3: intro to object vision Chap 4: gestalt rules models


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Object vision (Chapter 4)

Lecture 8 Jonathan Pillow Sensation & Perception (PSY 345 / NEU 325) Princeton University, Spring 2015

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline for today:

  • adaptation
  • intro to object vision
  • gestalt rules
  • models & principles of object recognition

Chap 3: Chap 4:

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Adaptation

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

“tilt after-effect”

Adaptation: the Psychologist’s Electrode

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

“tilt after-effect”

  • perceptual illusion of

tilt, provided by adapting to a pattern

  • f a given orientation
  • supports idea that the

human visual system contains individual neurons selective for different orientations

Adaptation: the Psychologist’s Electrode

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Adaptation: the Psychologist’s Electrode

Adaptation: the diminishing response of a sense organ to a sustained stimulus

  • An important method for deactivating groups of

neurons without surgery

  • Allows selective temporary “knock out” of group of

neurons by activating them strongly

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Effects of adaptation on population response and perception

Stimulus presented = Before Adaptation unadapted population resp to 0 deg 0 degree stimulus

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Effects of adaptation on population response and perception

Stimulus presented = Then adapt to 20º Before Adaptation unadapted population resp to 0 deg

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Selective adaptation alters neural responses and perception

Stimulus presented = After Adaptation perceptual effect of adaptation is repulsion away from the adapter

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Selective adaptation for spatial frequency: Evidence that human visual system contains neurons selective for spatial frequency

Selective Adaptation: The Psychologist’s Electrode

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Adaptation that is specific to spatial frequency (SF)

  • 1. adapt
  • 2. test
  • 3. percept

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Adaptation that is specific to spatial frequency (SF)

  • 1. adapt
  • 2. test
  • 3. percept

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Adaptation that is specific to spatial frequency (SF)

  • 1. adapt
  • 2. test
  • 3. percept

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Adaptation that is specific to spatial frequency AND orientation

  • 1. adapt
  • 2. test
  • 3. No adaptive percept

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Adaptation that is specific to spatial frequency AND orientation

  • 1. adapt
  • 2. test
  • 3. No adaptive percept

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Adaptation that is specific to spatial frequency AND orientation

  • 1. adapt
  • 2. test
  • 3. No adaptive percept

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Orthodox viewpoint:

  • If you can observe a particular type of adaptive after-effect,

there is a certain neuron in the brain that is selective (or tuned) for that property

Selective Adaptation: The Psychologist’s Electrode

THUS (for example): There are no neurons tuned for spatial frequency across all

  • rientations, because adaptation is orientation specific.

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Selective Adaptation: The Psychologist’s Electrode

width of “channels” that contribute to contrast sensitivity

adapting spatial freq

contrast sensitivity after adaptation to a sine wave with a frequency

  • f 7 cycles/degree.

threshold increases near the adapted frequency

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Selective Adaptation: The Psychologist’s Electrode

adapting spatial freq

Therefore:

  • adaptation reveals separate channels devoted to orientation

and spatial frequencies

  • width of adaptive effect reveals the width of the channel

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Summary (Chapter 3B)

  • spatial frequency sensitivity & tuning
  • V1 receptive fields, orientation tuning
  • Hubel & Weisel experiments
  • simple vs. complex cells
  • cortical magnification
  • cortical columns
  • adaptation

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Perceiving and Recognizing Objects

4

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Introduction What do you see?

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Introduction What do you see?

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Introduction What do you see?

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Introduction

How did you recognize that all 3 images were of houses? How did you know that the 1st and 3rd images showed the same house? This is the problem of object recognition, which is solved in visual areas beyond V1.

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

house-detector receptive field?

Unfortunately, we still have no idea how to solve this problem. Not easy to see how to make Receptive Fields for houses the way we combined LGN receptive fields to make V1 receptive fields!

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

house-detector receptive field?

And how does it represent that it’s the same house from different directions?

Ok for detecting a single “stick figure” house. But this receptive field would never work: needs to recognize houses from different angles, sizes, colors, etc.

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Viewpoint Dependence View-dependent model - a model that will only recognize particular views of an object

  • template-based model

e.g. Problem: need a neuron (or “template”) for every possible view of the object

  • quickly run out of neurons!

“house” template

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Van Essen’s Diagram of the Visual Pathway not to scale! We still have (mostly) no idea what’s going on here.

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Middle Vision Middle vision: – after basic features have been extracted and before

  • bject recognition and scene understanding
  • Involves perception of edges and surfaces
  • Determines which regions of an image should be

grouped together into objects

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Finding edges

  • How do you find the edges of objects?
  • Cells in primary visual cortex have small

receptive fields

  • How do you know which edges go

together and which ones don’t?

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Middle Vision Computer-based edge detectors are not as good as humans

  • Sometimes computers find too many edges
  • “Edge detection” is another theory (along with Fourier analysis!)
  • f what

V1 does.

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Middle Vision Computer-based edge detectors are not as good as humans

  • Sometimes computers find too few edges

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Figure 4.5 This “house” outline is constructed from illusory contours

“Kanizsa Figure” illusory contour: a contour that is perceived even though nothing changes from one side of the contour to the other in the image

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Gestalt Principles

  • Gestalt: In German, “form” or “whole”
  • Gestalt psychology: “The whole is greater than the sum
  • f its parts.”
  • Opposed to other schools of thought (e.g., structuralism)

that emphasize the basic elements of perception structuralists:

  • perception is built up from “atoms” of

sensation (color, orientation)

  • challenged by cases where perception

seems to go beyond the information available (eg, illusory contours)

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Gestalt Principles

Gestalt grouping rules: a set of rules that describe when elements in an image will appear to group together

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Gestalt Principles Good continuation: A Gestalt grouping rule stating that two elements will tend to group together if they lie on the same contour

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Gestalt Principles Good continuation: A Gestalt grouping rule stating that two elements will tend to group together if they lie on the same contour

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Gestalt Principles Gestalt grouping principles: § Similarity § Proximity

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Dynamic grouping principles § Common fate: Elements that move in the same direction tend to group together § Synchrony: Elements that change at the same time tend to group together (See online demonstration: book website) Gestalt Principles http://sites.sinauer.com/wolfe4e/wa04.01.html

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Figure/Ground Segregation: Face/Vase Illusion “ambiguous figure”

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Gestalt figure–ground assignment principles:

  • Surroundedness: The surrounding region is likely

to be ground

  • Size: The smaller region is likely to be figure
  • Symmetry: A symmetrical region tends to be seen

as figure

  • Parallelism: Regions with parallel contours tend to

be seen as figure

  • Extremal edges: If edges of an object are shaded

such that they seem to recede in the distance, they tend to be seen as figure Gestalt Principles

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

pandemonium model

  • Oliver Selfridge’s (1959) simple model of letter

recognition

  • Perceptual committee made up of “demons”
  • Demons loosely represent neurons
  • Each level is a different brain area
  • Pandemonium simulation:

http://sites.sinauer.com/wolfe4e/wa04.02.html

Models of Object Recognition

Models of Object Recognition

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Models of Object Recognition

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Models of Object Recognition

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Models of Object Recognition

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47
  • Hierarchical “constructive” models of perception:
  • Explicit description of how parts are combined to

form representation of a whole

Models of Object Recognition

Metaphor: “committees” forming consensus from a group of specialized members

  • perception results from the consensus that emerges

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Accidental Viewpoints

  • Accidental viewpoint: produces some regularity in the

visual image that is not present in the world

  • Perceptual system will not adopt interpretations that assume

an accidental viewpoint.

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Accidental Viewpoints

  • Accidental viewpoint: produces some regularity in the

visual image that is not present in the world

  • Perceptual system will not adopt interpretations that assume

an accidental viewpoint.

  • Belivable 3-d figure:

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Accidental Viewpoints

  • Unbelievable figure

You could build a 3D

  • bject that would lead to

this 2D image, but would need to take the picture from a very specific viewpoint

(Another example of an “ambiguous figure”)

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Impossible triangle (Perth, Australia)

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Impossible triangle (Perth, Australia)

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Accidental Viewpoints in art

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Accidental Viewpoints in art

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Accidental Viewpoints in art

55

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Accidental Viewpoints in art

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Accidental Viewpoints in art

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59