Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L evy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L evy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L evy risk model Hailiang Yang Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science The University of Hong Kong Based on a paper with Zhimin Zhang Tokyo, September 2013 Hailiang Yang


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

Hailiang Yang

Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science The University of Hong Kong Based on a paper with Zhimin Zhang

Tokyo, September 2013

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Ruin theory: a few words about the history

◮ Lundberg, F. (1903). Approximerad Framstallning av

Sannolikhetsfunktionen

◮ Cram´

er H. (1930). On the Mathematical Theory of Risk

◮ Cram´

er, H. (1955). Collective risk theory: A survey of the theory from the point of view of the theory of stochastic process

◮ Gerber, H. U. and Shiu, E. S. W. (1998). On the time value

  • f ruin

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Ruin theory: a few words about the literature

◮ Harald Cram´

er (1969) stated that Filip Lundberg’s works on risk theory were all written at a time when no general theory

  • f stochastic processes existed, and when collective

reinsurance methods, in the present day sense of the word, were entirely unknown to insurance companies. In both respects his ideas were far ahead of his time, and his works deserve to be generally recognized as pioneering works of fundamental importance.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-4
SLIDE 4

◮ The Lundberg inequality is one of the most important results

in risk theory. Lundberg’s work was not rigorous in terms of mathematical treatment. Cram´ er (1930, 1955) provided a rigorous mathematical proof of the Lundberg ineqality. Nowadays, popularly used methods in ruin theory are renewal theory and the martingale method. The former emerged from the work of Feller (1968, 1971) and the latter came from that

  • f Gerber (1973, 1979).

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why insurance companies do not use the results from ruin theory

◮ Answer: The models in ruin theory are too simple or do not fit

the real data

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Classical insurance risk models

U(t) = u + c· t − S(t), where S(t) =

N(t)

i=1

Xi, N(t) Poisson process, Xi i.i.d sequence.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Study of ruin probability

◮ Closed formula ◮ Upper bound ◮ Asymptotic results

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Other ruin quantities

◮ Surplus before and after ruin ◮ Gerber-Shiu function ◮ ...

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Highlights of this paper

◮ Propose a nonparametric estimator of ruin probability in a

L´ evy risk model

◮ The aggregate claims process X = {Xt, ≥ 0} is modeled by a

pure-jump L´ evy process

◮ Assume that high-frequency observed data on X is available ◮ The estimator is constructed based on Pollaczeck-Khinchine

formula and Fourier transform

◮ Risk bounds as well as a data-driven model selection

methodology are presented

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Some related references

◮ Croux, K., Vervaerbeke, N. (1990). Nonparametric estimators

for the probability of ruin. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 9, 127-130.

◮ Frees, E. W. (1986). Nonparametric estimation of the

probability of ruin. ASTIN Bulletin 16, 81-90.

◮ Hipp, C. (1989). Estimators and bootstrap confidence

intervals for ruin probabilities. ASTIN Bulletin 19, 57-70.

◮ Politis, K. (2003). Semiparametric estimation for non-ruin

  • Probabilities. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2003(1), 75-96.

◮ Yasutaka S. (2012). Non-parametric estimation of the

Gerber-Shiu function for the Wiener-Poisson risk model. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2012 (1) 56-69.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Our model of surplus

Ut = u + ct − Xt, where u ≥ 0 is the initial surplus, c > 0 is the constant premium

  • rate. Here the aggregate claims process X = {Xt, t ≥ 0} with

X0 = 0 is a pure-jump L´ evy process with characteristic function ϕXt(ω) = E[exp(iωXt)] = exp ( t ∫

(0,∞)

(eiωx − 1)ν(dx) ) , where ν is the L´ evy measure on (0, ∞) satisfying the condition µ1 := ∫

(0,∞) xν(dx) < ∞.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ruin probability

The ruin probability is defined by ψ(u) = P ( inf

0≤t<∞ Ut < 0|U0 = u

) . Assumption The safety loading condition holds, i.e. c > µ1.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Some notation

Let L1 and L2 denote the class of functions that are absolute integrable and square integrable, respectively. For a L1 integrable function g we denote its Fourier transform by ϕg(ω) = ∫ eiωxg(x)dx. For a random variable Y we denote its characteristic function by ϕY (ω). Note that under some mild integrable conditions Fourier inversion transform gives g(x) = 1 2π ∫ e−iωxϕg(ω)dω.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Pollaczeck-Khinchine formula

Let H(x) = 1 µ1 ∫ x ν(y, ∞)dy with density h(x) = ν(x, ∞)/µ1. Then the Pollaczeck-Khinchine type formula for ruin probability is given by ψ(u) = 1 − (1 − ρ)

j=0

ρjHj∗(u) = ρ − (1 − ρ)

j=1

ρj ∫ u hj∗(y)dy = ρ − (1 − ρ) ∫ u χ(x)dx, where ρ = µ1/c, χ(x) = ∑∞

j=1 ρjhj∗(x).

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The convolutions are defined as Hj∗(x) = ∫ x H(j−1)∗(x−y)H(dy), hj∗(x) = ∫ x h(j−1)∗(x−y)h(y)dy with H1∗(x) = H(x) and h1∗(x) = h(x).

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Estimate the parameter ρ

Suppose that the process X can be observed at a sequence of discrete time points {k∆, k = 1, 2, . . .} with ∆ > 0 being the sampling interval. Let Zk = Z ∆

k = Xk∆ − X(k−1)∆,

k = 1, 2, . . . , n. Assumed that the sampling interval ∆ = ∆n tends to zero as n tends to infinity. An unbiased estimator for ρ is given by ˆ ρ = 1 cn∆

n

k=1

Zk. (1)

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Estimate the function χ(x)

By integration by parts ϕh(ω) = 1 µ1 A(ω), where A(ω) = ∫ ∞ eiωxν(x, ∞)dx = ∫ ∞ eiωx − 1 iω ν(dx) is the Fourier transform of ν(x, ∞).

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Standard property of Fourier transform implies that ϕχ(ω) = ∫ eiωx

j=1

ρjhj∗(x)dx =

j=1

ρj (ϕh(ω))j = A(ω) c − A(ω). Thus, Fourier inversion transform gives the following alternative representation for χ(x), χ(x) = 1 2π ∫ e−iωx A(ω) c − A(ω)dω. (2)

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Remark

The denominator c − A(ω) is bounded away from zero because by |eiωx − 1| ≤ |ωx| we have |c − A(ω)| ≥ c − ∫ ∞

  • eiωx − 1

  • ν(dx) ≥ c − µ1 > 0

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-20
SLIDE 20

In order to obtain an estimator for χ(x) we can first estimate A(ω). Note that {Zk} are i.i.d. with common characteristic function ϕZ(ω) = exp ( ∆ ∫ ∞ ( eiωx − 1 ) ν(dx) ) . By inverting the above characteristic function we obtain ∫ ∞ (eiωx − 1)ν(dx) = 1 ∆Log (ϕZ(ω)) , where Log denotes the distinguished logarithm

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Using the fact that A(ω) = 1

∆ Log(φZ (ω)) iω

, we know that a plausible estimator is 1 ∆ Log(ˆ ϕZ(ω)) iω , where ˆ ϕZ(ω) = 1

n

∑n

k=1 eiωZk is the empirical characteristic

function.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-22
SLIDE 22

However, on the one hand, the distinguished logarithm in the above formula is not well defined unless ˆ ϕZ(ω) never vanishes; on the other hand, it is not preferable to deal with logarithm for numerical calculation. In order to overcome this drawback, we follow a different approach.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Write A(ω) in the following form, A(ω) = ϕZ(ω) − 1 iω∆ + 1 iω∆ [Log(ϕZ(ω)) − (ϕZ(ω) − 1)] . Using the inequality |eiωx − 1| ≤ |ωx|, we have |ϕZ(ω) − 1| ≤ |ω|∆µ1. Together with the inequality |Log(1 + z) − z| ≤ |z|2 for |z| < 1

2, we obtain

|Log(ϕZ(ω)) − (ϕZ(ω) − 1)| ≤ (ω∆µ1)2, (3) provided that ∆|ω| is small enough.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-24
SLIDE 24

If ∆|ω| → 0, [Log(ϕZ(ω)) − (ϕZ(ω) − 1)]/(iω∆) can be neglected, i.e. A(ω) ≈ ϕZ(ω) − 1 iω∆ . Hence, we propose the following estimator for A(ω), ˆ A(ω) = ˆ ϕZ(ω) − 1 iω∆ , (4) where for ω = 0 (4) is interpreted as the limit ˆ A(0) :=

1 n∆

∑n

k=1 Zk.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Write En(ω) = {|c − ˆ A(ω)| ≥ (n∆)− 1

2 }. Replacing A(ω) in (2.3)

by ˆ A(ω) gives the following estimator ˆ χ(x) = 1 2π ∫ e−iωx ˆ A(ω) c − ˆ A(ω) 1En(ω)dω, (5) where the indicator function 1En(ω) is used to guarantee that the denominator is bounded away from zero.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-26
SLIDE 26

A cut-off modification of estimator of χ: ˆ χm(x) = 1 2π ∫ mπ

−mπ

e−iωx ˆ A(ω) c − ˆ A(ω) 1En(ω)dω, (6) where m is a positive cur-off parameter.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Estimator for ruin probability

ˆ ψm(u) = ˆ ρ − (1 − ˆ ρ) ∫ u ˆ χm(x)dx (7) = ˆ ρ − 1 − ˆ ρ 2π ∫ mπ

−mπ

1 − e−iωu iω ˆ A(ω) c − ˆ A(ω) 1En(ω)dω, where the second step follows from Fubini’s theorem.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Risk bounds

For v ∈ L1 ∩ L2 let ∥ v ∥2= ∫ |v(x)|2dx. Under some assumptions and assume that ∆ → 0, m∆ → 0 and n∆ → ∞, then E∥ˆ χm − χ∥2 = O ( m(n∆)−1 + m−2a) . In particular, when m = O((n∆)

1 2a+1 ) and n∆2a+2 → 0, we have

E∥ˆ χm − χ∥2 = O ( (n∆)−

2a 2a+1

) .

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Model selection

We know that the estimator depends heavily on the cut-off parameter m. We propose a data-driven strategy to choose m. We select adaptively the parameter m as follows: ˆ m∗ = arg min

m∈{1,2,...,mn}{γn(ˆ

χm) + pen∗(m)}. (8)

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-30
SLIDE 30

where γn(v) = ||v − ˆ χm||2 − ||ˆ χm||2, and pen∗(m) = 96c2 1/n∆ ∑n

j=1 Z 2 j

(c − 1/n∆ ∑n

j=1 Zj)4

m n∆, if |c − 1/n∆ ∑n

j=1 Zj| ≥ ϵn, and

pen∗(m) = m n∆, if |c − 1/n∆ ∑n

j=1 Zj| < ϵn.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Simulation studies

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 u

Figure: Estimation of the ruin probability in the compound Poisson risk model with exponential claim sizes. True ruin probability (blue line) and 20 estimated curves ( red lines). Sample size n = 1000, sampling interval ∆ = 0.01.

Hailiang Yang hlyang@hku.hk Nonparametric estimate of the ruin probability in a pure-jump L´ evy risk model