non abelian discrete symmetries in string f theory
play

(Non-) Abelian Discrete Symmetries in String (F-) Theory Mirjam - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Geometry and Physics of F-theory 2017 ICTP, Trieste, February 27-March 2, 2017 (Non-) Abelian Discrete Symmetries in String (F-) Theory Mirjam Cveti Outline (Summary) Progress report since F-theory16, Caltech I. Abelian discrete gauge


  1. Geometry and Physics of F-theory 2017 ICTP, Trieste, February 27-March 2, 2017 (Non-) Abelian Discrete Symmetries in String (F-) Theory Mirjam Cveti č

  2. Outline (Summary) Progress report since F-theory’16, Caltech I. Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in F-theory multi-sections &Tate-Shafarevich group – highlight Z 3 highlight Heterotic duality and Mirror symmetry II. Non-Abelian discrete gauge symmetries in F-theory relatively unexplored stoop down to weakly coupled regime Non-Abelian discrete symmetries in Type IIB String Explicit construction of CY-threefold, resulting in a four-dimensional Heisenberg-type discrete symmetry

  3. Abelian discrete symmetries in Heterotic/F-theory M.C., A. Grassi and M. Poretschkin, ``Discrete Symmetries in Heterotic/F-theory Duality and Mirror Symmetry,’’arXiv:1607.03176 [hep-th] Non-Abelian discrete symmetries in Type IIB string V. Braun, M.C., R. Donagi and M.Poretschkin, ``Type II String Theory on Calabi-YauManifolds with Torsion and Non-Abelian Discrete Gauge Symmetries,’’ arXiv:1702.08071 [hep-th]

  4. Abelian Discrete Symmetries in F-theory Calabi-Yau geometries with genus-one fibrations These geometries do not admit a section, but a multi-section Earlier work: [Witten; deBoer, Dijkgraaf, Hori, Keurentjes, Morgan, Morrison, Sethi;…] Recent extensive efforts ’14-’16: [Braun, Morrison; Morrison, Taylor; Klevers, Mayorga-Pena, Oehlmann, Piragua, Reuter; Anderson,Garcia-Etxebarria, Grimm; Braun, Grimm, Keitel; Mayrhofer, Palti, Till, Weigand; M.C., Donagi, Klevers, Piragua, Poretschkin; Grimm, Pugh, Regalado; M.C., Grassi, Poretschkin;…] Key features: Higgsing models w/U(1), charge-n < F > ≠ 0 − conifold transition Geometries with n-section Tate-Shafarevich Group Z n Z 2 [Anderson,Garcia-Etxebarria, Grimm; Braun, Grimm, Keitel; Mayrhofer, Palti, Till, Weigand’14] Z 3 [M.C.,Donagi,Klevers,Piragua,Poretschkin 1502.06953]

  5. Tate-Shafarevich group and Z 3 [M.C., Donagi, Klevers, Piragua, Poretschkin 1502.06953 ] Only two geometries: X 1 w/ trisection and Jacobian J(X 1 ) X 1 with tri-section (cubic in P 2 ) Jacobian x P J(X) Jacobian X 1 with tri-section There are three different elements of TS group! (cubic in P 2 ) Shown to be in one-to-one correspondence with three M-theory vacua.

  6. Discrete Symmetries & Heterotic/F-theory Duality [ Morrison,Vafa ‘96; Friedman,Morgan,Witten ’97] Basic Duality (8D): Manifest in stable degeneration limit: K3 surface X splits into Heterotic E 8 x E 8 String on T 2 two half-K3 surfaces X + and X - dual to X − X F-Theory on elliptically fibered X + K3 surface X x Dictionary: X + and X - à background bundles V 1 and V 2 • • Heterotic gauge group G = G 1 x G 2 G i = [E 8 ,V i ] P 1 K3-fibration over • The Heterotic geometry T 2 : at intersection of X + and X - (moduli)

  7. Heterotic/F-theory Duality [Morrison, Vafa ’96], [Berglund, Mayr ’98] Employ toric geometry techniques in 8D/6D to study stable degeneration limit of F-theory Toric polytope: Dual polytope: specifies the ambient specifies the elements of O( -K X ) - space X monomials in ambient space 6D: fiber this construction over another P 1 Study: U(1)’s [M.C., Grassi, Klevers, Poretschkin, Song 1511.08208] at F-theory’16, Caltech Discrete symmetries [M.C., Grassi, Poretschkin 1607.03176] highlights here

  8. Discrete Symmetry in Heterotic/F-theory Duality [M.C., Grassi, Poretschkin 1607 .03176] Goal: Trace the origin of discrete symmetry D for P 2 (1,2,3) fibration • Conjecture [Berglund, Mayr ’98] X 2 elliptically fibered, toric K3 with singularities (gauge groups) of type G 1 in X + and G 2 in X - its mirror dual Y 2 with singularities (gauge groups) of type H 1 in X + and H 2 in X - with H i =[E 8 , G i ] • Employ the conjecture to construct background bundles with structure group G where D=[E 8 , G] beyond P 2 (1,2,3) • Explore ``symmetric’’ stable degeneration with G 1 =G 2 à symmetric appearance of discrete symmetry D

  9. Example with Z 2 symmetry Dual polytope: Polytope: (monominals of the ambient space) . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - gauge symmetry ) 2 - gauge symmetry 8D: ( 2) ) / Z 2 ) y (( E 7 × SU(2) ) / Z 2 ) . . . . . . . . . . . 2 - vector bundle ( ) 2 - vector bundle bient space P (1 , 1 , 2) . . . . . . . . . y (( E 7 × SU(2) ) / Z 2 ) 2) ) / Z 2 ) bient space P (1 , 1 , 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6D : - gauge symmetry - gauge symmetry 2) ) / Z 2 ) y (( E 7 × SU(2) ) / Z 2 ) bient space P (1 , 1 , 2) . . . . . . . . . Field theory: Higgsing symmetric U(1) model: only one (symm. comb.) U(1)-massless à only one Z 2 -``massless’’

  10. Example with Z 3 symmetry Dual polytope: Polytope: ularities - gauge symmetry 6D : ( E 6 × E 6 × SU (3)) / Z 3 - gauge symmetry als Z 3 . These examples demonstrate: toric CY’s with MW torsion of order-n, via Heterotic duality related to mirror dual toric CY’s with n-section. Related: [Klevers, Peña, Piragua, Oehlmann, Reuter ‘14]

  11. Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries – less understood F-theory - limited exploration [Grimm, Pugh,Regalado ’15], c.f., T. Grimm’s talk [M.C., Lawrie, Lin, work in progress] [M.C., Donagi, Lin, work progress] stoop down to weak coupling Type II string compactification Important progress in these directions builds on the work [Camara, Ibanez, Marchesano ’11] Abelian discrete gauge symmetries realized on Calabi-Yau threefolds with torsion. Non-Abelian Heisenberg-type discrete symmetries realized on Calabi-Yau threefolds with torsion classes that have specific non-trivial cup-products. [Berasaluce-Gonzales, Camara, Marchesano, Regalado, Uranga ’12]

  12. Calabi-Yau threefold X 6 withTorsion Torsion ( H 5 ( X 6 , Z )) Torsion ( H 2 ( X 6 , Z )) Z )) = Z k , ' example Torsion ( H 4 ( X 6 , Z )) Torsion ( H 3 ( X 6 , Z )) Z )) = Z k 0 ' [Camara, Ibanez, Marchesano ’11] w/ Let ρ 2 , β 3 , ˜ ω 4 , and ζ 5 represent the generators of the torsion cohomologies orsion Z , Torsion Z , Torsion and Torsion Z = d ˜ ρ 4 = k ζ 5 , d γ 1 k ρ 2 , k − 1 and k ′ − 1 torsion linking numbers k 0 ˜ d ω 2 = k 0 β 3 , = d α 3 ω 4 , (consequence of re γ 1 , ω 2 , α 3 and ˜ ρ 4 are non-closed forms satisfying: expressions for torsion ectively, and they satisfy: linking numbers) Z Z Z Z γ 1 ^ ζ 5 = ρ 2 ^ ˜ ρ 4 = α 3 ^ β 3 = ω 2 ^ ˜ ω 4 = 1 X 6 X 6 X 6 X 6 Upon Type IIB KK reduction of C 2 , B 2 , C 4 gauge potentials on X 6 � G ij η i µ η µ j à Z k x Z k’ discrete symmetry, realized in the Stückelberg mass [Berasaluce-Gonzales, Camara, Marchesano, Regalado, Uranga ’12] When: , M non-vanishing ρ 2 ^ ρ 2 = M ˜ ω 4 , M 2 Z Upon KK reduction, Heisenberg discrete symmetry specified by k, k’, M: ∂ µ b i � k A i η i = i = 1 , 2 , µ , � G ij η i µ η µ j w/ µ ∂ µ b 3 � k 0 A 3 µ � Mb 2 ( ∂ µ b 1 � k A 1 η 3 = µ ) µ

  13. Calabi-Yau threefold X 6 withTorsion Torsion ( H 5 ( X 6 , Z )) Torsion ( H 2 ( X 6 , Z )) Z )) = Z k 1 ⇥ Z k 2 , ' another example Torsion ( H 4 ( X 6 , Z )) Torsion ( H 3 ( X 6 , Z )) Z )) = Z k 3 , ' When: , w/ M non-vanishing ρ 2 ^ ρ 2 = M ˜ ω 4 , M 2 Z à Heisenberg discrete symmetry specified by k 1 , k 2 , k 3 and M: ∂ µ b 2 ( i ) � τ∂ µ b 1 A 2 µ ( i ) � τ A 1 � � = ( i ) + k i , i = 1 , 2 η µ ( i ) � G IJ ∗ η I µ η µ J ∗ µ ( i ) w/ ∂ µ b 3 + k 3 A 3 η 3 b 2 (1) � τ b 1 k 2 A 1 � � = µ � M µ (2) . (1) µ , which take th and τ = C 0 +ie − φ deno [Grimm, Pugh, Regalado ’15] This structure resul Dilaton-axion coupling

  14. Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetry in Type IIB Requires the study of Calabi-Yau threefolds with torsion by determining torsion cohomology groups and their cup-products à technically challenging Choose a specific Calabi-Yau threefold X 6 : free quotient of T 6 by a fixed point free action of Z 2 × Z 2 : [part of a general classification [ Donagi, Wendland’09 ]] � z 0 + 1 � g 1 : ( z 0 , z 1 , z 2 ) 7! 2 , � z 1 , � z 2 , � � z 0 , z 1 + 1 2 , � z 2 + 1 � g 2 : ( z 0 , z 1 , z 2 ) 7! st known example of 2 =x i + 𝜐 i y i C / ( Z + τ i Z ) 3 z i , action of the group i=0,1, 2

  15. Computation of cup-products: Strategy: relate X 6 to a submanifold Y 0 : Y 0 , ! X, ( x 0 , x 1 , x 2 , y 0 ) 7! ( x 0 + ⌧ 0 y 0 , x 1 , x 2 ) , z i =x i + 𝜐 i y i four-dimensional sub-torus quotient, invariant under Z 2 × Z 2 . Cup-products in Y 0 could be done explicitly by hand, but obtained as part of a computational scheme (cellular model à co-chains of cubical cells) that gives, among others, full integer cohomology of X 6 . Restriction i ∗ : H ∗ (X 6 , Z) → H ∗ (Y 0 , Z) - surjective, and exhibits H ∗ (Y 0 , Z) as a direct summand of H ∗ (X 6 , Z), along with the multiplicative structure of the cohomlogy ring of Y 0 Determine cup-products of H 2 (X 6 , Z) torsion classes that are non-vanishing in H 4 (X 6 , Z).

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend