nhc Study overview Literature Stormwater Loading Field BMP Review - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

nhc
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

nhc Study overview Literature Stormwater Loading Field BMP Review - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Infiltration BMP Design and Maintenance Optimization Preliminary Results Lake Tahoe Basin Science Conference May 23, 2012 nhc Study overview Literature Stormwater Loading Field BMP Review Simulations Survey 2 nhc Field data collection


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Infiltration BMP Design and Maintenance Optimization

Preliminary Results

Lake Tahoe Basin Science Conference May 23, 2012

nhc

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Study overview

Literature Review

2 nhc

Field BMP Survey Stormwater Loading Simulations

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Field data collection

Study Sites

3 nhc

  • Concentrated in the South Lake area
  • Coordinated with TRPA and landowners
  • 45 Sites
  • 45% Single and Multi Residential
  • 45% Commercial
  • 10% other
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Field data collection 4 nhc Sub-surface Infiltration Systems Infiltration Basins Pervious Pavement Dry Wells Infiltration Trenches

6 2 15 2 45

Observations and Measurements:

BMP design, condition, performance Drainage size, surfaces, condition

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Field data analysis 5 nhc

1 5 3

Condition: Visual estimate of sediment accumulation

5 4 3 2 1 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Average Condition Score Frequency

Mean 3.064 StDev 1.082 N 56

Normal

Infiltration BMP Media Condition

Condition Score

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Field data analysis

Drainage Surface and Infiltration Performance

6 nhc

640 480 320 160

  • 160

20 15 10 5 1L Infiltration Time (seconds) Frequency

Impervious Roofs Surface

Histogram of Imp1LInfilTime, Roof1LInfilTime

Performance diagnostic - time for infiltration of 1L water.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Field data analysis

Field Survey Insights

7 nhc

  • Visual condition estimate is a

poor indicator of performance

  • Non-design runoff results in

severe declines

slide-8
SLIDE 8

BMP stormwater loading simulations

Approach

  • Load stormwater with typical

Tahoe Basin FSP mg/L

  • Vary stormwater composition

and BMP designs

  • Quantify infiltration

performance changes

8 nhc

slide-9
SLIDE 9

BMP stormwater loading simulations

Experimental Challenges

9 nhc

slide-10
SLIDE 10

BMP stormwater loading simulations

Clogging Mechanisms

10 nhc

slide-11
SLIDE 11

BMP stormwater loading simulations

Infiltration Performance Decline

11 nhc

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225

Infiltration Rate (in/hr) FSP Load (grams)

Replicate measurements < 1SD of the mean

slide-12
SLIDE 12

BMP stormwater loading simulations

Scaling up to In-Situ BMPs

12 nhc

Assumptions:

  • Stormwater with constant FSP concentrations
  • Rain = 30 in/yr, RO coef = 1
  • BMP = No depth, 12.8 in/hr soil

Surface Type FSP (mg/L) BMP/ Drainage

Roof 5 1:12 Parking Lot 100 1:12

Surface Type BMP/ Drainage FSP (mg/L) 3 year Infiltration Decline (%)

Roof 1:9 5 Parking Lot 1:9 100

slide-13
SLIDE 13

BMP stormwater loading simulations 13 nhc Roof @ 3 yrs = 25% decline Parking Lot @ 3 yrs 99.7% decline

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusions

Findings that we should care about

  • All surface types not equal

in clogging potential

  • Results may indicate

severe performance declines within 3 years

  • Severe declines also results

in loss of stormwater volume reduction benefits 14 nhc

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions

Next steps

  • Continue loading simulations
  • Lateral infiltration
  • Stormwater composition
  • BMP designs
  • Field verification of

performance declines

  • Draft BMP design and

maintenance recommendations 15 nhc

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16 nhc

Questions ?

(www.2ndnaturellc.com )