NGAC October 15,2008 David J. Cowen, University of South Carolina - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ngac october 15 2008 david j cowen university of south
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NGAC October 15,2008 David J. Cowen, University of South Carolina - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

National Vision for Land Parcel Databases in the United States NGAC October 15,2008 David J. Cowen, University of South Carolina Chair National Research Council Study Land Parcel Databases: A National Vision The National Research Council


slide-1
SLIDE 1

National Vision for Land Parcel Databases in the United States

NGAC October 15,2008 David J. Cowen, University of South Carolina Chair – National Research Council Study

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Land Parcel Databases: A National Vision The National Research Council Study Committee

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What do we know ?

  • “There is a critical need for a better land-

information system in the United States to improve land-conveyance procedures, furnish a basis for equitable taxation, and provide much- need information for resource management and environmental planning “

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Technology

  • “Current technology is adequate in most cases for the

surveying, mapping, data collecting, filing and dissemination of information.

  • Advancement in computer applications, communication

networks and copying processes promise of more- efficient use of the multipurpose cadastre.”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Obstacles

  • The major obstacles in the

development of a multipurpose cadastre are the

  • rganizational and

institutional requirements.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Parcels are a critical part of a modern GIS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Parcels are linked to many operations

  • f Government
slide-9
SLIDE 9

But, of course, we knew that in 1980

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Enmark – FIG

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Kjellson, B. 2002. What do Americans pay for not having a public LIS? Proceedings of FIG XXII International Congress, Washington, D.C., April 19-26, 2002.

The US has a unique position among the most developed countries, having no state or federal system for land registration in a title system or computerized deeds system. Instead the property market relies on title insurance companies to provide stability and

  • rder. Public initiatives seem to be restricted to information about

federal land. the American homeowner is paying dearly for the inefficiencies in

  • ur real estate markets by paying extremely high property

transaction costs because of the complexity in finding the needed property information.

What do Americans pay for not having a public LIS? Kjellson

slide-12
SLIDE 12

County Parcel Data

Parcels Acquired for 60 of 115 counties

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Lessons Learned - Again

Communication among Parcel People is

Good

Local Governments Get It State Coordinators answer their email at

midnight

There is more data out there than you think.

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Charleston SC Does the Census need parcels ?

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • D. Cowen June, 2004

Lots of Organizations Lots of Organizations

slide-17
SLIDE 17

FGDC Organization

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Connecting the Components

Coordination & Standards Data Discovery & Access Consistent & Current Content

Looks like Parcels

slide-19
SLIDE 19

N.C. / S.C. Parcels :NC One Map & USGS National Map It is possible!!!

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Cowen

NSDI Parcel Related Geospatial data

Cadastre Federal Lands Governmental Units Housing Land Conveyance Framework?

GAO – 2004

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Post Bailout Presentation

  • The mortgage mess has important geographic

dimensions

  • Existing Federal Programs ( HMDA) should have

been monitoring this mess

  • Many local governments have systems ( CAMA) that

could monitor this

  • The private sector is monitoring it
  • If not now – WHEN?
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Are their geographic dimensions to the mess?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Newsweek June 2 , 2008

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Reverse Redlining

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Redlining in Philadelphia - 1932

slide-26
SLIDE 26

March 2005 !!!!!!!!!

slide-27
SLIDE 27

What appraisers were saying

slide-28
SLIDE 28

USA Today

slide-29
SLIDE 29

USA Today – Query by location

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Parcel Based Early Warning System

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Zillow – Heat Maps

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Zillow Heat Maps

slide-33
SLIDE 33

What Zillow Knows

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Zillow – Foreclosures

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Foreclosure.com

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Foreclosure.com

slide-37
SLIDE 37

But What Would a National Parcel Program Cost?

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Cost = $294.6 Million

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Lets do the math

Taxpayers are going to spend about $2,295 per person to purchase bad mortgages

  • ($700,000,000,000/305,000,000)

Parcel program ~ $294 Million – Or $.96 per person !!!! – Or 0.00042 = .04% of the bailout budget

($294,600,000/ $700,000,000,000)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

But Wait – There is more!

– Points will do – Google and Microsoft also want these parcels – E-911 needs them – Several Companies will subsidize – More states are getting involved

  • Washington – 39 counties last week
  • Arkansas
  • North Carolina
  • Florida
slide-41
SLIDE 41

NPR - All Things Considered, July 31, 2006

www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5590541

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Private Parcel Activities

slide-43
SLIDE 43

First American

They have offered to create parcels for any county in the US

slide-44
SLIDE 44

National Parcel Map Data Portal Boundary Solutions Inc.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Parcel Web Service with Imagery

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Australia – Google Map Address Matching to Parcel Nation Wide

slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Customizing the Virtual Earth Platform for Government

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Hasn’t the federal Government been Paying Attention ?

slide-50
SLIDE 50

HUD Map of Cleveland Tract Level Annual Data

slide-51
SLIDE 51

HMDA

slide-52
SLIDE 52

The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA)

Enacted by Congress in 1975 and is implemented by the Federal Reserve Board's Regulation C. This regulation provides the public loan data that can be used to assist: – in determining whether financial institutions are serving the housing needs of their communities; – public officials in distributing public-sector investments so as to attract private investment to areas where it is needed; – and in identifying possible discriminatory lending patterns. – This regulation applies to certain financial institutions, including banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other mortgage lending institutions

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC)

slide-54
SLIDE 54

?

Members of the FFIEC Some Folks are minding the store

Federal Reserve FDIC National Credit Union Office of Thrift Supervision Comptroller of the Currency Nebraska Dept of Banking

slide-55
SLIDE 55

The Community Reinvestment Act CRA

slide-56
SLIDE 56

The Community Reinvestment Act CRA

  • The Community Reinvestment Act is intended to

encourage depository institutions to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they operate, including low- and moderate- income neighborhoods, consistent with safe and sound banking operations. It was enacted by the Congress in 1977 (12 U.S.C. 2901) and is implemented by Regulations 12 CFR parts 25, 228, 345, and 563e. (See Regulation).

  • .
slide-57
SLIDE 57

HMDA Reporting

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Locational Information

slide-59
SLIDE 59

HMDA Reporting

slide-60
SLIDE 60

By Tract / Annually

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Can’t We Find An Address?

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Where in the world is 116 Ila Lane ?

County Parcel GIS Wrong End

  • f Street

Census Blocks Confused Wrong End

  • f Street

Pretty Good Now

slide-63
SLIDE 63

HMDA

Wrong End

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Not Rocket Science !!

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Put a bar code on it !!!

If FedEX can tell you where your package is – It should not be too hard to keep tract

  • f parcels
slide-66
SLIDE 66

116 Ila Lane, 29206 Assessor – Not confidential

  • Owners: David & Sandra

Cowen,

  • Legal residence
  • Taxes = $2,293
  • Market Value $196,900
slide-67
SLIDE 67

Census versus Tele Atlas Address Points Part of $200+ Million Confidential Commercial Not – Confidential

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Five Minute Exercise How it could work

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Richland County Comparable Sales

$150

slide-70
SLIDE 70

$150 Per Square Foot

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Graph of Comparable Sales

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Series1

Early Warning

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Who / When ?

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Possible Visualization

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Dissecting the Problem

Sold in 2005 for $402,000 Sold in 2008 for $364,000

These sale prices are typical for current housing market conditions.

Taxes in 2005 - $5,935 Taxes in 2008 - $5,375 Tax Dollars since 2005

  • $560

This is a single parcel example. There are over 477,000 parcels in Oakland County.

Homes recently sold

slide-75
SLIDE 75

9.60% 9.33% 6.77% 4.79% 4.50% 4.06% 1.17%

  • 3.67%
  • 8.00%

7.41% 6.36% 4.91% 5.28% 5.14% 5.56% 4.16% 0.04%

  • 3.50%
  • 10.00%
  • 5.00%

0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Oakland County, MI Percentage Change in Assessed and Taxable Values 2001 through 2008

Change in Assessed Value Change in Taxable Value

Property Value Changes

**

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Why am I Optimistic ?

slide-77
SLIDE 77
slide-78
SLIDE 78

Washington Parcel Data - 39 Counties

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Washington Process

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Status Map

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Washington Timeline

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Florida

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Florida Parcels on FTP Site

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Arkansas

slide-85
SLIDE 85

North Carolina $10 Fee

  • "§ 161-11.3. Fees for floodplain mapping.
  • Ten dollars ($10.00) of each fee collected by the register of deeds for registering or
  • filing a deed of trust or mortgage pursuant to G.S. 161-10(a)(1a) must be forwarded by
  • the register of deeds to the county finance officer, who must forward the funds to the
  • Department of Crime Control and Public Safety to be credited to the Floodplain
  • Mapping Fund established under G.S. 143-215.56A. The county finance officer must
  • forward the funds to the Department on a monthly basis."
  • SECTION 29.7.(c) Part 6 of Article 21 of Chapter 143 is amended by
  • adding a new section to read:
  • "§ 143-215.56A. Floodplain Mapping Fund.
  • The Floodplain Mapping Fund is established as a special revenue fund. The Fund
  • consists of the fees credited to it under G.S. 161-11.3. Revenue in the fund may be used
  • nly to offset the Department's cost in preparing floodplain maps and performing its
  • ther duties under this Part."
  • SECTION 29.7.(d) This section becomes effective October 1, 2008, and
  • applies to deeds of trust and mortgages registered or filed on or after that date.
  • "§ 161-11.3. Fees for floodplain mapping.
  • Ten dollars ($10.00) of each fee collected by the register of deeds for registering or
  • filing a deed of trust or mortgage pursuant to G.S. 161-10(a)(1a) must be forwarded by
  • the register of deeds to the county finance officer, who must forward the funds to the
  • Department of Crime Control and Public Safety to be credited to the Floodplain
  • Mapping Fund established under G.S. 143-215.56A. The county finance officer must
  • forward the funds to the Department on a monthly basis."
  • SECTION 29.7.(c) Part 6 of Article 21 of Chapter 143 is amended by
  • adding a new section to read:
  • "§ 143-215.56A. Floodplain Mapping Fund.
  • The Floodplain Mapping Fund is established as a special revenue fund. The Fund
  • consists of the fees credited to it under G.S. 161-11.3. Revenue in the fund may be used
  • nly to offset the Department's cost in preparing floodplain maps and performing its
  • ther duties under this Part."
  • SECTION 29.7.(d) This section becomes effective October 1, 2008, and
  • applies to deeds of trust and mortgages registered or filed on or after that date.
slide-86
SLIDE 86

State Owned Property

slide-87
SLIDE 87

State Owned Property

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Aerial Photos

slide-89
SLIDE 89

GLOB Goals

  • Geospatial LoB will establish a new and more citizen-

centric collaborative model for geospatial-related activities and investments.

  • This will create a framework for sustainable participation

from non-Federal partners, and create a more coordinated and leveraged approach to producing, maintaining, and using geospatial data and services.

  • Provisioning the Nation with easy to use geospatial

capabilities will promote cheaper, smarter and more efficient government business, services and information.

Geospatial Line of Business Common Solutions and Target Architecture June 26, 2006

slide-90
SLIDE 90

“Building a viable NSDI to serve the needs of all levels of government and the private sector requires a solid foundation that is strategic, deliberate, and assembled in discrete, manageable units.”

FGDC Mission or Lip service ?