myeloma clinical presenta1on the need for a changing
play

Myeloma(Clinical(Presenta1on( (the(need(for(a(changing(paradigm? ( - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Myeloma(Clinical(Presenta1on( (the(need(for(a(changing(paradigm? ( Professor'Gordon'Cook' St'Jamess'Ins4tute'of'Oncology ' Leeds'Teaching'Hospital ' Multiple Myeloma 28,700 & 19,920 new diagnoses p.a. in the EU 1 & USA 2 ,


  1. Myeloma(Clinical(Presenta1on( –(the(need(for(a(changing(paradigm? ( Professor'Gordon'Cook' St'James’s'Ins4tute'of'Oncology ' Leeds'Teaching'Hospital '

  2. Multiple Myeloma • 28,700 & 19,920 new diagnoses p.a. in the EU 1 & USA 2 , respectively • ≈ 4,000 new patients p.a & ≈ 3,000 deaths p.a. in the UK • Recent improvement in survival as a result of new treatments but access to optimum treatment and managing expectations are big challenges • 37% are diagnosed through emergency routes rather than referral by GPs. This compares to an average 23% across all cancer types (National Cancer Intelligence Network 2012) • Patients diagnosed through emergency routes have significantly poorer one-year survival outcomes compared to those diagnosed by GP referral (51% vs. 82%) (National Cancer Intelligence Network 2012) 1 Boyle et al, Ann Oncol, 2005, 16, 481 2 NCI, SEER database

  3. Survival(&(years(of(life(lost ( • N=10,'549'from'17'centres'in'EU/USA/Japan'with'a' med'FU'3.25'&'70.3%'derived'from'studies.' • Correla4on'with'increasing'age'and'advanced'stage ' at'presenta4on'(r=0.13,'95%ci'0.11,'0.16).' I II III 50 40 %patients 30 20 10 0 <40 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 >80 Age, yrs Ludwig et al, J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(9), 1599

  4. Rela1ve(Excess(Risk ( • Median'years'of'life'lost'was'16.8'years'(n=10,549)'' – Significantly'higher'than'the'12.5'years'for'all'cancers'( Burnet' ' et'al,'Br'J'Cancer'92:2413245,'2005 )' – US'Na4onal'Center'of'Health'Sta4s4cs:'median'14.0'years'of' life'lost'for'MM'myeloma'(2004)' – Bri4sh'Columbia'Cancer'Registry:'median'12.7'years'of'life' lost'for'MM'(2007).'' – East'Anglia,'UK:'median'10.3'years'of'life'lost'for'MM' (1990c94)' • Rela4ve'excess'risk'(RER)'of'death:' '

  5. Survival(&(years(of(life(lost ( Ludwig et al, J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(9), 1599

  6. Survival(&(years(of(life(lost ( Average Years life lost 45 All Male Female 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 <40 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 >80 Age Ludwig et al, J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(9), 1599

  7. Survivorship(–(CCT(vs(ASCT ( Years of Life lost 40 36.8 35.9 35 CCT ASCT 30 27.4 25.6 25 21 18.2 20 13.6 13.1 15 10.6 8.1 10 5 0 <40 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 Ludwig et al, J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(9), 1599

  8. Early(diagnosis(&(screening ( • Early'stage'screening'programme'(1983)'' – electrophoresis'of'all'serum'samples'with'globulin'levels'over' 35g/irrespec4ve'of'the'source'of'the'samples'or'the' provisional'diagnosis'and'' – marrow'examina4on'and'electrophoresis'at'an'early'stage'in' pa4ents'with'an'unexplained'persistently'raised'ESR.' • Prior'to'screening,'n=79/60mns,'postcimplementa4on,' n=120/60mns'with'an'expected'figure'of'86.3'(cancer' registra4on'for'England'and'Wales'1977c80).' • Screening'iden4fied'7'pa4ents'who'died'soon'afer' diagnosis'from'cardiocrespiratory'comorbidi4es'who' would'otherwise'been'missed.'' Flanagan et al, Post Grad Med J, 1988, 64, 747-751

  9. • ≈ 40% presented with late stage disease, pre- & post- screening. • ≈ 20% experienced symptoms >3 msn pre-diagnosis ' 60 90 50 80 %De Novo Patients %pateitns with co- 70 40 morbidities 60 50 30 40 20 30 20 10 10 0 0 MBD No MBD Flanagan et al, Post Grad Med J, 1988, 64, 747-751

  10. Causes(&(consequences(of(late(Diagnosis ( • Retrospec4ve'audit'of'n=92' De'Novo' pa4ents' • 30%'diagnosed'<3'months'from'first'symptom' • 55%'ini4ally'presented'to'a'GP,''&'in'56%'of'these' there'was'an'interval'of'>6'months'(>12'months'in' 33%)'before'specialist'referral.'' • Delay'of'>6'months'from'first'symptom'to' diagnosis'in'67.4%' Kariyawasan et al, QJ Med, 2007, 100, 635-40

  11. Symptoms,(stage(and(delay(in(diagnosis ( 60 80 I II III Symptoms at presentation 70 50 60 40 %patients 50 40 30 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 <3/12 3/12 - 6/12 >6/12 First symptom to Diagnosis (mns) Kariyawasan et al, QJ Med, 2007, 100, 635-40

  12. Kariyawasan)et)al,)QJ)Med,)2007,)100,)635940 )

  13. LTH(Myeloma(New(Diagnosis ( • LTH'is'a'2400cbedded'acute'hospitals'trust'serving' a'secondary'care'popula4on'of'720,000'(2008c09)' &'a'ter4ary'care'popula4on'of'2.7M' • August'2011cJuly'2012,'64'new'diagnoses'of'PCD' from'secondary'care'catchment:' – 54'Symptoma4c,'9'Asymptoma4c'&'1'Plasmacytoma' • 22'of'total'PCD'(34%)'diagnosed'as'a'result'of' admission'but'represents' 38%( of'symptoma4c' MM.'

  14. New(Diagnosis(of(PCD((Aug’11PJuly’12) ( 70 OP IP 60 %New DIagnosis 50 40 30 20 10 0 Plasmacyt Asympt Sympt

  15. New(Diagnosis(through(emergency:( ( Cause(of(Admission ( Confusion EM disease HyperCal SCC Bone Pain AKI 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 %Acute admissions (Newly Diagnosed)

  16. New(Diagnoses(&(OS ( • Median'FU'8.7'mns'(0.4,'16)'for'all' – Diagnosed'IP'Med'FU'10.2'(0.4,'15)' – Diagnosed'OP'Med'FU'8.6'(0.8,'18)' • 13/54'(24%)'have'died:' – Diagnosed'IP'9/21(43%)' – Diagnosed'OP''4/33'(12%)'

  17. New(diagnosis(&(OS ( OS - IP vs OP IP Diagn 100 OP Diagn Percent survival 50 p=0.02 HR 3.66 (95% CI 1.24, 11.65) 0 0 200 400 600 Days elapsed Median Survival: I/P 14.8 mns O/P NR

  18. Na1onal(Cancer(Pa1ent(Experience(survey ( >3 pre-referral consultations % Adj ORs 95% CI MM 50.6 3.42 3.01, 3.9 HD 42.2 1.67 1.34, 2.08 NHL 32.2 1.5 1.5, 1.69 Leukaemia 27.6 1.15 0.99, 1.32 Lyratzopoulos et a, Lancet Oncology, 2012, 13, 353

  19. Effects(of(ethnicity(and(age ( Lyratzopoulos et a, Lancet Oncology, 2012, 13, 353

  20. Late/delayed(Diagnosis ( Solu4ons? '

  21. Late diagnosis: why? • Rarity? – GPs may only see 2 myeloma patients in their career – Lack of GP awareness of myeloma • Vague presenting symptoms typical of demographic – e.g. lower back pain (osteoporosis), infection and fatigue • Late presentation by patients • Low public profile • No screening?

  22. Myeloma UK work on improving early diagnosis • A GP education and awareness campaign aimed at reducing the likelihood of delays in diagnosis • Launched by Myeloma UK in mid-2010 • It engages myeloma patients, their networks and the public in helping GPs recognise the signs and symptoms of myeloma • It involves campaigners to TAKE 2 or more Myeloma Diagnosis Pathways to their GPs and encouraging others to do the same

  23. The Myeloma Diagnosis Pathway • The Myeloma Diagnosis Pathway (MDP) is a simple two-sided algorithmic reference tool for GPs outlining signs, symptoms and tests to take for myeloma • It was developed by Myeloma UK with the help of its medical advisory committee and GP reviewers

  24. TAKE 2 Campaign: the impact • Reached over 9,000 GPs to-date • Over 150 MPs supported the campaign • Is now being replicated in countries around the world including Australia, The Netherlands, Belgium, USA and Portugal, Canada and China • Excellent feedback from GPs via surveys and unsolicited comments • Support from Department of Health • Long-term impact will be assessed against baseline research

  25. NAEDI – National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative • Early diagnosis, estimated 10,000 deaths per annum could be saved • Prevention – lifestyle • Screening – bowel, breast • HPV vaccination testing • Original focus lung, breast, colorectal, prostate and skin • Rarer cancers now a priority – but challenging

  26. Early(vs(Deferred/delayed( treatment (

  27. Early( vs (Deferred(Treatment(in(early(MM ( Mortality Progression Wheatley et al, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003 (1) pp. CD004023

  28. Early( vs (Deferred(Treatment(in(early(MM ( Vertebral Compression Fractures Leukaemic Transformation

  29. Trea1ng(early(disease ( • IMiDs' – Witzig'et'al' (Leukaemia,'doi'10.1038/leu.2012.236) Thalidomide/Zom'vs'Zom'(n=68):'TTP'2.4'yrs'(1.4,'3.6)'vs' 1.2'yrs'(0.7,'2.5),'p=0.02.' – Detweiler'et'al' (Am'J'Hemat,'2010,'85,'10,'737),'n=31' treated'with'Thal'monotherapy.'TTP'61'mns'>PR,'39mns' MR'&'9mns'<MR' • Immunotherapy' – An4cKIR'an4body'(IPH2101)'in'clinical'trials' – ImMucin'vaccine'trialed'in'RRMM'and'now'asyptoma4c' MM'being'studied.'

  30. Summary • Improvement in survival with current treatment strategies evident • A delayed diagnosis is a significant problem resulting in undue morbidity and health-related QoL issues. • Modest investments of time and money in early diagnosis has the potential to improve survival and quality of life • Early diagnosis may offer new opportunities for disease management strategies

  31. Thank you!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend