Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Multi-Jurisdictional Workers' Compensation Claims Selecting the Jurisdiction and Navigating Conflicting State Laws Regarding Benefits, Rights and Responsibilities TUES DAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2012 1pm East ern | 12pm Cent ral | 11am Mount ain | 10am Pacific Today’s faculty features: Thomas O. S ippel, Partner, Leitner, Williams, Dooley & Napolitan , Roswell, Ga. ean W. Martin, Member, Leitner Williams Dooley & Napolitan , Chattanooga, Tenn. S Michael C. Milstein, Bryce Downey & Lenkov , Chicago The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10 .
Conference Materials If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: • Click on the + sign next to “ Conference Materials” in the middle of the left- hand column on your screen. • Click on the tab labeled “ Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. • Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. • Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: • Close the notification box • In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location • Click the S END button beside the box
Tips for Optimal Quality S ound Qualit y If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-258-2056 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@ straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Qualit y To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.
5 Presented to Strafford CLE by Michael C. Milstein BRYCE DOWNEY & LENKOV LLC February 14, 2012
6 Jurisdiction- The legal power, right, or authority of a particular court to hear and determine causes Subject Matter Jurisdiction The authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type or cases relating to a specific subject matter Rare issue in practice Illinois: liberal state= Petitioner’s want to file here
7 Each state has its own statute which codifies jurisdiction under its own system of Workers’ Compensation laws What are the factors for determining if a State has jurisdiction?
8 Place where injury occurs Place of employment contract Place where the employment relationship is carried out Place where the employment is localized Place where the employee resides Place whose statutes the parties have adopted by contract
9 All states apply jurisdiction if the injury occurs within that state 43 states apply jurisdiction if the contract for employment was made within that state 40 states apply jurisdiction if the employment is principally located in that state However, 15 states will not apply their law to out-of- state employers with insurance in another state
10 Cowger v. Industrial Commission (2000 Illinois Appellate Court) Petitioner was a truck driver injured in Texas Petitioner resided in Illinois Respondent was domiciled in Indiana When Petitioner called to inquire about the job, he was told his “job hunting days were over” Petitioner thought this meant he was hired, but he had to complete a drug test and fill out paperwork Petitioner also had to pick up his tractor in Indiana Petitioner received instructions from Indiana
11 Cowger v. Industrial Commission (Illinois Appellate Court) Court held that for there to be a contract of hire, there needs to be mutual consent Respondent needed the paperwork and drug test before they could accept the Petitioner as an employee No contract for hire in Illinois Injury not in Illinois Employment not localized in Illinois (even though he frequently traveled in Illinois) Illinois does not have jurisdiction
12 The Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. v. Michael Haynes et al (Northern District of Illinois) Players filed for WC benefits in California Players were part of the Collective Bargaining Agreement An Arbitrator held that CBA clearly stated that all WC claims should be brought before the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Players appealed stating that the agreement violates California public policy
13 The Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. v. Michael Haynes et al (Northern District of Illinois) Court held that there is no reason that the agreement needs to conform to California law The agreement doesn’t discuss using California law only Illinois law Court did not look at where injury took place, state of hire, or where most of the work was performed Unclear whether employers can force employees to accept WC benefits from a different state if injured in that state Seems unlikely an employee can sign away those rights
14 Mahoney v. Industrial Commission (2006 Illinois Supreme Court)- each state is very different 1969: Petitioner hired to work at O’Hare Airport 1993: Transferred to Orlando 1999: Injured Petitioner lived in Ohio Petitioner paid Florida taxes Petitioner had Florida drivers license
15 Mahoney v. Industrial Commission (2006 Illinois Supreme Court) Court held that the situs of the contract of employment is the sole and “exclusive” determinate of jurisdiction when injury is outside Illinois but contract for hire inside Illinois
16 Step 1: get ALL necessary information (location of injury, contract for hire, location of employment etc…) Step 2: Review state law where injury occurred and potential other states Numerous reasons, not just jurisdiction. Will be discussed soon Step 3: Check for employment contracts Step 4: Get a lawyer!
17 Michael C. Milstein mmilstein@brycedowney.com – 312-327-0042 200 North LaSalle Street Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60601 www.brycedowney.com
MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL WORKERS COMPENSATION CLAIMS 18 Michael C. Milstein BRYCE DOWNEY & LENKOV LLC, Chicago IL Sean W. Martin LEITNER, WILLIAMS, DOOLEY & NAPOLITAN PLLC, Chattanooga, TN Thomas O. Sippel LEITNER, WILLIAMS, DOOLEY & NAPOLITAN PLLC, Atlanta, GA
19 Subject Matter Jurisdiction The authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type or cases relating to a specific subject matter Rare issue in practice Illinois: liberal state= Petitioners want to file here
20 Each state has its own statute which codifies jurisdiction under its own system of Workers’ Compensation laws What are the factors for determining if a State has jurisdiction?
21 Place where injury occurs Place of employment contract Place where the employment relationship is carried out Place where the employment is localized Place where the employee resides Place whose statutes the parties have adopted by contract
22 All states apply jurisdiction if the injury occurs within that state 43 states apply jurisdiction if the contract for employment was made within that state 40 states apply jurisdiction if the employment is principally located in that state However, 15 states will not apply their law to out-of- state employers with insurance in another state
23 Cowger v. Industrial Commission (2000 Illinois Appellate Court) Petitioner was a truck driver injured in Texas Petitioner resided in Illinois Respondent was domiciled in Indiana When Petitioner called to inquire about the job, he was told his “job hunting days were over” Petitioner thought this meant he was hired, but he had to complete a drug test and fill out paperwork Petitioner also had to pick up his tractor in Indiana Petitioner received instructions from Indiana
24 Cowger v. Industrial Commission (Illinois Appellate Court) Court held that for there to be a contract of hire, there needs to be mutual consent Respondent needed the paperwork and drug test before they could accept the Petitioner as an employee No contract for hire in Illinois Injury not in Illinois Employment not localized in Illinois (even though he frequently traveled in Illinois) Illinois does not have jurisdiction
25 The Chicago Bears Football Club, Inc. v. Michael Haynes et al (Northern District of Illinois) Players filed for WC benefits in California Players were part of the Collective Bargaining Agreement An Arbitrator held that CBA clearly stated that all WC claims should be brought before the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission Players appealed stating that the agreement violates California public policy
Recommend
More recommend
