MOU LAY-UP SEMINAR Oslo, Norway THIRD PARTY REVIEW Andrew Pointing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CEFOR: MOU LAY-UP SEMINAR Oslo, Norway THIRD PARTY REVIEW Andrew Pointing 12 December 2016

A TYPICAL THIRD PARTY REVIEW A mixed case study for verification of MOU / vessel lay- up

Consultation Third Party Review with owner (and his consultation with stakeholders Desktop On-Site Vessel: Review: - Mooring arrangement - Plans -Jacking status - Engineering - FFA / LSA 3rd Party What does it look like? Verification On-Site Port: Desktop - ISPS review: - Class - Quay status report -Anchorage Desktop On-Site review: Vessel: -Preservation - Lay-up -Maintenance location

Third Party Review Class Unit’s Class Society Consultation with • Owner to notify Class society of lay- up or taken ‘out of owner (and his service’ status of the vessel / MOU • Has Class issued a lay-up declaration or similar consultation with stakeholders Flag State Unit’s Flag State • Owner to notify Flag State when the vessel is laid or taken ‘out of service’ for a prolonged period. KEY RISK ELEMENT: • Flag State may amend registration of the unit / vessel to reflect current status - Cover in case of incident - Correct status for unit Insurance Unit’s P&I and H&M • Owner to notify insurance interests of the lay-up or taken ‘out of service’ normally prior to change of status. • Port authority may require a letter from the units underwriter confirming adequate cover for port risks

Third Party Review Desktop Review: Lay-up Plan Unit and Status Specific - Plans • Outline of preservation and maintenance routines for the lay-up period • Mooring Plan - Engineering • Weather forecast and monitoring arrangements • Manning levels and knowledge to meet the lay-up plan requirements • Use of any 3 rd party lay-up enabler •Monitoring of unit’s mooring, stability, access / egress • Follow-up by owner / 3 rd party review / verification KEY RISK ELEMENTS: - Condition & Status of the unit going Engineering into lay-up Unit and location specific - Cost Based Assessment for safety and • Mooring analysis operation critical equipment • Site Specific Assessment • Supporting geotechnical data / analysis - Market Conditions: how long is lay-up • Supporting metocean study / analysis duration • Supporting documentation for quayside assets (bollards, fenders, etc) The unit is ‘out of normal location’ -

Third Party Review Desktop Review: Class Status Report - Class Status Unit and Status Specific Report • Status and validity of unit certification • Key date for next 5ly Special Survey • Conditions of Class • Memoranda from Class KEY RISK ELEMENTS: - Units Class and Flag status correctly notified - Maintenance of Certification as required

Third Party Review Location Country • Geopolitical condition prevailing • Piracy Desktop Review: • ISPS – Signatory • Logistics for personnel transfer and spare equipment supply • Near potential market / normal operating area - Lay-up Location Location City (Marine) / Area • Support Services including logistics and emergency response • Piracy • Metocean Conditions – historic, prevailing and monitoring KEY RISK ELEMENTS: • Same owner / Operator vessels / units in same location • Tidal range / currents • Harbour / Port aware of the unit’s status and emergency - Information to support response capability engineering Location - Local support services Harbour / Port / Anchorage - Piracy • Marine Traffic • Proximity of other unit’s and vessels - More than 1 unit / vessel • Quay side arrangements and supplies (water, waste, power, from same owner etc) • Seabed holding ground / geotechnical assessment for jack-ups • ISPS facilities • Free from obstruction: UKC, swing circles, debris, etc

Third Party Review Mooring arrangement On unit • Mooring arrangement and equipment as per plan and mooring On-Site Unit: analysis • Mooring management adequate with proper routines and record keeping - Mooring • Winches and lines properly set-up (brakes, etc) Arrangement - Jacking Status Jacking Status On unit - FFA / LSA • Jack-up unit location approval issued • Jacking air gap as planned • Legs / jacking gear correctly set as for normal operation • Rig arrival report review KEY RISK ELEMENTS: - Mooring arrangement FFA / LSA - Leg penetration / preload On unit • FFA / LSA available for use for those remaining on board - FFA / LSA Arrangement • Means of escape clear and ready for use (2off) • Safety Equipment plan up to date and copy ready at point of access • Emergency Response plan up dated to reflect lay-up status

Third Party Review ISPS Port • Is the ISPS arrangement adequate and as expected? On-Site Port: • Any change to the security status of the port from the planning phase? - ISPS - Quay - Anchorage Quay Port • Is the quay as described in the mooring plan and mooring analysis? • Is the quay assets (bollards, fenders, etc) rated as expected? • Is the access to / from the unit adequate and fit for purpose? • Services in place: water, power, bunkers, sewage, waste? KEY RISK ELEMENTS: • Passing marine traffic and other mooring units / vessels? - Mooring arrangement Anchorage Port - ISPS • Any change to planned number and proximity of other units / - Marine Traffic and Proximity to other vessels? • Logistics for personnel and spare equipment transfer? units and vessels • Port security and emergency response cover? - Logistic and Other support services • Harbour support services as planned (tugs etc)? • Marine traffic as expected?

Third Party Review Preservation Unit • What is the status of the plant preservation? On-Site Unit: • Has the plant manufacturer’s instruction and the lay -up plan be followed? - Preservation • What is not covered? Anything significant? • Is there adequate dehumidifiers / ventilators in use? - Maintenance • Engine heaters in use? KEY RISK ELEMENTS: Maintenance Unit • Is there adequate record keeping (eg PMS)? - Adequate maintenance of safety • Is the PMS up to date as per the lay-up plan? and mission critical equipment Is software included in the preservation / maintenance plan? Adequate monitoring of the unit’s • What is not covered? Anything significant? - • Is there adequate monitoring of the unit’s stability / tank and stability and tanks and bilges status bilge status? - Adequate record keeping

Third Party Review Desktop On-Site Review Verification • When all plans and engineering are accepted • When all findings from the site visit are adequately addressed Owner’s Plan with Third Party Approval

Thank-you Any questions?

ONE PARTNER. WORLDWIDE SUPPORT. www.loc-group.com Andrew Pointing LOC Group Limited Director Marine Assurance & Risk a.pointing@loc-group.com +47 905 02 861