SLIDE 1
A TYPICAL THIRD PARTY REVIEW
A mixed case study for verification of MOU / vessel lay- up
MOU LAY-UP SEMINAR Oslo, Norway THIRD PARTY REVIEW Andrew Pointing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
MOU LAY-UP SEMINAR Oslo, Norway THIRD PARTY REVIEW Andrew Pointing - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CEFOR: MOU LAY-UP SEMINAR Oslo, Norway THIRD PARTY REVIEW Andrew Pointing 12 December 2016 A TYPICAL THIRD PARTY REVIEW A mixed case study for verification of MOU / vessel lay- up Consultation Third Party Review with owner (and his
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Third Party Review
What does it look like?
3rd Party Verification
Consultation with owner (and his consultation with stakeholders
On-Site Vessel:
- Mooring
arrangement
- Jacking status
- FFA / LSA
On-Site Port:
- ISPS
- Quay
- Anchorage
On-Site Vessel:
- Preservation
- Maintenance
Desktop review:
- Lay-up
location
Desktop review:
- Class
status report
Desktop Review:
- Plans
- Engineering
SLIDE 4
Third Party Review
Unit’s Class Society Class
- Owner to notify Class society of lay-up or taken ‘out of
service’ status of the vessel / MOU
- Has Class issued a lay-up declaration or similar
Unit’s Flag State Flag State
- Owner to notify Flag State when the vessel is laid or
taken ‘out of service’ for a prolonged period.
- Flag State may amend registration of the unit / vessel to
reflect current status
Unit’s P&I and H&M Insurance
- Owner to notify insurance interests of the lay-up or taken
‘out of service’ normally prior to change of status.
- Port authority may require a letter from the units
underwriter confirming adequate cover for port risks
Consultation with
- wner (and his
consultation with stakeholders
KEY RISK ELEMENT:
- Cover in case of incident
- Correct status for unit
SLIDE 5
Third Party Review
Unit and Status Specific Lay-up Plan
- Outline of preservation and maintenance routines for the lay-up
period
- Mooring Plan
- Weather forecast and monitoring arrangements
- Manning levels and knowledge to meet the lay-up plan requirements
- Use of any 3rd party lay-up enabler
- Monitoring of unit’s mooring, stability, access / egress
- Follow-up by owner / 3rd party review / verification
Unit and location specific Engineering
- Mooring analysis
- Site Specific Assessment
- Supporting geotechnical data / analysis
- Supporting metocean study / analysis
- Supporting documentation for quayside assets (bollards, fenders, etc)
Desktop Review:
- Plans
- Engineering
KEY RISK ELEMENTS:
- Condition & Status of the unit going
into lay-up
- Cost Based Assessment for safety and
- peration critical equipment
- Market Conditions: how long is lay-up
duration
- The unit is ‘out of normal location’
SLIDE 6
Third Party Review
Unit and Status Specific
Class Status Report
- Status and validity of unit certification
- Key date for next 5ly Special Survey
- Conditions of Class
- Memoranda from Class
Desktop Review:
- Class Status
Report
KEY RISK ELEMENTS:
- Units Class and Flag status correctly
notified
- Maintenance of Certification as
required
SLIDE 7
Third Party Review
Country Location
- Geopolitical condition prevailing
- Piracy
- ISPS – Signatory
- Logistics for personnel transfer and spare equipment supply
- Near potential market / normal operating area
City (Marine) / Area Location
- Support Services including logistics and emergency response
- Piracy
- Metocean Conditions – historic, prevailing and monitoring
- Same owner / Operator vessels / units in same location
- Tidal range / currents
- Harbour / Port aware of the unit’s status and emergency
response capability
Harbour / Port / Anchorage Location
- Marine Traffic
- Proximity of other unit’s and vessels
- Quay side arrangements and supplies (water, waste, power,
etc)
- Seabed holding ground / geotechnical assessment for jack-ups
- ISPS facilities
- Free from obstruction: UKC, swing circles, debris, etc
Desktop Review:
- Lay-up Location
KEY RISK ELEMENTS:
- Information to support
engineering
- Local support services
- Piracy
- More than 1 unit / vessel
from same owner
SLIDE 8
Third Party Review
On unit Mooring arrangement
- Mooring arrangement and equipment as per plan and mooring
analysis
- Mooring management adequate with proper routines and
record keeping
- Winches and lines properly set-up (brakes, etc)
On unit Jacking Status
- Jack-up unit location approval issued
- Jacking air gap as planned
- Legs / jacking gear correctly set as for normal operation
- Rig arrival report review
On unit FFA / LSA
- FFA / LSA available for use for those remaining on board
- Means of escape clear and ready for use (2off)
- Safety Equipment plan up to date and copy ready at point of
access
- Emergency Response plan up dated to reflect lay-up status
On-Site Unit:
- Mooring
Arrangement
- Jacking Status
- FFA / LSA
KEY RISK ELEMENTS:
- Mooring arrangement
- Leg penetration / preload
- FFA / LSA Arrangement
SLIDE 9
Third Party Review
Port ISPS
- Is the ISPS arrangement adequate and as expected?
- Any change to the security status of the port from the planning
phase?
Port Quay
- Is the quay as described in the mooring plan and mooring
analysis?
- Is the quay assets (bollards, fenders, etc) rated as expected?
- Is the access to / from the unit adequate and fit for purpose?
- Services in place: water, power, bunkers, sewage, waste?
- Passing marine traffic and other mooring units / vessels?
Port Anchorage
- Any change to planned number and proximity of other units /
vessels?
- Logistics for personnel and spare equipment transfer?
- Port security and emergency response cover?
- Harbour support services as planned (tugs etc)?
- Marine traffic as expected?
On-Site Port:
- ISPS
- Quay
- Anchorage
KEY RISK ELEMENTS:
- Mooring arrangement
- ISPS
- Marine Traffic and Proximity to other
units and vessels
- Logistic and Other support services
SLIDE 10
Third Party Review
Unit Preservation
- What is the status of the plant preservation?
- Has the plant manufacturer’s instruction and the lay-up plan be
followed?
- What is not covered? Anything significant?
- Is there adequate dehumidifiers / ventilators in use?
- Engine heaters in use?
Unit Maintenance
- Is there adequate record keeping (eg PMS)?
- Is the PMS up to date as per the lay-up plan?
Is software included in the preservation / maintenance plan?
- What is not covered? Anything significant?
- Is there adequate monitoring of the unit’s stability / tank and
bilge status?
On-Site Unit:
- Preservation
- Maintenance
KEY RISK ELEMENTS:
- Adequate maintenance of safety
and mission critical equipment
- Adequate monitoring of the unit’s
stability and tanks and bilges status
- Adequate record keeping
SLIDE 11
Third Party Review
Verification On-Site
- When all findings from the site visit are adequately addressed
Owner’s Plan with Third Party Approval
Review
Desktop
- When all plans and engineering are accepted
SLIDE 12
Thank-you Any questions?
SLIDE 13