monitoring soil geochemistry in the urban environment a
play

Monitoring soil geochemistry in the urban environment: A comparison - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Monitoring soil geochemistry in the urban environment: A comparison of studies in p 1972 and 2005 in Denver, Colorado David B. Smith, Karl J. Ellefsen, U.S. Geological Survey Robert G. Garrett, Geological Survey of Canada L. Graham Closs,


  1. Monitoring soil geochemistry in the urban environment: A comparison of studies in p 1972 and 2005 in Denver, Colorado David B. Smith, Karl J. Ellefsen, U.S. Geological Survey Robert G. Garrett, Geological Survey of Canada L. Graham Closs, Colorado School of Mines

  2. Outline  Two soil geochemical surveys of the Denver metro area • 1972 • 2005 200  Abundance and distribution of selected elements from each survey elements from each survey  Observed changes in soil composition between 1972 and 2005 between 1972 and 2005

  3. 1972 Geochemical Survey  Skyline Laboratories, Wheat Ridge, CO  Roadside soils (top 15 cm)  433 sites at 1-mile centers (section ( corners, as defined by the Public Lands Survey System) y y )  Sieved to less than 250 µm  Analyzed for Cu Pb Zn Cd Hg  Analyzed for Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd, Hg

  4. Power Power Plants Downtown Smelters

  5. View from Globe Smelter toward Denver Denver

  6. 2005 Geochemical Survey 2005 Geochemical Survey  USGS Colorado School of Mines  USGS, Colorado School of Mines  Collected same sites as 1972 survey  Sieved to less than 250 µm  Analyzed both 2005 samples and y p 1972 samples for more than 40 elements

  7. Change between 1972 and 2005 Change between 1972 and 2005 El Elements showing most change*: Pb, As, Hg, t h i t h * Pb A H Cd, Mo, Al *Based on Wilcoxon rank sum test and confirmed by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test at 95% confidence level

  8. 19 61 61 83

  9. 19 mg/kg Nat. Avg. N t A

  10. 19 mg/kg Nat. Avg.

  11. Concentration in 2005 minus concentration in 1972

  12. 0.2 0.6 0.7

  13. Summary  Pb, As, Hg, Cd, Cu, Mo, Sb, Sn, and Zn elevated in “central Denver” in both surveys—Anthropogenic sources  Greatest change generally for these elements • Clean Air Act (1970) • Remediation activities  Urban geochemical “footprint” ~20 – 30 km in diameter  Mg, K, Fe, Al, V, Ce, La have clear geogenic sources Mg, K, Fe, Al, V, Ce, La have clear geogenic sources  Quantifying change not straightforward • Site duplication uncertain • Roadside soils “dynamic” sample medium Roadside soils dynamic sample medium • Possible dilution from roadside dust and debris over 33 yrs

  14. Denver study: Chapter 30, Chapter 30, p. 521 - 546, published in published in April 2011

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend