Minimum Wage update: non-hospital residential health care - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

minimum wage update non hospital residential health care
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Minimum Wage update: non-hospital residential health care - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS Minimum Wage update: non-hospital residential health care Committee of the Whole October 18, 2017 Background On June 30, 2017, City Council approved a municipal minimum wage for the City of Minneapolis. Council


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

Minimum Wage – update: non-hospital residential health care

Committee of the Whole October 18, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • On June 30, 2017, City Council approved a

municipal minimum wage for the City of Minneapolis.

  • Council also asked staff to meet with stakeholders

in non-hospital residential care enterprises qualifying as large businesses to determine whether they could accommodate minimum wage increases as set forth by policy.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

What we learned

  • The issue of medical reimbursement for medical

professionals is complex and varied.

  • Among some of the most critical nuances are rates can
  • ften lag behind service delivery between 18 to as

much as 27 months. For others, their rates are “banded” and tied to rates determined by the state legislature.

  • Recent contracts negotiation with labor have also

impacted rates for nursing and home care professionals, even if not a part of a collective bargaining unit.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Nursing home facilities

  • In 2015, the MN Legislature authorized a new system for

nursing facility reimbursement rates called Value-Based Reimbursement or “VBR.”

  • As of 2016 under VBR, reimbursement rates are based
  • n the actual costs of resident care, but there are limits:

if a facility’s care-related costs are greater than its limit, the facility’s rate would not reflect the portion of the costs in excess of the limit.

  • As with previous systems, facilities’ rates are case-mix

adjusted—facilities receive higher rates to care for more-resource intensive patients.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Nursing home facilities

A few more considerations regarding reimbursement:

  • There’s an additional quality component that impacts a facility's

rates with those scoring higher in quality surveys or indicators,

  • r those applying for quality incentives based on measurable
  • utcomes, eligible for up to 5% of their operating payment rate,

though all providers must achieve measurable program

  • utcomes to retain full funding.
  • Additionally, MN’s rate equalization law requires nursing home

facilities to provide equal services to its residents, regardless of payer source – meaning they cannot charge private paying residents more than the rate paid by the state under its medical assistance program (Medicaid).

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Nursing home facilities

VBR shows some positive trends in wages and staffing, due in part to the market needing to remain competitive in this field. A 2017 Nursing Facility Payment Reform report issued by the Department of Human Services indicates:

  • Wages: per hour increases ranged from 3%-12% from 2015

to 2016 under VBR, with “facilities much more likely to use VBR funds to provide increases in wages than in benefits.”

  • Staffing: noted a “continuing trend of staffing level increases.

One-hundred eight facilities (30%) indicated that they increased staffing levels due to the increase in funds from VBR.”

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Nursing home facilities

But there are flaws as well:

  • 18-27 month gap or lag between when facilities report their

costs and the subsequent associated payment rate year – something that happens with most healthcare providers seeking reimbursement from Medicaid.

  • Does not include an inflationary adjustment in rate setting –

something advocates are trying to get included in the future.

  • Prior to moving to VBR, most nursing homes were under a 4

year rate freeze and so are still catching up from that period in time.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Nursing home facilities

LeadingAge Minnesota:

  • Represent about 60-70 members in Minneapolis, including 10 nursing

homes.

  • Importantly, are supportive of efforts to increase minimum wage for

workers – their request is:

  • Modify the phase in depending on size of employer and whether such

employers provide medical benefits (6 years if not providing benefits and 8 years if providing benefits) or

  • Treat all nursing home providers as “small” for purposes of implementation.
  • Their date reveals:
  • The “lowest wage paid for these positions is below $15 in all cases but one, and
  • ther than nursing assistants is often $3 or more less than $15. Again with the

exception of nursing assistants, the average wages in all settings are also below $15.”

  • It also reveals consistency with what we know: most non hospital health care

facilities are already paying above minimum wage in order to stay competitive. In fact of the 22 facilities surveyed by LeadingAge, almost 1/3 (32%) already have an average wage above $15/hr.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Nursing home facilities

This is consistent with our initial report containing DEED data:

  • Nursing care facilities: 7 employers/61 employees/$15.57 avg. wage
  • Home health care facilities: 23 employers/215 employees/$10.95 avg. wage
  • Assisted living facilities: 7 employers/167 employees/$9.99 avg. wage
  • Other residential facilities: 14 employers/142 employees/$8.39 avg. wage

1-25 employees

  • Nursing care facilities: <5 (no identifying data is available)
  • Home health care facilities: 9 employers/299 employees/$8.12 avg. wage
  • Other residential facilities: <5 (no identifying data is available)

26-50 employees

  • Nursing care facilities: <5 (no identifying data is available)
  • Home health care facilities: 8 employers/554 employees/$10.25 avg. wage
  • Assisted living facilities: <5 (no identifying data is available)
  • Other residential facilities: <5 (no identifying data is available)

51-100 employees

  • Nursing care facilities: 9 employers/1375 employees/$16.54 avg. wage
  • Home health care facilities: 8 employers/1136 employees/$11.05 avg. wage
  • Assisted living facilities: <5 (no identifying data is available)
  • Other residential facilities: <5 (no identifying data is available)

101-250 employees

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Other types of home and community-based care

  • We had an opportunity to speak with other

stakeholders in this general non-hospital health care space whose reimbursement rates are tied to some type of regulation.

  • Specifically, we met with ARRM who represents

home and community-based services providers who provide direct support services for people living with disabilities (like PCA’s, for ex.).

  • Wages for these professionals are almost entirely

influenced by the reimbursement rates for services set by the state.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Other types of home and community-based care

  • While there is no lag in payment for these services,

rates for this group are currently “banded” – meaning the state has allowed for rates to be increased throughout the state on a staggered basis.

  • Average of wages throughout the state are $11.97,

with slightly higher rates for those in urban metro areas.

  • By 2018, rates for all professionals are intended to

reach around $13/hr.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Other types of home and community-based care

  • Aside from reimbursement rates, they also expressed concern

with providers who have PCA’s provide services that involve short trips to the city.

  • For example, many PCA’s travel to Minneapolis to attend a Twins

game, visit a museum or go to the theater. Given that our

  • rdinance applies to any employee who performs at least two

hours of work in a calendar week within the City of Minneapolis, such PCA’s would be covered by the ordinance.

  • While also supportive of the City’s efforts to raise the minimum

wage, their ask was an outright exemption and if not, a phased in approach that matched their “banded” rate schedule.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Staff considerations

  • Current rates in comparison to Minneapolis policy

requirements

  • Impacts of providing unique accommodations

based on industry

  • Ability to review impacts by industry through

minimum wage impact study

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Staff considerations

  • Ultimately, we do not recommend a change in

policy, but do recommend:

  • Ensuring staff report back on this industry specifically as

part of the minimum wage impact assessment.

  • Including support for improvements to rate

reimbursement rates for all non-hospital health care providers in our legislative policy agenda that includes considerations such as inflation rate inclusion and reduction or elimination of the reimbursement lag for providers.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Questions?