Minimizing resource protection in IP over WDM networks: Multi- layer Shared Backup Router
- A. Mayoral, V. López, Ori Gerstel, Eleni Palkopoulou, O. Gonzalez de Dios,
J.P. Fernández-Palacios
Minimizing resource protection in IP over WDM networks: Multi- - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Minimizing resource protection in IP over WDM networks: Multi- layer Shared Backup Router A. Mayoral, V. Lpez, Ori Gerstel, Eleni Palkopoulou, O. Gonzalez de Dios, J.P. Fernndez-Palacios Index Introduction 01 Multi-layer Restoration
Minimizing resource protection in IP over WDM networks: Multi- layer Shared Backup Router
J.P. Fernández-Palacios
01 02 03 04 05
Introduction Multi-layer Restoration Techniques Impact on CAPEX reduction Conclusions Multi-Layer Shared Backup Router use case
4 Core Networks Evolution Telefónica I+D
§ 1+1, 1:1 or M:N Protection § Restoration
… … …
Traffic is rerouted using FRR
Interconnection Routers Transit Routers Access Routers
6 Core Networks Evolution Telefónica I+D
§ GMPLS restoration of “alien” lambdas generated by IP colored ports. § Without alien wavelength, other scenarios are hidden to the IP.
§ Multi-layer Restoration after a port failure. § Multilayer Shared Back-up Router after a node failure
Trials with vendors ComMag Paper Jan 2014 This work
7 Core Networks Evolution Telefónica I+D
Back up IP port
A B
preconfigured)
provisioning)
9 Core Networks Evolution Telefónica I+D
… … …
Interconnection Routers Transit Routers Access Routers Shared Backup Routers
10 Core Networks Evolution Telefónica I+D
Access R1 Access Region 2 Transit R1 Transit R2 Transit Backup R3 Interconnection Transit R3 Access R3
Currently, MPLS survability only can be done using pre-stablished links. (Fixed neighbours).
connectivity and dynamicity to recover both layer failures.
number of resources to drive traffic available.
11 Core Networks Evolution Telefónica I+D
RA RA
RT RT RT Region 1 Region 2
10G Interface
100%
Single Failure: Connectivity lost and then, ML-Path establishment
Shared protection router. 100% After the failure, a new path is stablished with the UNI interface. 100% Traffic recovered in less than one minute With this approach CapEx can be decreased because of less backup routers needed.
13 Core Networks Evolution Telefónica I+D
and MLSBR schemes assuming a MTBF of 3 years.
protection scheme as MTTR is greater for the same availability.
1 2 3 4 12 5 6 10 11 8 7 9 18 25 16 13 14 15 17 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 23 29 24 30 TR11 TR12 TR13 TR14 TR3 TR4 TR5 TR6 TR1 TR2 TR7 TR8 TR9 TR10 Add/drop Node OXC
Number of Backup Routers Availability 2 3 4 5 6 Protection
99,99% 33,0 59,2 86,6 110,7 132,6 11,1 99,999% 14,3 31,9 51,6 72,4 91,0 3,4 99,9999% 6,7 17,6 31,9 47,2 63,6 0,1
Table 1: Comparison between MLBSR and Protection in terms of MTTR (days)
PEX reduction
14 Core Networks Evolution Telefónica I+D
maximum occupation of 80% for 1+1 protection.
can vary.
number of IP ports.
the number of SBR grows, but savings are conserved in 2017.
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 2 3 4 5 6
% IP ports reduction # Shared Backup Routers 2012 2017
16 Core Networks Evolution Telefónica I+D
05
can increase the MTTR.
approaches and defines requirements to take into account to deploy the solution.
18 Core Networks Evolution Telefónica I+D
1+1 IP Protection with an additional router RA RA RA RA
RT RT RT RT Región 1 Región 2
10G Interface
50% 50% 50% 100% Additional protection router After the first failure an UNI request is used to create a new backup path. 50% Again we are in the initial situation with protection mechanisims ready. 50%
With multi-layer restoration and extra router we can relax even more the MTTR requisites.
Single Failure: Typical Operation: Traffic is moved to backup router.