SLIDE 24 Introduction Fingerprints prediction Database matching Result Conclusion Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Experiment 3
Learning curve
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
APCI−ITFT−CID(295)
percent of training data averge prediction error for fingerprints of baseline <= 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
../APCI−ITFT−HCD(882)
percent of training data averge prediction error for fingerprints of baseline <= 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
../APCI−ITFT(1177)
percent of training data averge prediction error for fingerprints of baseline <= 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
../LC−ESI−ITFT−CID(447)
percent of training data averge prediction error for fingerprints of baseline <= 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
../LC−ESI−ITFT−HCD(2655)
percent of training data averge prediction error for fingerprints of baseline <= 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
LC−ESI−QTOF(1027)
percent of training data averge prediction error for fingerprints of baseline <= 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Figure 9: Blue line is training error; red line is cross validation prediction error; black line is the relative rank of the correct molecule. Matching database is Kegg.
Huibin Shen Metabolite Identification via Machine Learning