Management Goal / Thesis Goal: Home Away from Home Lighting Depth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Name: Broadway Plaza Location: Downtown Rochester, Minnesota Building Size: 29 Stories Primary Occupancy: Apartment Building Mixed Occupancy: Business/Retail (Floors 1-3) Management Goal / Thesis Goal:  Home Away from Home

Lighting Depth  Apartment Lobby  Exterior Façade  Pool  Function Room  Skyway  Conference Room  Conference Room Comparison Study Electrical Depth and Construction Management Breadth  Distribution System Redesign and Analysis  Short Circuit Analysis Daylighting, Mechanical, and Construction Management Breadth  Daylighting Study  HAP Analysis of Pool Loads  Dimming Cost and Energy Savings  SkyCalc Preliminary Analysis

Lighting Depth: Spaces Not Being Presented Exterior Facade Skyway Function Room Conference Room

Lighting Redesign: Apartment Lobby Location: 1 st Floor Function:  Main entrance/Focal point  Casual waiting tasks

Schematic Design Concept Design Goals  Providing a warm & inviting ambience  Creating focal points  Guiding visitors Design Criteria  Luminances of Room Surfaces Schematic Design Sketches  System Control and Flexibility  Horizontal Illuminance  10fc ~ General Entrance  30fc ~ Lounge Work Plane  50fc ~ Receptionist Desk  Vertical Illuminance  10fc ~ Receptionist  5fc ~ General Areas

Solution: Entry Lighting Plan WW2 Linear Wall C1 Wash Fluorescent Cyc Light FC1 Fluorescent Cove FP2 Indirect-Direct Linear Pendant SC2 UC1 FD1 Linear Tasklight CF Downlight Sconce

Solution: Lounge Lighting Plan SP2 Adjustable Spotlight FP3 Decorative Bowl Pendant L1 FC1 Floor Fluorescent Lamp Cove

Solution Summary Luminaire Lamp Ballast/ Description Mounting Quantity Watts Designation # Type Transformer FC1 Low-profile cove Cove 1 F54T5 DIM-ELEC. 13 796 Linear Indirect-Direct FP2 Pendant 2 F28T5 DIM-ELEC. 2 124 Pendant WW2 Perimeter wall wash Recessed 1 F32T8 ELECTRONIC 4 140 UC1 Tasklight Surface 2 F13T5 ELECTRONIC 2 56 SP2 Spotlight Recessed 1 20MR16/SP NA 4 80 FP3 Decorative bowl pendant Pendant 4 CF42W DIM-ELEC. 4 608 SC2 Linear sconce Wall 1 35MR11 NA 2 70 L1 Floor lamp Floor 1 100A NA 4 400 28T5 (red) 1 of 28T5 (green) Integrated Digital C1 Cyc light Floor 2 256 each 28T5 (blue) (Dimmable) 28T5 (white) FD1 CF downlight Recessed 1 CF32W DIM-ELEC. 3 105 Power Consumption 2635 ASHRAE 90.1 Power Allowance: 1.8W/sq.ft. Power Density 1.42 W/sq.ft. Energy Savings  11% below existing design  21% below ASHRAE 90.1

Lounge Renderings IESNA: 30 fc Recommendation Design Average: 40 fc

Entry Renderings

Fire Wall Model Study Luminaire Lamp Ballast/ Description Mounting Designation # Type Transformer 28T5 (red) 1 of 28T5 (green) Integrated Digital C1 Cyc light Floor each 28T5 (blue) (Dimmable) 28T5 (white) Replication Wall Section

Lighting Redesign: Pool Location: Northeast Corner of 3 rd Floor Function:  Private Pool and Spa Area

Schematic Design Concept Design Goals  Relaxed, private, controllable atmosphere created  Safety hazards minimized  Reflected glare minimized  Maintenance simplified Design Criteria Schematic Design Sketches  Daylighting Integration and Control  Uniformity of Light Distribution •Coefficient of Variation ~ 0.3 or less  Horizontal Illuminance  30 fc ~ Pool Surface (Recreational swimming)  20 fc ~ 3 ft above the deck

Solution: Pool Lighting Plan FP4 Linear Indirect Lensed Pendant FD5 CF Lensed Downlight C3,C4 Fiber optic Color-changing Floodlight, 10° tilt

Control System Details Control System  5 Zones, a-e  Radio frequency control, no wiring necessary  Zone changes possible  4 Preset Scenes Integrated Photocell

Solution Summary Luminaire Lamp Ballast/ Description Mounting Quantity Watts Designation # Type Transformer FP4 Indirect lensed pendant Pendant 1 F54T5 DIM-ELEC. 40 2440 FD5 CF lensed downlight Recessed 1 CF32W DIM-ELEC. 8 484 Underwater Luminaires Color-changing NA (MH ballast in C3 In-pool 1 Fiber Optic 3 underwater flood lens base unit) Color-changing NA (MH ballast in C4 In-pool 1 Fiber Optic 2 510 underwater flood lens base unit) Side light fiber optic NA (MH ballast in C5 In-pool 1 Fiber Optic 1 (96ft) cable base unit) Power Consumption 2924 ASHRAE 90.1 Power Allowance: 1.1W/sq.ft. Power Density 1.0 W/sq.ft. Underwater Power Allowance: 1.0W/sq.ft. Underwater Consumption 510 Power Density 0.97 W/sq.ft. Energy Savings  10% below existing design  10% below ASHRAE 90.1

Pool Rendering IESNA: 30 fc Recommendation Design Average: 31 fc Pool

Pool Renderings In-pool lighting only

208V vs. 480V & 208V Distribution System Analysis Purpose  Analysis of alternative power distribution system based on first cost and efficiency  In conjunction with the Construction Management Breadth Existing System  (2) transformers, 2500 kVA-480V Multifunction floors, 1000 kVA-208V Residential Redesigned System  (1) 3750 kVA-208V Transformer Analysis Method  Reconfiguration and resizing of electrical equipment and system paths  Relocation of equipment (not included)  Cost analysis

208V Single-Line Diagram

Distribution System Cost Analysis  RS Means 2003 Electrical Cost Data (materials & labor)  Location Factor: Rochester, Minnesota  Time Adjustment: 2002 Design Total Cost Comparisons 37% Utilization Transformer Panel/Wiring Location Time Adjustment Total Cost Increase for Voltages Cost Costs, etc. Factor 208V Only $61,490.00 $622,973.60 1.02 0.975 $680,699.05 Redesign 480V & 208V $68,820.00 $431,389.11 1.02 0.975 $497,457.96 Conclusions  Efficiency, Maintenance, and safety paralleled  First-cost basis ~ Maintain existing power distribution, 480V & 208V

Daylighting Analysis E bv = M bv /2 = (E 1/2 kv * _ b )/2 Goals E 1/2 kv  Increase skywell efficiency  Decrease glass area  Allow dimming Existing Condition Conclusion  Decrease glass area decrease load  Minimal light loss

Finalized Redesign Well ~ 40’ X 6’ Splay ~47’ X 14’ Shading Glazing Description Trans. U-Value SHGC Coefficient Insulating Triple Glazing Glass with Krypton Gas Fill, 63% 0.13 0.55 0.48 1 1/4" Overall Depth

Hap Analysis Existing Design Redesign Existing: 8.6 Tons Redesign: 7.4 Tons Savings: 1.2 Tons or 86% of original  Energy Savings  No equipment resizing

Daylighting Analysis Pool Dimming Yearly Savings: $164.17 Dimming vs. Non-Dimming Equipment Cost Difference Time of Payback Alternative Option $400 2.5 years  Direct switching  Payback~0.5 years Skyway Dimming Yearly Savings: $246.35 Dimming vs. Non-Dimming Equipment Cost Difference Time of Payback $1820 7.4 years With (11pm-5am) Dimming Considered 5.3 years

Conclusions Lighting Depth  Creates a “home away from home” welcoming atmosphere  Provides flexibility and easy control for users  Satisfies all goals and design criteria set forth Electrical Depth and CM Breadth  Alternative power distribution system viable  Selection of existing system based on first cost Daylighting, Mechanical, and CM Breadth  Mechanical energy savings incurred  Electrical energy consumption decreased

THANK YOU Individuals and Companies Mr. Edward Wunderley, Mr. Donald Rimer, and Mr. Jack Grzybek of Burt Hill Mr. Michael Manley of Royal Management & Development Mr. Joseph Crick of Oakwood Broadway Plaza Mr. Andrew Sedlak Faculty Personal Dr. Richard Mistrick My fiancé, Todd Dr. Martin Moeck My parents, Donald and Janice Professor Kevin Parfitt Lori, AJ, and Aaron Jonathan Dougherty All of my fellow AE’s Professor Paul Bowers

Lighting Depth: Spaces Not Being Presented Exterior Facade Skyway Function Room Conference Room

Daylighting Analysis Pool  Continuous dimming over pool Skyway  Continuous dimming along corridor AGI 32 Software Study Study Date Dates Represented  Rochester, MN weather data December 21 November 13 to February 12 February 13 to May 12  3 Sky Conditions March 21 August 13 to November 12  (5) 2-hour intervals per day June 21 May 13 to August 12

HAP Analysis Methodology  Proper U-value calculation of surfaces  Lighting Load: 1.0 W/sq.ft.  Occupancy ~ 10 people  Evaporation load of pool (2003 ASHRAE HVAC Applications) w p = 0.1A(p w - p a )F a = 2.499 lb/h Btuh = w p * 45Btu/lb = 112.5 Btuh (latent load) Where: p a = saturation pressure at room air dew point p w = saturation vapor pressure taken at surface water temperature F a = 0.65, Condominium Pool Water Temperature = 80 ° F Dry Bulb Air Temperature = 78 ° F % Relative Humidity = 55

208V Single-Line Diagram