malaysia
play

MALAYSIA PRODUCTIVITY CORPORATION D R I V I N G P R O D U C T I V I - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MALAYSIA PRODUCTIVITY CORPORATION D R I V I N G P R O D U C T I V I T Y O F T H E N AT I O N KS#1 1/2019 Meeting Chair: Hari Narayanan PSDC Penang | 19 March 2019 | 10:00 am ~ 12:00 nn 1 EEPN - SULIT KS#1 Work Plan 2019 (original) KPI


  1. MALAYSIA PRODUCTIVITY CORPORATION D R I V I N G P R O D U C T I V I T Y O F T H E N AT I O N KS#1 1/2019 Meeting Chair: Hari Narayanan PSDC Penang | 19 March 2019 | 10:00 am ~ 12:00 nn 1 EEPN - SULIT

  2. KS#1 Work Plan 2019 (original) KPI 2019 Measure Key Strategies Action Items 1. MCAD tools provisioning for SME’s. Enroll D&D SMEs to participate in pay - # of SMEs 6 per-use model participating Budget (RM) 2.5M Lead by MIMOS 2. Prioritized executions of the Test Lab Study Results. More details after 2 Actionable Items completion of report by EOY2018 Budget (RM) - Lead by SIRIM 3. Post Finishing School for Talents for IC Design # of fresh engineers 300 trained Enhance Budget (RM) 6.9M Lead by CREST/MIMOS Higher Value- Added 4. MIDA’s incentive process enhancement by reviewing 4 areas. Star rating based > 4 Activities Measure satisfaction rating of applicants’ experience out of 5 stars Budget (RM) - Lead by MIDA 5. IC Design Consortium: Sharpen and enable the focus to win business 3 # of business wins Budget (RM) - Lead by MIMOS Proposal Proposal adopted by MOE; 6. Universities Curriculum Enhancement for IC Design: Develop a proposal with Adopted for implementation in 3~4 Uni’s , and BEM and MQA. Budget for travels and meetings 2019/2020 session Budget (RM) 50K Lead by MOE Note: Achievement of KPIs is subjected to availability Note: Achievement of KPIs is subjected to availability Total Budget for 2019 (RM) 9,450K 2 of requested funding for EEPN, and delivery partners of requested funding for EEPN, and delivery partners

  3. KS#1 Work Plan 2019 (revised) KPI 2019 Measure Key Strategies Action Items 1. MCAD tools provisioning for SME’s. Enroll D&D SMEs to participate in pay - # of SMEs 6 per-use model participating Budget (RM) 2.5M Lead by MIMOS 2. Prioritized executions of the Test Lab Study Results. 7 Actionable Items 7 Actionable Items identifies upon completion of report in Feb 2019 Budget (RM) - Lead by SIRIM 3. Post Finishing School (PSF) and Structured Industry Apprenticeship Program # of fresh engineers 300 (SIAP) for IC Design talent. RM6.9 requested is for 2 years of PSF (2019/2020). trained Enhance Budget (RM) 6.9M Lead by CREST/MIMOS Higher Value- Added Proposal 4. MIDA’s incentive process enhancement: Assisting in drafting a special Proposal adopted by Activities Adopted incentive paper for E&E (while waiting for revision of promoted list) MITI and MOF for Budget (RM) - implementation by Q3’19 Lead by MIDA 5. IC Design Consortium: Sharpen and enable the focus to win business x New KPI needed? Budget (RM) - Lead by MIMOS Proposal 6. Universities Curriculum Enhancement for IC Design: Develop a proposal with Proposal adopted by Adopted 3~4 Uni’s , and BEM and MQA. Budget for travels and meetings MOE; for implementation Budget (RM) 50K in 2019/2020 session Lead by MOE Note: Achievement of KPIs is subjected to availability Note: Achievement of KPIs is subjected to availability Total Budget for 2019 (RM) 9,450K 3 of requested funding for EEPN, and delivery partners of requested funding for EEPN, and delivery partners

  4. M-CAD Tools with MIMOS Latest meeting with MIMOS on 25 th January 2019 at MIDA Next Steps Action Items for MMOS • Explore collaboration with IME as a potential tools provider • Can we leverage Marii for talent development in mechanical design • Alignment with academia and matching universities’ curriculum Potential List of M&E Companies with industry needs 1. Vitrox Action Item for EEPN 2. Aemulus 3. Existec • Meet with potential end users (local automation SME’s and 4. PentaMaster suppliers) to identify their tools required and any talent gaps 5. Experia Future Action Items 6. Warta • Source of Funding (RM2.5 million) and sustainability model 7. TT Vision 8. KT Microhandling (Kobay) • Implementation details e.g. procurement, license hosting site etc 9. Coraza 4

  5. Test Lab Project USAINS presentation to stakeholders (24 th Jan 2019) 5

  6. Test Lab Project: ‘Action Items’ for EEPN KS#1 # Action Item / Description Owner / Deadline Status 1 Expand the Inventory of Test Lab to include MIMOS’s FA, Reliability Testing and MIMOS, Dr. Hari emailed WanAzli and Scanning; plus SIRIM’s FA and Reliability Testing capabilities. Deadline 26th Feb 2019 Pannir of MIMOS 2nd Feb Work with MIMOS to publish their expertise to the industry 2 Validate the capabilities of the labs as listed in the Study (by cross-checking with KS#1 David has send out .xls listing SIRIM QAS, PSDC EMC, etc) before publication to public Deadline 4th Mar 2019 3 Work with SIRIM to identify their bottlenecks and improve testing lead-time KS#1 and SIRIM Meeting w/ Zamri Mustaffa in 4th (including engagement and waiting time) Kick-start w/ SIRIM 20th Feb March at MIDA 4 Work with PSDC EMC Lab on their variable costing model, specifically to provide KS#1 and PSDC Muhamed emailed Dr.Hari 28th Jan flexible time slot engagement model for local SMEs Deadline 28th Feb 2019 PSDC to revert soon 5 Identify overall national strategy for Test Lab capabilities. Based on MITI whitepaper, KS#1 and MITI Dr. Hari emailed Aida of MITI 2nd partner w/ MITI to formulate this national agenda and strategy Review w/ MITI, 22 Feb 2019 Feb 6 Form a committee of experts to prioritize the existing gaps and provide investment KS#1, USAINS and David Khor 18FEB: David met Dr. Hari @ MIDA needed to address these gaps Nomination 22 Feb 2019 22FEB: David emailed Ho Hock Guan of Motorola Experts from Motorola and Keysight as mandatory 7 Create a cluster of test labs experts to help SMEs, by providing them with coaching KS#1, MIMOS and SIRIM and guidance on best approach to ensure minimal iterations of their testing and Deadline review w/ Dr. Pannir: qualifications cycles 12 Mar 2019 6

  7. Meeting with SIRIM Bottleneck and improve test lead time (including engagement and waiting time Update was done by Pn. Hahnas, SIRIM QAS (21st Feb 2019) Late delivery time due to the need of rectify back with the customers in the case of sample failure Another reason is the testing of products are varies, some need longer time Recommendation: - • SIRIM does have the “Testing Management System” whereby can obtain the customer satisfaction/feedback • To collect data from the system for the trend of the rating of customer satisfaction (by monthly/yearly basis) 7

  8. Meeting with SIRIM ROHS 3 (to comply with International Standard ) … (21st Feb 2019) • SIRIM does consider to develop their test lab in complying with ROHS 3. • However, due to several reasons the action to upgrading the lab is on hold. To conduct 4 additional test, SIRIM need to set up 4 more lab. • Constraint on funding in purchasing/upgrading the equipment is one of the reason • Lack of expertise is another reason • SIRIM does request for a few quotations for the upgrading of test lab but somehow on hold due to the change of Ministries taken over the agenda. Recommendation:- • To re-propose to the management on upgrading the lab in order to comply with ROHS 3 including:- • Equipment cost to set up 4 more lab • Consultation fees of the supplier • Training fees to the employees • Cost and benefit analysis? 8

  9. TÜV Rheinland’s Event in Penang Seminar and Networking Lunch A taste of Product Testing, Inspection and Certifications Date: 26 March 2019 Time: 9:30am ~ 2:00pm Venue: Olive Tree Hotel, Penang Hosted by TÜV Rheinland as technical partner with EEPN and SME Corp as event partners 9

  10. Post Finishing School Scoping • Post Finishing School AND SIAP-IC? 10

  11. Timeline: PSF-IC (Cohort Year 4) 11

  12. Timeline: SIAP-IC (Cohort Year 3) 12

  13. Industry Feedback re: PSF and SIAP topics As at 21 st Feb 2019, 4 companies have reverted • Intel, UST Global, Symmid Corporation and Emerald Systems 13

  14. Industry Feedback re: PSF and SIAP topics 14

  15. Industry Feedback re: PSF and SIAP topics MOE-Intel Elite Internship Program Symmid Corporation 15

  16. SIAP Costing by Haziati (email 30 th Jan 2019) Option #1: University handles on their own. Option #2: Training + Program Management Cost Option #3: The initial proposed budget at RM2.2++ 16

  17. Post School Finishing Costing Based on CREST's SIAP-IC Option #3: The initial proposed budget at RM2.2++ EEPN will ask from MOHR/HRDF (for Post Finishing School for IC Design) • Targeting 300 fresh graduates per year. • Amount requested is RM6.9 million for 2 years (2019 and 2020) Meeting with Betty Hassan of MOHR and HRDF team on 31 st Jan 2019 at Putrajaya Two Action items were proposed: 1. EEPN to prepare proposal for National Talent Strategy for E&E Industry and submit MOHR. Ms. Betty to review and advise on next action plans 2. EEPN to prepare proposal to utilize MOHR-MOE RM 14 million on reskilling budget for existing workforce and yet-to-be employed graduates related to I4.0, for both KS#1 and KS#2 17

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend