MALAYSIA PRODUCTIVITY CORPORATION D R I V I N G P R O D U C T I V I - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MALAYSIA

D R I V I N G P R O D U C T I V I T Y O F T H E N AT I O N

PRODUCTIVITY CORPORATION

KS#1 1/2019 Meeting Chair: Hari Narayanan

PSDC Penang | 19 March 2019 | 10:00 am ~ 12:00 nn

1 EEPN - SULIT

KS#1 Work Plan 2019 (original)

Note: Achievement of KPIs is subjected to availability

• f requested funding for EEPN, and delivery partners

Enhance Higher Value- Added Activities

Key Strategies Action Items

2019 Measure KPI

• 1. MCAD tools provisioning for SME’s. Enroll D&D SMEs to participate in pay-

per-use model Lead by MIMOS 6 # of SMEs participating 2.5M Budget (RM) Note: Achievement of KPIs is subjected to availability

• f requested funding for EEPN, and delivery partners

2

• 2. Prioritized executions of the Test Lab Study Results. More details after

completion of report by EOY2018 Lead by SIRIM 2 Actionable Items

• Budget (RM)
• 3. Post Finishing School for Talents for IC Design

Lead by CREST/MIMOS 300 # of fresh engineers trained 6.9M Budget (RM)

• 4. MIDA’s incentive process enhancement by reviewing 4 areas.

Measure satisfaction rating of applicants’ experience Lead by MIDA > 4 Star rating based

• ut of 5 stars
• Budget (RM)
• 5. IC Design Consortium: Sharpen and enable the focus to win business

Lead by MIMOS 3 # of business wins

• Budget (RM)
• 6. Universities Curriculum Enhancement for IC Design: Develop a proposal with

3~4 Uni’s, and BEM and MQA. Budget for travels and meetings Lead by MOE

Proposal Adopted

Proposal adopted by MOE; for implementation in 2019/2020 session

50K Budget (RM) 9,450K Total Budget for 2019 (RM)

KS#1 Work Plan 2019 (revised)

Note: Achievement of KPIs is subjected to availability

• f requested funding for EEPN, and delivery partners

Enhance Higher Value- Added Activities

Key Strategies Action Items

2019 Measure KPI

• 1. MCAD tools provisioning for SME’s. Enroll D&D SMEs to participate in pay-

per-use model Lead by MIMOS 6 # of SMEs participating 2.5M Budget (RM) Note: Achievement of KPIs is subjected to availability

• f requested funding for EEPN, and delivery partners

3

• 2. Prioritized executions of the Test Lab Study Results. 7 Actionable Items

identifies upon completion of report in Feb 2019 Lead by SIRIM 7 Actionable Items

• Budget (RM)
• 3. Post Finishing School (PSF) and Structured Industry Apprenticeship Program

(SIAP) for IC Design talent. RM6.9 requested is for 2 years of PSF (2019/2020). Lead by CREST/MIMOS 300 # of fresh engineers trained 6.9M Budget (RM)

• 4. MIDA’s incentive process enhancement: Assisting in drafting a special

incentive paper for E&E (while waiting for revision of promoted list) Lead by MIDA

Proposal Adopted Proposal adopted by MITI and MOF for implementation by Q3’19

• Budget (RM)
• 5. IC Design Consortium: Sharpen and enable the focus to win business

Lead by MIMOS x New KPI needed?

• Budget (RM)
• 6. Universities Curriculum Enhancement for IC Design: Develop a proposal with

3~4 Uni’s, and BEM and MQA. Budget for travels and meetings Lead by MOE

Proposal Adopted Proposal adopted by MOE; for implementation in 2019/2020 session

50K Budget (RM) 9,450K Total Budget for 2019 (RM)

Latest meeting with MIMOS on 25th January 2019 at MIDA Next Steps Action Items for MMOS

• Explore collaboration with IME as a potential tools provider
• Can we leverage Marii for talent development in mechanical design
• Alignment with academia and matching universities’ curriculum

with industry needs Action Item for EEPN

• Meet with potential end users (local automation SME’s and

suppliers) to identify their tools required and any talent gaps Future Action Items

• Source of Funding (RM2.5 million) and sustainability model
• Implementation details e.g. procurement, license hosting site etc

4

M-CAD Tools with MIMOS

Potential List of M&E Companies

• 1. Vitrox
• 2. Aemulus
• 3. Existec
• 4. PentaMaster
• 5. Experia
• 6. Warta
• 7. TT Vision
• 8. KT Microhandling (Kobay)
• 9. Coraza

5

USAINS presentation to stakeholders (24th Jan 2019)

Test Lab Project

Test Lab Project: ‘Action Items’ for EEPN KS#1

6

# Action Item / Description Owner / Deadline Status

1 Expand the Inventory of Test Lab to include MIMOS’s FA, Reliability Testing and Scanning; plus SIRIM’s FA and Reliability Testing capabilities. Work with MIMOS to publish their expertise to the industry MIMOS, Deadline 26th Feb 2019

• Dr. Hari emailed WanAzli and

Pannir of MIMOS 2nd Feb 2 Validate the capabilities of the labs as listed in the Study (by cross-checking with SIRIM QAS, PSDC EMC, etc) before publication to public KS#1 Deadline 4th Mar 2019 David has send out .xls listing 3 Work with SIRIM to identify their bottlenecks and improve testing lead-time (including engagement and waiting time) KS#1 and SIRIM Kick-start w/ SIRIM 20th Feb Meeting w/ Zamri Mustaffa in 4th March at MIDA 4 Work with PSDC EMC Lab on their variable costing model, specifically to provide flexible time slot engagement model for local SMEs KS#1 and PSDC Deadline 28th Feb 2019 Muhamed emailed Dr.Hari 28th Jan PSDC to revert soon 5 Identify overall national strategy for Test Lab capabilities. Based on MITI whitepaper, partner w/ MITI to formulate this national agenda and strategy KS#1 and MITI Review w/ MITI, 22 Feb 2019

• Dr. Hari emailed Aida of MITI 2nd

Feb 6 Form a committee of experts to prioritize the existing gaps and provide investment needed to address these gaps KS#1, USAINS and David Khor Nomination 22 Feb 2019 18FEB: David met Dr. Hari @ MIDA 22FEB: David emailed Ho Hock Guan of Motorola Experts from Motorola and Keysight as mandatory 7 Create a cluster of test labs experts to help SMEs, by providing them with coaching and guidance on best approach to ensure minimal iterations of their testing and qualifications cycles KS#1, MIMOS and SIRIM Deadline review w/ Dr. Pannir: 12 Mar 2019

Meeting with SIRIM

7

Bottleneck and improve test lead time (including engagement and waiting time Update was done by Pn. Hahnas, SIRIM QAS (21st Feb 2019) Late delivery time due to the need of rectify back with the customers in the case of sample failure Another reason is the testing of products are varies, some need longer time Recommendation: -

• SIRIM does have the “Testing Management System” whereby can obtain the customer

satisfaction/feedback

• To collect data from the system for the trend of the rating of customer satisfaction (by

monthly/yearly basis)

Meeting with SIRIM

8

ROHS 3 (to comply with International Standard) … (21st Feb 2019)

• SIRIM does consider to develop their test lab in complying with ROHS 3.
• However, due to several reasons the action to upgrading the lab is on hold. To conduct

4 additional test, SIRIM need to set up 4 more lab.

• Constraint on funding in purchasing/upgrading the equipment is one of the reason
• Lack of expertise is another reason
• SIRIM does request for a few quotations for the upgrading of test lab but somehow on

hold due to the change of Ministries taken over the agenda. Recommendation:-

• To re-propose to the management on upgrading the lab in order to comply with ROHS

3 including:-

• Equipment cost to set up 4 more lab
• Consultation fees of the supplier
• Training fees to the employees
• Cost and benefit analysis?

TÜV Rheinland’s Event in Penang

9

Seminar and Networking Lunch A taste of Product Testing, Inspection and Certifications Date: 26 March 2019 Time: 9:30am ~ 2:00pm Venue: Olive Tree Hotel, Penang

Hosted by TÜV Rheinland as technical partner with EEPN and SME Corp as event partners

Scoping

• Post Finishing School AND SIAP-IC?

10

Post Finishing School

11

Timeline: PSF-IC (Cohort Year 4)

12

Timeline: SIAP-IC (Cohort Year 3)

As at 21st Feb 2019, 4 companies have reverted

• Intel, UST Global, Symmid Corporation and Emerald Systems

13

Industry Feedback re: PSF and SIAP topics

14

Industry Feedback re: PSF and SIAP topics

15

Industry Feedback re: PSF and SIAP topics

MOE-Intel Elite Internship Program Symmid Corporation

16

SIAP Costing by Haziati (email 30th Jan 2019)

Option #1: University handles on their own. Option #2: Training + Program Management Cost Option #3: The initial proposed budget at RM2.2++

17

Post School Finishing Costing

Based on CREST's SIAP-IC Option #3: The initial proposed budget at RM2.2++ EEPN will ask from MOHR/HRDF (for Post Finishing School for IC Design)

• Targeting 300 fresh graduates per year.
• Amount requested is RM6.9 million for 2 years (2019 and 2020)

Meeting with Betty Hassan of MOHR and HRDF team on 31st Jan 2019 at Putrajaya Two Action items were proposed:

• 1. EEPN to prepare proposal for National Talent Strategy for E&E Industry and submit
• MOHR. Ms. Betty to review and advise on next action plans
• 2. EEPN to prepare proposal to utilize MOHR-MOE RM 14 million on reskilling budget

for existing workforce and yet-to-be employed graduates related to I4.0, for both KS#1 and KS#2

High Level Opportunities Meeting with Ms. Jasbir and MIDA on 9th Jan 2019 1. Formulate a Strategic Investment Policy to provide guidance on strategically aligned investments 2. ‘Promoted investments’ list should be regularly updated and revised to stay relevant 3. Leverage neutral third-party expertise to support applications, whenever necessary 4. The NCI chairman and committee must be empowered to make decisions and thus be responsible and accountable 5. Explore additional alternative measurements beyond ‘value-added percentage’ to strengthen justifications 6. Form a federation of E&E industry to provide feedback and recommendations

18

MIDA’s Incentives process enhancement

Specific Direct Opportunity for EEPN Meeting with Ms. Azlina and MIDA team on 18th Feb 2019 Assisting MIDA in drafting a proposal re: MIDA Special Incentives for E&E Industry

• While waiting for amendments to promoted list; which is a lengthy process

Current process

1. Incentives applications endorsed by NCI, and presented to MOF. 2. Applications are regularly rejected by MOF, due to inability to meet ITA criteria – Value Added of 40% (can’t met due to transfer pricing and high import value) – ‘Cukai kali kedua’ and ‘peratusan galakan yang tinggi’ (i.e. 100% of incentives)

New proposal

• NCI to recommended new lower criteria for approval

– Less than 40% Value Added, and multi-rounds of incentives

• Additional scope, covering D&D and Engineering Services
• In return, MIDA will propose a 4-column of Tiered Incentives, and obligations from recipients of

incentives

19

MIDA’s Incentives process enhancement

Proposal to be tabled to MITI, and then MOF, for approval (starting March 2019)

Follow up from ICD Consortium meeting on 9th Jan 2019 at MIDA

20

IC Design Consortium

No Action Item Status 1 Check with CREST management team’s on their interest to own IC Design Consortium.

• Action Owner: Dr. Hari to review with Jaffri (CEO of CREST) by 15 Jan 2019

Jaffri was informed, but has not revert 2 Schedule meeting with Silterra i.e. Firdaus and Tahir (gauge interest to own IC Design Consortium), with MIMOS, CREST

• Action Owner: MPC (as secretariat) by 1st week of Feb’19

No Done. Still applicable? 3 Schedule a 3-hour meeting with the 3 founding members

• Action Owner: MPC (as secretariat)
• Founding members are Oppstar, Infinecs and Symmid, plus MATRADE; 25th Jan
• Done. Group meeting was held
• n 25th Jan 2019 (MIDA)

together with MATRADE 4 Further clean up draft Consortium document for Governance Structure, Rules of Engagement etc

• Action Owner: Edward of MIMOS , before 20th Jan 2019

1st meeting on 25th Jan 2019 2nd meeting on 18th Feb 2019 5 Research 3 additional names e.g. Optbuild, QRF Solutions and Stellar Services (ex- Grectronics) … suitability to be part of consortium?

• Action Owners: Shahiman & Edward from MIMOS, by 20th Jan 2019
• Additional two interested

Stellar and QRF

• No reply from OptBuild

21

IC Design Consortium

Notes from 18th Feb Meeting

Decision:

• Make MyMS a legal entity which will represent all the members in market development and commercial
• engagement. This Product-Based entity will have 2 operation models

Two possible Models

1. Engage w/ private customers or Government for turnkey project. Pass through to members w/ a 10% commission 2. Identify a product for development. Engage members for resources and cost implications. Possible shared IP

Next Steps

– Meet with My-MS to draft details of Ver 1.0 proposa. MIMOS to facilitate – Meet separately with 3~4 consortium members for their buy-in – MIMOS and My-MS to refine Ver 2.0 proposal – Present back to KS#1 team

Update 21 Feb (Ed’s email) – MIMOS requests more time to meet with My-MS to discuss concerns re: potential business framework, roles and responsibilities etc Meeting with Damian re: how MATRADE can help

Summary of Action Items from meeting with MOE on 13th Feb 2019 at Putrajaya

22

Universities Curriculum Enhancement

# Topic Description Owner Status

1 Focus on remaining ten 3D post grads MOE to review the renaming 10 3D post grads, and review their career aspirations. Provide an attractive package for them to stay on and embark on the PhD program. Work on alternative funding for the PhD with CREST. Urgency is due to Universities are holding these post grads with no funding to retain them Prof Dr. Arham (MOE) TBD 2 Duration of Internship program MOE to review the 6-month internship requirement, and pilot with selected Universities Universities reps highlight willingness to participate, subject to their Deans/VCs agreement. Implementation concerns are EAC, MQA and BEM. Prof Dr. Arham (MOE) TBD 3 Refinement of SIAP Program CREST and MIMOS to learn from 3D curriculum gap self-analysis to improve and refine SIAP CREST to conduct a workshop with relevant parties e.g. MIMOS, TalentCorp, CEDEC, Universities and Industries for this purpose

• Dr. Norazmi

(CREST)

• 1. Working Discussion

with Industry (7th March, CREST)

• 2. Workshop between

Industry & University by BHI MoE (20th March, full day, CREST) 4 Co-Funding for Post- School Finish (PSF) program As a stop-gap measure, the team has come out with Post-School Finish (PSF) programs for the 2019 and 2020. Unfortunately, we are constrained by lack of funding

• Dr. Norazmi (CREST) to work with Prof. Dr. Arham (MOE) on pursue for funding from MOE .
• Dr. Norazmi

(CREST) TBD EEPN to follow up with TalentCorp on any remaining budget to fund PSF program MPC (EEPN Secretariat) TBD

Thank You

MPC TIP @MPC_HQ https://www.facebook.com/MPCHQ @mpc_hq

23

Latest meeting on 25th Jan 2019 (MIDA)

• Should it be a project-based consortium, or a resource-based consortium?
• Resource-based

– Immediate revenue generation – Cost-plus model

• Project-based

– Strategy for ‘market access’ – Need strong financial backing – Long gestation period

• MyMS Case Study:

– Need to focus on a niche market and lock-in an anchor customer

Decision : Team agreed to form a JV for a IC Product Company

24

IC Design Consortium