making sovereign debt safe with a
play

MAKING SOVEREIGN DEBT SAFE WITH A FINANCIAL STABILITY FUND (BY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A DISCUSSION OF MAKING SOVEREIGN DEBT SAFE WITH A FINANCIAL STABILITY FUND (BY LIU, MARIMON & WICHT) Aitor Erce (UPNA) My nutshell The paper designs a co-insurance contract: Use strict rules (DSA) and state-contingent contracts


  1. A DISCUSSION OF “ MAKING SOVEREIGN DEBT SAFE WITH A FINANCIAL STABILITY FUND ” (BY LIU, MARIMON & WICHT) Aitor Erce (UPNA)

  2. My nutshell The paper designs a co-insurance contract: ■ Use strict rules (DSA) and state-contingent contracts to ensure agents do the right thing ■ deliver default-free debt (more safe assets) ■ require no permanent transfers, nor seniority

  3. Could a paper be more timely?

  4. The setting

  5. ■ Seniority status and pari-passu – Default is selective despite pari-passu – If official debt is senior, dilution risk may trigger K flight ■ Total default – Default is always partial (acceleration not a given) ■ Sovereign debt perimeter – The setting by-passes the diabolic loop ■ DMO job is straight forward (  is exogenous) – Would ESF affect the maturity of market borrowing?

  6. The meaning

  7. ■ Negative yields – Isn't this official debt relief? – Also PSI results in a reduction yields (resolution vs. default) ■ Arrow securities – Who does the ESF trade them with? – Dummies like me need this more eschewed: how can we replicate the payoffs in reality to deliver countercyclical debt? Can we use plain vanillas, puts and calls?

  8. The elephant

  9. Debt Sustainability Analysis ESF-DSA makes an amazing job. Its main features are: – State-dependent – Considers spillovers (Z) – Strict and mechanical: must be met in every possible state ■ Is it replicable? – No room for systematic errors – No room for grey zones – No room for judgement and “exemptions” All of these can open the door to problems with DSA

  10. DSA: Biases and incentives ■ Case-by-case approach requires the use of judgment on top of the mechanical DSA exercise ■ Judgement doesn't improve DSA accuracy – Political inference (Gelpern 2016)

  11. DSA: Biases and incentives ■ The mechanical DSA modelling is weak (Corsetti 2019) – This makes judgement necessary (IMF 2019) ■ Can the same body simultaneously be accountable lender and impartial sustainability judge? – Lang & Presbitero (2018): bureaucratic interest affect DSA – Antic & Persico (2020): if an agent compensation is “too tied” to the assets she manages, she optimally weakness the quality of her signal/misreports

  12. Opacity ty in DSA ■ Greece: Enhanced Surveillance Report (November 2019). EC ■ Greece: 2019 Article IV Consultation

  13. ■ Great effort on a critical area: contingent and countercyclical sovereign financing instruments and institutions are on high demand ■ I am looking forward to reading your future papers!!!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend