magnetar twists fermi gbm detec5on of sgr 1550 5418
play

MagnetarTwists: Fermi/GBMDetec5onof SGR15505418 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MagnetarTwists: Fermi/GBMDetec5onof SGR15505418 ErsinG SabancUniversity,Istanbul YukiKaneko C.Kouveliotou,E.RamirezRuiz,J.Granot,


  1. Magnetar
Twists:

 Fermi
/
GBM
Detec5on
of

 SGR
1550‐5418
 Ersin
Göğüş
 Sabancı
University,
Istanbul
 Yuki
Kaneko
 C.
Kouveliotou,
E.
Ramirez‐Ruiz,
J.
Granot,


 A.
van
der
Horst,
A.
WaYs,
A.
von
Kienlin,
et
al.

 Fermi
Symposium,
Washington,
D.C.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






November
4,
2009


  2. SGR
1550‐5418
=
1E
1547.0‐5408


  3. GBM
Trigger
090122037
 • Trigger
at
00:53:52
UT
 Enhanced
Persistent
Emission
 on
January
22,
2009
 • 1 st 
of
41
GBM
Triggers
 • Trigger
data
for
600
s
 • 58
untriggered
bursts
 iden5fied
within
600
s


  4. Pulsa5on
Detec5on
 12-27 keV 27-50 keV 50-102 keV 102-293 keV

  5. Timing
Analysis


  6. Pulse
Profiles
 • Double
peak
at
low
E
 • Single
peak
at
high
E
 • No
pulsa5on
>
110
keV
 (a) 10 - 14 keV (b) 14 - 22 keV (c) 22 - 33 keV (d) 33 - 50 keV (e) 50 - 74 keV (f) 74 - 110 keV

  7. RMS
Pulsed
Frac5on
Spectrum
 • Correlates
with
energy
 • Peaks
in
50
–
74
keV
 • Not
significant
>
110
keV
 • Indica5on
of
a
“dip”


  8. Spectral
Analysis
 Time
Integrated
Spectrum
[T 0 
+
72
–
248
s]
 8
–
909
keV
 Burst
Free
 Power
Law
 Total
Energy
 Addi5onal
Blackbody
(kT
=
18
keV)
:
 Δ Cstat
=
13.5
(for
2
DOF)
 
 4.3 × 10 40 ergs 


  9. Time
Resolved
Spectra
( ν F ν )
 [T 0 
+
72
–
117,
122
–
169,
173
–
223
s] 
 74
–
117
s






 Power
Law
only

(Blackbody
is
not
needed)
 173
–223
s
 122
–169
s
 Power
Law
 Power
Law
 Blackbody
 Blackbody
 F BB /F TOTAL 
=



26%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 25%
 


  10. Temporal
Proper+es
 Spectral
Proper+es
 • Pulsa5ons
most
significant
 • Blackbody
required
in




 in
 120
–
210
s
 122
–
223
s
 • Pulse
frac5on
peaks
in

 • Blackbody
 kT 
 ~ 
17
keV
 
 50
–
74
keV 
 ( Wien
peak
 ~ 50
keV )
 • Pulsa5ons
not
seen
above
 • F BB
 



  
25%

 110
keV
 
 F PWRL 
  
75%


  11. Assuming
a
hot
spot
of
radius R HS
 on
the
neutron
 star
surface
 
 
 
 For D =
5
kpc,
 kT 
=
17
keV
:
 Hot Spot 
 A HS 
 ≈ 0.044
(D/5
kpc) 2 
km 2 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  
 R HS 
≈
120
m

 


  12. Corona on Magnetars by Beloborodov & Thompson (2006) Dissipation rate: L d ~ Ι Φ E Net current: Ι ∝ Β , Δψ , a 2 L obs = 2.8 × 10 38 erg s -1 >> L d  inconsistent with observation e ± plasmas & photons confined by closed B field region Trapped energy: E B (a) = 1/6 a 3 B 2 > E iso,BB For a = 120 m & E iso,BB = 5.6 × 10 40 erg: B > 1.4 × 10 14 G P ˙  consistent with B = 2.2 x 10 14 G from P

  13. Energy dissipated in the corona is radiated in two forms:  non-thermal, high energy radiation produced by collisionless dissipation of the coronal beam  blackbody radiation by thermalization: as the remaining energy dissipated in the corona enters the dense atmosphere, the crust is thermalized by two-body collisions and e - /e + pair formation Both components are expected to have comparable luminosities.

  14. Assuming
a
hot
spot
of
radius R HS
 on
the
neutron
 star
surface
 
 
 Hot 
 For D =
5
kpc,
 kT 
=
17
keV
:
 Spot 

 A HS 
 ≈ 0.044(D/5
kpc) 2 
km 2 
 















 
 

 
  
R HS 
≈
120
m
 which
is
the
size
of
the
magne+cally‐confined
 hot
plasma
and
is
<<
1%
of
the
NS
surface
 area


Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend