Lytix Biopharma
- Developing novel cancer immunotherapies
Lytix Biopharma - Developing novel cancer immunotherapies Investor - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Lytix Biopharma - Developing novel cancer immunotherapies Investor Presentation , January 2017 2 Lytix Biopharma Developing novel cancer immunotherapy Vision leading R&D company in the field of cancer immunotherapy Private
Öystein Rekdal
‘’nature’s own defense mechanisms’’
stage development and commercialization
2
an extended range of tumor specific antigens
3
combinations with checkpoint inhibitors which is expected to result in high deal-making activity
4
LTX-315 represents a novel approach, making “cold” tumors “hot” Alligator Bioscience Nature of therapy Immunicum Bioinvent Clinical phase Antibody-based Vaccine Antibody-based Targovax Vaccine-based & Virus-based Phase I Phase II Phase I/II Phase I/II Lytix Biopharma Oncolytic Peptide Phase I
– Every year, 14 million people are diagnosed with cancer
– Surgery, radiation, chemo, hormonal and targeted
– 8.2 million deaths annually
5
2015 2022
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Sales of cancer drugs 2015-2022
6
against threats e.g. bacteria, cancer
immune system resulting in a constant “power struggle” between the immune system and the cancer
cancer by boosting or breaking different mechanisms
more successful to win over the disease Cancer immuno-therapy
Yervoy (BMS) Keytruda (MSD) Tecentriq (Roche/Genente ch Durvalumab (AstraZeneca) Opdivo (BMS) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
7
Avelumab (Merck / Pfizer)
8
Untreated
Time from treatment Proportion alive
Long term survival Long term survival Chemotherapy / radiation therapy
Immune therapy combination
Immune therapy monotherapy
Next wave is to develop combinations
today representing the new backbone of cancer treatment
ICI’s: significant progress but no silver bullit
Source: EvaluatePharma (2016)
ICIs Responders Non- responders Grade 3/4 AE’s (side effects) Yervoy 20% 80% 20-30% Opdivo 40% 60% 10-20% Keytruda 33% 67% 10% Combination
Opdivo 58% 42% 55%
Anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 clinical data in adv. melanoma
are being treated
higher response rate than monotherapy
9
ICI’s Increase the activity of T-cells
Removing the brakes Tumor specific T-cell activation
inflamed, lacking effector cells (CD8+)
efficacy (”hot” tumor)
– Increase efficacy by inducing T-cell inflamed tumor microenvironment (hot tumors) – Checkpoint inhibitor therapy allows immune responses to eliminate cancer cells
10 (Fig modified from Sharma, and James P. Allison, Science 2015)
Few effector T cells Many effector T cells
11 Padmanee Sharma, and James P. Allison, Science 2015;348:56-61
Zhou, Cell Death & Disease 2016. Zhou, Oncotarget 2015. Forveille, Cell Cycle 2015. Eike, Oncotarget, 2015. Camilio, OncoImmunology 2014, Camilio, Cancer Immunol Immunother, 2014
significantly enhanced in LTX- 315 treated tumors versus untreated tumors
different tumor antigenes
neo-antigenes that some of the T-cell clones generated recognize
Cancer model: Murine B16 melanoma. Adaptive Biotech’s TCR sequencing platform (immunoSEQ)
Fig from Jamal-Hanjani, Clin.Cancer Res, 2015
1st 2nd 3rd
Control LTX-315
Days 2nd tumor 3rd tumor
Source: data on file, manuscript in preparation 15
Anti-CTLA-4 and LTX-315
Yamasaki et al, Cell Death & Differentiation, 2016
– inflamed tumor microenvironment – immune responses to neoantigens
– inflamed tumor microenvironment – immune responses to neoantigens
an ideal combinations
16
Placebo LTX-315 Anti-CTLA-4 Anti-CTLA-4 + LTX-315
Baseline After treatment
Before: Cold tumor Few CD8+ T-cells After treatment: Hot tumor Increase of CD8+ T-cells
Ongoing open phase 1, typical ph1 patient population, different cancer types, dose escalation, multilesion injections Complete and partial regression of injected lesions
Stable disease (irRC response criteria)
Significant infiltration of CD8+ T-cells
Melanoma Patient (inj.lesion)
17 * Data on file, study ongoing
Sarcoma patient (inj. lesion)
Week 6 biopsy: Large left flank lesion (non Injected) Adrenal carcinoma No viable tumor cells 7 LTX-315 injections
LTX-315
5 wk interval 7 injections 5 wk 6 mths treatment
aPDL1
Tumour size (SPD on CT) Time on treatment
* SD: Stable Disease (irRC criteria)
Baseline biopsy: Large left flank lesion (non Injected)
ABSCOPAL EFFECT
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2 H1 H2
MONOTHERAPY TRIALS
Mixed indications Ph I Single lesion Multiple lesions
COMBINATION TRIALS
Malignant melanoma (2nd Line) PhI/II LTX-315 + anti-CTLA-4 TNBC (2-4th line) Ph I/II LTX-315 + anti-PD-1 Undisclosed project
Enrolment and treatment Study preparation Esc; Dose escalation phase Exp; Expansion phase
Phase I Phase I
20
Prep. Phase II Phase II Prep. Phase II Phase II
FPI. FPI. LPI Interim. data
Phase I Phase I
(20)
Prep. Phase II Prep Prep F/UP F/UP
21
OUS (G. Mælandsmo)
23
LTX-315 LTX-401 DTT
Monotherapy Combination therapy w/ICIs Undisclosed project All solid tumours Malignant melanoma Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Undisclosed indication
PRECLINIC CLINIC
PLATFORM Transdermally accessible tumors ‘’cold to hot’’ Deep-seated tumours Deep-seated tumours PROGRAM
Wenche Marie Olsen, DrPhilos, COO
and management of new drug products in pharmaceutical and biotech industry
Øystein Rekdal, PhD, Co-founder and CSO
Extensive research background and is collaborating with several distinguished international institutions Andrew Saunders, CMO
Biotech (Bioenvision) and founder and managing director of Linden Oncology Ltd, a specialist oncology consultancy. Kjetil Vangsnes, CFO
maritime shipping
24
Håkan Wickholm, CEO
from AstraZeneca
including oncology and Strategic Business Development on both sell- and buy-side projects.
Gert W. Munthe, Chairman
private equity player. Chairman Pronova Biopharma 2004-2013.
business - former CEO of Alpharma (listed on the NYSE), NetCom and Nycomed Imaging Knut Eidissen
company Picasso
public companies, and strong track record in creating shareholder value Kari Grønås
development in Norwegian pharmaceutical companies
Debasish Roychowdhury
commercial operations. Former Global Head of Oncology at Sanofi with additional senior experience with GSK and Eli Lilly
and serves in senior advisory roles for biotechnology companies Lena Torlegård
corporate and crisis communication
currently a member of the Board of Directors for Nanologica John Sigurd Svendsen
the University of Tromsø
including the laboratory of Professor K.B. Sharpless (Nobel Laureate, Chemistry, 2000) at MIT Morten Jurs
executive experience from several board positions from both public and private companies
BioPharma
25
the shares
Shareholders No Shares % NORTH MURRAY AS 160 572 16,0% PICASSO KAPITAL AS 122 189 12,2% TAJ HOLDING AS 78 519 7,8% CARE HOLDING AS 75 230 7,5% NORINNOVA INVEST AS 48 766 4,9% LYSNES INVEST AS 43 245 4,3% HOPEN INVEST AS 29 487 2,9% NORD I AS 27 329 2,7% 3 T PRODUKTER AS 25 730 2,6% 4 LB INVEST AS 17 812 1,8%
Top 10 628 879 62,8% Others 372 927 37,2% Total 1 001 806 100,0%
Ownership structure, per nov 2016
26
27
Potential first-in-class product that makes ”cold” tumors ”hot”
Boards and Management
commercial experience
An emerging immunocology leader
Multiple value triggers