SLIDE 1 Looking to the long-term: hearing the public interest voice in energy and water
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
SLIDE 2 Welcome and opening comments Ted Cantle, Chair, Sustainability First Sharon Darcy, Director, Sustainability First
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
2
SLIDE 4
Thanks to our New-Pin sponsors
SLIDE 5 MeeCng the challenges of technology, climate change, customer expectaCons and socio-demographic change Emma Howard Boyd Chair, The Environment Agency
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
5
SLIDE 6 Market actors explain how they have taken long-term public interest outcomes into account in their businesses
Panel chair: Ted Cantle
Judith Ward, Sustainability First
Chris Harris, Director of RegulaCon, npower Jim Cardwell, Head of Trading & InnnovaCon, Northern Powergrid Alex Plant, RegulaCon Director, Anglian Water
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
6
SLIDE 7 The long-term public interest in water & energy – what outcomes do we seek? Judith Ward Sustainability First
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
7
SLIDE 8 Developing New-Pin’s public interest voice
- Defining the public interest
The public interest is the aggregate well-being of the general public - both short and long-term. It comprises the combined interests of consumers, citizens, the environment and investors- for both today and tomorrow
- Developing a public interest framework
8
SLIDE 9 What long-term public interest outcomes did New-Pin seek ?
9
SLIDE 10 Developing a common language was useful
- Energy and water sectors – a focus
- n outcomes which are engineering-
led / economic.
- Public interest outcomes – viewed
differently by different people. Shaped by many factors
- Common language around public
interest - helps build consensus around desired outcomes
10
SLIDE 11 Key quesCons to shape thinking for ‘long-termism’
- How to ‘frame’ the issue / draw the
boundaries ? (dependencies, systemic risk)
- Delivery time-scales – what consensus ?
- Fairness : within & between generations ?
11
SLIDE 12 New-Pin looked at some ‘hard’ public interest topics
- Long-run affordability – who pays for what - & when ?
- Long-run resilience – meeting 21st century expectations &
challenges
- Trust and confidence - developed a series of New-Pin
frameworks –‘Levers for change’.
12
SLIDE 13 Levers for change – long-run affordability
13
SLIDE 14 Levers for change – long-run resilience
14
SLIDE 15 Levers for change – trust and confidence
15
SLIDE 16 Decision-makers – a pracCcal focus on long-term public interest outcomes
- Know what outcomes stakeholders want
- Manage conflicting interests transparently. Clarify why agree /
disagree
- In today’s decision-making - know how public interest outcomes
and long-termism sit. And how delivered.
16
SLIDE 17 Market actors explain how they have taken long-term public interest outcomes into account in their businesses Chris Harris, Director of RegulaCon, npower Long-term affordability
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
17
SLIDE 18 Market actors explain how they have taken long-term public interest outcomes into account in their businesses Jim Cardwell, Head of Trading & InnnovaCon, Northern Powergrid Resilience and sustainability
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
18
SLIDE 19 Market actors explain how they have taken long-term public interest outcomes into account in their businesses Alex Plant, RegulaCon Director, Anglian Water Trust and confidence
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
19
SLIDE 20 Market actors explain how they have taken long-term public interest outcomes into account in their businesses
Panel chair: Ted Cantle
Judith Ward, Sustainability First
Chris Harris, Director of RegulaCon, npower Jim Cardwell, Head of Trading & InnnovaCon, Northern Powergrid Alex Plant, RegulaCon Director, Anglian Water
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
20
SLIDE 21 Delivering public interest outcomes through markets, regulation and interventions
Panel Chair: Maxine Frerk, Sustainability First Sharon Darcy, Sustainability First, Lawrence Slade, CEO, Energy UK Sonia Brown, Director, UK Regulatory Policy & Public Affairs, Visa Europe
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
21
SLIDE 22 Delivering public interest outcomes through markets, regulaCon and intervenCons Sharon Darcy, Sustainability First
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
22
SLIDE 23 Overview of tools for delivering long-term public interest
Market led approaches IntervenBons Engagement Governance
Hard tools IncenBves and compliance SoZ tools Behaviours and purpose
23
SLIDE 24 Delivering public interest outcomes in the face of change
24
? ??? ??
- Stay focused on public interest
- utcomes
- Enable flexibility
- Encourage innovation
- Keep delivering the basics – boring
things can be important
- Use the most appropriate mix of tools
for the job
SLIDE 25 Need a case by case approach to ge[ng right mix of tools
Contestable approaches Efficiency InnovaBon, choice Flexible & dynamic Speedy decisions Non-contestable approaches Long-term vision Market frameworks and rules InformaBon Standards & compliance
25
SLIDE 26 Different outcomes need different mix of tools
26
SLIDE 27 Look at full range of market-led approaches
27
SLIDE 28
Specific issues for market-led approaches in energy & water
EssenCal services
InerCa Complex decision making chains Different consumer segments, different needs
MonopolisCc characterisCcs
Big price tags & long asset lives Stewardship ‘Anchors’ in the community
Complex systems
Networks Inter-dependencies Systemic risks
SLIDE 29 Ge[ng the ‘right’ regulatory rule book
- The regulator is not ‘in the room’ when
companies have to make decisions
- Less prescription, more principles
- Need to agree what ‘acceptable’ conduct
looks like
- Need to build understanding of basic ‘rules of
the kitchen’ with big fines for getting these wrong
29
SLIDE 30 The role for government & regulators in terms of innovaCon
30
- Removing barriers
- Historical custom and practice?
- Genuine protections for consumers, citizens and the environment?
- Incentives and funding
- Innovators need to make a profit! How to share risks and rewards
- Align with desired public interest outcomes – innovation not end in itself
- Look beyond technology to also include consumer facing, commercial and
institutional innovation
SLIDE 31 Signalling prioriCes for innovaCon in the public interest
C C C C
Co-ordinated – across government, with regulators and partners
31
Collaborative – clear when co-operation is and isn’t permitted Clear – gives investors a firmer footing for their plans Culturally supportive – gives companies time & space to test ideas, which may not always work
C
Consistent – more predictable, setting out how will adapt to change
SLIDE 32 Levers for change – decision making framework for considering market-led approaches in energy and water
32
SLIDE 33 Levers for change – principles for government & regulators when considering transformaCve innovaCon
33
SLIDE 34 Lawrence Slade, CEO, Energy UK Delivering public interest outcomes through market-led approaches in energy
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
34
SLIDE 35 Sonia Brown, Director, UK Regulatory Policy & Public Affairs, Visa Europe Delivering public interest outcomes through regulaCon and intervenCons in water
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
35
SLIDE 36 Delivering public interest outcomes through markets, regulation and interventions
Panel Chair: Maxine Frerk, Sustainability First Sharon Darcy, Sustainability First, Lawrence Slade, CEO, Energy UK Sonia Brown, Director, UK Regulatory Policy & Public Affairs, Visa Europe
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
36
SLIDE 37 Networking lunch 13:15 – 14:15 The Bishop Partridge Hall
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
37
SLIDE 38 Delivering public interest outcomes through engagement and governance Panel Chair: Ted Cantle, Sustainability First Chair
Sharon Darcy, Sustainability First Zoe McLeod, Chair, South East Water Customer Challenge Group John Roberts, Chair, Electricity North West
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
38
SLIDE 39 Ensuring the public interest voice is heard Delivering public interest outcomes through engagement and governance Sharon Darcy, Sustainability First
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
39
SLIDE 40 Engagement – why engagement is important in energy & water
Affordability Resilience The demand side LegiBmacy Engagement
40
SLIDE 41 Engagement in energy and water is evolving
- Companies need to own their relationships with their customers and
manage their risks
- When there is imperfect competition / monopoly engagement is unlikely to
happen without
- Effective conduct regulation
- Regulatory incentives
- Engagement approaches in energy & water have made significant strides
in last ~5 years
- Both sectors are learning from each other – and form further afield
- But – consumer, citizen and wider stakeholder views are also changing
SLIDE 42 Purposeful engagement to deliver public interest outcomes – a journey
42
SLIDE 43 Where are the gaps?
- Cost of capital – uncertain role - public concerns around excess
returns
- ‘Citizen’ focused engagement
- Limited cross-sector view on affordability of essential services
- Little engagement on systemic issues / risks
SLIDE 44 The link between engagement and governance
44
Engagement needs to shape and drive….. …..corporate governance and board agendas if….. ….public interest outcomes are to be delivered This isn’t just having a ‘public interest’ – or indeed employee or consumer - representaBve on the board
SLIDE 45 The role of the board in delivering public interest
- utcomes
- New-Pin corporate governance research
- Boards need to develop a far deeper understanding of the public
interest
- They need to use this to address the three key public interest
challenges in energy & water
- These are risks to the business and need to be actively managed
as such
45
SLIDE 46
Delivering the public interest - challenge (i) AverCng ‘unacceptable’ dividends and returns What role can the board play to help move from this…. ….to this, without pushing up the cost of capital?
SLIDE 47
Delivering the public interest – challenge (ii) Building beeer regulator / company relaConships What role can the board play to help move from this…. ….to this, without poliBcal backlash and fear of regulatory capture?
SLIDE 48 Delivering the public interest - challenge (iii) The important role of the Non ExecuCve Director What role can the board play to move from this (wool over their eyes) …. …. to this, while retaining sight
- f long-term public interest
- utcomes ?
SLIDE 49 Governance also needs to evolve to keep in step with the energy and water transiCon - & societal change
- Changes in energy, and to a lesser extent water, are likely to cause
distributional impacts
- Increasing questions about what is ‘fair’
- A re-appraisal of what it means to ‘play in this space’
- Acceptance that dealing with environmental and social externalities
‘goes with the territory’
- More attention being paid to company purpose and advantages of
moving from a ‘shareholder to a stakeholder economy’
49
SLIDE 50 What does it mean to be a purposeful company?
Environmental Social Governance
50
E S G
The ‘ESG’ factors from SecBon 172 of the 2006 Companies Act and responsible investment are now firmly ‘in the frame’
SLIDE 51 Levers for change – board effecCveness check-list
51
SLIDE 52 To meet the needs of current customers, future consumers and wider stakeholders boards need to ask….
- Is there clarity in the corporate structure as
to where responsibility sits for current and future UK customer needs?
- Is their risk appetite appropriately aligned
with public interest?
- Do they have an agreed set of criteria as to
what it means to be a respected corporate citizen?
52
SLIDE 53 Delivering public interest outcomes through engagement
Zoe McLeod, Chair, South East Water Customer Challenge Group
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
53
SLIDE 54
How can CCGs best challenge companies to consider the longer-term interest?
New-Pin February 2018 Zoe.mcleod@gmail.com South East Water CCG Chair
SLIDE 55 CCG role
To provide independent challenge to companies and independent assurance to Ofwat
- n:
- the quality of a company’s customer engagement; and
- the extent to which the results of this engagement are driving the company’s decision
making and being reflected in the company’s business plan. Ofwat’s “long-term vision is to put current and future consumers at the heart of the way companies run their businesses” “…expect companies to be creative in exploring ways in which customers can best be engaged on long-term issues and consider the best ways to frame and interpret such engagement”
SLIDE 56 Clear outcomes
CCGs should challenge companies to ensure engagement is strategic, proportionate and effective. Companies must be clear what they are trying to achieve when engaging on longer-term issues. For example: 1. Develop understanding – so they can better plan for and meet future need e.g. to deliver resilient water supplies, protect the environment, deliver social well-being, maximise cost efficiencies. 2. Co-delivery – so customers become part of the solution to a potential future problem e.g South East Water’s Resilient Customer concept – understand values, attitudes and beliefs so can encourage behaviour change to help prevent and respond to future challenges. 3. Customer satisfaction – if you understand customer/stakeholders’ expectations for the future you can ensure you address them/demonstrate how you are addressing their priorities. 4. Legitimacy – involving customers in the process of making decisions incl. complex trade-offs between current and future needs – build trust 5. Unmet need – unlock customers’ creativity to better understand what services they might like to have if they could e.g. South East Water’s Futurologist
The aim should drive the engagement approach – who the company engages with and how they engage
SLIDE 57 ScruCnise the evidence base
CCGs need to monitor the robustness of research – mindful of the challenges: For example:
- Some customers may lack the information or
understanding of what is possible in the future.
- Some groups may find it hard to get their voice
heard. Behavioural:
- Status quo bias – natural preference to keep things
as they are
- Anchoring – heavily influenced by framing of the
questions
- Present bias – heavily discount the future – give
current benefits disproportionate benefit over future benefits
- Loss aversion – people tend to put more effort into
avoiding loss than ensuring gain
Approaches
- Game-ification
- More deliberative research
- Futurologist
- Engage experts
- Advocates – who can
represent others
- Careful framing - virtual
reality/videos Risk: un-intentional bias in views sought or information
SLIDE 58 Horizon scanning – challenge companies to take a broad view of the future
Political Economic Social Environmental Legal Technological
- Strategic DirecBon Statements, Insight Dashboard
SLIDE 59 Managing dilemmas – trade-offs
Affordability today Cost in the future
Reward Long-term CollecBve Risk Short-term Individual
SLIDE 60 No single soluCon
Business plan that balances the needs of current and future customers
ExpectaBons & prioriBes OpportuniBes/ challenges Needs/wants
But:
flag tensions/mitigations
- Clear about the values and
perspectives that drive decisions
robustness, relevance research, credentials, practical considerations
SLIDE 61 Responsible business strategy
South East Water Co-creating a Responsible Business Strategy:
- Build a consensus among customers/stakeholders about role
South East Water should play in wider society/ community
- Develop a clear understanding of where the company creates
value in society and commercially in the widest sense – helps to inform approach today and in the future
- Exploring integrated reporting - provides insight into the
- rganisation's strategy, how it relates to the organisation's ability
to create value in the short, medium and long term. = A local view of the water company’s role in the public interest?
SLIDE 62
Challenge the Company using the Sustainability First New-Pin tools
SLIDE 63 Delivering public interest outcomes through governance John Roberts, Chair, Electricity North West
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
63
SLIDE 64 Delivering public interest outcomes through engagement and governance Panel Chair: Ted Cantle, Sustainability First Chair
Sharon Darcy, Sustainability First Zoe McLeod, Chair, South East Water Customer Challenge Group John Roberts, Chair, Electricity North West
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
64
SLIDE 65 Learning from each other David Gray, Chair of Ofgem (GEMA)
Alena Kozakova, Chief Economist, Ofwat In conversaCon with Sarah Harrison
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
65
SLIDE 66 Learning from each other
David Gray, Chair of Ofgem (GEMA)
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
66
SLIDE 67 Learning from each other
Alena Kozakova, Chief Economist, Ofwat
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
67
SLIDE 68 Learning from each other David Gray, Chair of Ofgem (GEMA)
Alena Kozakova, Chief Economist, Ofwat In conversaCon with Sarah Harrison
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
68
SLIDE 69 Closing address Adrian Gault Chief ExecuCve Commieee on Climate Change
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
69
SLIDE 70 Independent advice to government
- n building a low-carbon economy
and preparing for climate change
Embedding the public interest – a Committee on Climate Change perspective
Adrian Gault Acting Chief Executive
Wednesday 28 February 2018 Sustainability First, Looking to the long-term conference
SLIDE 71 The Climate Change Act 2008
Driving change & the Climate Change Act
71
2050 Emissions Target A goal
1
Carbon budgets A pathway
2
Requirement that Government brings forward policies to reduce emissions & address climate risks A toolkit
3
Commieee on Climate Change and AdaptaCon-Sub Commieee to monitor progress and propose change A monitoring framework
4
SLIDE 72 Criteria are specified in the Act, which must be considered
- Science
- Technology
- Economic circumstances (including competitiveness)
- Fiscal circumstances
- Social circumstances, in particular fuel poverty
- Energy policy, in particular energy supplies
- DAs
- Circumstances at European and international level
72
SLIDE 73 Carbon budgets are stepping stones to the 2050 target
73 Carbon budgets and the cost-effecCve path to the 2050 target
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Budget emissions (over five years, MtCO2e) UK GHG emissions (MtCO2e/yr) Allowance for IAS Statutory 2050 target allowing for IAS emissions Legislated carbon budgets Historical emissions Cost-effective path to 2050 #UKClimateAction
SLIDE 74
Implications for energy prices and bills? Energy efficiency improvements for households can more than offset impact of low- carbon policies to 2030
For energy-intensive industries cost compensaBon and exempBons should remain so long as there are differences in low-carbon policy costs between the UK and internaBonal compeBtors
SLIDE 75 The Climate Change Act requires Government to publish its policies & proposals to meet carbon budgets
75
The Climate Change Act requires the Government to publish policies & proposals to enable carbon budgets - on track to the 2050 target - to be met
- Our assessment for our June 2017 Progress Report was that there were significant gaps to meeBng
the fourth and fihh carbon budgets
- The gap to the fourth budget was 155 MtCO2e and the gap to the fihh budget was 260 MtCO2e
#UKClimateAction
SLIDE 76 The Government’s ‘Clean Growth Strategy’ was published in October 2017
76
- This sets out the Government’s plan for
meeBng the legislated carbon budgets
- “Clean growth is at the centre of our
modern Industrial Strategy” – PM May
- It includes 50 key policies and proposals
the Government intend to implement across the economy
#UKClimateAction
SLIDE 77 Our assessment - there is still a policy gap to the fourth and fifth carbon budgets
77 Gap to carbon budgets aZer the Clean Growth Strategy (non-traded sectors)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 MtCO2e per year
New emission projections reduce but do not eliminate this gap
- Gap of 65 MtCO2e to 4th & 5th
carbon budgets
- Gap of 100 & 130 MtCO2e to cost-
effective path
#UKClimateAction
SLIDE 78 Four key next steps to meet carbon budgets & prepare for 2050
78
1
Remove delivery risks around exisBng and new policies
2
Provide detail on how policy proposals will be delivered
3
Set out new policies closing gap to 4th & 5th carbon budgets
4
Prepare for 2050 (e.g. kick-start a CCS industry in the 2020s)
#UKClimateAction
SLIDE 79 Government has identified key milestones - we will monitor progress against these & extra actions required
79
- Government has idenBfied that publicaBon of the Strategy is not the end of the process
- They have set up a Clean Growth Inter-Ministerial Group, and have commiled to annual
monitoring and updaBng of the Strategy. We will monitor progress annually against the Government’s idenBfied milestones, and the extra milestones required to close the policy gap.
#UKClimateAction
SLIDE 80 Recent progress mainly in electricity generation
80
UK GHG emissions by sector (1990-2016)
50 100 150 200 250 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 MtCO2e Power Industry Transport Buildings Agriculture & LULUCF Waste F-gases
Meeting future targets requires emission reductions across the economy. Also raises questions about balance of action at national and devolved or regional level
SLIDE 81 To reduce emissions from heating the options are known…
81
SLIDE 82 Reducing CO2 emissions from heating to near zero by 2050 likely to require a mixed solution
82
SLIDE 83 Without knowing the full 2050 solution, there are cost- effective actions to take now
83 To 2050…
?
SLIDE 84 www.theccc.org.uk | @theCCCuk
Thank you!
SLIDE 85 Next steps Sharon Darcy, Director, Sustainability First
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
85
SLIDE 87 Building on the work of New-Pin
- Reflections on today
- The Levers for change are in your hands – please share
- New-Pin governance round table
- Project Compact – helping energy and water companies better
manage the politics of fairness and the environment
- Building a model to map political and regulatory risk in respect
to fairness and the environment
- Learning what works and what doesn’t from other sectors
- Developing Public Interest Compacts to get a step change in
relationships with stakeholders
87
SLIDE 88 Thank you! Please join us for networking drinks in the Bishop Partridge Hall
@SustainFirst #PublicInterest #longterm
88