Loc Local Con Control and and Acc Accoun untability bility Plan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
loc local con control and and acc accoun untability
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Loc Local Con Control and and Acc Accoun untability bility Plan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mar 05, 2023 102 likes •524 views

Loc Local Con Control and and Acc Accoun untability bility Plan Plan (L (LCA CAP) P) HOW IT HO IT CONNE NNECTS TO TO BAR BARGAI AINI NING, NG, OR ORGANI GANIZING, NG, STUDENT STUDENT ACHIEVEM ACHIEVEMENT ENT, AND AND SCHOOL SCHOOL

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Loc Local Con Control and and Acc Accoun untability bility Plan Plan (L (LCA CAP) P)

HO HOW IT IT CONNE NNECTS TO TO BAR BARGAI AINI NING, NG, OR ORGANI GANIZING, NG, STUDENT STUDENT ACHIEVEM ACHIEVEMENT ENT, AND AND SCHOOL SCHOOL IMPR PROVEM EMENT ENT

NORM NORMA SA SANCHEZ NCHEZ RE REGION GION 3 CT CTA IP IPD ST STAFF VERN VERN GA GATE TES RE REGION GION 3 NOD NOD ST STAFF

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Loc Local Con Control & Acc Accoun untabil bility ty Plan Plan (L (LCA CAP) P)

Topics Covered

  • 1. Bargaining
  • 2. Student Achievement
  • 3. Organizing
slide-3
SLIDE 3

THE DUTY TO BARGAIN

slide-4
SLIDE 4

DUTY TO BARGAIN

GENERAL DUTY MANDATORY SUBJECTS PERMISSIVE SUBJECTS UNLAWFUL SUBJECTS WAIVER

slide-5
SLIDE 5

DUTY TO BARGAIN

A school district wants to increase the workday by four (4) hours without additional compensation.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

DUTY TO BARGAIN Can the four (4) hour increase be included in the LCAP? What if they bargain it? Is there anyway we can prevent it?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Districts are prohibited from including items in their LCAP that require negotiations that have not yet occurred.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Boi Boilerpla erplate Con Contract ct Languag Language

Boilerplate language are sections in contracts that are often referred to as “standard” but can be significantly controlling:

Zipper Clauses Reopener Clauses Management Rights Savings Clause

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Remember, the general duty to bargain in good faith is the baseline. The parties can contract around or modify this in certain circumstances.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Zipper Zipper Cl Clauses auses

The purpose of a zipper clause is to conclude negotiations and provide the parties with security for a set period of time. When your contract has a tight zipper clause, the zipper clause waives the parties duty to bargain.

Is this good or bad? As the attorneys always say “it depends….” And it depends on how your zipper clause is written . . .

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Zipper Clauses

Example 1

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Zipper Clauses

Example 2

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Reopener Clauses

Example

Sometimes the parties modify the duty to bargain by including reopener provisions

If you have reopeners, have you defeated the protection a zipper clause provides?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Ma Manage geme ment Ri Righ ghts ts Cl Clauses auses

Why have it at all? Is it necessary to repeat in a contract the statutory rights you already have? If Management has placed their statutory rights in the CBA, have they waived their right to refuse to bargain permissive subjects? Although that last sub-bullet made you think “Aha…I’ve got them!” Management Rights articles almost always hurt us… Another “standard” article that frequently provides greater control to one party to the contract (and it isn’t the Association)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sa Savings vings Cl Clause ause

Boilerplate designed to protect the remainder of the parties agreement in the case where one part of the agreement has become unlawful Disgusting example: “The District shall only hire white male teachers between the ages of 25 and 45.” If this existed in a contract prior to the civil war, would it have been lawful and then become unlawful? Frightening example: Doe v Antioch

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Savings Clause

Example

slide-17
SLIDE 17

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

* Source: West Ed presentation at March 2015 State Board of Education Meeting: Item 6.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

LCAP Building Blocks

19

* Source: CA School Services, 2015

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Inputs vs. Outputs

20

* Source: CA School Services, 2015

slide-21
SLIDE 21

State Priorities

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

STATE PRIORITIES GROUPED INTO THREE CATEGORIES

22

Conditions of Learning Pupil Outcomes Engagement

  • Basic Services
  • Implementation of

State Standards

  • Course Access
  • Student

Achievement

  • Other Student

Outcomes

  • Student

Engagement

  • School Climate
  • Parental

Involvement

slide-23
SLIDE 23

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT OTHER STUDENT OUTCOMES

( State Priorities 4 and 8 )

PUPI L OUTCOMES

Focus is on:

Performance on State assessments (SBAC), current API is suspended until new API is developed. Number of students who are college and career ready. Share of English Learners who become English proficient and their reclassification rate. Number of students who pass AP exams.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Assessm Assessments fo for 2015 2015‐16 16

STUDENTS ASSESSMENTS

ALL SBAC ELA & Math ‐ Grades 3‐8, 11 ALL No 2nd Grade Testing List of Diagnostic Assessments Available (CDE) ALL CST Science Tests ‐ Grades 5, 8, 10 SPECIAL ED

with Severe Cognitive Disability

CAA – California Alternate Assessment for ELA & Math in Grades 3‐8 and 11 CST CAPA Science ‐ California Alternate Performance Assessment in Grades 5, 8, 10 Suspended CAHSEE – CA High School Exit Exam (SB 172 will suspended CAHSEE for 3 years) EL Primary Language Assessment (CELDT) *ELPAC under development (replaces CELDT)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

ELA Student Score Report - Grade 4

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Math Student Score Report - Grade 4

slide-27
SLIDE 27

AB AB 484 484

NOT A TESTING HOLIDAY

2014‐15

No SBAC School Wide Results Only Individual Student Scores Sets Baseline API Data OR Other Measure

2015‐16

Second year of only Student Scores

2016‐17

API School Growth Targets Set TO BE REPLACED Schools work towards reaching their targets during the year

2017‐18

API Accountability TO BE REPLACED

GAVE CA A HIGH‐STAKES ACCOUNTABILITY HOLIDAY

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

API API Configur iguratio ion

Stei Steinber nberg Bill ill – S – SB 1458 1458 Elementary & Middle School High School

  • Minimum up to 60%

made up of Statewide assessment (SBAC)

  • Attendance rates
  • Other Indexes
  • Maximum up to 60% made up
  • f Statewide assessment (SBAC)
  • Attendance rates
  • Graduation rates
  • Other Indexes
  • College & Career Readiness

Index ‐ being created by Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA) Committee

To be replaced with new legislation

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

* Source: WestEd, March 2015 SBE Meeting

Draft ‐ Multiple Measures

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

* Source: WestEd, July 2015 SBE Meeting

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Evaluation Rubrics Major Tasks and Milestones

June 2015 February 2016 October June October

2nd LCAP with Annual Update Completed

Original Evaluation Rubrics Adoption Revised Evaluation Rubrics Adoption Research & Prototype Testing Alignment with Accountability Development Stakeholder Engagement

The figure shows the revised timeline established for LCFF from June 2015 through October 2016, along with major tasks and milestones that will be completed in order to adopt the Evaluation Rubric by October 2016.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

California Collaborative for Educational Excellence (CCEE)

The CCEE (Education Code Section 52074) will provide advice and assistance to LEAs (charter schools, school districts, and county offices of education) in achieving the goals set forth in the Local Control and Accountability Plans (LCAPs).

CCEE Executive Director: Carl Cohen CCEE Board:

Tim Sbranti Member Appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly Michael C. Watkins Member Appointed by Senate Committee on Rules Tom Torlakson Member State Superintendent

  • f Public Instruction

Sue Burr Vice-Chair Appointed by the President of the State Board of Education Sandy Thorstenson Chair Appointed by the Governor

Fiscal Agent: Kenneth M. Young

Riverside County Office of Education Riverside County Superintendent of Schools

slide-33
SLIDE 33

ORGANIZING

slide-34
SLIDE 34

No more legal “gotcha regulations.” The “law” won’t fix your problems. There are no technical solutions.

SO WHAT?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

WH WHO ARE ARE YO YOU ENGAGI ENGAGING NG WI WITH?

YOURSELF? TEACHERS? Which TEACHERS? COMMUNITY?

slide-36
SLIDE 36

FRE FRESNO NO TE TEACHER HERS ASSOCIA ASSOCIATON ON

https://animoto.com/play/PLzR8WyDfPzXoWCo22DnQg

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

LEVELS LEVELS OF OF UNI UNION ENGAGEM ENGAGEMENT NT

  • BRINGING HOME THE BACON
  • ABILITY TO ENFORCE & DEFEND CONTRACT
  • SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT
  • IMPROVING THE COMMUNITY
slide-38
SLIDE 38

PRIORITIZE ENGAGE ORGANIZE People Members Students Parents Community Goals What’s Working? What’s Not? Proposals People & Goals

slide-39
SLIDE 39

THI THINK BI BIG! G! THI THINK DIFFERENT! DIFFERENT!

slide-40
SLIDE 40

“

If you DO NOT:

  • 1. consult, or demand to bargain
  • 2. organize with members,

students, and the community Then the LCAP will not get done through you… …it will get done TO you.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Re Resources

LCAP Watch: http://lcapwatch.org CTA Website: (search LCFF on www.cta.org)

http://www.cta.org/Issues‐and‐Action/School‐Funding/Local‐ Control‐Funding‐Formula.aspx

CDE Website: (search LCFF on www.cde.ca.gov)

http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/

LCAP Template and Regulations: WestEd Website

http://lcff.wested.org/ca‐state‐board‐of‐education‐approves‐lcff‐ regulations‐and‐lcap‐template/

LCAP Rubrics:

http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/ag/ag/yr15/documents/mar15item06slid esupdate.pdf