life history ecology and potential
play

Life-history, Ecology, and Potential Threats to Mat-Su/Cook Inlet - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Life-history, Ecology, and Potential Threats to Mat-Su/Cook Inlet Chinook Salmon in the Marine Environment Kate Myers (email kwmyers@uw.edu ) 2014 Mat-Su Salmon Science & Conservation Symposium, November 19, 2014, Palmer, AK Photo: S.V.


  1. Life-history, Ecology, and Potential Threats to Mat-Su/Cook Inlet Chinook Salmon in the Marine Environment Kate Myers (email kwmyers@uw.edu ) 2014 Mat-Su Salmon Science & Conservation Symposium, November 19, 2014, Palmer, AK Photo: S.V. Naydenko

  2. Issue: recent low productivity of Alaska Chinook Source: ADFG Chinook Salmon Research Team 2013 2

  3. Total Pacific Rim salmon catches high 3

  4. Key Questions • Is recent low productivity of Alaska kings due to changes in survival in freshwater or the ocean or both? • What caused recent changes in freshwater or marine survival? 4

  5. Outline • Brief review of marine life history & ecology and potential threats in marine habitats • Introduce leading hypotheses linking changes in marine and freshwater habitats to recent declines • Suggestions for next steps 5

  6. Why is marine life history & ecology important to king salmon? ~99% of total growth occurs Open ocean Coastal Ocean in the ocean; (immature) (juvenile) 1-5 years 6 months ~3% average marine survival Life cycle of (Quinn 2005) king salmon River Open ocean (egg-smolt) (maturing) 1-2 years 6 months River (adult) 3 months 6

  7. General salmon ocean life history Ocean age groups (winters at sea) Six species (% survival) 0 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 High Chum 1.4 abundance Sockeye 13.1 Zooplankton 2.8 Pink feeders Low Chinook 3.1 abundance Steelhead 13.0 Micronekton 10.4 Coho feeders % survival = smolt to adult survival estimates (Quinn 2005) 7

  8. What is the appropriate spatial & temporal scale to address this issue? 8

  9. 9

  10. 10

  11. Seasonal distribution of Chinook in research vessel surveys (1956- 1996) in the North Pacific Ocean & Bering Sea Source: Welch et al. 2014 PICES Presentation (pices.int) 11

  12. Many factors influence ocean distribution Distribution 12

  13. Recent evidence supports concept that ocean migration patterns of salmon are inherited 13

  14. Evidence indicates Upper Cook inlet kings are distributed in the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea 14

  15. Tag recovery data provide information on age- specific seasonal distributions of Upper Cook Inlet Kings 15

  16. Known ocean distribution of Upper Cook Inlet salmon from tag recoveries Composite of all recoveries 1981-2013 Data source: Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, Regional Mark Information System 16

  17. UCI – 1 st ocean summer-fall – Age 1.0 17

  18. UCI – 1 st ocean winter – Age 1.1 18

  19. UCI – spring – Age 1.1 19

  20. UCI – summer – Age 1.1 20

  21. UCI – fall – Age 1.1 21

  22. UCI – winter – Age 1.2 22

  23. UCI – spring/summer – Age 1.2 5- 5 8 7 - 7-9 8 7 4-5 23

  24. UCI – fall – Age 1.2 10- 11 24

  25. UCI – winter – Age 1.3 25

  26. UCI – spring – Age 1.3 26

  27. UCI – summer/fall – Age 1.3 7-9 7 7 7-10 7 8 - 8 9 27

  28. UCI – spring/summer – Age 1.4 5-8 7 28

  29. UCI – spring – Age 1.5 29

  30. Conceptual model of seasonal migration patterns of Upper Cook Inlet Chinook (modified from Larson et al. 2013) Juvenile age .0 Spring-fall Winter

  31. No apparent differences in vertical distribution by ocean age group in winter of trawl bycatch of kings % of total by age group Ocean surface Fish Squid Record depth of individual fish measured by electronic tag = 1,717 ft (523 m) Data are from 1997-1999 31

  32. Electronic tag data indicate Chinook vertical distribution is deeper than other species 32

  33. 33

  34. Pop-up satellite tag recovery shows temperature- depth distribution & estimates location Tag released in Dutch Harbor, Dec. 2013 Pop-up Apr. 2014 Data and slide provided by Andrew Seitz, UAF 34

  35. Gulf of Bering Alaska Gulf of Sea feeding Alaska transit Pop-up feeding February March April January December Data and slide provided by Andrew Seitz, UAF 35

  36. Fish deep in day (yellow), shallow at night (purple-blue) Depth AKST (feet) Day 0 Pop- 11 am up tag at 328 ft 6 am sea surf- Night ace 656 ft 1 am 8 pm 984 ft Day 1312 ft 3 pm Data and slide provided by Andrew Seitz, UAF 36

  37. Squid are the major prey of kings in the Central Gulf of Alaska in summer (50-56°N, 145°W) Unidentified Fish Prey composition Squid Euphausiid Amphipod Data from Kaeriyama et al. 2004 37

  38. Squid, fish, and euphausiids are major prey in summer diets of kings in the Bering Sea Squid Fish Euphausiids Other 100% Prey composition by volume Euphausiids 80% 60% Fish 40% Squid 20% 0% 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 38

  39. Winter diets of kings in Bering Sea shelf habitats varied by ocean age group – (samples from trawl bycatch contained pollock offal) Mean % Prey Composition Fish 100% Pollock Offal Fish 75% Euphausiids Squid 50% Other-shrimp, 25% plastic Euphausiids 0% 1 & 2 3 4 & 5 Ocean Age-1 & 2 Ocean Age-3 Ocean Age-4 & 5 Ocean Age Group 39

  40. Life-stage specific responses of Alaska kings to natural climate change Open ocean Warm Cool climate climate life stage: 1 st Ocean High survival & Low survival & winter abundance abundance n n High growth Low growth Immature rate if prey not rate if prey limited limited High ocean survival Early maturation; early Late maturation; late Adult return; adults younger, return; adults older & smaller at return larger at return 40

  41. Decreasing trend in average weight of Kings in Upper Cook Inlet Commercial Catch 35 30 Average weight (lbs) 25 20 15 10 5 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Return Year Data Source: ADF&G 41

  42. Possible reasons for declining size and age Slide provided by Ed Farley, NOAA 42

  43. Potential threats to Mat-Su Kings • Climate change • Ocean Fishing • Hatchery-wild interactions in the ocean • Marine Pollution 43

  44. Distribution, Growth, & Survival 44

  45. Chinook frequently caught at cooler range of summer sea surface temperatures ( ° C) than other salmon species (Abdul-Aziz et al. 2011) 32*F 57*F 45

  46. Projected changes in sea surface temperatures indicate loss of most summer thermal habitat of king salmon by the end of the century 1980s 2040s 2080s 86% loss of 1-10°C (34- 50°F) habitat by 2080s Data from Abdul-Aziz et al. 2011 46

  47. What are the biological implications of ocean acidification? • Reduced calcification rates for calcifying (hard-shelled) Barrie Kovish organisms • physiological stress • Shifts in phytoplankton Pacific Salmon diversity and changes in food webs • Reduced tolerance to other Vicki Fabry environmental fluctuations • Potential for changes to fitness Pteropods ARCOD@ims.uaf.edu and survival, but this is poorly understood Coccolithophores (Slide provided by Dick Feely, NOAA ) 47 Copepods

  48. Ocean Fishing: What are the combined impacts of catch, bycatch, dropout mortality, and ecological interactions by commercial fisheries Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea? Stock Proportions of Chinook in GOA pollock trawl bycatch Guyon et al. 2014 48

  49. Do interactions with hatchery salmon in the ocean affect productivity of wild Mat-Su salmon? Hatchery Premise: No Competition 5 billion per year Asian & North American releases into ocean Data Source: npafc.org 49

  50. Regional Wild vs. Hatchery Abundance Some “ pristine ” regions have high hatchery production, 1990-2005; Data source: Ruggerone et al. 2010 50

  51. Marine pollution example: Potential Mechanisms of Juvenile Salmon Mortality Due to Plastic Marine Debris Direct Mortality Mechanical injury, starvation, toxicity Indirect Mortality Indirect Mortality Transgenerational Biomagnification & epigenetic effects on bioaccumulation of physiology & behavior toxic chemicals Immature Juvenile Life Cycle Smolt Maturing Adult Egg Fry Freshwater 51

  52. Hypotheses linking changes in FW and Marine Habitats to recent declines Slide provided by Nate Mantua, NOAA 52

  53. 1. Critical size and period hypothesis Year class strength is set during 1 st year at sea Slide provided by Ed Farley, NOAA/AFSC/Auke Bay Lab 53

  54. 2. Match Mismatch Hypothesis: smolts are entering the ocean earlier Gulf of Alaska Slide provided by Ed Farley, NOAA/AFSC/Auke Bay Lab 54

  55. Slide provided by Ed Farley, NOAA/AFSC/Auke Bay Lab 55

  56. 3. Declining adult size reduces productivity Modified from slide provided by Ed Farley, NOAA/AFSC/Auke Bay Lab 56

  57. Suggestions for next steps • Proceed with recommended ADFG Chinook stock assessment & research plan (ADFG 2013) • Develop a plan for local marine research, monitoring, & evaluation of juvenile salmon & their nearshore habitats in Cook Inlet • Support/collaborate with NOAA’s juvenile salmon ecosystem monitoring & assessment in shelf habitats of the Bering Sea & Gulf of Alaska • Cooperate with treaty organizations addressing these issues in international waters (high seas) - North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission (npafc.org) and North Pacific Marine Science Organization (pices.int) 57

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend