levels of advantages disadvantages governance
play

Levels of Advantages & Disadvantages Governance Global Many - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sustainable Development Goals and Governance Mark Elder Governance and Capacity Group, IGES July 24, 2012 International Forum for S ustainable Asia and Pacific 2012, Pacifico Y okohama, Y


  1. Sustainable Development Goals and Governance 持続可能な開発目標とガバナンス Mark Elder Governance and Capacity Group, IGES July 24, 2012 International Forum for S ustainable Asia and Pacific 2012, Pacifico Y okohama, Y okohama, Japan ustainable Development Goals, the Road Ahead S ession S 1-3: S

  2. ON TARGET Why is Governance for SDGs Important? なぜ SDG のガバナンスが重要なのか? • Current governance structures are not addressing problems of sustainable development • S cale and scope of problems and governance do not match (global problems vs. national sovereignty • To develop policies & measures to implement S DGs • Implementation of policies and measures • Enhance accountability 2

  3. ON TARGET What Reforms in Governance are Needed? どのようなガバナンス改革が必要か? • Mainstream sustainable development into other policies • Mainstreaming needs coordination between ministries • Multiple levels of government need to work together • Monitoring & reporting to enhance accountability • More multistakeholder participation in designing and implementing policies • Governance should expand beyond governments o (More informal governance mechanisms by stakeholders) 3

  4. ON TARGET Solutions are necessary at all levels: Multilevel Governance 全てのレベルでの解決が必要:マルチレベルガバナンス Levels of Advantages & Disadvantages Governance  Global • Many problems require global cooperation • Global cooperation is cumbersome  Regional / • Cooperation & coordination easier than global S ubregional  National • Key powers to tax, spend, regulate  S • ubnational Close to implementation, knows local conditions • Limited power, sometimes problems aren’ t local  Non-governmental • Individuals and businesses are key actors • Can sometimes act faster than governments (informal) • S ometimes difficult to coordinate -- Business, NGOs, etc.  One level can’t solve problems alone  Need cooperation between & within levels  Principle of subsidiarity: delegation to lowest appropriate level 4

  5. ON TARGET Multistakeholder participation should be enhanced マルチステークホルダー参画を強化するべき Key benefit s • Improve informat ion input int o decisions • Improve legit imacy • Improve coordinat ion • S t rengt hen monit oring and report ing Key improvement s • Leads t o bet t er S DGs • Leads t o bet t er implement at ion measures • Improves implement at ion • Can help improve account abilit y 5

  6. ON TARGET Global Level / 地球レベル Rio+20 Outcome: • High level political forum to replace Commission on S ustainable Development (CS D) (May become S ustainable Development Council) • UNEP: Universal Membership in its Governing Council (now 58 countries) and Increased funding • Implementation will be discussed in the General Assembly (Discussion from end of 2012 to end of 2013) Possible functions of the high level political forum (a few from Rio+20) • Political leadership & guidance • Enhance integration of the 3 pillars of S D • Platform for dialogue and agenda setting • Improve coordination & coherence within the UN • Follow up the progress • S haring information and experience • S trengthen science policy interface & evidence based decisions • (Does not specifically mention accountability or general capacity building) 6

  7. ON TARGET Regional Level / 地域レベル Regional Level Considerations • Need to consider roles of existing regional institutions, including UNES CAP , UNEP regional offices • Need more cooperation and coordination among existing institutions • Make sure that sustainable development institutions keep up with the pace of regional economic integration IGES Proposal Long run: S hort run: A st ronger inst it ut ion such as Capacity and information an Asian Environment al exchange platform Organisat ion based on or linked t o exist ing frameworks 7

  8. ON TARGET National Level / 国レベル S ustainable development • S hould be the general organizing principle of public policy. (Priority) • S hould be integrated into national plans and policies • S hould be integrated into each ministry • Needs a coordinating body to promote cooperation between ministries and other levels of government We will know there is progress when central bankers stop talking about “ sustainable economic growth” and start using talking about sustainable development. 8

  9. ON TARGET Local Level / 地方レベル • It is very popular t o t alk Recommendations about sust ainable cit ies.  Local and nat ional policies • Closer to people’s daily lives. need t o be coordinat ed • Better knowledge of actual  Apply t he subsidiarit y conditions principle (act ion should be at • But cit ies’ powers are t he lowest appropriat e level) limit ed  National governments may • Few resources or regulatory need to give local governments powers (except land use) more authority • Determined by national  Est ablish report ing and governments feedback mechanisms • S cope of problems often does not coincide with local bet ween local and nat ional government boundaries government s 9

  10. ON TARGET Informal Governance / インフォーマルガバナンス • Governance is not j ust about governments • Other stakeholders can j oin in voluntary arrangements • Especially involves business, NGOs • Public-private partnerships Business Public- Civil S ociet y NGOs Privat e Government Part nerships Part nerships Other stakeholders  Business involvement is essential  But difficult to regulate business  Need to use voluntary efforts 10

  11. ON TARGET Governance and the “Means of Implementation” ガバナンスと実施手段 1. Capacit y development 2. Financing 3. Technology  Governance needs t o deliver t hese (how? ) 11

  12. ON TARGET Conclusions / 結論 • Proposals in this presentation are not necessarily new • They have been accepted or implemented only to a limited extent • They are still valid • How can we expect more this time? • S DGs may provide more focus • S DG and S DC process may generate institutional incentives • Problems are becoming more severe; will be more difficult to ignore  But more effort needed to persuade politicians and citizens of the importance of S D. • Need to stop preaching to the converted • Rio+20: 50,000 people attended, but others are not necessarily convinced • Need to talk to others, not j ust among ourselves. 12

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend