LeRoy CUSD #2 Funding and Accountability in Illinois; Whats it mean - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Strategic Leadership in Education

LeRoy CUSD #2

Involved Community, Competitive Students, ProductiveCitizens

Funding and Accountability in Illinois; What’s it mean for us at home?

Governance & Planning

Fundamentals of EBF

34 Elements x the LeRoy Students

New State Money

What’s possible with

• ur Property Tax Base

Old Money from the State

Fundamentals of EBF

$22,086 New Money

$1,676,458

State Base

$1,952745 Gap to Adequacy

$4,623,983 Local

Mathematics Real

$8,344,911 Target

Planning Process: What do we need most?

• Income, 20:1 Non Low-Income

• Income, 25:1 Non Low-Income

Illinois State Board of Education FY 2019 Adequacy Target Gap Analysis Calculator

October 2018

• reTeachers

• re

• re Positions

• $72,559.50

Today vs TheModel

• 1. Is our Adequacy Target sufficient to

meet the demand of our community?

• 2. How are we staffed and spending? Is

that our intention?

• 3. Within the researched based

recommendations, what is our greatest opportunity for impact?

Planning Process: What do we need most?

Category Model Target U2 Current Target for Change Core Teachers 34.04 30.33 Specialist Teachers 8.13 13.50 Instructional Facilitator 3.73 0.00 Core Intervention Teachers 1.52 1.00 Guidance Counselor 2.36 1.00 Nurse 0.98 1.00 Supervisory Aide 3.44 0.00 Librarian 1.52 1.00 Librarian Aide 2.48 0.00 Principal 1.52 3.00 Assistant Principal 1.52 1.00 School Site Staff 3.44 2.50 Targeted Intervention Teacher 1.43 0.00 Targeted Pupil Support Staff 1.43 0.00 Targeted Extended Day Teacher 1.49 0.00 Targeted Summer School Teacher 1.49 0.00 SPED Core Teacher 5.30 6.00 SPED Instructional Assistant 5.30 14.50 SPED School Psychologist 0.74 0.25 Total: 81.86 75.08 6 FTE's Notes: We have several staff that exist in multiple categories at the same time, so some

• f our "0's" are actually occupied positions. The existence of our LIFE and LPA program

also create a level of uniqueness to the calculations for the LeRoy School system. Because we have students attending on a tuition basis, we are actually supported in part by the state funding of other districts. We also have staff that transitions over into

• ur efforts with PK education which is not reflected within the Evidence Based Model. It

is important to realize that this is not a perfect representation of our staffing but is appropriate to be used for planning purposes. It is also our position that in the area of "specialist teacher" that our overage is reflective of our local demand to offer Art, Music, and Vocational Programming.

Decade ofDirection

• 1. Interventionist Position

I. Cost: $40,000

• II. Tier Funding: $22,000 in FY18 and

$25,000 in FY19

• III. Hire the position for FY20
• 2. Continued commitment to AdvancED as a

Continuous Improvement Partner.

• 3. Continued Commitment to Measured Progress

for Assessment of AcademicGrowth.

• 4. Title funds will support the extension of the

school day/year until Tier Revenues allow the replacement.

• 5. Do without the Instructional Facilitators and

Guidance Counselor positions for now.

Tax RateImplications

❖ ❖ ❖ ❖

Current EAV: $102,844,903 Current Adjusted Operating Tax Rate: $4.504 Relative Necessary Rate: $4.486

❖ ($4,613,901 / $102,844,903 x 100)

Gap in Rate: -$0.018

❖ $250,000 House (33% x $250,000/100 x $0.018) = $14.85

reduction

❖ Gap in Resource: $18,233

Using the Model to Build Our Narrative

❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ ❖

Staffing by Evidence Responding to ESSA Negotiating Property Tax Debate Does the $40,000 matter to us? Example Questions or Dissent

Thank You… For taking the time to invest in learning and leading!