laura k nelson northeastern university laurak nelson l
play

Laura K. Nelson | Northeastern University @LauraK_Nelson | - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Laura K. Nelson | Northeastern University @LauraK_Nelson | L.Nelson@northeastern.edu |------------------------------------| | INTERACTION | | EFFECTS | | =/= | |


  1. Laura K. Nelson | Northeastern University @LauraK_Nelson | L.Nelson@northeastern.edu

  2. |------------------------------------| | INTERACTION | | EFFECTS | | =/= | | INTERSECTIONALITY | |------------------------------------| (\__/) || (• ㅅ •) || / づ

  3. |-------------------------| | MACHINE | | LEARNING | | IS | | INDUCTIVE | |-------------------------| (\__/) || (• ㅅ •) || / づ

  4. |-----------------------------| | A (the?) FUTURE | | OF | | MACHINE | | LEARNING | | IS | | INTERSECTIONAL | |----------------------------| (\__/) || (• ㅅ •) || / づ

  5. Part I: Groundwork

  6. Intersectionality is a theoretical framework for understanding how social identities and categories combine and interact with systems of social, cultural, economic, and political power to create distinct, and unequal, lived experiences.

  7. Intersectionality as Epistemology 1. Identities and institutions are relational 2. Identity is an embedded experience 3. Nested hierarchies are situationally specific 4. Context is key to knowing 5. Categories are mutually constitutive

  8. Deductive

  9. Deductive Inductive

  10. The tyranny of variable-based regression analysis

  11. Let’s Talk Math

  12. Let’s Talk Math 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬𝞧 + 𝞋

  13. Let’s Talk Math 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬𝞧 + 𝞋 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬 1 𝞧 + 𝞬 2 𝞧 + 𝞋

  14. Let’s Talk Math 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬𝞧 + 𝞋 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬 1 𝞧 + 𝞬 2 𝞧 + 𝞋 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬 1 𝞧 + 𝞬 2 𝞧 + 𝞬 3 𝞧 + 𝞋

  15. Let’s Talk Math 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬𝞧 + 𝞋 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬 1 𝞧 + 𝞬 2 𝞧 + 𝞋 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬 1 𝞧 + 𝞬 2 𝞧 + 𝞬 3 𝞧 + 𝞋 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬 1 𝞧 + 𝞬 2 𝞧 + 𝞬 3 𝞧 + ( 𝞬 1 * 𝞬 3 ) 𝞧 + 𝞋

  16. Let’s Talk Math 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬𝞧 + 𝞋 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬 1 𝞧 + 𝞬 2 𝞧 + 𝞋 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬 1 𝞧 + 𝞬 2 𝞧 + 𝞬 3 𝞧 + 𝞋 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬 1 𝞧 + 𝞬 2 𝞧 + 𝞬 3 𝞧 + ( 𝞬 1 * 𝞬 3 ) 𝞧 + 𝞋 𝞥 = 𝝱 + 𝞬 1 𝞧 + 𝞬 2 𝞧 2 + 𝞋

  17. Inferential Statistics assume known relationships → assess fit mathematical rigid statistical significance interpretable parameters

  18. Enter: Machine Learning

  19. Enter: Machine Learning Machine learning is the algorithms and statistical models that computer systems use to perform a specific task without using explicit instructions, relying on patterns and inference instead.

  20. intercategorical intracategorical anticategorical processes complexity complexity complexity

  21. intercategorical intracategorical anticategorical processes complexity complexity complexity moar data

  22. intercategorical intracategorical anticategorical processes complexity complexity complexity high- moar data dimensional data

  23. intercategorical intracategorical anticategorical processes complexity complexity complexity high- unsupervised moar data dimensional data

  24. intercategorical intracategorical anticategorical processes complexity complexity complexity high- unsupervised moar data dimensional #oversharing data

  25. Inferential Statistics Machine Learning assume known relationships → assess fit unknown relationships → fit the data mathematical empirical rigid elastic statistical significance generalizability interpretable parameters black box (or prediction)

  26. Inferential Statistics Machine Learning assume known relationships → assess fit unknown relationships → fit the data mathematical empirical rigid elastic statistical significance generalizability interpretable parameters black box (or prediction)

  27. Inferential Statistics Deductive

  28. Inferential Statistics Inductive Deductive Machine Learning

  29. Yup, even supervised machine learning! Inferential Statistics Inductive Deductive Machine Learning

  30. Quantitative Method with a Parametric Epistemology Quantitative Method with a Qualitative Epistemology

  31. The mathematical assumptions of machine learning are perfectly aligned with intersectionality as epistemology.

  32. The mathematical assumptions of machine learning are perfectly aligned with intersectionality as epistemology. and even ontology!

  33. Part II: The 19th Century U.S. South

  34. N = 414 41 by white women 89 by white men 48 by Black women 243 by Black men or about Black persons

  35. word embeddings

  36. word embeddings etariat , the modern working class , developed -- prolongation of the working hours , by increase ial validity for the working class . All are inst the struggle of the working class against the bo re always during the working season members of an nd nationality . The working men have no country said , that two men working differently bring ab he revolution by the working class , is to raise effect , and of two working similarly , one atta est of the exploited working class alone . Thus t measures against the working class ; and in ordin the cudgels for the working class . Thus arose p

  37. word embeddings The Sociological Imagination

  38. word embeddings The Sociological Imagination Skip-Gram: The ??? Imagination

  39. word embeddings The Sociological Imagination Skip-Gram: The ??? Imagination CBOW: ??? Sociological ???

  40. word embeddings sewing - carpentry registered-nurse - physician housewife - shopkeeper nurse - surgeon interior designer - architect softball - baseball blond - burley feminism - conservatism cosmetics - pharmaceuticals giggle - chuckle vocalist - guitarist petite - lanky sassy - snappy diva - superstar charming - affable volleyball - football cupcakes - pizzas hairdresser - barber

  41. de-biasing word embeddings sewing - carpentry registered-nurse - physician housewife - shopkeeper nurse - surgeon interior designer - architect softball - baseball blond - burley feminism - conservatism cosmetics - pharmaceuticals giggle - chuckle vocalist - guitarist petite - lanky sassy - snappy diva - superstar charming - affable volleyball - football cupcakes - pizzas hairdresser - barber Tolga Bolukbasi et al. “Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings.” NIPS 2016, Barcelona Spain.

  42. reveal intersecting systems of power sewing - carpentry registered-nurse - physician housewife - shopkeeper nurse - surgeon interior designer - architect softball - baseball blond - burley feminism - conservatism cosmetics - pharmaceuticals giggle - chuckle vocalist - guitarist petite - lanky sassy - snappy diva - superstar charming - affable volleyball - football cupcakes - pizzas hairdresser - barber

  43. reveal the lived experience under intersecting systems of cultural power sewing - carpentry registered-nurse - physician housewife - shopkeeper nurse - surgeon interior designer - architect softball - baseball blond - burley feminism - conservatism cosmetics - pharmaceuticals giggle - chuckle vocalist - guitarist petite - lanky sassy - snappy diva - superstar charming - affable volleyball - football cupcakes - pizzas hairdresser - barber

  44. Intersectionality using Word Embeddings Map four combined social identities - Black and white men and women - and four social institutions - the polity, the economy, culture, and the domestic - to produce four visualizations showing the specific and relational position of each identity embedded within the social institutions, as conveyed in the context of pro-abolitionist narratives from the 19th century U.S. South.

  45. Intersectionality using Word Embeddings Black women = ‘negro’ + ‘woman’ Black men = ‘negro’ + ‘man’ white women = ‘caucasian’ + ‘woman’ white men = ‘caucasian’ + ‘woman’ polity = ‘nation’ + ‘state’ economy = ‘money’ culture = ‘culture’ domestic = ‘housework’ + ‘children’

  46. Intersectionality using Word Embeddings Black women = ‘negro’ + ‘woman’ Black men = ‘negro’ + ‘man’ white women = ‘caucasian’ + ‘woman’ white men = ‘caucasian’ + ‘woman’ polity = ‘nation’ + ‘state’ economy = ‘money’ culture = ‘culture’ domestic = ‘housework’ + ‘children’

  47. Intersectionality using Word Embeddings Black women = ‘negro’ + ‘woman’ Black men = ‘negro’ + ‘man’ white women = ‘caucasian’ + ‘woman’ white men = ‘caucasian’ + ‘woman’ polity = ‘nation’ + ‘state’ economy = ‘money’ culture = ‘culture’ domestic = ‘housework’ + ‘children’

  48. Intersectionality using Word Embeddings white women → dainty = 0.40 Black women → dainty = 0.26 white men → dainty = 0.25 Black men → dainty = 0.11

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend