Last week 1. We showed that is -additive on M . 2. Hence | M is - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

last week
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Last week 1. We showed that is -additive on M . 2. Hence | M is - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Last week 1. We showed that is -additive on M . 2. Hence | M is a measure! We denote it simply by . 3. We started on general measure and (a little) integration theory. 4. You proved that all measures have nice properties. 5.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Last week

  • 1. We showed that λ∗ is σ-additive on M.
  • 2. Hence λ∗|M is a measure! We denote it simply by λ.
  • 3. We started on general measure and (a little) integration theory.
  • 4. You proved that all measures have nice properties.
  • 5. You looked at the concepts of almost everywhere and complete

measures.

  • 6. We defined the notion of an A-measurable function.
  • 7. We defined a simple A-measurable function.
  • 8. We defined the integral of a non-negative simple A-measurable

function.

  • 9. We didn’t quite show that the definition was independent of our

representation of the simple function.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Last week

  • 1. We showed that λ∗ is σ-additive on M.
  • 2. Hence λ∗|M is a measure! We denote it simply by λ.
  • 3. We started on general measure and (a little) integration theory.
  • 4. You proved that all measures have nice properties.
  • 5. You looked at the concepts of almost everywhere and complete

measures.

  • 6. We defined the notion of an A-measurable function.
  • 7. We defined a simple A-measurable function.
  • 8. We defined the integral of a non-negative simple A-measurable

function.

  • 9. We didn’t quite show that the definition was independent of our

representation of the simple function.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Last week

  • 1. We showed that λ∗ is σ-additive on M.
  • 2. Hence λ∗|M is a measure! We denote it simply by λ.
  • 3. We started on general measure and (a little) integration theory.
  • 4. You proved that all measures have nice properties.
  • 5. You looked at the concepts of almost everywhere and complete

measures.

  • 6. We defined the notion of an A-measurable function.
  • 7. We defined a simple A-measurable function.
  • 8. We defined the integral of a non-negative simple A-measurable

function.

  • 9. We didn’t quite show that the definition was independent of our

representation of the simple function.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Last week

  • 1. We showed that λ∗ is σ-additive on M.
  • 2. Hence λ∗|M is a measure! We denote it simply by λ.
  • 3. We started on general measure and (a little) integration theory.
  • 4. You proved that all measures have nice properties.
  • 5. You looked at the concepts of almost everywhere and complete

measures.

  • 6. We defined the notion of an A-measurable function.
  • 7. We defined a simple A-measurable function.
  • 8. We defined the integral of a non-negative simple A-measurable

function.

  • 9. We didn’t quite show that the definition was independent of our

representation of the simple function.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Last week

  • 1. We showed that λ∗ is σ-additive on M.
  • 2. Hence λ∗|M is a measure! We denote it simply by λ.
  • 3. We started on general measure and (a little) integration theory.
  • 4. You proved that all measures have nice properties.
  • 5. You looked at the concepts of almost everywhere and complete

measures.

  • 6. We defined the notion of an A-measurable function.
  • 7. We defined a simple A-measurable function.
  • 8. We defined the integral of a non-negative simple A-measurable

function.

  • 9. We didn’t quite show that the definition was independent of our

representation of the simple function.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Last week

  • 1. We showed that λ∗ is σ-additive on M.
  • 2. Hence λ∗|M is a measure! We denote it simply by λ.
  • 3. We started on general measure and (a little) integration theory.
  • 4. You proved that all measures have nice properties.
  • 5. You looked at the concepts of almost everywhere and complete

measures.

  • 6. We defined the notion of an A-measurable function.
  • 7. We defined a simple A-measurable function.
  • 8. We defined the integral of a non-negative simple A-measurable

function.

  • 9. We didn’t quite show that the definition was independent of our

representation of the simple function.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Last week

  • 1. We showed that λ∗ is σ-additive on M.
  • 2. Hence λ∗|M is a measure! We denote it simply by λ.
  • 3. We started on general measure and (a little) integration theory.
  • 4. You proved that all measures have nice properties.
  • 5. You looked at the concepts of almost everywhere and complete

measures.

  • 6. We defined the notion of an A-measurable function.
  • 7. We defined a simple A-measurable function.
  • 8. We defined the integral of a non-negative simple A-measurable

function.

  • 9. We didn’t quite show that the definition was independent of our

representation of the simple function.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Last week

  • 1. We showed that λ∗ is σ-additive on M.
  • 2. Hence λ∗|M is a measure! We denote it simply by λ.
  • 3. We started on general measure and (a little) integration theory.
  • 4. You proved that all measures have nice properties.
  • 5. You looked at the concepts of almost everywhere and complete

measures.

  • 6. We defined the notion of an A-measurable function.
  • 7. We defined a simple A-measurable function.
  • 8. We defined the integral of a non-negative simple A-measurable

function.

  • 9. We didn’t quite show that the definition was independent of our

representation of the simple function.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Last week

  • 1. We showed that λ∗ is σ-additive on M.
  • 2. Hence λ∗|M is a measure! We denote it simply by λ.
  • 3. We started on general measure and (a little) integration theory.
  • 4. You proved that all measures have nice properties.
  • 5. You looked at the concepts of almost everywhere and complete

measures.

  • 6. We defined the notion of an A-measurable function.
  • 7. We defined a simple A-measurable function.
  • 8. We defined the integral of a non-negative simple A-measurable

function.

  • 9. We didn’t quite show that the definition was independent of our

representation of the simple function.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Today

  • 1. We will show that every non-negative measurable function is an

increasing limit of simple functions.

  • 2. We will define the integral of a non-negative measurable function.
  • 3. We will look at properties of the integral.
  • 4. Notably the Monotone Convergence Theorem.
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Today

  • 1. We will show that every non-negative measurable function is an

increasing limit of simple functions.

  • 2. We will define the integral of a non-negative measurable function.
  • 3. We will look at properties of the integral.
  • 4. Notably the Monotone Convergence Theorem.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Today

  • 1. We will show that every non-negative measurable function is an

increasing limit of simple functions.

  • 2. We will define the integral of a non-negative measurable function.
  • 3. We will look at properties of the integral.
  • 4. Notably the Monotone Convergence Theorem.
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Today

  • 1. We will show that every non-negative measurable function is an

increasing limit of simple functions.

  • 2. We will define the integral of a non-negative measurable function.
  • 3. We will look at properties of the integral.
  • 4. Notably the Monotone Convergence Theorem.