DG Energy Unit C3 Energy efficiency of products & Intelligent Energy - Europe Matthew Kestner
8/09/2011Consultation Forum
Vaccum Cleaners
l
l DG Energy Unit C3 Energy efficiency of products & Intelligent - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Consultation Forum Vaccum Cleaners l DG Energy Unit C3 Energy efficiency of products & Intelligent Energy - Europe Matthew Kestner 8/09/2011 Vacuum cleaners - Background: l . Increasing Energy Consumption Average input power around 500W
DG Energy Unit C3 Energy efficiency of products & Intelligent Energy - Europe Matthew Kestner
8/09/2011Consultation Forum
Vaccum Cleaners
l
l
Vacuum cleaners - Background:
input power around 500W in 1960s to 1500W today
(but lack of data)
TWh
l
Vacuum cleaners - Scope:
Domestic and Commercial
l
Vacuum cleaners - Scope: Comments
Domestic and Commercial
.
Exclude
.
Wet (Spray liquid) – e.g. carpet cleaners
(Spray Extraction Machines – ECMA)
.
Wet and Dry Workshop machines (ANEC include)
.
Robot VCs (ANEC include)
.
Industrial Machines Need specialist operator
.
Central VCs
.
Floor Polishers
.
Scrubber Driers, Sweepers, commercial VC with head>50cm,
l
Vacuum cleaners - Scope:
But
2 years extra for measurement methods
No requirements, Labelling Optional
l
Vacuum cleaners - Scope: Comments
But
2 years extra for measurement methods
No requirements, Labelling Optional NL(ANEC) - Should not be optional, include battery VCs intended for normal household use, exclude others.
l
Vacuum cleaners - Categories:
l
Vacuum cleaners - Categories:
l
Vacuum cleaners - Categories:
Same
(possibly no label for commercial VCs)
definition of commercial/domestic
l
Vacuum cleaners - Impacts:
l
VCs – Policy : Noise
» dBa figure
» No Limit
l
VCs – Policy : Noise
» dBa figure
» No Limit
Directive already defines noise with limits – should follow
l VCs –Dust re-emission
» E.g. 0.4 - 4 micron
l VCs –: Dust re-emission
» Indoor particulate much higher than outdoor levels » Significant health impact » Not clear that ‘very good’ filtration (e.g. 99.5%)
significant improvement over ‘good’ filtration (e.g. 98%)
» Very important to some consumers (e.g. households
with asthma suffers)
l
VCs –: Dust re-emission
» Re-emission % figure e.g. 2.5%
» Limit
3% re-emission
l
VCs –: Dust re-emission
» Re-emission % figure e.g. 2.5%
» Limit
3% re-emission
» 0.3 µ to 20 µ » 1% after 1 year, 0.4% after 3 years
l VCs –Cleaning performance
» More realistic than 5 double strokes » Repeatability and Reprocability a little worse than after
5 double strokes
» but probably be acceptable for performance
declaration.
l VCs –Cleaning performance
» More realistic than 5 double strokes » Repeatability and Reprocability a little worse than
after 5 double strokes
» but probably be acceptable for performance
declaration.
2 Double Strokes
(also) measure with (half) full bag
l VCs –: Cleaning performance
» Separate A-G scale Carpet – Hard floor
l VCs –: Cleaning performance
» Separate A-G scales Carpet – Hard floor » ANEC harder scales (reflecting limits)
l VCs – Cleaning performance
» Separate A-G scales Carpet/Hard floor » Separate % figures Carpet/Hard floor
l VCs –: Cleaning performance
» No limits
l VCs –: Cleaning performance Comments
»
NL suggest limits of 65% carpets and 95% hard floor (5 double strokes) would meet (CECED) concerns about very low performance VCs receiving a label or better
»
Ro suggests limits
»
ECOS limit after 2 Double Strokes
»
ANEC limits of 55% carpets and 85% hard floor (2 double strokes)
l VCs –: Energy Consumption
Information available suggests
» 2 double strokes (regardless of level of cleaning)
l VCs –: Energy Consumption
» Real life Cleaning times implies about 2 double strokes
in test
» Floor must be covered at least once » Test floors probably ‘dirtier’ than real life
(so fewer ‘double strokes’ needed to achieve set cleanliness)
l VCs –: Energy Consumption
» Cleaning time implies about 2 double strokes in test » Floor must be covered at least once » Test floors probably ‘dirtier’ than real life
(so fewer ‘double strokes’ needed to achieve set cleanliness)
l VCs – : Energy Consumption
» LLCC for (standard size) vacuum cleaner
750W – about 28 kWh per year
» Extra costs low (and saving from smaller motor)
l VCs – : Energy Consumption
» Power input x Annual Cleaning time
l VCs – : Energy Consumption
Power input x Annual Cleaning time
power (A 800W G 1200 W) (as in study)
l VCs – : Energy Consumption
»50 Cleans x 87M² x 2 double strokes x F x P
+ 5h idle time
(divided between 40 M² carpet & 47 M² hard floor) (time to clean 87M² from head width and velocity of 0,5M/s)
l VCs –: Correction Factor ‘F’
Penalizes Vacuum Cleaners with ‘bad’ cleaning performance where after 2 double strokes users may still see visible dirt and so may continue to clean.
l VCs –: Correction Factor ‘F’
»For VCs with at least average Dust Pick up:
1
»For VCs with below average Dust Pick up:
Average Cleaning performance Cleaning Performance
l
VCs –: Correction Factor ‘F’ Comment
Penalizes Vacuum Cleaners with ‘bad’ cleaning performance where after 2 double strokes users may still see visible dirt and so may continue to clean.
VCs with very low power and very low performance could still receive A energy rating (or better) – but with G performance rating.
l VCs –: Correction Factor ‘P’
Penalizes Vacuum Cleaners which require ‘high’ push force (over 25N), where users may push vacuum cleaner more slowly.
l VCs –: Correction Factor ‘P’
Penalizes Vacuum Cleaners which require ‘high’ push force (over 25N), where users may push vacuum cleaner more slowly.
l VCs –: Correction Factor ‘P’
»For VCs with push force under 25N:
1
»For VCs with push force over 25N:
Push force 25
l
VCs –: Correction Factor ‘P’ Comment
Penalizes Vacuum Cleaners which require ‘high’ push force (over 25N), where users may push vacuum cleaner more slowly.
limit of 50N
l
VCs –: Energy Consumption Comments CECED
»50 Cleans x 87M² x N double strokes + 5h idle time »Where » N is the extrapolated number of double strokes to achieve
reference cleaning performance.
»E.G. if cleaning performance on carpet after
(No other correction factors)
l
VCs –: Error Margins
»Cleaning Performance (e.g. on carpets)
Declared Measured Difference
1 double stroke 60 55 9% 2 double strokes 70 65 8% Annual Energy kWh 29 37 28%
(1000W machine)
l VCs – : Energy Consumption
»Annual Energy Consumption < 62 kWh/year
»(1666W for VC without malus and 30cm head)
»Power cap of 1600W and
» Annual Energy Consumption (CECED calculation) < 243 kWh/year
»Power cap 1200W
l
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 W A T T S
Ecodesign Requirements 2014
(30cm head)
DG ENER CECED
B 3 A 2 1 C 4 D 5 E 6,5 F 8 G 10
VAC 1 20 VAC 2 100l VCs – : Energy Consumption
»Annual Energy Consumption < 36 kWh/year
»(967 W
for VC without malus and 30cm head)
»Power cap of 1200W and
»Annual Energy Consumption (CECED calculation) < 91 kWh/year
l
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 W A T T S
Ecodesign Requirements 2017
(30cm head)
DG ENER CECED
B 3 A 2 1 C 4 D 5 E 6,5 F 8 G 10
VAC 1 20 VAC 2 100l
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 W A T T S
Ecodesign Requirements 2017
(30cm head)
DG ENER CECED Performance
B 3 A 2 1 C 4 D 5 E 6,5 F 8 G 10
VAC 1 20 VAC 2 100l
500 1000 1500 2000 2500
A+++ A++ A+ A B C D E F GW A T T S
Energy efficiency classes (30cm head)
B 3 A 2 1 C 4 D 5 E 6,5 F 8 G 10
VAC 1 20 VAC 2 100l
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 W A T T S B 3 A 2 1 C 4 D 5 E 6,5 F 8 G 10
VAC 1 20 VAC 2 100Energy efficiency classes (CECED)
(30cm head)
A B C D E F G
l
Vacuum Cleaners –: