Knowing the Unknowable Michael J. Benton University of Bristol - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

knowing the unknowable
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Knowing the Unknowable Michael J. Benton University of Bristol - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Knowing the Unknowable Michael J. Benton University of Bristol Historical sciences Differ from experimental sciences in that experiments cannot be repeated Ernest Rutherford OM, FRS (1871-1937) famously remarked that Physics is the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Knowing the Unknowable

Michael J. Benton University of Bristol

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Historical sciences

  • Differ from experimental sciences in that

experiments cannot be repeated

  • Ernest Rutherford OM, FRS (1871-1937)

famously remarked that ‘Physics is the

  • nly real science. All that is not physics

is merely stamp collecting.’

  • Many today might agree
  • Can the natural and historical sciences

transcend mere description of pattern?

  • How do we know the colour of a

Tyrannosaurus or the nature of its eyeball?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Modern analogues

  • Surely we tell dinosaur colours (and sounds) by guesswork?
  • We can compare with living animals…
  • …but, how do palaeontologists select modern organisms as

analogues for ancient ones?

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Extant phylogenetic bracket

  • Choice of modern analogues is constrained by the EPB
  • If birds today have a feature and it is shared with modern

crocodiles, then dinosaurs likely had that feature as well (anatomical, ecological, behavioural…)

  • So, we will never find a T. rex eyeball, but we know what it

was probably like in some detail, by the EPB

  • Let’s explore some attributes of dinosaurs…
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Speed

slide-6
SLIDE 6

v = 0.25*g0.5*SL1.67*h-1.17

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Online calculator: http://www.sorbygeology.group.shef.ac.uk/DINOC01/dinocal1.html

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Luis Rey Speed 2

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A sprinting T. rex would be 100-200% leg muscles!

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Biting force

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Bite force: 13,400 N

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Multi-body dynamic modelling: 35,000-57,000 N (Bates & Falkingham 2012) Great white shark: 9300 N; Lion: 2000 N; Human: 200-700 N

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Exceptional fossils

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Deep within the feathers of Sinosauropteryx... magnified 50,000 times

slide-16
SLIDE 16

These are phaeomelanosomes (spherical, 0.5 µm across) – indicate ginger colour

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Eumelanosomes – black/ brown/ grey feathers/ hair Phaeomelanosomes – ginger feathers/ hair

slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Who had feathers: all coelurosaurs? all theropods?... even all dinosaurs?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

New dinosaur from Siberia, a basal ornithischian… Bears three kinds of feathers and three kinds of scales Godefroit et al. (Science, July 25th, 2014)

New feathered ornithischian

slide-21
SLIDE 21

New feathered ornithischian

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Kulinda, Siberia

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Kulinda, Siberia

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Oviraptorosaur Caudipteryx

Macroevolution

  • How and when did birds
  • riginate?
  • What were the key

features that drove their early diversification?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Puttick et al. (2014, Evolution)

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Rate calculations show that both

body size (FL) and arm length show massive increase in rate of evolution (150-200 x) on the Paraves branch

  • This means the functional

prerequisites for flight had emerged 10 Myr earlier than origin

  • f birds
  • Rich new fossil finds show the 30

apomorphies of Aves now largely emerged much deeper in phylogeny

  • EM calculations show wing length

increased by body size reduction and wing length remaining constant

Puttick et al. (2014, Evolution)

PARAVES AVES DEINONYCHOSAURIA OTHER THEROPODS

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Evolutionary models

  • Plot of body size on trees of

therapsids and archosauromorphs through the Triassic showed continuous change, but little evidence for Cope’s Rule, and generally passive (BM/URW) models fit best

  • Subclades show different

evolutionary models, with BM and stasis common; EB for Cynodontia and Therapsida

  • Major changes in subclades reflect
  • pportunistic responses to

removal of potential competitors

Sookias et al. 2012 PRSB

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • New fossils with exceptional preservation
  • Smart, lateral thinking
  • Inference from repeated associations in modern plants

and animals

  • Exploration of fundamentals in biomechanics
  • Experiments with physical properties and forces
  • Use of new technology
  • Application of evolutionary models and statistics to

phylogenetic trees

Knowing the unkowable