kinematic spaces
play

Kinematic Spaces: Symmetry: a . . . Motivations from de Vries - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History Kinematic Spaces: . . . First Result: . . . Kinematic Spaces: Symmetry: a . . . Motivations from de Vries Algebras: . . . Relation Between . . . Space-Time Physics, Main Product Operations .


  1. Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History Kinematic Spaces: . . . First Result: . . . Kinematic Spaces: Symmetry: a . . . Motivations from de Vries Algebras: . . . Relation Between . . . Space-Time Physics, Main Product Operations . . . Main Result Mathematical Results, Home Page Algorithmic Results and Title Page Challenges, and Possible ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Relation to de Vries Algebras Page 1 of 32 Go Back Vladik Kreinovich and Francisco Zapata Department of Computer Science, University of Texas Full Screen El Paso, Texas, USA, vladik@utep.edu, fazg74@gmail.com Close Quit

  2. Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History 1. Why Ordering Relations Kinematic Spaces: . . . • Traditionally, in physics, space-times are described by First Result: . . . (pseudo-)Riemann spaces, i.e.: Symmetry: a . . . de Vries Algebras: . . . – by smooth manifolds Relation Between . . . – with a tensor metric field g ij ( x ). Product Operations . . . • However, in several physically interesting situations Main Result smoothness is violated and metric is undefined: Home Page – near the singularity (Big Bang), Title Page – at the black holes, and ◭◭ ◮◮ – on the microlevel, when we take into account quan- ◭ ◮ tum effects. Page 2 of 32 • In all these situations, what remains is causality � – Go Back an ordering relation. Full Screen • Geometers H. Busemann, R. Pimenov, physicists E. Kro- nheimer, R. Penrose: a theory of kinematic spaces. Close Quit

  3. Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History 2. Causality: Brief History Kinematic Spaces: . . . • In Newton’s physics, signals can potentially travel with First Result: . . . an arbitrarily large speed. Symmetry: a . . . de Vries Algebras: . . . • Let a = ( t, x ) denote an event occurring at the spatial Relation Between . . . location x at time t . Product Operations . . . • Then, an event a = ( t, x ) can influence an event a ′ = Main Result ( t ′ , x ′ ) if and only if t ≤ t ′ . Home Page • The fundamental role of the non-trivial causality rela- Title Page tion emerged with the Special Relativity (SRT). ◭◭ ◮◮ • In SRT, the speed of all the signals is limited by the ◭ ◮ speed of light c . Page 3 of 32 • As a result, a = ( t, x ) � a ′ = ( t ′ , x ′ ) if and only if t ′ ≥ t and d ( x, x ′ ) Go Back ≤ c , i.e.: t ′ − t Full Screen � c · ( t ′ − t ) ≥ 1 ) 2 + ( x 2 − x ′ 2 ) 2 + ( x 3 − x ′ ( x 1 − x ′ 3 ) 2 . Close Quit

  4. Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History 3. Causality: A Graphical Description Kinematic Spaces: . . . ✻ t First Result: . . . x = − c · t x = c · t Symmetry: a . . . ❅ � ❅ � de Vries Algebras: . . . ❅ � ❅ � Relation Between . . . ❅ � ❅ � Product Operations . . . ❅ � ❅ � Main Result ❅ � Home Page ❅ � ❅ � ❅ � ✲ Title Page x ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ Page 4 of 32 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

  5. Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History 4. Importance of Causality Kinematic Spaces: . . . • In the original special relativity theory, causality was First Result: . . . just one of the concepts. Symmetry: a . . . de Vries Algebras: . . . • Its central role was revealed by A. D. Alexandrov (1950) Relation Between . . . who showed that in SRT, causality implied Lorenz group: Product Operations . . . • Every order-preserving transforming of the corr. partial Main Result ordered set is linear, and is a composition of: Home Page – spatial rotations, Title Page – Lorentz transformations (describing a transition to ◭◭ ◮◮ a moving reference frame), and ◭ ◮ – re-scalings x → λ · x (corresponding to a change of Page 5 of 32 unit for measuring space and time). Go Back • This theorem was later generalized by E. Zeeman and is known as the Alexandrov-Zeeman theorem . Full Screen Close Quit

  6. Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History 5. When is Causality Experimentally Confirmable? Kinematic Spaces: . . . • In many applications, we only observe an event b with First Result: . . . some accuracy. Symmetry: a . . . de Vries Algebras: . . . • For example, in physics, we may want to check what Relation Between . . . is happening exactly 1 second after a certain reaction. Product Operations . . . • However, in practice, we cannot measure time exactly, Main Result so, we observe an event occurring 1 ± 0 . 001 sec after a . Home Page • In general, we can only guarantee that the observed Title Page event is within a certain neighborhood U b of the event b . ◭◭ ◮◮ • Because of this uncertainty, the only possibility to ex- ◭ ◮ perimentally confirm that a can influence b is when Page 6 of 32 a ≺ b ⇔ ∃ U b ∀ � b ∈ U b ( a � � b ) . Go Back • In topological terms, this means that b is in the interior Full Screen K + a of the closed cone C + a = { c : a � c } . Close Quit

  7. Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History 6. Kinematic Orders Kinematic Spaces: . . . • In physics, a ≺ b correspond to influences with speeds First Result: . . . smaller than the speed of light. Symmetry: a . . . de Vries Algebras: . . . • There are two types of objects: Relation Between . . . – objects with non-zero rest mass can travel with any Product Operations . . . possible speed v < c but not with the speed c ; Main Result – objects with zero rest mass (e.g., photons) can travel Home Page only with the speed c , but not with v < c . Title Page • Thus, ≺ correspond to causality by traditional (kine- ◭◭ ◮◮ matic) objects. ◭ ◮ • Because of this: Page 7 of 32 – the relation ≺ is called kinematic causality , and Go Back – spaces with this relation ≺ are called kinematic Full Screen spaces . Close Quit

  8. Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History 7. Kinematic Spaces: Towards a Description Kinematic Spaces: . . . • To describe space-time, we thus need a (pre-)ordering First Result: . . . relation � (causality) and topology (= closeness). Symmetry: a . . . de Vries Algebras: . . . • Natural continuity: for every event a and for every neighborhood U a , there exist a − ≺ a and a ≺ a + . Relation Between . . . Product Operations . . . • Natural topology: every neighborhood U a contains an Main Result open interval ( a ′ , a ′′ ) = { b : a ′ ≺ c ≺ a ′′ } . Home Page • Natural idea: a motion with speed c is a limit of mo- Title Page tions with speeds v < c when v → c . ◭◭ ◮◮ • Resulting description of � in terms of ≺ : C + = K + � � ◭ ◮ and C − = K − , i.e., b � a ⇔ ∀ U b ∃ � � b ∈ U b & � b b ≻ a . Page 8 of 32 b ≺ b ′′ hence • For U b = ( b ′ , b ′′ ), when b ≺ b ′′ , we get a ≺ � Go Back a ≺ b ′′ . Full Screen • Thus, a � b ⇔ ∀ c ( b ≺ c ⇒ a ≺ c ) . Close Quit

  9. Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History 8. Resulting Definition Kinematic Spaces: . . . • A set X with a partial order ≺ is called a kinematic First Result: . . . space if is satisfies the following conditions: Symmetry: a . . . de Vries Algebras: . . . ∀ a ∃ a − , a + ( a − ≺ a ≺ a + ); Relation Between . . . ∀ a, b ( a ≺ b → ∃ c ( a ≺ c ≺ b )); Product Operations . . . ∀ a, b, c ( a ≺ b, c → ∃ d ( a ≺ d ≺ b, c )); Main Result ∀ a, b, c ( b, c ≺ a → ∃ d ( b, c ≺ d ≺ a )) . Home Page • We take a topology generated by intervals Title Page ( a, b ) = { c : a ≺ c ≺ b } . ◭◭ ◮◮ • A kinematic space is called normal if ◭ ◮ b ∈ { c : c ≻ a } ⇔ a ∈ { c : c ≺ b } . Page 9 of 32 Go Back • For a normal kinematic space, we denote b ∈ { c : c ≻ a } by a � b . Full Screen • It is proven that a ≺ b � c and a � b ≺ c imply a ≺ c . Close Quit

  10. Why Ordering Relations Causality: Brief History 9. First Result: Reconstructing ≺ from � Kinematic Spaces: . . . • We consider separable kinematic spaces. First Result: . . . Symmetry: a . . . • We say that a space is complete if every � -decreasing de Vries Algebras: . . . bounded sequence { s n } has a limit, i.e., ∧ s n . Relation Between . . . • Lemma. If every closed intervals { c : a � c � b } is Product Operations . . . compact, then the space is complete. Main Result • If two complete separable normal kinematic orders ≺ Home Page and ≺ ′ on X lead to the same closed order � = � ′ , then Title Page ≺ = ≺ ′ . ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ • Let S e denote the set of all � -decreasing sequences s = { s n } for which ∧ s n = e . Page 10 of 32 • For s, s ′ ∈ S e , we define s ≥ s ′ ⇔ ∀ n ∃ m ( s n � s ′ m ); Go Back then: Full Screen a ≻ b ⇔ ∃ e � b ∃ s = { s n } ∈ S e ( s is largest in S e & s 1 = a ) . Close Quit

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend