karen de smet 24 10 2011 famhp
play

Karen DE SMET 24.10.2011 FAMHP FAMHP/kds/ 24.10.2011 F ederal A - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

F ederal A gency for M edecines and H ealth P roducts F ederal A gency for M edicines and H ealth P roducts (FAMHP) Karen DE SMET 24.10.2011 FAMHP FAMHP/kds/ 24.10.2011 F ederal A gency for M edecines and H ealth P roducts Biosimilar


  1. F ederal A gency for M edecines and H ealth P roducts F ederal A gency for M edicines and H ealth P roducts (FAMHP) Karen DE SMET 24.10.2011 FAMHP FAMHP/kds/ 24.10.2011

  2. F ederal A gency for M edecines and H ealth P roducts Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibodies Incorporation of comments under discussion NC strategy: A risk-based approach? A step-wise approach to identify potential risks which require further investigation on a case-by-case basis. 3 steps: 1. In vitro studies  fundamental in NC comparability 2. Identification of factors of importance for the evaluation of the need for in vivo studies 3. In vivo studies Timing: before initiating clinical development FAMHP/ikds 2 06.10.2011

  3. F ederal A gency for M edecines and H ealth P roducts Comparative In vitro studies (step 1) On an appropriate number of batches −Binding to target antigen(s) −Binding to closely related molecules (e.g. TNF β for a mAb directed against TNF α ) −Binding to Fc  receptors (Fc  RI, Fc  RIIA, Fc  RIIB and Fc  RIIIB) FcRn and complement (C1q) −Fab-associated functions (e.g. neutralization, receptor activation or receptor blockade) −Fc-associated functions (e.g. ADCC and CDC) No complement activation assay No TCR studies: see ICHS6(R1) FAMHP/ikds 3 06.10.2011

  4. F ederal A gency for M edecines and H ealth P roducts Factors of importance for the evaluation of the need for in vivo studies (step 2) Some mAbs may mediate effects that cannot be fully elucidated by in vitro studies.  Relevant in vivo model? - species: NHP or transgenic animals or transplant models - design: sensitivity and variability Factors to consider if relevant in vivo model available:  different cell expression system  impurities that need to be characterized (product- and/or process related)  differences in formulation (excipients not widely used for mAbs) FAMHP/ikds 4 06.10.2011

  5. F ederal A gency for M edecines and H ealth P roducts Factors of importance for the evaluation of the need for in vivo studies (step 2) •If step 1 OK & no concern in step 2: OR these do not block direct entrance into humans (consider risk mitigation principles for FIM)  NO in vivo animal study FAMHP/ikds 5 06.10.2011

  6. F ederal A gency for M edecines and H ealth P roducts In vivo studies (step 3) •If in vivo studies deemed necessary  Focus of study (PK and/or PD and/or safety) depends on need for additional information  Design : maximise the information obtained Non-terminal?  3Rs  Conc-response assessment covering human therapeutic dose  Duration study  PK & clinical posology FAMHP/ikds 6 06.10.2011

  7. F ederal A gency for M edecines and H ealth P roducts In vivo studies (step 3) • Comparative toxicology studies  not recommended (also not in non-relevant species) •Immunogenicity: store blood samples •Safety pharmacology, local tolerance, reproduction toxicology, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity studies  not required FAMHP/ikds 7 06.10.2011

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend