Kansas: Impact of Federal Health Reform Preliminary Estimates on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

kansas
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Kansas: Impact of Federal Health Reform Preliminary Estimates on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Kansas: Impact of Federal Health Reform Preliminary Estimates on Cost and Coverage Steve Schramm Gabe Smith s chramm- r aleigh H EALTH S TRATEGY (srHS) Kansas Health Policy Authority Topeka, Kansas May 18, 2010 Discussion Outline


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Kansas: Impact of Federal Health Reform

Preliminary Estimates on Cost and Coverage

Steve Schramm Gabe Smith schramm-raleigh HEALTH STRATEGY (srHS)

Kansas Health Policy Authority Topeka, Kansas May 18, 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Discussion Outline

 Funding and Background  SHRP Model

 Data and Baseline  Structure  Flowchart

 Federal Health Care Reform – Key Drivers

 Coverage  Cost

 Scenario Modeling  Impact

 Coverage  Cost

 Questions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Funding and Background

 Funding - generously provided by the United Methodist Health Ministry Fund  Background – srHS has conducted statewide health reform analyses/modeling in multiple states, including:

 Connecticut  Kansas  Maine  Massachusetts The Health Fund’s Mission Healthy Kansans through cooperative and strategic philanthropy guided by Christian principles.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

SHRP Model

Data and Baseline

 Data Sources

 Current Population Survey (CPS) (2008 Data)  Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (2006-2008 Data)  Kansas Insurance Department Survey (2006 Data)  Medicaid Expenditure Data (2008-2010 Data)

 Baseline – Point-in-Time Model

 2011 Dollars  Full Implementation as of 2020

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

SHRP Model

Structure

 Components within the Model

 Employer (ER) Size (1-9 ,10-24, 25-49, 50+)  Medicaid/CHIP Programs

 Program Expansion/Contraction by Federal Poverty Level (FPL)  FMAP Changes

 Individual and Employer Subsidies by FPL and ER Size  Market Revisions

 Combination of Markets  Guarantee Issue and Pre-Existing Conditions Exclusions

 Government-Sponsored Public Plan  Individual and Employer Mandate by FPL and ER Size  Reimbursement Adjustments and Cost Sharing Provisions  Residual Uninsurance by FPL

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6 Flow Chart - srHS State Health Reform Projection (SHRP) Model

Existing Health Care Marketplace Insured ~By Market ~Covered Populations ~Premium and Out-of-Pocket Spending Uninsured ~By Market Linkage ~Out-of-Pocket Spending and Existing Public Programs Marketplace Changes Voluntary Mandatory Population Shifts Take-Up Rates Mandates Elasticity of Demand Crowd Out Expenditures Standard Kansas Benefit Packages/Costs Reimbursement Changes Premium and OOP Changes in Spending by Payer State Federal Employer Self Private Public Coverage Accessibility Medicaid Expansion Individual & Employer Subsidies Insurance Exchange Market Revisions Outreach

Kansas SHRP Model

Flow Chart of Variables
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Coverage Cost Economics of Options

  • Choices Available to Individuals
  • (Dis)Incentives to Small Businesses

Subsidies *

  • Eligibility
  • Affordability of Coverage

Changes in FPL Eligibility Levels *

  • Medicaid Expansion to 138% FPL

FMAP *

  • CHIP FMAP of 95%
  • Expansion FMAP of 90%

Economics of Penalties

  • Individuals - $695 vs. $5,500 premium
  • Employers - $2,000 vs. $3,600 premium

Reimbursement

  • One-Time Adjustment or

Beginning of Fundamental Shift

Federal Health Care Reform

Key Drivers of Coverage and Cost Impacts

* Fixed Parameters with FHCR Legislation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

State Expenditures (▲Increase/▼Decrease) and Uninsured Remaining

Scenarios 6% Residual Uninsurance 4% Residual Uninsurance 5% Increase to Reimbursement Scenario 1 (Sc1) ▲ $32.9 Million 143,000 Uninsured Scenario 3 (Sc3) ▲ $36.3 Million 98,000 Uninsured 0% Increase to Reimbursement Scenario 2 (Sc2)* ▲ $2.0 Million 143,000 Uninsured Scenario 4 (Sc4) ▲ $5.3 Million 98,000 Uninsured

SHRP Scenario Modeling - Results

Provider Reimbursement and Residual Uninsurance

* The remainder of the graphs and figures represent Scenario 2 (Sc2)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Kansas – Pre-FHCR vs. Post-FHCR

Distribution of Insurance Coverage by Payor (Sc2)

  • 200,000

400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000

Federal Health Care Reform - Kansas Change in Insurance Coverage

Pre-Reform Post-Reform

▲ 96,000 ▲ 73,000 ▲ 120,000 ▼ 108,000 ▼191,000

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Kansas – Pre-FHCR vs. Post-FHCR

Distribution of Insurance Coverage by Payor (Sc2)

55% 3% 3% 3% 12% 2% 8% 3% 2% 0% 0% 3% 0% 6%

Post-Reform

51% 4% 4% 4% 8% 2% 7% 0% 2% 0% 0% 3% 0% 14%

Pre-Reform

  • 1. Large Employers (50+)
  • 2. Small Employers (1-9)
  • 3. Small Employers (10-24)
  • 4. Small Employers (25-49)
  • 5. Individuals
  • 6. Medicare
  • 7. Medicaid
  • 8. Medicaid Expansion
  • 10. CHIP
  • 11. CHIP Expansion
  • 12. Premium Assistance
  • 13. Other Public Programs
  • 14. New Public Plan
  • 15. Uninsured

Large Employers Uninsured Individual

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Kansas – Pre-FHCR vs. Post-FHCR

Health Care Expenditures by Payor (Sc2)

$- $2,000,000,000 $4,000,000,000 $6,000,000,000 $8,000,000,000 $10,000,000,000 $12,000,000,000 $14,000,000,000 $16,000,000,000

Total Cost Employer Self State Federal

Federal Health Care Reform - Kansas Change in Health Care Expenditures

Pre-Reform Post-Reform

▲ $153 Million (1.1%) ▼ $361 Million ▼$ 308 Million ▲ $820 Million ▲$ 2 Million ▲Large ER’s ▼ ▼ ▼ Small ER’s

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Kansas – Pre-FHCR vs. Post-FHCR

Health Care Expenditures by Payor (Sc2)

Employer 44% Self 36% State 5% Federal 15%

Pre-Reform

Employer Self State Federal Employer 41% Self 34% State 5% Federal 20%

Post-Reform

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Questions