K-12 English/Language Arts Resource Adoption School Board Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

k 12 english language arts resource adoption
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

K-12 English/Language Arts Resource Adoption School Board Meeting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

K-12 English/Language Arts Resource Adoption School Board Meeting May 19, 2020 Dr. Ashley Cramp Director of Instruction Heather James PK-12 ELA Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment Specialist 1 Resource Adoption Goals Process


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

K-12 English/Language Arts Resource Adoption

School Board Meeting May 19, 2020

  • Dr. Ashley Cramp

Director of Instruction Heather James PK-12 ELA Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment Specialist

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Process

  • Driven by data
  • Streamlined
  • Transparent
  • Consistent

2

Resource Adoption Goals

Outcome

  • Teacher excitement about

instructional possibilities

  • Adoption of resources that

are: ฀ Comprehensive ฀ Balanced ฀ Realistic ฀ Flexible ฀ Supportive ฀ Culturally relevant

slide-3
SLIDE 3

June: Invite teachers to participate in the resource adoption process September – October: Initial committee meetings, evaluation rubric finalization, first review of all resources using evaluation rubrics November: Discuss evaluation data; narrow selections for vendor Q & A January: Resources available for public input February: Vendor Q & As; final committee meeting April: Recommendations presented to all staff via Google presentation May: Recommendations presented to the Academic Committee and School Board

3

Resource Adoption Process at a Glance

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Step I- Committee Formation K-6

Baldwin ES:

  • Mary Stookey – K/Coach
  • Elicia Ansick – 1st
  • Connie Judd – 1st/SPED
  • Robyn Joyce – 2nd
  • Hailey Varner – 2nd

Haydon

  • Brittney McMullan, K
  • Gabriella Moreno, 1st/Dual Language
  • Tori Savas, 2nd/Dual Language
  • Sarah Verjinski, 3rd/Dual Language
  • Eauna Freeman, 4th
  • Carol Holtslander, 4th/Coach

Jennie Dean

  • Sara Ridgell, K
  • Robin Smith, 3rd
  • Jen Roberson, 4th/Coach

4

Round:

  • Jayme Welsh, 3rd
  • Natalie Weatherby-Nance, 4th/Coach

Weems:

  • Amanda Megee, K
  • Jen Thompson, K/Coach
  • Chelsea Kelly, 1st
  • Amberli Cho, 2nd/SPED
  • Kristen McKeown, 2nd
  • Melissa Wittig, 3rd
  • Danielle Harcup, 3rd
  • Dhanel Brown, 4th

Baldwin IS:

  • Jen Weiser, 5th
  • Kerry Lyn Hazelwood, 6th

Mayfield:

  • Amanda Coombs, 5th
  • Helen Wise, 5th
  • Stephanie Maldonado,

6th/Coach

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Step I- Committee Formation 7-12

Metz:

  • Patrick Jennings, 7th
  • Jeanne Riley, 7th/SPED
  • Elizabeth Schoenberger, 8th

Osbourn:

  • Denise Gubitosa,

9th/School Psychologist

  • Eryn Reece, 9th/AP
  • Maureen Sewell, 10th
  • Christos Zodiatis, 12th
  • Michelle Rannells, 9th AP

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Division Leadership

  • Guin Bruner - Purchasing Agent
  • Bobby Barrett - Director of Informational Technology
  • Debra Nash - Application Support Engineer
  • Pedro Hernandez - Supervisor of Digital Learning & Innovation
  • Carrie Pendleton - Instructional Specialist, SPED

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Committee Communication

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Rubric Components

  • Evaluator Information
  • ELA Content
  • Program Goals
  • Assessment
  • Equity
  • Teacher Support
  • Overall

○ Overall support rating

○ Possible vendor questions

8

Step II- Rubric Development

Scoring Categories

  • Adequate
  • Limited
  • Not Evident

○ A rating of “Not Evident” required the respondent to state their reasoning

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Step III- Resource Review & Evaluation

  • K-2
  • SuperKids
  • K-4
  • Benchmark Advance
  • K-5
  • Benchmark Workshop
  • Mondo Bookshop
  • Reach for Reading
  • Into Reading
  • Open Court
  • K-6
  • Scholastic Literacy
  • Wonders
  • 6-8
  • Connections: ELA
  • 6- 12
  • Mirrors & Windows
  • Into Literature
  • StudySync ELA
  • myPerspectives ELA
  • Writing with Power
  • 9-10
  • Foundations of Language

& Literature

  • 12
  • Evergreen: A Guide to

Writing with Readings

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

○ November: committee members were presented with evaluation data, top vendors were selected, and grade level groups were asked to finalize questions for vendor Question & Answer sessions ○ January: Vendor invitations sent, RFP prepared, public input

  • Public Input window: Jan. 6th-24th
  • Elementary: 1 teacher, 1 admin
  • Intermediate: 3 grade 5 teachers, 6 grade 6 teachers
  • Metz: 5 teachers
  • OHS: 1 teacher
  • Public: 0 participants
  • Feedback Needs: assessments included, online access to materials,

wide range of visually stimulating text, cultural relevance, teachers support, flexibility, option for print materials as needed,

  • pportunities for differentiation

10

Step III- Resource Review & Evaluation

slide-11
SLIDE 11

○ February: Q & A sessions were held with each committee

11

Step III- Resource Review & Evaluation

K-6 Vendor Q&A Sessions:

  • Into Reading
  • Benchmark Workshop
  • Scholastic Literacy
  • Wonders
  • Bookshop

7-12 Vendor Q&A Sessions:

  • StudySync ELA
  • myPerspectives ELA
  • Mirrors & Windows
  • Writing with Power
  • Into Literature
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Step IV - Vendor Q&A

  • Vendor Q & A Rubric:

○ Positives ○ Challenges ○ Overall Support:

■ Strongly Support ■ Can Support ■ Do NOT Support

  • Committee members were asked to attend all

sessions in order to have a full understanding of product offerings before selecting a final recommendation

  • In total, the following number of committee members

completed all evaluations and Q & As: ○ K-6: 29 committee members ○ 7-12: 8 committee members

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Step V- Finalize Resource Recommendations

Questions leading to a recommendation:

  • What was the overall level of committee support for

each product?

  • What were the positives and challenges of each

product?

  • What perspective did those who participated in the

public input provide?

  • Which product aligns best with the direction the

division is moving based on literacy research?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Step V- Finalize Resource Recommendations

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Step VI- Presentation of Recommendation to Staff

Due to COVID-19, committee members were not able to present our recommendations to the staff. Recommendations were shared via Google slides which included: ➢ The names of committee members ➢ A high level overview of the process ➢ Committee recommendations ➢ Highlights of recommendation ➢ A Google form confirming who has viewed the presentation and space for comments/questions

slide-16
SLIDE 16

K-6: Scholastic Literacy

Costs Paid in Year 1: ฀ Total Cost Per Student K-6 (with 6 year subscription): $679,850 ฀ Leveled Bookroom Cost: $33,571 X 5 = $167,855 ฀ Total Cost for SPED Self-Contained: $8,795 ฀ Total Cost for Haydon Dual Language: $24,697 (including Leveled Library shipping) ฀ TOTAL: $881,197 TOTAL w/ 3% Shipping & Handling: $907,633 Costs Paid Year 2-6: replacement or enrollment growth Costs Paid Year 7: consumables/digital renewals in year 7 - $40.00 per student K-4

$31.00 per student 5-6

16

Estimated Cost

Grade K 1 2 3 4 5 6

Price Per Student

$174.78 $174.78 $174.78 $174.78 $174.78 $141.87 $141.87

# of Students

586 598 602 558 579 598 593

Total Cost K-4, 5-6

$510,882 $168,968

Leveled Bookroom Cost

$167,855 $38,674 - Gratis

Self-contained SPED

$8,795

Haydon Immersion

$24,697 NA

slide-17
SLIDE 17

7-12: StudySync ELA, McGraw Hill

Costs Paid in Year 1: ฀ Total Cost of Digital Subscriptions (with 7 year subscription): $344,500 ฀ Print teacher’s editions, digital access for teachers, and 1-2 novels per student - Gratis w/ possible 5% shipping 17

Estimated Cost

7 8 9 10 11 12

Digital Subscription Cost Per Student

$100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00

# of Students

620 577 568 595 557 528

Digital Subscription Total

$344,500

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Budgeted Amount: 1.2 Million

➢ Overage: $52,133 Accounted for overage by reevaluating C & I budget

18

Total Cost

Level / Course Total Cost K-6 $907,633 7-12 $344,500 K-12 Total $1,252,133

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Provide teachers with digital access for the

summer

  • Provide teachers with access to pre-recorded

webinars to help teachers navigate these new platforms

  • Continue work to connect the resources with

curriculum maps and the division curriculum framework

  • Work with Scholastic and StudySync to plan

effective PD for the fall

19

Next Steps

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • May 13, 2020:

– The committee submitted its’ recommendations to the Academic Committee of the MCPS School Board.

  • May 19, 2020

– Recommendations presented to the MCPS School Board for approval.

20

Step VII- Submit Recommendation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

K-12 English/Language Arts Resource Adoption

School Board Meeting May 19, 2020

  • Dr. Ashley Cramp

Director of Instruction Heather James PK-12 ELA Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment Specialist