June 2014 Park Street Companies | 1000 Brickell Avenue, Suite 915 | - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

june 2014
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

June 2014 Park Street Companies | 1000 Brickell Avenue, Suite 915 | - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED Place content here TITLE Say whatever you would like to say Place content here TITLE Say whatever you would like to say COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRY TRENDS STRATEGIES TO GET AHEAD Some fun shapes


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • Place content here
  • Say whatever you would like to say

TITLE

  • Place content here
  • Say whatever you would like to say

TITLE

  • Some fun shapes to use

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRY TRENDS – STRATEGIES TO GET AHEAD By Harry Kohlmann, Ph.D. American Beverage Licensees – Annual Convention June 2014

Park Street Companies | 1000 Brickell Avenue, Suite 915 | Miami FL, 33131 +1 305 967 7440 | info@parkstreet.com | www.parkstreet.com

No part of the document may be circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution without prior written approval from Park Street. This material was used by Park Street during an oral presentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

SOME CURRENTLY HOT INDUSTRY TOPICS – MANY CHOICES TO SPEAK ABOUT

2

“Mil illenials lenials, , fema emale and le and multi multi-cultural consumers” “Legalization of Marijuana” “Craft brewers and craft distillers” “Flavors, flavors, flavors” “The Bou

  • urbo

rbon n Renaissance and the Cider Boom” “Storytelling to sell brands” “Recession is is over er, , tr trad ading ing-up up is is back” “Distribution bottlenecks” “Chains winning using mega brands as loss leaders” “Blurring ca cate tego gory y lines” “Brands growing and maturing faster” “Keg wines” “Direct-to to-consumer shipping” “Technology disruption” “More convenience and customization” “Supplier and distributor consolidation” “Innovation boom by alcoholic beverage entrepreneurs” “Widening of wealth/income gap” “More targeted brand propositions”

slide-3
SLIDE 3

SOME BACKGROUND FOR TODAY’S DISCUSSION

3

Today’s discussion does does not

  • t
  • Provide a full tutorial on all issues

for independent on- and off-premise outlets

  • Cover all nuances of each

category: beer vs. wine vs. spirits

  • Cover all nuances of each state
  • Provide a one size fits all strategy
  • Offer advice on regulatory issues

Today’s discussion does does

  • Offer a view on a few important

commercial and industry trends

  • Provide some insights into the

market forces influencing the route to market environment with a focus on the wine and spirits categories

  • Offer some insights to assist the

strategy development for on- and

  • ff-premise licensees
slide-4
SLIDE 4

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED LICENSEES ARE IMPACTED BY SEVERAL MAJOR CHANGES IN CONSUMER, SUPPLIER AND WHOLESALER TIERS Route to Market for Alcoholic Beverages

Consumers Distributor/control state board On- and off-premise retailers Brand owner/producer Brand

  • wner/

producer 4

Consumer topics

  • Growth segments

─ Millennial ─ Female ─ Multi-cultural

  • Shortening brand life cycles
  • Disruptors using new technology

Supplier topics

  • Consolidation
  • Brand extension over brand creation
  • Innovation wave by craft producers &

entrepreneurs Distributor topics

  • Consolidation
  • Influence of large suppliers
  • Increasing distribution challenges for

emerging brands

  • New channels for new brands
slide-5
SLIDE 5

ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE MARKET HAS BEEN GROWING

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Con Consu sump mption tion in in th the U U.S. .S. betw tween 2002 and 2012

In millions of 9-L cases 10-Year CAGR Beer Wine Spirits 5 3.0% 2.7% 0.2% 0.6% Total

Sources: Beer Institute, Liquor Handbook, Wine Handbook

slide-6
SLIDE 6

MARKET TRENDS: WHAT CONSUMER GROUPS ARE DRIVING GROWTH?

What consumer groups are driving growth right now? It is different for each licensee, but it is likely coming from

  • ne or more of the following three groups:

1 Millenials 2 Women 3 Multi-cultural

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

THE EMERGENCE OF MILLENIALS

7

Source: US Census Bureau, Wikipedia, Park Street research, estimates as definitions vary

1,000 2,000 3,000

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000

1909-1932 68 Million

Births (000)

1933-1945 34 Million 1946-1964 76 Million WWII Bopper Baby Boom 1965-1983 62 Million Gen X Millenials 1984-2004 85 Million

Overview of American generations over the ages

slide-8
SLIDE 8

THE EMERGENCE OF MILLENIALS - OVERVIEW

  • How big is the Millennial Generation?

They number in total about 85 million

  • f which about 60 million are now 21+ of
  • age. They are split 52% male / 48% female
  • How influential are Millenials?

They are the largest generation of customers yet. According to BCG, they represent $1.3 trillion in consumer spending

  • What are their characteristics?

It is said that no one truly understands Millennials — not even Millennials themselves. However, here are some general observations:

– Need for instant gratification, all the time – They have short attention spans (How many music videos are watched until the end?) – Not yet grown up (Many lack “real” jobs or live with their parents) – Two personas: one online (think Instagram and Facebook) and one in real life – Almost everything is documented (think SMS, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) – Expert multi-taskers (A Millennial can send a text message, order a Starbucks coffee, and pay a bill with a smartphone app all at the same time!)

8

Source: US Census Bureau, web research, Moose agency, Park Street research

slide-9
SLIDE 9

THE EMERGENCE OF MILLENIALS – GENERATION IS CLEARLY DIFFERENT THAN PREVIOUS ONES

Highlighted statements Millennial Gen X Boomers Older Like to explore new and different products 54% 49% 37% 21% Strongly prefer sweeter wines 64% 54% 44% 36% Like to try new (Spirit) flavors 60% 50% 36% 18% Drink different products depending upon occasion 52% 46% 40% 29% Prefer to mix/create drinks myself 51% 46% 36% 31% Enjoy introducing others to my favorite brand/drinks 54% 44% 33% 21% Willing to pay more for products/services committed to positive social and environmental impact 57% 40% 33% 31%

Source: Nielsen Bev Al Generations Study 2013, Wine and Spirits Daily Summit 2014

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

THE EMERGENCE OF MILLENIALS – INFORMATION SUPPORT IN DECISION MAKING

10

36% 32% 28% 26% 26% 23% 22% 22% 22% Facebook Ads Paid Endorsements See and Touch Video How-to Guides In-Person Word of Mouth Paid Video Advertising YouTube Ads Video Reviews News Articles 33% 29% 29% 26% 24% 24% 24% 23% 23% 23% In-Person Word of Mouth Facebook Ads Twitter Ads Blogs Brand Emails News Articles See and Touch Written Reviews YouTube Ads Video Reviews SP SPIRI IRITS TS BEER BEER AND AND WINE WINE

Source: Moose Digital Ad Agency

Non Non-tr trad aditiona itional l for

  • rms

ms of

  • f

co commun mmunica ication tion req equir uired ed to to i influen nfluence ce pu purcha hase se de decision cision of

  • f Mi

Mill llen enials ials

Types pes of

  • f inf

infor

  • rma

mation tion a M a Millennial illennial is is lik likel ely to look to look for or

  • r or tak

take into cons e into consider ideration tion when hen making making a pur a purchas hase

slide-11
SLIDE 11

THE IMPORTANCE OF TECHNOLOGY AND THE SMART PHONE IN PARTICULAR

Impor mportance of tance of tec technolog hnology and s and smar mart t phones phones

  • Millennials are digital natives – the first generation

to grow up with technologies such as the Internet, social media and mobile phones

  • More than 50 percent of younger millennials say

mobile devices are the primary access point to the Internet

  • Millennials are so tethered to mobile phones that

the majority would give up their car before their devices

Source: Forbes, Zipcar, Park Street research

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

THE EMANCIPATION OF THE FEMALE CONSUMER - HIGHLIGHTS

12

  • The majority of women either make or

share the purchase responsibility for alcoholic beverages in a household

  • Women’s education and income levels

continue to rise, driving increased independence (traditionally they followed the men’s lead) and increasing frequency and consumption

  • Tend to prefer sweeter drinks than men

across all alcoholic beverage categories

  • Women who are regular consumers of

alcohol are also the most likely ones to amplify a brand’s message through word

  • f mouth

Wha hat t res esear earch s h say ays a about f bout female emale cons consumer umers from

  • m an alcoholic

an alcoholic bever erage per ge perspectiv pective: e:

Source: Park Street research

slide-13
SLIDE 13

THE EMANCIPATION OF THE FEMALE CONSUMER – DRINK OCCASIONS

13 Off-pr premis emise e examples xamples: On On-pr premis emise e examples xamples:

  • Just Hanging Out
  • A Get Together / Party
  • Just Because
  • Girls Night Out
  • Bachelorette Party
  • Happy Hour

Source: Park Street research

slide-14
SLIDE 14

THE EMANCIPATION OF THE FEMALE CONSUMER – BEVERAGE PREFERENCES

14

72% 47% 44% 44% 42% 39% 38% 38% 37% 30% 30% 21% 16% 14% 14% 13% 12%

Wine Light Beer Full Calorie Beer Unflavored Vodka Rum Pre-Mixed, RTD Cocktails Tequila Sparkling Wine/Champage Flavored Vodka Cordials/Liqueurs/Schnapps Coffee/Cream Liquers Bourbon Gin Scotch Irish Whiskey Cognac/Brandy Canadian Whiskey

Be Bever erage pr ge pref efer erences ences of

  • f female

emale cons

  • nsumer

umers

Consumption over the last 3 Months

  • Wine has always been by far the

most popular alcoholic beverage

  • The beverage category that saw its

popularity rise the most is vodka. In 1998, one fifth of female drinkers consumed the product; today it is

  • ne third
  • Women consume an average of 5.7

different categories of alcoholic beverages per year. The youngest age bracket (22 to 29) is the most experimental, consuming an average of 6.3 different categories per year

Source: Beam, Park Street research

slide-15
SLIDE 15

GROCERY STORES INNOVATING WAYS TO INCREASE APPEAL TO FEMALE WINE BUYERS

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

MARKET TRENDS: THE U.S. IS BECOMING INCREASINGLY MULTICULTURAL

16

167% 142% 56% 1% 42% Hispanic Asian American African American White Total

Popula

  • pulation g

tion growth th projection

  • jection

2010 2010 – 2050 by 2050 by ethnic ethnic group

  • up

Compos Composition ition of

  • f popula

population tion by by ethnic ethnic group

  • up,

, 2010 v 2010 vs. . 2050 2050

64% 64% 46% 46% 16% 16% 31% 31% 13% 13% 13% 13% 5% 5% 8% 8%

2010 2050 White Hispanic Asian American African American Other & Multiple

100% 100% 100% 100%

* Excludes American Indian, Alaska Native, Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islanders Source: US Census Bureau, Nielsen / Wine Market Council (US Wine Consumer Trends)

  • The multicultural ethnic groups represent a buying power of $3.3 trillion and have

been growing faster than the average U.S. consumer’s buying power

  • It is estimated that multicultural consumers spent more than $21 billion on alcoholic

beverages in 2013 with a split of 60% beer and wine / 40% distilled spirits

slide-17
SLIDE 17

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED BUYING POWER AMONG KEY ETHNIC SEGMENTS HAS GROWN RAPIDLY…

Source: The Multicultural Economy, J. Humphreys Selig Center for Economic Growth & U.S. Census Bureau

Multicultur ulticultural al Buy Buying ing Power ( er ($ in $ in Billions Billions) $- $500.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 $2,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,500.00 1990 2000 2008 2013 His ispanic panic As Asian ian Am American erican Af Africa rican Am American erican

$3,315 B $2,330 B $1,326 B $637 B

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED AND HAS GROWN FASTER THAN THE AVERAGE U.S. CONSUMER’S BUYING POWER

Source: The Multicultural Economy, J. Humphreys Selig Center for Economic Growth & U.S. Census Bureau

Multic ulticultu ultural al Bu Buying ing Power er Growth (in th (in %) %) 0.00 0.00% 1.0 1.00% 2.00 2.00% 3.00 3.00% 4.00 4.00% 5.00 5.00% 6.00 6.00% 7.00 7.00% 8.00 8.00% 9.00 9.00% 10.0 10.00% 0% Multi ulticultur cultural Buy al Buyin ing P g Pow

  • wer G

er Grow rowth th ( (20 2008-201 08-2013) 3) Total Total Pop

  • pula

ulatio tion Africa African A n Ame merica rican Asian Asian Am Amer erica ican His Hispan panic ic

5.1% 5.5% 8.3% 8.7%

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

MARKET TRENDS: THE U.S. IS BECOMING INCREASINGLY MULTICULTURAL

UNDE DERS RSTAN ANDI DING THE ETHNIC C GROUPS T TO TAR ARGET T THEM EFFE FFECT CTIVE VELY Y – HIGHLI LIGHTS His ispanics panics Af African rican-Americans Americans As Asian ian-Americans Americans

  • Although Asian-Americans

come from many nations with distinct cultures, the community as a whole developed shared values

  • Maintenance of a business

network is crucial part of social life

  • “Face” (e.g., reputation) is a

guiding principle for Asian- American consumers – Pricing that is well known – Visual codes that clearly indicate the level of investment

  • Image is key! They seek

material success, status, and personal reputation enhancement

  • African-Americans have a

high brand commitment particularly with respect to high-end brands

  • Endorsements by hip-hop

artists and brand / product mentions in hip-hop songs have a strong influence on brand consumption

  • Although Hispanics come from

many nations with distinct cultures, the community as a whole developed shared values

  • Language is a connector and

the culture is being passed on from one generation to the next

  • Drinking is an important part
  • f the Hispanic lifestyle.

Drinks together with food play an important role in bonding

  • Brands are more important

than the beverage category

  • Many consumers adopt a new

“upgraded” brand or category

Source: Beam, Nielsen / Wine Market Council (US Wine Consumer Trends)

Sta tatus tus is is an impor an important tant driv driver in er in pur purchas hasing decis ing decisions ions for

  • r multicultur

multicultural al cons consumer umers – the the communica communication tion should hould be tailor be tailored ed to impr to improve e ef effectiv ectivenes eness

slide-20
SLIDE 20

MARKET TRENDS: ADDRESSING THE WANTS OF MULTICULTURAL MINORITIES – EXAMPLE CIROC

20

40 60 67 78 98 247 339 795 1,280 1,860 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

2003 2003 – 2007 2007 25% CA % CAGR 2007 2007 – 2012 2012 80% CA % CAGR Sales volume Thousands of 9-L cs

  • Diageo originally introduced Ciroc as a competitor to Grey Goose,

but its sales were highly disappointing after years of efforts. By 2007, Grey Goose still outsold Diageo’s Ciroc by 34x

  • In the middle of 2007, hip-hop artist Sean “P

. Diddy” Combs became the face of the brand with the goal of of transforming Ciroc into a brand for African-American consumers

  • The result was a spectacular jump in sales. In subsequent years,
  • ther hip hop artists such such Rick Ross, DJ Khaled, and others

joined P . Diddy to promote Ciroc’s positioning

Source: Beverage Information Group, Diageo, Park Street research

slide-21
SLIDE 21

DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS NOT ISOLATED Gender Gender: : Fema emale le Gener Generation tion Age: Age: Mi Millennials llennials Race Ethnicit Race Ethnicity: y: Mult Multi-cultur cultural al Cons Consumer umers

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN CONSUMER BEHAVIOR: ARE LIFE CYCLES OF BRANDS SHORTENING? Faster growth Less loyalty

U.S. sales volume of selected brands

In thousands of 9-L cases

  • Faste

ster r informa formati tion fl flow w can lead to to fas faster ter growth rowth for for bran rands

  • In

In so some me of f the the fas fast t growi rowing bran rands, s, the the bran rand loya yalty ty mi might t not t be as s stron strong

  • The challenge for

for the the reta retailer r is s to to know w which which bran rand

  • r

r prod roduct t turn turns s

  • ut

t to to be a fad fad and which which one re repre resents ts a re real tr trend and su susta stainable va value prop roposit sition in the the ma marke rketplac tplace

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 New Amsterdam Svedka

10 years 3 years

U.S. sales volume of selected brands

In thousands of 9-L cases

100 200 300 400 500 600 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 Nuvo Skinny Girl

Source: Park Street research, Beverage Handbook

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN CONSUMER BEHAVIOR: RISK OF TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTORS – OTHER INDUSTRY EXAMPLES Technology disruptors in regulated industries: personal transportation example Technology disruptors in retail industries: video rental example

  • Taxi industry is locally and regionally regulated

– very little incentive for participants to innovate as a way to increase profits

  • UBER, an App-Powered transportation network

company, recognized that customers are willing to pay a premium price for convenience, professionalism, and cleanliness

  • Resistance of regulators and incumbents

fought by utilizing social media networks of passionate UBER users

  • Founded in 2009, most recent valuation at

$18bn

  • Video rental business initially highly

fragmented with independent stores prior to being consolidated and dominated by chains such as Blockbuster, which at its peak had 9,000 stores and 60,000 employees

  • Netflix, a start-up focused on flat rate DVD-by-

mail entered the market in 1997

  • Blockbuster turned down an acquisition of

Netflix for $50m in 2000

  • Blockbuster filed for bankruptcy in 2010 and in

2014 the company ceased operations

  • Netflix’s market cap in May 2014 exceeded

$23bn

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN CONSUMER BEHAVIOR: RISK OF TECHNOLOGY DISRUPTORS – ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE EXAMPLES Local delivery consolidators Online automatic check

  • Mostly mobile apps to consolidate consumers

and “introduce” them to particular liquor stores (which make the sale) and delivery personnel (who deliver)

  • Revenue models vary, but many of them charge

a type of referral fee to the store and a delivery fee to the consumer

  • Venture capital has started to back some of

these new entrants (e.g., Drizly is reported to have raised close to $5m so far this year)

  • Ultimate value driver for these ventures is to
  • wn the relationship with the consumer and

market that relationship to brand owners and

  • ff-premise licensees
  • Mobile apps to facilitate the payment and

possibly the order process at a bar or restaurant

  • Venture capital has started to back some of

these new entrants (e.g., Dash is reported to have raised a second round of $1.2m this year)

  • Ultimate value driver for these ventures is to
  • wn the relationship with the consumer and

market that relationship to brand owners and

  • n-premise licensees

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED LICENSEES ARE IMPACTED BY SEVERAL MAJOR CHANGES IN CONSUMER, SUPPLIER AND WHOLESALER TIERS Route to Market for Alcoholic Beverages

Consumers Distributor/control state board On and off premise retailers Brand owner/producer Brand

  • wner/

producer 25

Consumer topics

  • Growth segments

─ Millennial ─ Female ─ Multi-cultural

  • Shortening brand life cycles
  • Disruptors using new technology

Supplier topics

  • Consolidation
  • Brand extension over brand creation
  • Innovation wave by craft producers &

entrepreneurs Distributor topics

  • Consolidation
  • Large supplier influence
  • Increasing distribution challenges for

emerging brands

  • New channels for new brands
slide-26
SLIDE 26

INDUSTRY STRUCTURE: THE SUPPLIER TIER IN EACH ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CATEGORY IS CONCENTRATED

Mar arket et shar hare of e of leading leading alcoholic lcoholic bever erage ge companies companies bas based on r ed on revenues enues*

Source: Beverage Information Group; *Beer measured in case volume

37% 38% 63% 62% 91% 9% Other suppliers Beer* Top 5 suppliers Wine

100%

Spirits

  • Supplier tiers in

alcoholic beverages are concentrated

  • Beer is the most

concentrated category, dominated by the top 2 players (ABI, Miller Coors)

  • Consolidation in wine

and spirits is high and increasing

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

SUPPLIER TIER IN SPIRITS: THE TOP 5 SPIRITS SUPPLIERS GENERATE ~63% OF THE INDUSTRY REVENUE

  • Smirnoff (vodka); Captain Morgan (rum); Crown

Royal, 7 Crown (whisky)

U.S. Spirits Suppliers, by Wholesale Revenue (2012) Billions, USD Largest Brands, by Volume (and Category)

  • Bacardi (rum); Grey Goose (vodka); Dewar’s

(whisky); Castillo (rum); Bombay Sapphire (gin)

  • Absolut (vodka); Seagram’s Gin; Malibu (rum);

Jameson (whisky); Kahlua (liqueur)

  • Jim Beam (whisky); DeKuyper (cordial); Sauza

(tequila); Canadian Club (whisky)

  • Jack Daniel’s, Canadian Mist (whisky); Southern

Comfort (cordial)

  • Fireball; Barton, Skol, Fleischmann’s Royal (vodka);

Rich & Rare, Canadian LTD (whiskey)

  • Hennessy (cognac); Grand Marnier (liqueur);

Belvedere, Chopin (vodka)

  • Burnett’s (vodka); Evan Williams (whiskey);

Christian Bros. (brandy); Aristocrat (vodka)

Spirits Market Share (2012) %

  • Patron (tequila); Citronge (liqueur)
  • Stolichnaya (vodka); Sailor Jerry (rum); Clan

MacGregor (scotch); Milagro (tequila) Patron $0.97 $2.2 $1.5 Heaven Hill $0.65 Other $5.1 Sazerac Beam Global $2.2 Bacardi $2.4 Diageo $6.3 William Grant $0.58 $0.63 Moet Hennessy Brown-Forman $0.82 Pernod Ricard Source: Beverage Information Group 27.0% 10.2% 9.5% 9.5% 6.5% 4.2% 3.5% 2.8% 2.7% 2.5% 22%

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

LARGE SUPPLIERS HAVE SHIFTED ACTIVITIES FROM BRAND BUILDING TO BRAND EXTENDING – M&A IS THE NEW BRAND DEVELOPMENT

Exa Example mples s of inno innova vation a ion and brand por portfoli lio man managemen ment in in spir spirit its s indu indust stry y by y lar large sup suppli liers s (o (other t than t tradit itiona ional l eleme lements s suc such as as packaging ing and l liquid iquid)

New Brand Development Acquisitions New Brand Extensions

Reduced focus

28

  • New brand

development (NBD) of large suppliers with low success rate

  • New brand

extension development with higher success rate

  • Acquisitions

also seen more favorable for new brand additions as they do not have full negative P&L impact of internal NBD

slide-29
SLIDE 29

BRAND EXTENSIONS: EXAMPLE ABSOLUT

29

1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 7 8 9 12 12 12 13 14 17 18 21

1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014

Source: Liquor Handbook, DRINK, just-drinks, Park Street research

Number of brand extensions Volume and average sales volume per variation Thousands of 9-L cases

  • Ruby Red
  • Berry Acai
  • Wild Tea
  • Raspberri
  • Vanilia
  • Citron
  • Kurant
  • Mandarin
  • Pears
  • Peppar
  • Mango
  • Apeach
  • Orient Apple
  • Grapevine
  • Cherrykran

Available Flavors: In addition there are unflavored extensions and limited edition bottles:

  • Absolut 100 (2007)
  • Absolut Elyx (2013)
  • Absolut Tune
  • Cities (e.g., Boston, Miami)
  • Seasonal

748 580 515 485 386 364 345 331 305 259 4,488 4,667 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Volume per variation Total volume

  • Absolut increased

the number of brand extensions by over 3x in the 10 year period between 2003 and 2012

  • With sales staying

relatively flat, the complexity and shelf requirements increased and the sales per SKU dropped by over 2/3

slide-30
SLIDE 30

BRAND EXTENSIONS – VODKA CATEGORY EXAMPLE

30

Source: Liquor Handbook, DRINK, just-drinks, Park Street research

37 21 11 6 15 41 14 3 1 34

Smirnoff Absolut Svedka Grey Goose Skyy Pinnacle McCormick Ketel One Barton Burnett's Number of vodka varieties available to order for 10 leading US vodka brands Florida retailer example as of May 2014 183 183 dif ifferent vari varieties ies

  • The days when

consumers would drink every new vodka flavor dreamed up seem numbered

  • “Flavor fatigue”

has started to appear

  • The torrent of

flavor launches of the past few years has eased to a steady trickle

  • Flavored vodka accounts

for ~30% of the total vodka volume in the U.S.

  • Hence, one can estimate

that roughly 5% of products account for 70% of the sales volume

Varietals Core 5% 70%

100%

95% 30% # of products % of volume

slide-31
SLIDE 31

HISTORICAL MULTIPLES OF PUBLIC SPIRITS COMPANIES: TRADING ON AVERAGE ~3x REVENUES AND ~14x EBITDA

His Historic torical al EV EV/Sales Sales Multiple Multiple, , 200 2004 4 – 2013 2013 31

Note: Companies included are leading spirits companies Beam, Brown-Forman, Campari, Diageo, and Pernod Ricard as well as Constellation; Source: Bloomberg

0x 2x 4x 6x 8x

High

High: igh: 7.5x .5x Low: : 1.5x .5x Avg: vg: 3.4x .4x

Average Low His Historic torical al EV EV/EBI EBITD TDA A Multiple Multiple, , 200 2004 4 – 2013 2013

5x 15x 25x 35x 45x

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

High Average Low

High: igh: 42.0x .0x Low: : 8.2x .2x Avg: vg: 14.4x .4x

slide-32
SLIDE 32

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED

32

ACQUISITIONS TYPICALLY CONDUCTED AT HIGH VALUATIONS

Year Brand Acquirer Cases (‘000 9L) Total con- sideration (Millions, USD) Price/ Case Revenue multiple** 2012 Pinnacle & Calico Jack Beam ~3,000 $605 $202 4.9x 2011 Skinny Girl Beam 110 $90 $818 11.2x 2010 Zacapa (50%) Diageo 100 $200 $2,000 15.8x 2007 Cabo Wabo Campari 56 $91 $1,429 9.6x 2007 Ketel One (50%) Diageo 1,700 $1,800 $1,059 8.4x 2007 Svedka Constellation 1,100 $384 $349 8.4x 2006 42 Below Bacardi 90 $91 $1,011 13.0x 2006 Chambord Brown Forman 144 $255 $1,711 16.3x 2004 Grey Goose Bacardi 1,400 $2,290 $1,636 9.7x

Examples xamples of

  • f acquis

acquisitions itions of

  • f br

brands ands w with ith a s a str trate tegic gic U.S .S. . focus

  • cus,

, spirits pirits

Source: Press search, Park Street analyses

Estimates Conc Conclus lusion ion

  • Transactions

conducted at high valuations

  • Acquirer has to back

into pro-forma EBITDA multiple below industry peer group trading multiple to achieve accretion

  • Acquisition multiple of

5x revenues might translate into 3x revenue for acquirer after synergies (e.g., national and international roll-out)

  • High exit valuations

attract investments to back emerging alcoholic beverage ventures

slide-33
SLIDE 33

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED RESULTING IN LARGE INCREASE OF NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTIONS

CAGR (2002-2013)

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 Other Vodka Whiskey Tequila Rum Brandy Gin

2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002

8.7% 5.6% 10.4% 7.6% 10.4% 16.7% 11.2%

Number of umber of spirit pirit la label bel filings ilings per y er year ear by by sub ub-ca cate tegor gory (2002 2002-2013) 2013)

# # of new spir spirit its s la label l fi filing ngs s inc ncrea easi sing ng rapidl idly

Source: TTB; Park Street Analyses

2013

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

THE CRAFT DISTILLER MOVEMENT IN THE U.S. IS ONE DRIVER OF THE INNOVATION BOOM

34

Source: TTB, Park Street analyses

Number of distillers in the US:

414 492 629 727 1168 1501 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

  • The number of distilleries operating in the

U.S. more than tripled in the last five years (ACDA estimates number of craft distillers

  • perating at over 600 in 2014)
  • If the craft spirits movement is as

successful as the craft brewing movement, the category could reach over 17 million cases by the end of the decade

slide-35
SLIDE 35

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED LICENSEES ARE IMPACTED BY SEVERAL MAJOR CHANGES IN CONSUMER, SUPPLIER AND WHOLESALER TIERS Route to Market for Alcoholic Beverages

Consumers Distributor/control state board On and off premise retailers Brand owner/producer Brand

  • wner/

producer 35

Consumer topics

  • Growth segments

─ Millennial ─ Female ─ Multi-cultural

  • Shortening brand life cycles
  • Disruptors using new technology

Supplier topics

  • Consolidation
  • Brand extension over brand creation
  • Innovation wave by craft producers &

entrepreneurs Distributor topics

  • Consolidation
  • Large supplier influence
  • Increasing distribution challenges for

emerging brands

  • New channels for new brands
slide-36
SLIDE 36

DISTRIBUTION TIER IN WINE AND SPIRITS: THE TOP 5 DISTIRBUTORS GENERATE ~57% OF THE INDUSTRY REVENUE

Tier 2 Wholesalers

  • Distilleries
  • Wineries
  • (Importers)
  • (Importers)
  • Distributors
  • Control Board

Tier 3 Retailers

  • On-Premise

(e.g., bar)

  • Off-Premise

(e.g., liquor store) Wine a ine and S Spir irit its s Sales Sales by y Ti Tier (2012) ) $ Millions

32,724 Total Spirits 47,238 Wine 14,514 72,760 101,660 Total Wine 28,900 Spirits

Co Concentration ion

38% 62% Other Top 5 43% Other Top 5 57% Top 5 Other 9,625 Spirits 33,120 23,495 Total Wine

Tier 1 Manufacturers / Suppliers

Source: Beverage Information Group; Impact; TTB; NABCA; Park Street Analyses 90% 10%

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED

SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS IS LEADING THE DISTRIBUTION TIER WITH REVENUES OF OVER $10BN

22.2%

Allied Beverage Young’s Market $5.83 $11.4 Glazer’s Family Johnson Bros. All Other Wholesalers (Incl. Control States) $0.76 Wirtz Beverage Fedway Associates $1.20 $2.96 $16.08 $3.59 $1.66 Charmer Sunbelt Martignetti Co. $5.36 $0.70 $1.77 Republic National Southern Wine & Spirits

AZ, CA, CO, FL, ID, IL, KY, NV, NY, WA 11.4% CO, FL, MD, NJ, NY 10.4% CO, FL, IN, LA, MD, SC, TX, VA 7.0% LA, MO, TX 5.8% CA, WA 3.4% IL, WI, NV 3.2% MN 2.3% MA, RI 1.5% NJ 1.4% NJ 35 20 14 13 10 6 22 5 1 1 72.18% 35.97% 36.42% 22.92% 22.53% 12.21% 59.71% 5.68% 4.21% 4.21% U.S. Wine & Spirit Wholesalers, by Revenue (2014P)* Billions, USD Market Share (2014P) % Largest Markets (>$250mm) Total States Covered Accessible Market** %

Source: Impact; *Some Control State Revenue Not Captured (e.g., Broker Commissions); **As % of Cases Sold in US(2012)

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED

SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS' GROWTH ACCELERATED OVER THE LAST 10 YEARS

1 2 3 3 7 10 23 35 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

2008 2003 1998 1993

4

1988

3

1983 1978 1973 1968

# of Markets Annual Revenues

In Introduction o ion of Diageo’s Next Generation ion Growth Pr Program

Souther

  • uthern W

n Wine ine & S & Spirits pirits: : Annual Annual Revenues enues ($ $ Millions illions) and and Number umber of

  • f Mar

arkets ets (196 1968-201 2014P 4P)

Source: Impact; Southern Wine &Spirits; Estimates

2014P

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

THE TRUE CONCENTRATION IS MORE VISIBLE ON THE STATE LEVEL – MANY MARKETS ARE LEFT WITH ONLY 2-3 MAJOR DISTRIBUTORS

California Texas New York Florida Illinois

24.545 13.077 11.674 8.433 16.403 900 900 740 2,100 1,710 1,025 1,525 1,850 1,300 1,805 SWS Young’s Republic Glazer SWS Charmer Republic Wirtz SWS Charmer SWS Top Di Dist stributor ibutors: s: In-State Revenue, Millions, USD** Total l State Volume lumes: Millions, 9-L Cases* 3,250

Source: Beverage Information Group; Impact; * 2012; **2013E; ***100% of top suppliers with top 2-3 distributors

39 Market shares for top 2-3 distributors in each open non- franchise state estimated at over 75%***

slide-40
SLIDE 40

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED

40

LARGE SUPPLIERS INFLUENCE DISTRIBUTION TIER IN WINE AND SPIRITS

La Large ge s sup upplier pliers

  • Concentrated action (e.g., RFP)
  • Coordinated planning (e.g., alliance)
  • Increasing demands

– Lower gross margins for distributors – Higher level of service and attention (e.g., dedication, divisions, specialists) – Penalties (if performance goals not met)

  • More sophisticated controls
  • Alignment

La Large ge distri distribu butor tors

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Supplier tier Annual gross profit contribution range in $m # of suppliers in portfolio # of top priorities # of top priorities/ supplier # of

  • ther

priorities # of

  • ther

priorities / supplier Top suppliers 5< 2 2 1.00 2 1.00 Large suppliers 2-5 4 3 0.75 3 0.75 Medium suppliers 1-2 8 0.00 10 1.25 Small suppliers 0.1-1 30 0.00 5 0.17 Entry suppliers <0.1 250 0.00 0.00 Total 294 5 20

41

DISTRIBUTORS TYPICALLY TAKE ORDERS FOR SMALL SUPPLIERS AND SELL PRODUCTS OF THE LARGE SUPPLIERS

Source: Interviews

Conc Conclus lusion ion

  • Large wholesalers are trying

to serve licensees the best way possible, but given the balance of power are also forced to push innovation pipeline of their large suppliers

  • Priorities for the sales force

are the outcome of negotiations between suppliers and distributors with large suppliers typically having leverage

  • In addition, the concept of fair

share of contribution is used to come up with the fair share

  • f attention which guides the

allocation of additional priorities

  • This is a rear view mirror

approach, upside potential is not necessarily considered

  • Small brands and small

suppliers typically end up without any priority

  • The licensees target consumer

demands for innovative brands might not get consideration

All lloc

  • cation

tion of

  • f w

who holesaler lesaler prioriti priorities es ba based sed on

  • n

fair air shar share of e of atten ttention tion – co conc ncep eptua tual

slide-42
SLIDE 42

WHOLESALE TIER OFTEN NOT MORE THAN ORDER TAKING, DELIVERY , AND CUSTOMER SERVICE VEHICLE FOR EMERGING BRANDS

42

Smal Small l suppli supplier ers s of

  • f new

new an and d eme emerging ging br bran ands ds

  • Large wholesalers are resistant to take new brands into the portfolio

– Uncertainty about the prospects – Conflicts with brands of larger suppliers – Requirement to improve efficiencies/ reduce complexity - bias to pass/wait

  • If they take a new brand into the portfolio

– Promising value proposition – Favor to supplier sales rep – Ask for “Insurance” contracts, high margins and long payment terms – Provide small account universe (e.g., one market) with no priorities – Positioned as order taking item given the attention of sales force can’t be diverted from larger supplier’s priorities – supplier’s sales reps need to generate demand

  • If the large wholesaler passes on the new brand, supplier is required to use small or

clearing wholesalers with more limited coverage

  • Wholesale function for new brands is limited in either set-up to order taking, deliveries,

and customer service

Dis istribution tribution funnel funnel

slide-43
SLIDE 43

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED

43

ALTERNATIVES TO TOP SUPPLIER DISTRIBUTORS TO GET UNIQUE BRANDS THAT COULD HELP CREATE RELEVANT DIFFERENTIATION

  • Unbundled logistics and sales: no salesforce

in market, clearing and logistics only

  • Small market share in particular state,

typically focused on metro areas

  • Independent or part of regional network
  • Dedicated or shared supplier reps licensed

as distributor solicitors

  • Account universe: supplier creates own

account list

  • Lack of economies of scale and scope:

limited coverage of market, risk of not being accepted by retailer and lower frequency of deliveries

  • Small market share in particular state,

typically focused on metro areas

  • Represent none of the top 10 spirits and

wine suppliers

  • Independent or part of regional network
  • Single sales force division set-up (for both

spirits and wine and on- and off-premise) with typically a large book

  • Lack of economies of scale and scope:

limited coverage of market, risk of not being accepted by retailer and lower frequency of deliveries

Second-tier distributors Clearing distributors Typical c ypical char haracter acterist istics/ ics/comments comments

  • Resistance by

licensees to accept a new wholesaler is one

  • f the biggest

barriers for the emerging brands to get to market

  • Processing another

vendor can make a big difference for the supplier and the licensee

  • Licensees in more

rural areas typically don’t have the option as distribution alternatives are small

slide-44
SLIDE 44

EMERGING BRANDS CAN BE A SOURCE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FOR A LICENSEE

44

“I don’t have time to approve another unknown ve vendor or see ndor or see an anot

  • ther crazy sa

her crazy sale lesm sman, I have a an, I have a battle to fight”

slide-45
SLIDE 45

EMERGING BRANDS CAN BE A SOURCE OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FOR A LICENSEE

45

  • A licensee should be open to brands with the following characteristics

– A distinct value proposition targeted at the licensee target consumer group – A solid marketing plan to generate pull from the consumer – Solid financial backing to execute the marketing plan

  • These brands might or might not be represented by a large wholesaler (e.g.,

conflicts, lack of track record, etc.)

  • The new brand could be able to create significant economic benefit for the licensee

(where legally allowed), far outweighing the downside of approving another vendor (if required) – Marketing funds spend against the licensees target consumers with the licensee mentioned as destination (e.g., viral social media campaign attracting consumers typically out of licensee’s regular customer base) – Marketing funds spend in the account (e.g., tastings, buy backs)

  • In order to tap into the potential, the licensee has to

– Be clear about its target customers – Market the platform actively to suppliers and small/clearing wholesalers (e.g.,

  • utreach communication)

– Conduct their own category management (if not captain, at least be validator)

  • Be data driven
  • Separate brands into categories to appeal to the target consumers: “must

haves”, wide selection propositions and new launches – have sections in store

  • r on the menu and market the platform
slide-46
SLIDE 46

SMALL AND MEDIUM SPIRITS BRANDS ARE ALREADY DRIVING CATEGORY GROWTH EVEN WITH DISTRIBUTION BARRIERS

Source: Nielsen Total U.S. All Outlets (xAOC + Liquor Plus + Conv + Military); 52 weeks ending 4-26-2014; Wine and Spirits Daily Summit 2014

20 40 60 80 100 120 Total Category Top 5 Companies Next 5 Companies All Non Top 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Sales $ % Chg vs Yr Ago Medium to small spirit companies (in aggregate) are driving category growth Spirits share and % change vs year ago – by supplier size $ Share of Spirits

$ Share $ Growth %

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

SUMMARY

47

  • Do not lose your direct relationship with your customer: give them

what they want whenever they want it – this will reduce the risk of your customers moving to a different provider using disrupting technology

  • Become your own category captain or validator in order to be part of

the marketing framework of suppliers – Identify your target consumer and market that target consumer reach upstream – Tap into supplier resources to promote your business (within legal boundaries of the three tier system) – Understand the theory of shortening brand life cycles and start being firm on resisting brand extensions of established brands that do not match your target customer needs

  • Do not discriminate against smaller wholesalers – an additional invoice

could be an investment with a possible high return

slide-48
SLIDE 48

APPENDIX

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED

49

ABOUT PARK STREET

Par ark Str treet eet is is a leading leading pr provide ider of

  • f div

diver ersif ified ied ser ervices ices, wor

  • rki

king ng ca capital, pital, and and tr trade ade financing inancing for

  • r domes

domestic tic and and im impor ported ted alcoholic alcoholic be bever erage ge br brands

  • nds. The

he company company is is headquar headquarter tered ed in in Miami iami, FL FL with ith oper

  • perations

tions acr acros

  • ss the

the U.S. and and suppor upports ts over er 1,000 000 br brands ands from

  • m mor

more than than 70 70 countries countries ar around

  • und the

the wor

  • rld
  • ld. Par

ark Str tree eet was as launc launched hed in in 2003 2003 by by McK cKins insey ey & Company Company alumni lumni and and is is led led by by executiv ecutives es wit ith lon long-stan tandin ding ind indus ustr try rela elation tionship hips and and decades decades of

  • f expe

xperien rience with ith lea leadin ding glob lobal be bever erage ge companies companies suc uch as as Bacar Bacardi, di, E. & J. Gallo allo, Dia iageo geo, Coca Coca Cola, Cola, and and mor more. The he company company ser erves es a br broad

  • ad range

ange of

  • f wine

ine and and spirits irits clients ents inc including luding cr craf aft dis distil tiller lers, mult multi-br brand and global lobal supplier ppliers, owner ner oper

  • perator

tors, vine ineyar ard owner ners, cele celebrity brity br brands ands, and and mor more. Park Street offers a fully integrated solution across back-office services, working capital investment, and advisory services. With more than fifty-five years of combined experience among its senior management team and expertise in

  • perations, strategy, information technology, finance, and deal structuring and

negotiation, Park Street is able to help clients overcome their most complex challenges, accelerate growth, and capitalize on compelling opportunities. Whether a client would benefit from back-office support, working capital investment, advisory services, or all of the above, Park Street provides a professional and comprehensive solution which integrates seamlessly across service areas and with the client organization.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED

50

PARK STREET SERVICES (1 of 2) Back-Office Services Distribution: Direct-to-Retail

Park Street provides a cost-effective, turn-key solution to manage the thousands of complex details required to import (if applicable), transport, insure, warehouse, sell (all 50 states), and receive payment for alcoholic beverage products in the U.S. — all while maintaining compliance with federal and state alcoholic beverage control laws and tax requirements. The three core benefits to Park Street’s foreign and domestic clients are: (i) achieving cost-effectiveness, (ii) enhancing operational performance, and (iii) focusing client resources on sales, marketing, and brand enhancement among consumers. With precision and transparency, Park Street manages the logistics, compliance, order fulfillment, data management, customer service, and accounting from the point the product is picked up at the producer until it is delivered to the customer and the customer invoice is paid. Park Street’s operational infrastructure integrates seamlessly with domestic and foreign production facilities resulting in streamlined operations. In select key markets (FL, NY , NJ, CA), clients can leverage Park Street’s distribution network to sell imported and domestic product directly to retailers (restaurants, bars, liquor stores, etc.). This distribution model is attractive to both established and emerging brands. It allows established brands to lower cost by leveraging the wholesale clearing model and enables emerging brands to enter new markets quickly and inexpensively in order to demonstrate initial market traction (i.e., test market campaign) before moving on to a traditional distributor. Brand owners also utilize Park Street’s distribution capabilities to sell additional products not supported by their traditional distributor (i.e., supplementary distribution).

slide-51
SLIDE 51

TITLE IN ALL CAPS DOUBLE LINED

51

PARK STREET SERVICES (2 of 2) Compliance Management Working Capital & Trade Finance

Park Street offers a full suite of compliance set-up and management services in order to help domestic and international alcoholic beverage companies go live and operate in adherence with federal and state laws and regulations. The company’s compliance set-up and management services provide an easy and cost-effective solution which enables clients to avoid costly delays and penalties and remain focused on the core competencies which drive brand growth.

Advisory Services Export Solutions

Park Street offers accounts receivable financing (factoring), revolving credit facilities, term loans secured by accounts receivables and other assets, guarantees, and letters of credit. The underwriting process focuses

  • n the quality and liquidity of the collateral/assets (e.g., creditworthiness
  • f the distributor, payment history, inventory turnover rate), as well as the

financial stability of the brand owner. Park Street provides advisory services focused on the alcoholic beverage sector, including, among

  • thers,

business building, route-to-market planning,

  • rganizational

effectiveness, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, and negotiation support. Park Street collaborates with clients to identify and implement value-creating solutions in a wide range of scenarios including start-up, growth acceleration, exit, and more. Park Street’s export solutions enable domestic suppliers to access markets around the world and allow foreign suppliers to utilize free trade zones at select U.S. ports to service regional and sub-regional markets (e.g., Mexico, Caribbean, Central America, South America). Services include, among others, warehousing, logistics management, regulatory compliance, order fulfillment, invoicing, and customer service.