July 21, 2020 2 Outline Study Overview What Weve Heard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
july 21 2020
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

July 21, 2020 2 Outline Study Overview What Weve Heard - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 24, 2023 227 likes •469 views

1 BOCC July 21, 2020 2 Outline Study Overview What Weve Heard Recommendations Next Steps 3 Study Overview Understand vision for future development and obtain community input Evaluate and recommend changes to

slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

BOCC July 21, 2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Study Overview
  • What We’ve Heard
  • Recommendations
  • Next Steps

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Study Overview

  • Understand vision for future development

and obtain community input

  • Evaluate and recommend changes to

current RP-2 policies and regulations

  • Review infrastructure needs in Balm

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Schedule (S (Subject to Change)

Develop Initial Recommendations March – April 2020

  • Infrastructure Needs

(Transportation, Public Utilities, Environmental)

Policy Recommendations & Updates Summer/Fall

  • Policy updates

Summer

  • PC Hearing and BOCC Transmittal

Fall

  • Moratorium Deadline

May 2020

Public Outreach March – July 2020

  • Community Open House #1

March 11, 2020

  • Online Survey

March 11 – April 2, 2020

  • Community Work Session

April 7, 2020

  • Stakeholder Work Session

June 18, 2020

  • Community Open House #2

Fall

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5 RP-2 North Sub-Plan Area RP-2 South Sub- Plan Area

Focus Area

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Approved Developments

6

19% of Focus area 30% Focus area + Other RP-2 Outside USA Approved Developments

  • 19% of the Focus area
  • 31% of RP-2 Outside USA

Vacant Developable

  • 47% of the Focus area
  • 34% of RP-2 Outside USA

La Land Analysis Summary

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What We’ve Heard – Community Outreach

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Community Open House

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What could be improved in the community? (Select all that apply)

9

72% 71% 64% 56% 32% 15% 9% 7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Protection of wildlife habitats Discourage suburban development in a rural area Infrastructure to support new developments (roads, utilities etc.) Encourage farming Add grocery stores, local retail, restaurants, etc. Other (please specify) Add more suburban development in a rural area Add affordable housing

Online Survey

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Stakeholder In Interviews

Development community

  • Current commercial requirements don’t work
  • Little developable land left in the RP-2 areas
  • Would like to see design guidelines
  • Not in favor of planned villages, make it more

about mobility

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Stakeholder In Interviews

Community

  • Supporting infrastructure before development
  • Density – no more than 2 dwelling units per acre,

½ acre lots (not in favor of clustering, TDR)

  • Preserve green and natural spaces
  • 250’ setbacks
  • Minimize light pollution
  • Include local commercial opportunities

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Recommendations

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Establish dif ifferent development areas

  • Recategorize

Planned Villages

  • Encourage different levels
  • f development
  • South Sub-Planning

Area/Village

  • North Sub-Planning

Area/Village

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

DENSITY CURRENT NORTH SOUTH Overall Density

2 du/gross acre 2 du/gross acre (50 – 160 acres) Design Rules (Buffering, lighting, connectivity, timing improvements with development) 2 du/gross acre (50 – 160 acres) Design Rules (Buffering, lighting, connectivity, timing improvements with development)

Added Community Benefits (would require review in PD)

Not included 3 du/gross acre with added community benefits 3 du/gross acre with added community benefits

With Clustering

3.5-4 du/net acre 3.5-4 du/net acre and at least 50% open space 3.5-4 du/net acre and at least 50%

  • pen space

With TDR

4 du/ gross acre 6 du/net acre 4 du/gross acre 6 du/net acre “Sending area”

Density (TB

(TBD ba based on

  • n dis

discussio ions wit ith com

  • mmunit

ity)

14

Red text indicates proposed updates

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Community benefit options:

  • Land dedication for town center
  • Multimodal connections to commercial
  • Other infrastructure improvements in

nearby commercial nodes (Balm downtown, other nodes, etc.)

  • Land dedication for community uses

and office uses

Update Commercial Poli licies

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Density bonuses for (requirements vary based on size of project):

  • Different housing types and sizes
  • Different lot sizes
  • Additional open space and preservation
  • Utilize Conservation subdivision standards
  • Additional optional infrastructure

improvements

  • Land dedication: schools, daycares,

civic or community uses etc.

  • Green/sustainable building patterns
  • Rural architectural style for buildings

Community Benefits

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Buffering
  • 250’ with minimum landscape standards on the periphery
  • If Less than 250’ greater buffering & screening requirements
  • Varying lot sizes/setbacks
  • Encourage a range of housing types/sizes
  • Discourage cookie cutter development
  • Multimodal access/circulation
  • Green and open space
  • Conservation measures
  • Water conservation, lighting, etc.

More Specific Desig ign Standards

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Immediate Short-term Mid/ Long-term

Amend the Comprehensive Plan Consolidate and reorganize policies County, Planning Commission Add clear references/linkages (to Comp Plan and LDC) County, Planning Commission Recategorize Planned Villages (2 areas - south/north) County, Planning Commission Update clustering: Add different lot sizes, home types, etc., clearly define density/intensity and what counts as open space County, Planning Commission Update/replace commercial standards with community benefits County, Planning Commission Include/update design rules County, Planning Commission Develop a mobility and commercial node map County, Development Community, Market professionals TDRs: Coordinate TDR efforts (consider Balm as "sending area" and others as "receiving area") County, Planning Commission

Timing Action Responsible Party

18

Amend the Comprehensive Pla lan (Deliverables as part of this study)

Timing Defined:

  • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption)
  • Short-term (Within 4 years)
  • Mid/Long-term (4+ years)

DRAFT

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Immediate Short-term Mid/ Long-term

Update Land Development Code Add corresponding regulations from Comprehensive Plan updates County Allow certain community benefits to replace commercial component County Add design standards - include neighborhood centers, walkability, buffering, conservation, drainage, etc. County, Planning Commission Landscape/buffering standards, menu of options for 250' setback County, Planning Commission Create checklist with required/optional design standards County, Planning Commission Remove planned village graphic County

Timing Action Responsible Party

19

Amend th the Comprehensive Pla lan

Update Land Development Code (Deliverables as part of this study)

Timing Defined:

  • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption)
  • Short-term (Within 4 years)
  • Mid/Long-term (4+ years)

DRAFT

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Immediate Short-term Mid/ Long-term

Schools/Civic uses: Site in neighborhoods, design for biking/walking and provide connections (on-going) Development community, County, School Board Further discuss public safety concerns with borrow pits County, Planning Commission Water/Sewer Infrastructure: Coordinate with future development County Clarify Planned Development Process for the area for new regulations County, Planning Commission TDRs: further discuss and explore TDR framework County, Planning Commission TDRs: Stakeholder Coordination: Convene residents/farmers, development community to discuss TDR process further. County, Planning Commission ELAPP: Coordinate possibility of connecting ELAPP north/south of focus area County, Planning Commission, Development Community

Timing Action Responsible Party

20

Other Potential Foll llow-up Actio ions

(O (Outside of this study)

Timing Defined:

  • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption)
  • Short-term (Within 4 years)
  • Mid/Long-term (4+ years)

DRAFT

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Immediate Short-term Mid/ Long-term

Mobility: Develop a mobility master plan (local connectivity, substandard roads, multimodal) County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Explore using TECO easements for trail network County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Construct roadway improvements in CIP and LRTP (Big Bend, CR 672, etc.) County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Construct improvements on substandard roadways, intersection improvements, sidewalks County, MPO, Planning Commission Revenue: Explore additional revenue sources (i.e. TIF, MSTU/MSBU) County Affordable Housing: Continue to discuss affordable housing and transit options County, Community & Stakeholders, Planning Commission Coordinate additional rural architectural standards/overlay County, Planning Commission

Timing Action Responsible Party

21

Timing Defined:

  • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption)
  • Short-term (Within 4 years)
  • Mid/Long-term (4+ years)

DRAFT

Other Potential Foll llow-up Actio ions

(O (Outside of this study)

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Update the Comprehensive Plan (FLU) based on comments
  • Update the Land Development Code
  • Community Open House (Summer/Fall)
  • County staff to work on follow-up actions as directed by the BOCC

Foll llow-up Activ ivities

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Questions and Answers

23 23