july 21 2020
play

July 21, 2020 2 Outline Study Overview What Weve Heard - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 BOCC July 21, 2020 2 Outline Study Overview What Weve Heard Recommendations Next Steps 3 Study Overview Understand vision for future development and obtain community input Evaluate and recommend changes to


  1. 1 BOCC July 21, 2020

  2. 2 Outline • Study Overview • What We’ve Heard • Recommendations • Next Steps

  3. 3 Study Overview • Understand vision for future development and obtain community input • Evaluate and recommend changes to current RP-2 policies and regulations • Review infrastructure needs in Balm

  4. 4 Schedule (S (Subject to Change) Develop Initial Recommendations March – April 2020 - Infrastructure Needs (Transportation, Public Utilities, Environmental) Public Outreach March – July 2020 - Community Open House #1 March 11, 2020 - Online Survey March 11 – April 2, 2020 - Community Work Session April 7, 2020 - Stakeholder Work Session June 18, 2020 - Community Open House #2 Fall Policy Recommendations & Updates Summer/Fall - Policy updates Summer - PC Hearing and BOCC Transmittal Fall - Moratorium Deadline May 2020

  5. Focus Area 5 RP-2 South Sub- Plan Area RP-2 North Sub-Plan Area

  6. Land Analysis Summary La Approved Developments 6 Approved Developments 19% of Focus area • 19% of the Focus area 30% Focus area + Other • 31% of RP-2 Outside USA RP-2 Outside USA Vacant Developable • 47% of the Focus area • 34% of RP-2 Outside USA

  7. 7 What We’ve Heard – Community Outreach

  8. 8 Community Open House

  9. 9 80% Online Survey 72% 71% 70% 64% What could be improved in the community? 60% 56% (Select all that apply) 50% 40% 32% 30% 20% 15% 9% 7% 10% 0% Protection of Discourage Infrastructure to Encourage Add grocery Other (please Add more Add affordable wildlife habitats suburban support new farming stores, local retail, specify) suburban housing development in a developments restaurants, etc. development in a rural area (roads, utilities rural area etc.)

  10. 10 Stakeholder In Interviews Development community • Current commercial requirements don’t work • Little developable land left in the RP-2 areas • Would like to see design guidelines • Not in favor of planned villages, make it more about mobility

  11. 11 Stakeholder In Interviews Community • Supporting infrastructure before development • Density – no more than 2 dwelling units per acre, ½ acre lots (not in favor of clustering, TDR) • Preserve green and natural spaces • 250’ setbacks • Minimize light pollution • Include local commercial opportunities

  12. 12 Recommendations

  13. 13 Establish dif ifferent development areas • Recategorize Planned Villages • Encourage different levels of development • South Sub-Planning Area/Village • North Sub-Planning Area/Village

  14. 14 Red text indicates Density (TB (TBD ba based on on dis discussio ions wit ith com ommunit ity) proposed updates DENSITY CURRENT NORTH SOUTH Overall Density 2 du/gross acre 2 du/gross acre 2 du/gross acre (50 – 160 acres) (50 – 160 acres) Design Rules (Buffering, lighting, Design Rules (Buffering, lighting, connectivity, timing connectivity, timing improvements improvements with with development) development) Added Community Not included 3 du/gross acre with added 3 du/gross acre with added community benefits community benefits Benefits (would require review in PD) 3.5-4 du/net acre 3.5-4 du/net acre and at least 3.5-4 du/net acre and at least 50% With Clustering 50% open space open space With TDR 4 du/ gross acre 6 du/net acre 4 du/gross acre 6 du/net acre “Sending area”

  15. 15 Update Commercial Poli licies Community benefit options: • Land dedication for town center • Multimodal connections to commercial • Other infrastructure improvements in nearby commercial nodes (Balm downtown, other nodes, etc.) • Land dedication for community uses and office uses

  16. 16 Community Benefits Density bonuses for (requirements vary based on size of project): • Different housing types and sizes • Different lot sizes • Additional open space and preservation • Utilize Conservation subdivision standards • Additional optional infrastructure improvements • Land dedication: schools, daycares, civic or community uses etc. • Green/sustainable building patterns • Rural architectural style for buildings

  17. 17 More Specific Desig ign Standards • Buffering • 250’ with minimum landscape standards on the periphery • If Less than 250’ greater buffering & screening requirements • Varying lot sizes/setbacks • Encourage a range of housing types/sizes • Discourage cookie cutter development • Multimodal access/circulation • Green and open space • Conservation measures • Water conservation, lighting, etc.

  18. Amend the Comprehensive Pla lan Timing Defined: • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption) • Short-term (Within 4 years) (Deliverables as part of this study) • Mid/Long-term (4+ years) Timing DRAFT Action Responsible Party Mid/ Immediate Short-term Long-term Amend the Comprehensive Plan Consolidate and reorganize policies County, Planning Commission Add clear references/linkages (to Comp Plan and LDC) County, Planning Commission Recategorize Planned Villages (2 areas - south/north) County, Planning Commission Update clustering: Add different lot sizes, home types, etc., clearly define density/intensity County, Planning Commission and what counts as open space Update/replace commercial standards with community benefits County, Planning Commission Include/update design rules County, Planning Commission County, Development Community, Develop a mobility and commercial node map Market professionals TDRs: Coordinate TDR efforts (consider Balm as "sending area" and others as County, Planning Commission "receiving area") 18

  19. Amend th the Comprehensive Pla lan Update Land Development Code Timing Defined: • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption) • Short-term (Within 4 years) (Deliverables as part of this study) • Mid/Long-term (4+ years) Timing DRAFT Action Responsible Party Mid/ Immediate Short-term Long-term Update Land Development Code Add corresponding regulations from Comprehensive Plan updates County Allow certain community benefits to replace commercial component County Add design standards - include neighborhood centers, walkability, buffering, conservation, County, Planning Commission drainage, etc. Landscape/buffering standards, menu of options for 250' setback County, Planning Commission Create checklist with required/optional design standards County, Planning Commission Remove planned village graphic County 19

  20. Other Potential Foll llow-up Actio ions Timing Defined: • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption) (Outside of this study) (O • Short-term (Within 4 years) • Mid/Long-term (4+ years) Timing DRAFT Action Responsible Party Mid/ Immediate Short-term Long-term Schools/Civic uses: Site in neighborhoods, design for biking/walking and provide connections Development community, County, (on-going) School Board Further discuss public safety concerns with borrow pits County, Planning Commission Water/Sewer Infrastructure: Coordinate with future development County Clarify Planned Development Process for the area for new regulations County, Planning Commission TDRs: further discuss and explore TDR framework County, Planning Commission TDRs: Stakeholder Coordination: Convene residents/farmers, development community to County, Planning Commission discuss TDR process further. County, Planning Commission, ELAPP: Coordinate possibility of connecting ELAPP north/south of focus area Development Community 20

  21. Other Potential Foll llow-up Actio ions Timing Defined: • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption) (Outside of this study) (O • Short-term (Within 4 years) • Mid/Long-term (4+ years) Timing DRAFT Action Responsible Party Mid/ Immediate Short-term Long-term Mobility: Develop a mobility master plan (local connectivity, substandard roads, multimodal) County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Explore using TECO easements for trail network County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Construct roadway improvements in CIP and LRTP (Big Bend, CR 672, etc.) County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Construct improvements on substandard roadways, intersection improvements, County, MPO, Planning Commission sidewalks Revenue: Explore additional revenue sources (i.e. TIF, MSTU/MSBU) County County, Community & Stakeholders, Affordable Housing: Continue to discuss affordable housing and transit options Planning Commission Coordinate additional rural architectural standards/overlay County, Planning Commission 21

  22. 22 Foll llow-up Activ ivities • Update the Comprehensive Plan (FLU) based on comments • Update the Land Development Code • Community Open House (Summer/Fall) • County staff to work on follow-up actions as directed by the BOCC

  23. 23 Questions and Answers 23

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend