joint committee on infant hearing
play

Joint Committee on Infant Hearing The Mid Years 1980 1994 Early - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Joint Committee on Infant Hearing The Mid Years 1980 1994 Early JCIH Emphasis The Challenge: Identify, evaluate and apply valid and reliable measures of hearing in infants and toddlers. We do NOT identify 50% of children


  1. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing The Mid ‐ Years 1980 ‐ 1994

  2. Early JCIH Emphasis • The Challenge: • Identify, evaluate and apply valid and reliable measures of hearing in infants and toddlers. • We do NOT identify 50% of children w ith hearing loss using high risk registries (Stein and cow orkers).

  3. Evolution of Technologies and Pilot Studies • Audiologists restive about applying new technologies to EI; frustration re late identification and subsequent consequences. • DOE and Tom Behrens, sow ed seeds w ith HRSA re: development of state projects to assess new born screening.

  4. Policy Conflicts and JCIH Membership • AAP--universal hearing screening w as conceptually sound, but … scientific evidence of value w as lacking. • Expense and qualified personnel issues. • AAP cited barriers to implementation in new born nurseries.

  5. Policy Conflicts and JCIH Membership • Council on Education of the Deaf • JCIH had an aural-oral emphasis and motivation tow ard early hearing detection. • Opposition to the practice and policy related to the advent of cochlear implants.

  6. JCIH 1982 • Expanded the risk criteria to 7. • Screening by 3 months and no later than 6 months. • no endorsement for any specific electrophysiologic procedure • Added need for medical treatment and education intervention. • Screening ‘under the supervision of an audiologist’

  7. Reforming Alliances: JCIH 1990 • AAP representation. • CED representation. • Expansion of risk criteria delineating different age groups (birth-28 days; 29 days to 2 years). • Added ototoxic medications, prolonged mechanical ventilation and head trauma to risk criteria. • Screening at risk babies at birth prior to discharge or before 3 months. • Recommended ABR screening, not behavioral screen due to high false positives.

  8. JCIH 1990 • Detailed outline of optimal early intervention services (PL 99-457). • Caveats about updating risk criteria; need for risk review every 3 years.

  9. JCIH 1994 • Supported the goal of universal detection of hearing loss as early as possible • All infants should be identified by 3 months of age, intervention begun by 6 months of age.

  10. A BIG THANK YOU!!! • MARIAN DOWNS • EVY CHEROW

  11. Lessons in Diplomacy and Science • High risk registry = A reasonable moderate public health approach to early identification & professional education to administer high risk registries

  12. JCIH 1982 • DEFINED • Screening by 3 months and no later than 6 months: no endorsement for any specific objective electrophysiologic procedure • Diagnostic procedures: behavioral and objective • Management: Audiologic, medical and psychoeducational

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend