Joint Committee on Infant Hearing The Mid Years 1980 1994 Early - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

joint committee on infant hearing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Joint Committee on Infant Hearing The Mid Years 1980 1994 Early - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Joint Committee on Infant Hearing The Mid Years 1980 1994 Early JCIH Emphasis The Challenge: Identify, evaluate and apply valid and reliable measures of hearing in infants and toddlers. We do NOT identify 50% of children


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Joint Committee

  • n Infant Hearing

The Mid‐Years 1980‐1994

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Early JCIH Emphasis

  • The Challenge:
  • Identify, evaluate and apply valid

and reliable measures of hearing in infants and toddlers.

  • We do NOT identify 50% of

children w ith hearing loss using high risk registries (Stein and cow orkers).

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Evolution of Technologies and Pilot Studies

  • Audiologists restive about applying new

technologies to EI; frustration re late identification and subsequent consequences.

  • DOE and Tom Behrens, sow ed seeds w ith

HRSA re: development of state projects to assess new born screening.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Policy Conflicts and JCIH Membership

  • AAP--universal hearing screening

w as conceptually sound, but … scientific evidence of value w as lacking.

  • Expense and qualified personnel

issues.

  • AAP cited barriers to implementation

in new born nurseries.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Policy Conflicts and JCIH Membership

  • Council on Education of the

Deaf

  • JCIH had an aural-oral emphasis

and motivation tow ard early hearing detection.

  • Opposition to the practice and

policy related to the advent of cochlear implants.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

JCIH 1982

  • Expanded the risk criteria to 7.
  • Screening by 3 months and no later

than 6 months.

  • no endorsement for any specific

electrophysiologic procedure

  • Added need for medical treatment

and education intervention.

  • Screening ‘under the supervision of

an audiologist’

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Reforming Alliances: JCIH 1990

  • AAP representation.
  • CED representation.
  • Expansion of risk criteria delineating different age

groups (birth-28 days; 29 days to 2 years).

  • Added ototoxic medications, prolonged mechanical

ventilation and head trauma to risk criteria.

  • Screening at risk babies at birth prior to discharge
  • r before 3 months.
  • Recommended ABR screening, not behavioral

screen due to high false positives.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

JCIH 1990

  • Detailed outline of optimal early

intervention services (PL 99-457).

  • Caveats about updating risk

criteria; need for risk review every 3 years.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

JCIH 1994

  • Supported the goal of

universal detection of hearing loss as early as possible

  • All infants should be identified

by 3 months of age, intervention begun by 6 months of age.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

A BIG THANK YOU!!!

  • MARIAN DOWNS
  • EVY CHEROW
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Lessons in Diplomacy and Science

  • High risk

registry =

A reasonable moderate public health approach to early identification & professional education to administer high risk registries

slide-12
SLIDE 12

JCIH 1982

  • DEFINED
  • Screening by 3 months and no

later than 6 months: no endorsement for any specific

  • bjective electrophysiologic

procedure

  • Diagnostic procedures: behavioral

and objective

  • Management: Audiologic, medical

and psychoeducational