Johan Sundberg ATTEMPTS to REPRODUCE a PIANISTS EXPRESSIVE TIMING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

johan sundberg
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Johan Sundberg ATTEMPTS to REPRODUCE a PIANISTS EXPRESSIVE TIMING - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presented by Beran Pacaci Sundberg, Friberg & Bresin: Director Musices Johan Sundberg ATTEMPTS to REPRODUCE a PIANISTS EXPRESSIVE TIMING with Ph.D. in musicology at Uppsala DIRECTOR MUSICES PERFORMANCE RULES University. was


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presented by Beran Pacaci Sundberg, Friberg & Bresin: Director Musices ISE 599: Spring 2004 1

ATTEMPTS to REPRODUCE a PIANIST’S EXPRESSIVE TIMING with DIRECTOR MUSICES PERFORMANCE RULES

by JOHAN SUNDBERG, ANDERS FRIBERG and ROBERTO BRESIN

  • BERAN PACACI -

SPRING 2004

Johan Sundberg

  • Ph.D. in musicology at Uppsala

University.

  • was the head of the music acoustics

research group from 1970 to 2001.

  • a music performer as a singer.
  • Current research areas include

– Singing Voice – Rules for Musical Performance – Breathing and Phonation

  • http://www.speech.kth.se/~pjohan

Anders Friberg

  • M.S. in Applied Physics. Ph.D. in ?
  • a music performer as a pianist.
  • Current research areas include

– Random fluctuations of timing in music performance. – Swing ratios and ensemble timing in jazz. – Combining the Radio Baton and Director Musices. – Performance synthesis in Director Musices.

  • http://www.speech.kth.se/~andersfr/

Roberto Bresin

  • Ph.D. in Music Acoustics.
  • Current research areas include

– Analysis and synthesis of emotional content in music. – Articulation strategies in expressive music performance. – Emotional melodies for mobile phones. – Synthesis of Emotional Expression in Music Performance.

  • http://www.speech.kth.se/~roberto
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Presented by Beran Pacaci Sundberg, Friberg & Bresin: Director Musices ISE 599: Spring 2004 2

KTH Music Acoustics Group

  • runs in four main streams:

– singing (solo and choral) – stringed instruments – music performance – computer music composition

Music Performance

  • is an important research area today.
  • The deviation from nominal inter-onset-

interval (IOI).

  • Every musician plays differently.

Music Performance Rules

The rules are divided into three main classes: ÿ Differentiation Rules: enhance the differences between tone categories. ÿ Grouping Rules: show what tones belong together. ÿ Emphasis Rules: emphasize unexpected notes. ÿ Ensemble Rules: synchronize the various voices in an ensemble.

Music Performance Rules

  • Differentiation Rules

– Duration Contrast – Melodic Charge – High Sharp

  • Grouping Rules

– Punctuation – Double Duration – Tuning – Phrase Arch – Inégales (or swing) – Ensemble Swing – Final Ritard – Harmonic Charge

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Presented by Beran Pacaci Sundberg, Friberg & Bresin: Director Musices ISE 599: Spring 2004 3

Director Musices (DM)

  • a software for Automatic Music Performance.
  • a rule system for Musical Performance.
  • implementing all previously defined rules.
  • features includes polyphony, midi I/O,

performance variable graphs and user rule definition.

Director Musices (DM)

  • DM rules contain two elements:

ÿ Context ÿ Quantity

Director Musices (DM) Research Strategy

  • Analysis-by-synthesis
  • Analysis-by-measurement
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Presented by Beran Pacaci Sundberg, Friberg & Bresin: Director Musices ISE 599: Spring 2004 4

Experiment Outline

  • Comparison between the real pianist’s

performance with different performances produced by the DM system.

  • MIDI data consists of score time in beats,

MIDI note numbers, IOI, sounded duration and dynamics in MIDI velocity.

Experiment Outline

  • Initial Run: Each rule is tested one by one.

Duration Contrast, Melodic Charge, Punctuation, Double Duration, Phrase Arch, Harmonic Charge, Faster-uphill and Leap-tone-duration.

  • Second Run: Combinations of rules are
  • tested. First Phrase Arch Rule, then

combining with Harmonic Charge and Duration Contrast.

Limitation of Correlation

  • The sign of the overall deviations is

considered, not their quantity.

  • The correlation is highly sensitive to

extreme values.

  • The correlation is much more sensitive to

the agreement for single notes when the number of notes compared is small as compared to when it is large.

Conclusion

  • The Phrase Arch rule is the winner in the

experimented performance.

  • Rule combination has to change between

sections.

  • Time varying rule palettes would be a

worthwhile target.

  • DM limitation: The general applicability of

the rule combination.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Presented by Beran Pacaci Sundberg, Friberg & Bresin: Director Musices ISE 599: Spring 2004 5

References

  • Ramon Lopez de Mantaras & Josep Lluis Arcos (2002).

AI and Music From Composition to Expressive Performance.

  • Efstathios Stamatatos & Gerhard Widmer (2002). Music

Performer Recognition Using an Ensemble of Simple Classifiers.

  • The Science of Music Performance

http://www.speech.kth.se/music/performance/