Jacques Genest, Rob Welsh Evidence-Based Marketing National - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Jacques Genest, Rob Welsh Evidence-Based Marketing National - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Harmonization of Guidelines: The C-CHANGE Initiative C anadian C ardiovascular HA rmonization of N ational G uidelines E ndeavour Acknowledgements Jacques Genest, Rob Welsh Evidence-Based Marketing National CPG Committee
Harmonization of Guidelines: The C-CHANGE Initiative
Canadian Cardiovascular HArmonization of National Guidelines Endeavour
- Acknowledgements
- Jacques Genest, Rob Welsh
- Evidence-Based Marketing
- National CPG Committee Memberships
- Disclosures
- Speaker/Advisory Board Honorariums
- Research Funding - Sanofi
- National CPG Committee Memberships
- Canadian Diabetes Association 2013
- Canadian Cardiac Rehabilitation Cardiac Rehabilitation (Chair)
- Canadian Hypertension Education Program
- C-CHANGE (Canadian Cardiovascular HArmonization of National Guidelines
Endeavour) (Chair)
- CCS Dyslipidemia 2102
- CCS Smoking Cessation 2011
- CCS Committee on Chronic Stable Angina
- CIHR Committee on Refractory Angina
- Physical Activity for Adults 2011
- Physical Activity for Persons with Spinal Cord Dysfunction (Chair) 2011
Overview
- Who is C-CHANGE?
- What is the history of C-CHANGE?
- Why is C-CHANGE important?
- What are the consequences of not realizing C-CHANGE?
- The Update Process
CPGs: Reality or Illusion?
Who is C-CHANGE?
- 1. Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation
- 2. Canadian Diabetes Association
- 3. CCS Dyslipidemia Guidelines Group
- 4. Canadian Hypertension Education Program
- 5. Canadian Stroke Network
- 6. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology
- 7. CCS Smoking Cessation Working Group
- 8. Obesity Canada
- 9. CCS Anti-Platelet Guidelines
- 10. CCS Heart Failure Guidelines
- 11. CCS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines
- 12. CCS Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Guidelines
C-CHANGE Partners
What is the History of C-CHANGE?
Why do we need Integrated CPGs?
C-CHANGE History
- 2002 – Campbell and Stone
– September 2002 – SOLIDDE
- 2003 – 2007
– Six meetings
- 2008
– CIHR
- Canadian Vascular Coalition
– CPG Development
C-CHANGE History
- 2010
– June – Harmonization Meeting
- 2011
– C-CHANGE Publication
- 2014 - Update
C-CHANGE History
- 2010
– June – Harmonization Meeting
- 2011
– C-CHANGE Publication
- 2014 - Update
Why IS C-CHANGE Important?
Why is C-CHANGE Important?
- Clinical Leadership
– Knowledge of science leads to expertise in the art
- Thought Leadership
– Visionaries – Work horses – Collaborators
- Research Leadership
– Basic science – Clinical trails – Outcomes assessments
- Primacy of Evidence-Informed Clinical Practice
– Evidence informs experience – Enhanced experience leads to enhanced outcomes
What are the Consequences of Not Realizing C-CHANGE?
“All for One and One for All!”
No C-CHANGE: Consequences
- CPG anarchy
– Competition for markets – Competition for funding – Competition for development stakeholders – Fragmentation of:
- Prevention
- Chronic disease care
- Teaching and education
- Sub-optimal patient outcomes
- Primacy of practice-informed clinical practice
– Experience is more important than evidence – Return to eminence-based practice
- Recommendation Redundancy
Recommendation Duplication Nutrition
Source Guideline (Location) Recommendation CDA (Health Behaviour Interventions) In diabetes Adults with diabetes should consume no more than 7% of total daily energy from saturated fats and should limit intake of trans fatty acids to a minimum. (Grade D, Consensus) Obesity Canada (Health Behaviour Interventions) A high-protein or a low-fat diet (within acceptable macronutrient distribution ranges indicated in the Dietary Reference Intakes) is suggested as a reasonable short-term (6–12 months) treatment option for obese adults as part of a weight-loss program. (Grade B, Level 2) Obesity Canada (Health Behaviour Interventions) Meal replacements may be considered as a component of an energy- reduced diet for selected adults interested in commencing a dietary weight-loss program. (Grade C, Level 2)
No C-CHANGE: Consequences
Harmonized Recommendations
Translating Scientific Knowledge into Clinical Action
Recommendation Categories
Diagnostic
- Screening
- Risk Stratification
- Diagnostic Tests
Therapeutic
- Treatment Targets
- Health Behaviour Therapies
- Pharmacological Therapies
The Update Process
- 1. Harmonize specific recommendations - same wording
- 2. Do not increase the workload
- 3. Implementation tools must adhere strictly to the recommendations
- 4. All C-CHANGE implementation tools will have C-CHANGE branding
- 5. Recommendations development - include an implementability wording
C-CHANGE Update Process
C-CHANGE Update Process
- 6. Harmonized C-CHANGE recommendations reviewed annually
- 7. Guidelines development requires AGREE II
- 8. Bias reduction remains a constant priority
- 9. Core C-CHANGE implementation tools will not have industry support
- 10. Primary care physicians and allied health care professions:
Recommendation Development Implementation Tool Development
SUMMARY
SUMMARY
- Who is C-CHANGE?
- What is the history of C-CHANGE?
- Why C-CHANGE important?
- What are the consequences of not realizing C-CHANGE?
- The Update Process
SUMMARY
- The KT Ripple Effect