J-P . Merlet HEPHAISTOS project INRIA 1 Assistance Robotics 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

j p merlet hephaistos project inria
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

J-P . Merlet HEPHAISTOS project INRIA 1 Assistance Robotics 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Using robotics methods for mobility and medical monitoring of frail people J-P . Merlet HEPHAISTOS project INRIA 1 Assistance Robotics 2 Assistance Robotics is an INRIA team devoted to the assistance to HEPHAISTOS frail people (elderly,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Using robotics methods for mobility and medical monitoring of frail people J-P . Merlet HEPHAISTOS project INRIA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Assistance Robotics

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Assistance Robotics

HEPHAISTOS is an INRIA team devoted to the assistance to frail people (elderly, handicapped, . . . )

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Assistance Robotics

HEPHAISTOS is an INRIA team devoted to the assistance to frail people (elderly, handicapped, . . . ) When starting to investigate this subject in 2006 we have almost no knowledge about these issues

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Assistance Robotics

3 years interview period (2008-2011) end-users associations retirement house caregivers local authorities medical community nurses family doctors nurses

≈ 200 interviews

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Assistance Robotics

for who ? end-user helpers medical community

Players Context

environment society

Tasks

what ? for what? how?

Time

when ? rules assistance systems

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Assistance Robotics

These interviews has allowed us to determine:

  • priorities → what, for who, when, what for
  • mobility assistance (for elderly, caregivers, family)
  • medical monitoring (especially at home)
  • guidelines → how, ethical rules

for example

  • low intrusivity
  • low cost
  • low energy consumption, smart objects

Interviews: a real change in my life will be to be able to go alone to the toilets

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Mobility

  • mobility is essential for a minimal autonomy → self-esteem
  • first phase of autonomy loss: mobility problem
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Mobility

Mobility operations:

  • transfer operations: mechanically demanding task
  • walking assistance
slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Mobility

Mobility monitoring is an essential tool for the medical community used for functional and cognitive assessment

  • clinical tests: 10m walk, TUG, Tinetti, . . .
  • suffer from: robustness, inaccurate or partial

measurements, lack of objectivity, . . .

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Mobility and fall

The fall problem

  • in France 10 000 elderly deaths per year are a direct

consequence of a fall

  • car accidents: 3000 deaths/year
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Objectives of mobility assistance devices

  • provide the right level of assistance for the end-users and

helpers

  • manage the fall problem (detection/prevention)
  • medical monitoring (provide synthetic assessment

indicators that may be used by doctors, detect rare events that are warnings for emerging pathologies)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Objectives of mobility assistance devices

  • low cost and intrusivity
  • user-friendly: manageable by the subject alone →

self-esteem

  • flexible and adaptable
  • connected
  • to the external world ? yes . . . sometime
  • to other devices ? yes, as much as possible
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Transfer

Available solutions: patient lifts

  • require an helper, difficult to use by them
slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Transfer

Available solutions

  • intrusive and expensive
  • only 1 or 2 action directions
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Transfer

Robotic solutions: RIBA robot

  • really intrusive
  • cost, energy autonomy, helper required
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Transfer

Robotic solutions: MONIMAD walker

  • quite cumbersome and heavy
  • limited transfer ability (sit-to-stand)
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Transfer

Purposes of a robotized solution:

  • preserving autonomy by allowing an elderly to remain mobile
  • decrease the burden of the caregiver
  • allow object manipulation
  • avoid fall

Constraints

  • should be able to fully lift an elderly: load
  • allow access to any part of a room: workspace
  • acceptance, cost
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Transfer: another robotized solution

main constraints: load and workspace

  • several links connecting the spine and

the torso

  • links are in parallel
slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Transfer: another robotized solution

How do we implement that for robots ? Objectives

  • divide the load among several links
  • only traction/compression in the links
slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Transfer: another robotized solution

Practical implementation: 6 independent extensible legs whose extremities are connected to the base and to the platform Gough platform 1956 Stewart platform 1965

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Transfer: another robotized solution

Linear actuators have limited stroke ⇒ parallel robots have a limited workspace How can we increase this workspace ?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Transfer: another robotized solution

Linear actuators have limited stroke ⇒ parallel robots have a limited workspace How can we increase this workspace ? Replace the rigid actuators by cables that can be coiled and un- coiled at will

  • low cost, low intrusivity
  • high lifting capacity, allow for walk monitoring

VIDEO1 VIDEO2

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Transfer: another robotized solution

Still many theoretical/practical issues to be solved:

  • kinematics
  • cable tension control
  • standards, norms ?
slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Walking assistance

Tools used when the first mobility problems appear

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Walking assistance

How can we transform these objects for:

  • medical monitoring
  • managing fall
  • assistance
slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Walking monitoring

ANG-light walker

  • incremental

encoders in the rear wheels

  • accelerometer/gyrometer
  • GPS,GSM
  • wifi, infra-red

position accuracy: ≈ 1cm over 10m rectilinear trajectory

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Walking monitoring

Initial assumptions: measuring the trajectory of the walker will provide information on the walking pattern

example: angular speed around the z axis will allows step

number measurements

–10 –5 5 10 2 4 6 8

x yz

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Walking monitoring: experiments

  • 24 "young" subjects at INRIA
  • mean age: 32 years, min 28,

max 65

  • 30 elderly people at Nice hospital
  • age ≥ 65, no severe mobility

problem

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Walking monitoring: experiments

Trajectory directives

10m 5m 5m 1 2

VIDEO1

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Walking monitoring: experiments

10m walking test elderly people are faster than young people!

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Walking monitoring: experiments

10m walking trajectory elderly people exhibit larger trajectory deviation

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Walking monitoring: experiments

maximal lateral deviation

5 10 15 20 25 5 10 15 20 25

x yz

new walking indicator

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Walking monitoring: experiments

Maximal instantaneous velocity

maximum instantanous speed 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 5 10 15 20 25

x yz

no significant difference young/elderly

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Walking monitoring: experiments

trajectory for the L-shaped directive

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Walking monitoring: experiments

Area for performing the maneuvers

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 1 2 3

x yz

  • ld

young

new walking indicator

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Other rollators

ANG-med ANG-II brake control fully motorized

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Other mobility application

Navigation in a city requires the knowledge of lowered kerbs location, sideways slope, . . . On board instrumentation of the ANG walkers allows for

  • automatic detection of the location of the lowered kerbs
  • sideways slope measurement

→ collaborative map

  • a given rollator may provide this information for a few streets
  • a fleet of rollators may provide this information for a city
slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Other mobility application

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Cane

An alternate to the walker

  • monitor walking pattern
  • possibly navigation help
  • self-raising
  • detect fall
  • lightning at night
  • but don’t modify the look of the

cane!

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Conclusion

Mobility

  • is a major issue for autonomy and self-esteem
  • may provide functional and cognitive assessment of the

subject Mobility assistance and monitoring should respect some rules

  • multi-functional and low cost
  • minimal intrusivity
  • collaborative and redundant
slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Conclusion

Issues

  • our robots are NOT "intelligent" so that social robots is a

dream that may occur when we will all be very, very old (unless a drastic change in computing technology occurs)

  • ethics and privacy respect of medical monitoring
  • who should have access to the data ?
  • responsibility in case of failure. . . that will definitely occur!
  • families and subject should be aware that robots will

never be 100% bugproof