ITCC
March 8, 2017 – Room 438 - ITD
ITCC March 8, 2017 Room 438 - ITD Agenda 1:00 Update on EA - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
ITCC March 8, 2017 Room 438 - ITD Agenda 1:00 Update on EA Activity Jeff Quast 1:20 Update on ITD Activity Gary Vetter 1:30 Update on Agency Activities Jeff Quast 1:40 Skype Server Update Kory Hellman 1:50 AD Sync to Azure Kory
March 8, 2017 – Room 438 - ITD
2
1:00 Update on EA Activity Jeff Quast 1:20 Update on ITD Activity Gary Vetter 1:30 Update on Agency Activities Jeff Quast 1:40 Skype Server Update Kory Hellman 1:50 AD Sync to Azure Kory Hellman 2:00 Iterative Development WSI and ITD 2:40 Oracle Update Kory Hellman 2:50 Statewide IT Plan Follow Up Justin Data 2:55 Future Agenda Items
3
Surveys completed
4
Power BI and Tableau. Fundamental requirements for data visualization include:
and the topic will be discussed in detail at the April meeting
5
Content removed for security reasons
6
reviewed the standards and agreed that no changes were needed
Baseline Config, Endpoint Protection
7
Technology Architecture (February)
their users on Office 2016 before then
Access Control standard would require the use of ADFS (via the SAML protocol) for all SaaS solutions
to manage administrative account credentials. Other solution will continue to be reviewed.
addressed with a new or existing EA standard
Application Architecture (February cancelled)
8
Response”
9
10
download if agencies on old client versions are not budgeted for an upgrade
11
with Azure AD
integration with on premise and cloud (Office365, Azure and SaaS applications) solutions.
March 8, 2017 ITCC Meeting
Improve customer service (both internal and external), meet WSI’s anticipated demand for growth, and enable WSI to remain current with technology
efficiencies
market research, architecture review, new Charter and requirements review
Approach” for WSI’s core system replacement/upgrade
database consolidation, a product roadmap (release plans), program plan, and procurements
The CAPS program replaces core WSI business applications (Work Manager, Claims, Policy systems) through an evolutionary approach The user interface is incrementally re-faced into one system, CAPS 20 ‘Releases’ (Projects) over approximately seven years Each Release is planned, baselined, managed, and closed as a ‘major IT project’ (each is approx. 6-10 months and $1-2M) Each Release delivers functionality into Production ServiceLogix provides the leadership and team for the application re- facing along with WSI staff. ITD, Intertech, and TEKsystems also support WSI with resources for project management, infrastructure, and database consolidation services.
Foundation for scope Roadmap for each phase
Use Cases defined Releases defined Sprint Plans for each Release
Release planning begins while the current release is underway, led by the primary PM The Release Plan is the basis for scope The team develops a sprint summary plan, baseline schedule, budget, and updates to the overall Program Plan A new amendment and SOW is developed with ServiceLogix for the Release, as well as other procurement revisions The ESC approves all planning documents for the Release; Iterative Start-up Report submitted to LITC The team begins prototyping while the current release is underway The Release is kicked off within a week of go-live of the previous Release
Each Release is comprised of two-week Sprints Each Sprint has a kickoff with Sprint Planning
ServiceLogix PM leads daily 15-30 minute SCRUM meetings
what’s on their plate today; issues are discussed after SCRUM
time
The Planning Team (Primary PM, Agency/Vendor PM’s, Sponsor,
upcoming release
At each Release Go-Live, the new functionality is migrated to Production and previous functionality is no longer available in the legacy system CAPS connects seamlessly to the legacy system, so the user continues to use older functionality for the majority of their work and uses CAPS for areas that have been re-faced Closing
team (ServiceLogix PM), but Sprint Retrospectives are also performed throughout
Report, and Closeout Report
State PM standards/practices can work well with this Agile approach Vendor has solid processes throughout, including quality code development and configuration management approach Comprehensive QA and UAT Testing Solid requirements built through prototyping and comprehensive use cases Comprehensive tool for task, workflow, artifact, issue/CR/defect management - enCorps Weekly Tech Touch-base meetings between WSI, ITD, and ServiceLogix team members have been valuable
WSI Communications Team and SharePoint Team Site – key communications to all agency staff
24
ITD - Iterative Development Approach for DPI NDFoods Enhancements Purpose: Allow large scope of work to be distributed into small manageable iterations. Emphasis on providing continuous functionality to the customers in a predictable manner.
iterations
Database migrations are usually done in 18-24 months cycles. Typical Process:
26
RAC
27
Agency Notice & Consultation:
ITD Software Development Maintained Apps:
application(s)
3rd Party Vendor Supported Apps:
supported application
for each application
performed preliminary testing and based on this testing ITD does not expect any major problems. ITD has successfully completed the upgrade of DHS Eligibility SPACES databases.
to promotes a "never trust, always verify" as its guiding principle.
segments of the network, agencies can protect critical intellectual property from unauthorized applications or users, reduce the exposure of vulnerable systems, and prevent the lateral movement of malware throughout the network.
more extensive agency testing. Because development, test and production regions must be in separate VLANs agency testing efforts must be closely coordinated with ITD.
requires testing. This means that clients who are not authorized to access an application / service will not be able to see it. Agency testing plans need to account for external test scenarios and allow additional time in the testing schedule
29
30