It It is is ne never to too la late fo for ... A ATLAS.TI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

It It is is ne never to too la late fo for ... A ATLAS.TI Strasbourg University EIPIN-IS Interdisciplinary Research Week 29.06.2019 ESR 4: Maurizio Crupi

Outline Ou 1. Preparation phase; 2. Organizing phase; 3. Reporting phase; 4. Use of Atlas.ti 2

Content Co t an anal alysis Inductive Deductive Text Text Categories Categories 3

Qu Qualitative co content an anal alysis Directed Conventional Summative Qualitative content analysis 4

1. 1. Pr Preparation pha phase • Existing literature + EU Regulations + Guidelines • Population manifest • Content: latent 5

Reg egister ered ed EU EU GI GIs Official Journal Other Publications: documents: Product How to analyse Implementing act specifications different documents? Single document • Link between product and Summary environment; • Product description; • Production methods. DOOR database: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/list.html?locale=it 6

Tr Trustworthiness of of pr prepa paration pha phase • Data collection: e.g. pre-interviews • Sampling: All the registered products at 11/09/2018 • different techniques; • saturation of data. Paragraph of the single • Unit of analysis document • Replicability 7

2. 2. Or Organ anizi zing pha phase I a) Open Coding -> reading -> identifying key concepts; 8

Organ Or anizi zing pha phase II II b) Grouping codes in categories; c) First read through; d) Second read through -> expanding the code structure; e) Abstraction -> description of the codes. 9

Co Code do docum ument ta table 10

Trustworthiness in Tr in or organizing pha phase Credibility Dependability Transferability Conformability 11

Tr Trustworthiness in in or organizing pha phase • Describe each code; • Make quotations; • Increase trusthworthiness by: • Prolonged engagement; • Persistent observation; • Triangulation; • Negative case analysis; • Face validity ; • Member checks; • Debriefing ; • Multiple coders. 12

Qu Quantitative as asses essmen ent of of c cod ode r e rel eliability • Only 14% of projects assess code reliability; • Test reliability at the beginning and at the end; • High intercoder reliability % Reliability 0-20% Slight Agreement 21-40% Fair 41-60% Moderate 61-80% Substantial 80-99% Almost Perfect 100% Perfect 13

3. 3. Reporting pha phase • Describe the analysing process; • Link results with the data; • Use appendices and tables; 60,0 PDO 376 PGI 354 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 0,0 Contemporary reputation History of the product Official documents Literary sources Oral sources Historic reputation - other Historic reputation - general Reputation - general 14

4. At 4. Atlas.ti 15

Bi Bibliogr graphy • Elo S and Kyngas H, ‘The qualitative content analysis process’ (2008) 62 Journal of Advanced Nursing 107; • —— and others, ’Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness’ (2014) 1 SAGE Open 1; • Hall M and Wright R, ‘Systematic Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions’ (2008) 96 California Law Review 63; • Hsieh HF and Shannon SE, ‘Three approaches to qualitative content analysis’ (2005) 15 Qualitative Health Research 1277. 16

Th Thank yo you! !