SLIDE 1
It It is is ne never to too la late fo for ... A ATLAS.TI
Strasbourg University EIPIN-IS Interdisciplinary Research Week
29.06.2019
- 1. Preparation phase;
- 2. Organizing phase;
- 3. Reporting phase;
- 4. Use of Atlas.ti
2
It It is is ne never to too la late fo for ... A ATLAS.TI - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
It It is is ne never to too la late fo for ... A ATLAS.TI - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
It It is is ne never to too la late fo for ... A ATLAS.TI Strasbourg University EIPIN-IS Interdisciplinary Research Week 29.06.2019 ESR 4: Maurizio Crupi Outline Ou 1. Preparation phase; 2. Organizing phase; 3. Reporting phase; 4.
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
Inductive Text Categories Deductive Text Categories
3
Co Content t an anal alysis
SLIDE 4
4
Qu Qualitative co content an anal alysis
Qualitative content analysis Conventional Directed Summative
SLIDE 5
- Existing literature
- Population
- Content:
5
1.
- 1. Pr
Preparation pha phase
manifest latent
+ EU Regulations + Guidelines
SLIDE 6
Official Journal Publications:
Implementing act Single document
- Link between product and
environment;
- Product description;
- Production methods.
Other documents:
Product specifications Summary
6
Reg egister ered ed EU EU GI GIs
How to analyse different documents?
DOOR database: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/list.html?locale=it
SLIDE 7
- Data collection: e.g. pre-interviews
- Sampling:
- different techniques;
- saturation of data.
- Unit of analysis
- Replicability
7
Tr Trustworthiness of
- f pr
prepa paration pha phase
Paragraph of the single document All the registered products at 11/09/2018
SLIDE 8
a) Open Coding -> reading -> identifying key concepts;
8
2.
- 2. Or
Organ anizi zing pha phase I
SLIDE 9
b) Grouping codes in categories; c) First read through; d) Second read through -> expanding the code structure; e) Abstraction -> description of the codes.
9
Or Organ anizi zing pha phase II II
SLIDE 10
10
Co Code do docum ument ta table
SLIDE 11
Credibility Dependability Transferability Conformability
11
Tr Trustworthiness in in or
- rganizing pha
phase
SLIDE 12
- Describe each code;
- Make quotations;
- Increase trusthworthiness by:
- Prolonged engagement;
- Persistent observation;
- Triangulation;
- Negative case analysis;
- Face validity;
- Member checks;
- Debriefing;
- Multiple coders.
12
Tr Trustworthiness in in or
- rganizing pha
phase
SLIDE 13
- Only 14% of projects assess code reliability;
- Test reliability at the beginning and at the end;
- High intercoder reliability
13
Qu Quantitative as asses essmen ent of
- f c
cod
- de r
e rel eliability
% Reliability 0-20% Slight Agreement 21-40% Fair 41-60% Moderate 61-80% Substantial 80-99% Almost Perfect 100% Perfect
SLIDE 14
- Describe the analysing process;
- Link results with the data;
- Use appendices and tables;
14
3.
- 3. Reporting pha
phase
0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 Contemporary reputation History of the product Official documents Literary sources Oral sources Historic reputation - other Historic reputation - general Reputation - general PDO 376 PGI 354
SLIDE 15
15
4.
- 4. At
Atlas.ti
SLIDE 16
- Elo S and Kyngas H, ‘The qualitative content analysis
process’ (2008) 62 Journal of Advanced Nursing 107;
- —— and others, ’Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on
Trustworthiness’ (2014) 1 SAGE Open 1;
- Hall M and Wright R, ‘Systematic Content Analysis of
Judicial Opinions’ (2008) 96 California Law Review 63;
- Hsieh HF and Shannon SE, ‘Three approaches to qualitative
content analysis’ (2005) 15 Qualitative Health Research 1277.
16
Bi Bibliogr graphy
SLIDE 17