It It is is ne never to too la late fo for ... A ATLAS.TI - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

it it is is ne never to too la late fo for a atlas ti
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

It It is is ne never to too la late fo for ... A ATLAS.TI - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

It It is is ne never to too la late fo for ... A ATLAS.TI Strasbourg University EIPIN-IS Interdisciplinary Research Week 29.06.2019 ESR 4: Maurizio Crupi Outline Ou 1. Preparation phase; 2. Organizing phase; 3. Reporting phase; 4.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

It It is is ne never to too la late fo for ... A ATLAS.TI

Strasbourg University EIPIN-IS Interdisciplinary Research Week

29.06.2019

ESR 4: Maurizio Crupi

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 1. Preparation phase;
  • 2. Organizing phase;
  • 3. Reporting phase;
  • 4. Use of Atlas.ti

2

Ou Outline

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Inductive Text Categories Deductive Text Categories

3

Co Content t an anal alysis

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Qu Qualitative co content an anal alysis

Qualitative content analysis Conventional Directed Summative

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Existing literature
  • Population
  • Content:

5

1.

  • 1. Pr

Preparation pha phase

manifest latent

+ EU Regulations + Guidelines

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Official Journal Publications:

Implementing act Single document

  • Link between product and

environment;

  • Product description;
  • Production methods.

Other documents:

Product specifications Summary

6

Reg egister ered ed EU EU GI GIs

How to analyse different documents?

DOOR database: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/list.html?locale=it

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Data collection: e.g. pre-interviews
  • Sampling:
  • different techniques;
  • saturation of data.
  • Unit of analysis
  • Replicability

7

Tr Trustworthiness of

  • f pr

prepa paration pha phase

Paragraph of the single document All the registered products at 11/09/2018

slide-8
SLIDE 8

a) Open Coding -> reading -> identifying key concepts;

8

2.

  • 2. Or

Organ anizi zing pha phase I

slide-9
SLIDE 9

b) Grouping codes in categories; c) First read through; d) Second read through -> expanding the code structure; e) Abstraction -> description of the codes.

9

Or Organ anizi zing pha phase II II

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Co Code do docum ument ta table

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Credibility Dependability Transferability Conformability

11

Tr Trustworthiness in in or

  • rganizing pha

phase

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Describe each code;
  • Make quotations;
  • Increase trusthworthiness by:
  • Prolonged engagement;
  • Persistent observation;
  • Triangulation;
  • Negative case analysis;
  • Face validity;
  • Member checks;
  • Debriefing;
  • Multiple coders.

12

Tr Trustworthiness in in or

  • rganizing pha

phase

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Only 14% of projects assess code reliability;
  • Test reliability at the beginning and at the end;
  • High intercoder reliability

13

Qu Quantitative as asses essmen ent of

  • f c

cod

  • de r

e rel eliability

% Reliability 0-20% Slight Agreement 21-40% Fair 41-60% Moderate 61-80% Substantial 80-99% Almost Perfect 100% Perfect

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Describe the analysing process;
  • Link results with the data;
  • Use appendices and tables;

14

3.

  • 3. Reporting pha

phase

0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 Contemporary reputation History of the product Official documents Literary sources Oral sources Historic reputation - other Historic reputation - general Reputation - general PDO 376 PGI 354

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

4.

  • 4. At

Atlas.ti

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Elo S and Kyngas H, ‘The qualitative content analysis

process’ (2008) 62 Journal of Advanced Nursing 107;

  • —— and others, ’Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on

Trustworthiness’ (2014) 1 SAGE Open 1;

  • Hall M and Wright R, ‘Systematic Content Analysis of

Judicial Opinions’ (2008) 96 California Law Review 63;

  • Hsieh HF and Shannon SE, ‘Three approaches to qualitative

content analysis’ (2005) 15 Qualitative Health Research 1277.

16

Bi Bibliogr graphy

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Th Thank yo you! !