Is Equity an Attainable Health System Goal? Grantmakers In Health - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

is equity an attainable health system goal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Is Equity an Attainable Health System Goal? Grantmakers In Health - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Is Equity an Attainable Health System Goal? Grantmakers In Health Annual Meeting on Health Philanthropy Baltimore, Maryland March 7, 2012 Alan Weil Executive Director National Academy for State Health Policy 2 Health Care Costs 3 Health


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Is Equity an Attainable Health System Goal?

Grantmakers In Health Annual Meeting on Health Philanthropy Baltimore, Maryland March 7, 2012

Alan Weil Executive Director National Academy for State Health Policy

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Health Care Costs

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Health Care Disparities

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Presentation Outline

  • Framework for addressing health disparities
  • Reasons for optimism
  • Unfinished business
  • Role of philanthropy

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Framework for Addressing Health Disparities

  • Layer 1 – Micro system level
  • Layer 2 – Health system level
  • Layer 3 – Societal level

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Framework for Addressing Health Disparities

  • Layer 1 – Micro system level
  • Layer 2 – Health system level
  • Layer 3 – Societal level

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Infant Mortality

7

5.6 13.3 5.5 4.8 9.2 5 10 15 20 White Black Hispanic Asian/PI AI/AN

Infant deaths per 1,000 live births

By race/ethnicity, 1995–2007

Source: Adapted from The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Coronary Heart Disease and Diabetes-Related Mortality, by Race/ Ethnicity

8

Age-adjusted mortality per 100,000 population

Coronary heart disease mortality Diabetes-related mortality

Source: Adapted from The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Receipt of Recommended Preventive Care for Older Adults, by Race/ Ethnicity, Family Income, and Insurance Status, 2008

9

Percent of older adults who received all recommended screening and preventive care within a specific time frame given their age and sex*

Adults ages 50–64 Adults age 65 and older

Source: The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011. * Recommended care includes at least six key screening and preventive services: blood pressure, cholesterol, Pap, mammogram, fecal occult blood test or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy, and flu shot. See report Appendix B for complete description.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Receipt of All Three Recommended Services for Diabetics, by Race/ Ethnicity and Family Income

10

Percent of diabetics age 40 and older who received hemoglobin A1c test, retinal exam, and foot exam in past year

Source: Adapted from The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Hospital Admissions for Select Ambulatory Care–Sensitive Conditions, by Race/ Ethnicity and Patient Income Area, 2007

11

Adjusted rate per 100,000 population* Heart failure Diabetes** Pediatric asthma

* Rates are adjusted by age and gender using the total U.S. population for 2000 as the standard population. ** Combines three diabetes admission measures: uncontrolled diabetes without complications, diabetes with short-term complications, and diabetes with long-term complications. Patient Income Area=median income of patient zip code. Source: Adapted from The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

State Scorecard on Equity

12

Source: The Commonwealth Fund, State Scorecard, 2009

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Framework for Addressing Health Disparities

  • Layer 1 – Micro system level
  • Layer 2 – Health system level
  • Layer 3 – Societal level

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Eliminate Disparities (ver. 1)

14 Health Outcomes Resources ($) A B

 

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Health Care Spending, 2009

15

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%

White, non- Hispanic Hispanic Black, non- Hispanic

Percent with expense by race/ethnicity for all payers

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000

White, non- Hispanic Hispanic Black, non- Hispanic

Average expense by race/ethnicity for all payers

Source: Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Cost-Related Access Problems, by Race/ Ethnicity, Income, and Insurance Status, 2010

16

Percent of adults ages 19–64 who had any of four access problems* in past year because of cost

* Did not fill a prescription; skipped recommended medical test, treatment, or follow-up; had a medical problem but did not visit doctor or clinic; or did not see a specialist when needed. Source: The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Aggregate Hospital Payment-to-cost Ratios for Private Payers, Medicare, and Medicaid, 1989 – 2009

17

Medicare Medicaid(1) Private Payer

70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 140% 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09

Source: Avalere Health analysis of American Hospital Association Annual Survey data, 2009, for community hospitals.

(1) Includes Medicaid Disproportionate Share payments.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Medicaid-To-Medicare Fee Index, By Type Of Service, 2008

State All services Prim ary care Obstetric care Other services US 0.72 0.66 0.93 0.72 CA 0.56 0.47 0.64 0.69 FL 0.63 0.55 0.99 0.59 IL 0.63 0.57 0.82 0.64 NY 0.43 0.36 0.67 0.31 TX 0.74 0.68 0.87 0.83 18

Source: Stephen Zuckerman, Aimee F. Williams and Karen E. Stockley, “Trends In Medicaid Physician Fees, 2003−2008,” Health Affairs, 28, no.3 (2009):w 510-w 519

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Racial Composition of Various Programs

19

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation State Health Facts and MEDPAC.

0 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60 % 70 % 8 0 % 90 % Medicare Em ployer Dual-eligibles Medicaid White Black Hispanic Other

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Eliminate Disparities (ver. 2)

20 Health Outcomes Resources ($)

A 

B

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Where We Are

21 Health Outcomes Resources ($)

A B  

A ’ B’

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Eliminate Disparities (ver. 3)

22 Health Outcomes Resources ($)

A B 

C

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Eliminate Disparities (ver. 4)

23 Health Outcomes Resources ($)

A B 

C

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Immunizations for Young Children

24

65.5 72.5 76 76.1 76.9 77.4 76.1 69.9 74.9 77 82 84 84 82 88 82 79 84 53 59 65 64 65 66 63 51 65

25 50 75 100 2002 2003^ 2004 2005 2006^ 2007 2008 2009‡ 2010

U.S. average Top 10% states Bottom 10% states Percent of children ages 19–35 months who received all recommended doses of six key vaccines*

* Recommended vaccines include: 4+ doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP), 3+ doses of polio, 1+ doses of measles-mumps- rubella, 3+ doses of Haem ophilus influenzae type B, 3+ doses of hepatitis B, and 1+ doses of varicella. ^ Denotes years in 2006 and 2008 National Scorecards. ‡ 2009 data are affected by a shortage of Hib vaccine in Dec. 2007–Sept. 2009. Data: National Immunization Survey Source: Adapted from The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Hospitals: Quality of Care for Heart Attack, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia

25

Percent of patients who received recommended care for all three conditions

Source: Adapted from The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Hospitals: Prevention of Surgical Complications

26

Percent of adult surgical patients who received appropriate care to prevent complications

Source: Adapted from The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Heart Failure Patients Given Complete Written Instructions When Discharged, by Hospitals and States

27

Percent of heart failure patients discharged home with written instructions*

* Discharge instructions must address all of the following: activity level, diet, discharge medications, follow-up appointment, weight monitoring, and what to do if symptoms worsen. Source: Adapted from The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Physical Restraints in Nursing Facilities

28

U.S. average and state distribution By race/ethnicity

Source: The Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2011.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Confounding Problem

29 Health Outcomes Resources ($)

“Wedge of Uncertainty”

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Framework for Addressing Health Disparities

  • Layer 1 – Micro system level
  • Layer 2 – Health system level
  • Layer 3 – Societal level

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

“…improving the clinical care delivery system’s efficiency and effectiveness will probably have

  • nly modest effects on the health of the

population overall in the absence of an ecologic, population-based approach to health improvement.”

  • Institute of Medicine

31

Source: Institute of Medicine, “For the Public’s Health: The Role of Measurement in Action and Accountability,” December 2010

slide-32
SLIDE 32

We All Know This

32 Health Outcomes Resources ($) Health spending Social spending

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Where Did Family Income Go in the Last Decade?

33

$820 $125 $870 $95

Family spending of increased income Monthly income increase from 1999-2009: $1,910

Health care Taxes unrelated to health care Price increases for goods not associated with health care Leftover income

Source: David I. Auerbach and Arthur L. Kellermann, “A Decade Of Health Care Cost Growth Has Wiped Out Real Income Gains For An Average US Family,” Health Affairs, 30, no.9 (2011):1630- 1636

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • (“All other” is a broad

category that includes state functions not tracked individually in this report, such as hospitals, economic development, housing, environmental programs, health programs and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), parks and recreation,natural resources, air transportation, and water transport

34

Source: NASBO, “2010 State Expenditure Report”

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Source: Congressional Budget Office, “Long-Term Budget Outlook,” June 2011.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Federal Revenues and Primary Spending, by Category, Under CBO’s Alternative Fiscal Scenario

36

Percent of GDP

Note: The alternative fiscal scenario incorporates several changes to current law that are widely expected to occur

  • r that would modify some provisions that might be difficult to sustain for a long period, including: Medicare

payment rates for physicians are maintained at the 2011 levels through 2021 (rather than at the lower rates of the sustainable growth rate mechanism) and that, after 2021, several policies that would restrain spending growth are assumed not to be in effect; and, all individual income tax provisions scheduled to expire in the next 10 years are extended through 2021, including the income tax reductions and AMT relief temporarily extended in the 2010 tax act. Source: Congressional Budget Office, The Long-Term Budget Outlook, June 2011.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Long-term Budget Outlook

37

Source: CBO, “The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022,” January 2012, page 50

Baseline scenario

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Long-term Budget Outlook – Discretionary Outlays

38

Source: CBO, “The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022,” January 2012, page 68

Baseline scenario

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Components of the Federal Budget as Shares of GDP:1972- 2011 Average and 2022 Projection Under the Alternative Fiscal Scenario

39

Source: Douglas W. Elmendorf, “The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2012 to 2022,” Testimony before the Senate Budget Committee, February 2012

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Average spending on health per capita ($US PPP) Total expenditures on health as percent of GDP

Source: The Commonwealth Fund, OECD Health Data 2010 (Oct. 2010).

International Comparison of Spending on Health, 1980–2008

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Total Hospital and Physician Costs for Select Surgeries—International Comparisons

41 Appendectom y Hip Replacem ent Bypass Surgery Canada $3,810 $10,753 $22,212 France $2,795 $12,629 $16,325 Germany $3,285 $15,329 $27,237 Netherlands $4,624 $12,737 $19,180 Spain $2,537 $9,327 $15,802 Switzerland $2,750 $6,683 $11,618 UK $3,476 $9,637 $13,998 US (avg) $13,123 $34,454 $59,770 US (95th percentile) $25,344 $75,369 $126,182

Source: Adapted from The Commonwealth Fund Blog, July 2011

slide-42
SLIDE 42

International Comparison of Health and Social Services Expenditures

42

Source: Elizabeth H Bradley et al., “Health and social services expenditures: associations with health outcomes,” BMJ Quality and Safety (2011)

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Reasons for Optimism

  • Significant layer 1 activity
  • ACA provisions affect layers 1 and 2
  • Delivery system primed for reform

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Unfinished Business

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

The Allocation Problem

Prevention, Health Prom otion, Public Health, Social Investm ents Core Health Care Services Leading Edge of Health Care

  • Underinvestment
  • Isolation
  • Unreasonably high

burden of proof

  • Overuse
  • Administrative waste
  • Quality defects
  • Underuse
  • Misallocation
  • Excessively rapid

adoption

  • Excessively slow

rejection

  • Pricing errors
  • Irrational exuberance

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Where We Are

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Where We Need to Be

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

But We Could End Up Here

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Or Here

49 $ $ $ $ $ $ Deficit Reduction Tax Cuts

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Five Opening Observations on Squeezing the Balloon

  • 1. Allocation problem is structural
  • 2. From “accountable care” to “population health”

is a big leap

  • 3. American federalism is a strength (and

weakness)

  • 4. Lack of infrastructure is a huge problem
  • 5. Cost containment must have a purpose

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Role of Philanthropy

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Can We Challenge Our Assumptions?

  • Medicare and Medicaid defense
  • Essential Health Benefits and benefit design
  • Malpractice reform
  • Can we hear a cry for help?
  • Can we engage two lost souls: patients and

physicians?

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Our Health Sector “Ask”

  • Adopt a coherent vision (triple

aim)

  • Shift from individual to system

performance metrics

  • Redefine quality from technical

to contextual performance

  • Reengineer to drive out waste
  • Take risk/bear risk
  • Lead and bring your board

along with you

  • Work across organizations of

differing sizes and missions

  • Break down professional

barriers; work in teams

  • Don’t compete over the wrong

things

  • Be nimble
  • Share your data
  • Share the credit
  • Get paid less if you don’t

succeed at making all of these changes

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Our Health Sector “Ask”

  • Adopt a coherent vision (triple

aim)

  • Shift from individual to system

performance metrics

  • Redefine quality from technical

to contextual performance

  • Reengineer to drive out waste
  • Take risk/bear risk
  • Lead and bring your board

along with you

  • Work across organizations of

differing sizes and missions

  • Break down professional

barriers; work in teams

  • Don’t compete over the wrong

things

  • Be nimble
  • Share your data
  • Share the credit
  • Get paid less if you don’t

succeed at making all of these changes

54

My ∧ Philanthropic

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55 Grantmakers In Health (GIH) is a nonprofit, educational organization dedicated to helping foundations and corporate giving programs improve the health of all

  • people. Its mission is to foster communication and collaboration among

grantmakers and others, and to help strengthen the grantmaking community's knowledge, skills, and effectiveness. Grantmakers In Health (GIH): Working tirelessly to reduce the burden of the health care system on the health of the American people.

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Fundamental Disagreement About Priorities

56

Republican voters Republican delegates Democratic delegates

7% 77%

Is it more important to provide health care coverage for all Americans or hold down taxes? Hold down taxes Provide health care for all Democratic voters

40% 53% 90% 7% 94% 3%

Note: “Don’t know” responses not shown Source: Mollyann Brodie, Kaiser Family Foundation. New York Times/ CBS News Poll (Jul 23 – Aug 26, 2008)

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Two Ways to Sweeten an Onion

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Alan Weil Executive Director aweil@nashp.org www.nashp.org www.statereforum.org

58