Irradiation Creep in Graphite A Review Barry J Marsden The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

irradiation creep in graphite a review
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Irradiation Creep in Graphite A Review Barry J Marsden The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Irradiation Creep in Graphite A Review Barry J Marsden The University of Manchester Stephen D Preston SERCO Assurance 1 Irradiation Creep in Graphite Due to fast neutron irradiation Significantly reduces stresses in nuclear


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Irradiation Creep in Graphite A Review

Barry J Marsden – The University of Manchester Stephen D Preston – SERCO Assurance

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Irradiation Creep in Graphite

  • Due to fast neutron irradiation
  • Significantly reduces stresses in nuclear

graphite components

  • The difference in dimensions between a

stressed sample and a sample having the same properties as that sample when unstressed

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Irradiated Unstressed Graphite Changes

  • Dimensional
  • Modulus
  • Coefficient of Thermal Expansion -CTE
slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Irradiated Stressed Graphite Changes

  • Dimensional
  • Modulus
  • Coefficient of Thermal Expansion - CTE
  • Additional changes to CTE
  • Additional changes to modulus
  • Modified dimensional change rate
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Irradiation Creep Rate (UK)

  • Proportional to stress
  • Inversely proportional to creep modulus

γ = Irradiation dose

  • CREEP RATE = PRIMARY + SECONDARY

( ) ( )

[ ]

( )

c c cr

E T b E T d d σ β γ σ α γ ε + − = exp

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Coefficients

  • Primary and secondary
  • Secondary creep coefficient independent of

temperature below 600oC

( ) ( )

T b T β α ,

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Low Dose Creep

  • When expressed in elastic strain units
  • Common law for tension and compression
  • Common creep law for all graphite types

σ εcr

c

E esu =

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.E+00 2.E+21 4.E+21 6.E+21 8.E+21 Dose, EDND, n/cm2 Elastic Strain Units

Pluto 300°C (Flux 4E13 n/cm2/s) BR2 300-650°C (Flux 3E14 n/cm2/s) Calder Hall 140-350°C (Flux ~1E12 n/cm2/s) UK Creep law

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Creep Modulus Ec

  • Unirradiated Young’s modulus
  • Creep rate not changed by pinning
  • However modified by:

– Structural changes – Radiolytic oxidation

  • UK theoretical pinning / unpinning model

appears to back this up

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.E+00 1.E+21 2.E+21 3.E+21 4.E+21 5.E+21 Dose, EDND n/cm2 ESU

Radiolytically oxidised sample 1 Radiolytically oxidised sample 2 Radiolytically oxidised sample 3 Unoxidised in compression Unoxidised pyrolytic Pre-irradiated to a high dose UK Creep law

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

USA and Russian low dose data

  • Similar laws to the UK but has a different

secondary creep temperature dependence

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

1.E-27 1.E-26 1.E-25 1.E-24 200 400 600 800 1000 Temperature °C Creep Coefficient (Kg/cm

2)-1 (neutron/cm2)-1

Russian Graphite EGCR (American Graphite) CGB (American Graphite)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

DRAGON Experience

  • Flux dependent creep coefficient (Verginga

and Blackstone)

( )

φ E kT Q / exp cont

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

High Dose Creep

  • UK rule breaks down
  • Tension and Compression different
  • Kennedy, Cundy, Kliest

( )

∆ − ′ =

  • =

m

  • crs

V V V V K K E K / 1 µ σ ε

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 5 10 15 20 Dose (x10

21 n.cm

  • 2 EDN)

ESU

ATR-2E @ 300 °C (in tension) 300°C with x3.3 multiplier (in tension) ATR-2E @ 500 °C (in tension) 500°C with x3 multiplier (in tension) ATR-2E @ 900 °C (in tension) 900°C with x7 multiplier (in tension) ATR-2E @ 550 °C (in compression)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Creep strain, CTE and Dimensional change

  • By observation creep strain modifies CTE
  • However, dimensional change appears to be

a function of CTE

  • Therefore creep strain should be expected to

modify dimensional change

  • Kelly, Burchell model 1994
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Change in Modulus due to Creep Strain

  • For IG-110 graphite a 35% change in

modulus for 0.23% creep strain - Oku -1998

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Main Conclusions

  • Creep is important in the design of graphite

components However:

– High dose creep is not well understood – Interaction between creep strain, modulus, CTE and dimensional change is not well understood – Poisson's ratio and other lateral effects have not been well quantified – Need for a well characterised irradiation creep experiment